Windows Server Reviews

I use Windows Server for applications.

I like that Windows Server is easy to use.

It would be better if they improved the user interface.

I have been using Windows Server for a few years. 

Windows Server is a stable solution.

The initial setup is straightforward.

It's easy for me to install or set up the Windows Server, but I have some technicians who do it.

There is a license for Windows Server, but we have got the license from a local supplier,
Black Neuron Technology. They also provide tech support locally.

I would recommend this solution to potential users.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give Windows Server a nine.

I use Windows Server 2015.

We have data center and now we use the software to do the virtualization. We develop certain functions. 

While the solution is stable, it could be more so. There are times when there is a need to make corrections. 

It would also be nice to see more integration. 

I have been using Windows Server for awhile, at least for a couple of years. 

Although the solution is stable, this could stand some improvement. 

Owing to the distance which is sometimes involved, the technical support can stand improvement. 

Windows Server is very easy to install. There is no issue in this regard. It can be done on one's disc, if he has one. 

The deployment can be done with rapidity and much ease. 

While I have five people in my organization, the deployment can be handled by a single engineer in my company. 

There are no fees involved in the solution. 

The government directly pays the licensing fees for all public organizations, of which we are included. The organization's name is IDU, which does license development for the country in the computer science department. They give us the SQL Server and Microsoft Office to install in our public hospital.

I work in MS Office, Oracle and SQL Server. Our company primarily uses MS Office. 

We have, perhaps, 200 users. 

I would recommend the solution to others, as I have done so in the past. 

I rate Windows Server a ten out of ten. 

We are using it for Windows Active Directory, DHCP Server, and application servers.

Its performance is very good, and it is stable. All applications are working perfectly, and there is no issue.

It can have more integration, which will be useful for the data integration process. More integration with different applications and different OS would be quite good.

We are using Windows Server for the last eight years.

It is stable.

We have three to four Windows Servers, and all users are connected to these servers.

They are customer-friendly.

Its initial setup is very simple and easy. It normally takes 20 to 30 minutes. After the installation is done, the configuration takes some time, but it depends on what type of configuration is required.

I did it myself. We have four technical guys who are connected to the deployment and maintenance of these servers.

We have perpetual licenses.

I would recommend this solution to others. I would rate Windows Server an eight out of 10.

We use this solution as our server application. Several applications are based on this operating system.

Windows server is easy to use.

Windows Server needs to introduce more dashboards.

A common user is not able to implement this solution. It could be simplified.

I have been using Windows Server for a couple of years.

We are using version 2019.

Windows Server is stable. I have no issues with the stability of the Windows Server.

We have 45 servers in our organization.

Technical support is good. We have no issues with the support of Microsoft.

We did not use any other solution.

It is quick and easy to install. 

The installation can take up to 45 minutes.

All technical people in our organization need to install Windows Server. Any IT engineer can deploy this solution. However, it cannot be set up by a regular user.

I completed the installation myself.

There is a licensing fee that is paid yearly. 

It is an expensive solution. 

I would recommend this solution to others who are interested in using it.

It is very popular, I would rate Windows Server a ten out of ten.

The solution can be used for remote access through the remote desktop.

The main feature of the solution is it has a graphical interface.

I have been using the solution for approximately five years.

The stability is not very good because you have to restart the system to keep the stability.

The solution is scalable.

The installation is very easy and the installation takes approximately 20 minutes.

I can do the implementation of the solution myself.

The price of the solution could be reduced and there is a license required.

I would recommend Windows Server if they are not able to use Linux.

I rate Windows Server a seven out of ten.

The solution is very useful if the company doesn't want open storage, OS. In those cases, we usually recommend customers to use Microsoft services. Most of the time it's actually the client who gives us advice on what kind of OS they want to use and they will just ask for the quotation. 

The solution is very flexible.

We find the solution to be easy to use and simple to navigate. 

The stability is very good.

The security on the server has been great. It's much more secure than, for example, other open-source operating systems.

We find the solution very easy to install. 

Technical support is very helpful.

The solution could be more reasonably priced.

We've been dealing with the solution for a couple of years at this point. It's been a while now. We've had some time with it. 

The stability of the product is good. The product doesn't crash or freeze and there are no bugs or glitches. It's reliable. 

There is no need to scale the solution. It's not the type of solution that really needs to scale.

I'm not sure the exact number of people using the solution. It's my understanding that it's over ten at this time. 

Technical support is very fast when it comes to replying. They were able to solve any issues we raised with them. We're satisfied with their level of service. 

The initial setup is not complicated to set up. It's pretty simple and straightforward. A company shouldn't have any issues with the process. 

The deployment process may take about 30 minutes or so, as long as you don't run into any errors.

You only need two technical people to manage the deployment process. You don't need a very big team.

The pricing could be a bit more competitive.

The solution offers a permanent license. You don't have to pay a monthly or yearly subscription. 

We are Windows Server consultants. 

I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten. We've been quite satisfied with its capabilities. 

I would recommend the product to other users and companies, especially those that don't want to use an open-source option. 

We use the solution for managing data base applications for client monitoring.

The solution could be more secure.

My company has been using Windows Server for ten years.

I feel the solution to be stable. 

The scalability is commensurate with what we are willing to pay for. 

We have not had experience with technical support. As we are in Indonesia, the fact that our application must follow the operating system can be problematic. 

We have an IT team which handles installation. I take care of the business aspects when it comes to customer relations. 

I do not recall how long installation took. 

We feel Windows Server to be very powerful and are not aware of solutions which can act as its replacement. 

We are an IT company and make both internal and external use of the solution, which we do as an integrator. 

We have a remote client boarder and they claim that replication is difficult. 

There are 1,500 users making use of the solution in my company. 

I would rate Windows Server as a six or six-point-five out of ten. 

We use this solution to run several personal applications and enterprise applications.

The performance is good.

Windows Server could be more user-friendly.

I have been using Windows Server for more than 10 years.

We have used several different versions starting from 2008 to 2020.

It is a stable solution.

Window Server is a scalable solution.

All of the users in our organization are using Windows Server.

We have no issues with the technical support.

There is no improvement needed with the Microsoft technical support.

I have not used any other solutions.

I was not involved in the installation of the Windows Server.

We need one or two team members to deploy and maintain this solution.

With my experience, I would definitely recommend this solution.

From a performance perspective, I would rate Windows Server a nine out of ten.

Because I have only used Windows Server, I can't give you a comparison with other solutions such as Linus or Unix.

We use it to deploy any product.

It is stable, scalable, flexible, and easy to use.

The integration and monitoring could be improved.

I've been using it for a couple of months.

It is stable.

It is scalable.

The initial setup was easy and took about half an hour.

On a scale from one to ten, I would rate Windows Server at eight.

We are using the solution as a web server.

The most valuable feature is the performance.

The solution could improve by increasing security.

I have been using this solution for a few years.

Microsoft Server is a reliable solution.

There are a few people using this solution in my organization.

The technical support from Microsoft is good.

The installation is easy and it took me approximately 30 minutes.

I did the implementation myself.

I would recommend this solution.

I rate Windows Server a seven out of ten.