Windows Server Reviews

We are using it mainly for Active Directory, Exchange Servers, and file services.

There are a lot of features. Active Directory is most valuable.

It should have more stability and fewer automatic updates. A CLI approach, similar to Linux, is missing right now.

I have been using this solution for 12 years.

It should have more stability.

I am quite satisfied with its scalability. We are an IT company, and we provide professional services to other companies, so we deploy a lot of services. Combined, we have a lot of users, but if you look at a specific company, we have between 200 to 500 employees.

I am satisfied with their technical support most of the time.

We have multiple types of licenses. Some of them are on a yearly basis, and some of them are prepaid.

I would rate Windows Server a seven out of 10.

We use this solution for many purposes, such as managing user accounts in Active Directory, storage, hosting applications, and remote server access.

The most valuable features of this solution are its performance, flexibility, and functionality.

I have been using Windows Server for approximately 16 years.

The solution is stable.

There are five people using the solution in my organization.

I am currently still using Windows 10.

The installation is straightforward and it took 45 minutes.

I did the implementation myself and we have one engineer that does the maintenance of the solution.

The price of the solution is expensive, and there are many price options available, such as monthly or perpetual licenses.

I would recommend this solution.

I rate Windows Server a ten out of ten.

I am using this solution for a databases server running Azure.

The solution is not easy to use and could be simplified. Additionally, the solution could have better integration.

I have been using this solution within the last 12 months.

The solution is stable.

The scalability has been fine for what we have been using it for. However, we have not fully utilized scalability.

We have approximately 100 users using this solution in my organization.

The installation is easy.

You do not need a vendor or consultant to do the implementation.

I would recommend this solution.

I rate Windows Server a seven out of ten.

We use this solution as an operating system to run applications, such as Microsoft SQL.

Overall the solution has been functioning very well for us.

Security and vulnerabilities could improve.

I have been using Windows Server for approximately three years.

The stability is good in Windows Server.

We have approximately 200 users using this solution in my organization.

The installation is straightforward and took approximately 30 minutes.

I did the implementation myself.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Windows Server nine out of ten.

I like that it's a stable product. For me, it's working fine.

It would help if there was a possibility to postpone some updates. If some are not required, it could speed up the process of starting up the operating system. Sometimes big workloads related to services are running directly on the system itself and not the application. This is what I have noticed.

I have been using Windows Server for a couple of years.

Windows Server is a stable solution.

I would recommend this solution to new users.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give Windows Server a ten.

We are using Windows Server on virtual machines running off-premise.

This operating system for business can be useful for personal documents or any daily or routine stuff.

The features that I have found most valuable are its ease of use and the compatibility with most other products.

I would definitely like to see bolting monitoring tools. To monitor the server you usually have to install third party tools. I would like to be less reliant on third-party tools. They always create some sort of security issue regarding ports that need to be opened, that type of thing. Windows Server has internally monitorable software but remote monitoring software would be a great add-on.

In the next version I would like to see monitoring tools or maybe an easier way to figure out who were the last people that were working on the server, something that gives me better insights into the actions taken by different users who need to access the server. Our server is definitely not for everybody to access, but even if it had logging installed or activated, it's quite difficult to figure out who did what.

I have been using Windows Server for a couple of years.

It is a stable solution.

Windows Server is definitely scalable.

We have 200 users using it in the network.

I was not part of the initial setup, I'm not part of the technical team. But I know from the people who did install it that it was quite easy.

On a scale of one to ten I would give Windows Server a nine.

I would recommend Windows Server for users who want to start using it.

We use this solution as our operating system.

It is very useful, and it is easy to use.

In the next release, I would like to see better pricing.

I have been using Windows Server since the beginning.

We are using the latest version.

Windows Server is stable.

It's an operating system, so scalability is not really applicable.

Everybody in our organization is using this solution. We have approximately 200 users.

We don't have any plans to increase usage.

I have not contacted technical support.

Previously, we had not used any other solution.

The initial setup was straightforward. It was easy.

It only took five minutes to deploy.

For 200 users, we need one engineer to maintain this solution.

We completed the installation ourselves, we did not use an integrator or consultant.

In general, the pricing can be improved.

Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis.

I would recommend Windows Server to others who are interested in using it.

I would rate Windows Server a nine out of ten.

We are using Windows Server as an operating platform. It's an Operating system.

We host our products on the Windows Server.

The performance is good.

While it is easy to use, it could be easier. 

The performance is good but we have had some issues when we use virtual machines. Loading and processing a lot of data leads to memory-related issues. As such, while the performance is good, it could still be improved.

We are using version 2012 and it could be that other versions have improved this feature.

We are currently using Windows Server 2012. We have been using this solution for approximately 12 years.

I have no issues with the stability of the Windows Server.

It's scalable. I am satisfied with the scalability of this solution.

We don't have plans to increase our usage.

We don't deal with Microsoft support directly. Our service team is in contact with them if there is an issue.

Previously, I did not use another solution.

The installation was straightforward and easy.

We have a team of server maintenance and network engineers to maintain this solution.

We had help from the Server team to implement this solution.

Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I  would rate Windows Server an eight out of ten.

This solution can be used for a lot of things, such as email, file servers, authentication, network access protocol, DNS, active directory, and accessing the main controllers.

The main features are ease of use and simple administration. 

 I have been using this solution for a couple of years.

I have found the stability to be good but it could improve.

The solution is scalable and we plan to increase usage.

I have used Linux Red Hat previously.

The installation is straightforward and takes approximately 10 minutes.

I have done the implementation myself but sometimes I require assistance because some environments have a lot of servers. The more servers you have the more administrators you will need for the maintenance.

There is a license required and it is on an annual basis.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Windows Server a seven out of ten.

We are providing services to our clients using this solution.

The only problem we have faced is when we are upgrading the solution it is complex. 

I have been using this solution for more than 20 years.

The solution is stable.

My whole company is using the solution and we plan to continue using it.

The technical support could have a faster response.

We have been installing the solution for years and it has always been straightforward.

There is a license required for this solution.

I rate Windows Server a six out of ten.