UiPath Platform Reviews

I did a proof of concept for a music industry client. It went well, and the client adopted UiPath. 

UiPath improved lots of features, like sequencing, recording, etc.

I had some issues with the ERP Automation features, and the setup is complex. 

UiPath is stable. 

UiPath projects are highly scalable. There are lots of customization options and ways to easily scale your existing bots. 

I haven't contacted UiPath support because the solution is stable and doesn't require support in most cases. The UiPath community is strong, and you can find answers from multiple places online. 

As a project consultant, I analyze the client's applications and set up everything for them. The initial setup is time-consuming. UiPath involves a longer setup process than other RPA tools.

I rate UiPath a five out of ten for affordability. UiPath costs a bit more than other tools like Blue Prism and Automation Anywhere. 

I rate UiPath a seven out of ten. UiPath offers many customization options. I would recommend it to clients who want to do high-quality processes and complex use cases. You also must consider your budget because the license cost is a little higher than average. 

I'm using UiPath for personal use. I'm trying to create an application in which all the work can be automated, such as financial, HR, and educational-related work so that we can have easy access to the details of candidates.

I'm using it for a small edge case and UiPath is able to solve it in a great way.

I'm very happy with the automation because it gives me more freedom to make things work on my projects.

With UiPath I have been able to increase productivity because the manual work has been reduced and everything is now automated with NLT and ML techniques. We aren't required to go into the specific aspects of every document. We get systemized documents that we can go through and get the details. The NLT is a major part of it for me because it can sense the text and make it more useful for me. It converts it in a way that I don't have to go through all the details.

It has reduced errors in a drastic way and that is something I really appreciate in UiPath. I would estimate the reduction at nearly 25 percent. Before, we were doing this work manually and it took a lot of hours. Now it has been reduced by 10 times and maybe more than that.

I like the automation tool in UiPath that helps in creating the bots. It helps me a lot in getting details from documents. Also, the ML/NLT models are good because they help with data recognition.

Creating automation is pretty simple. Everything is clearly mentioned. And the UiPath team has helped a lot with the learning curve. The user community is very helpful in solving issues. You can find different channels and YouTube videos for details. In terms of community, UiPath is doing great.

Many of the features were very complex in the beginning but with some experience, it has become a great tool for me.

I have been using UiPath for about six months.

It's stable.

We haven't required technical support because the community is very strong and every problem and solution is already there. And the UiPath solution team is also very strong.

Positive

We did not have a previous solution.

We took our time with the deployment. It was a planned activity and it was very straightforward. We didn't face any issues. We spent time reading the documentation and going through the videos about how to deploy things. The entire activity took some days, but the deployment, specifically, took around three or four hours. There were two of us involved.

There is a little maintenance. Sometimes we have to manage the storage and other things, but it's nothing major.

The pricing is fine and the features are good. Still, the pricing could be a little lower. With tools like AI/ML, if the pricing can be reduced, everyone will be able to adopt it.

I would recommend UiPath. For us, it solved our use cases, and we are really happy with it.

We have two primary use cases. We use UiPath to scrape data from multiple websites and platforms, mainly for competitive intelligence and internal use. The other use case is basic automation, that is, moving files from one system to another when there is no direct integration. Through UiPath and leveraging RPAs, we pull data from one system, for example, an S3 bucket or Google Drive, and put it into our database.

The use of UiPath has resulted in time savings for our organization. It has probably saved us 40 development hours a month.

Building automation with UiPath is easy. If you compare it to building these scripts using Python or any other programming languages directly, then it is incomparable. If you write a .NET or a Python code, it will take a lot of time development-wise. The ease of building automations is very high compared to that with programming languages.

End-to-end automation is important to us in terms of deployment and development. Development is definitely easy, but the orchestration of those flows and deployment can be a hassle to maintain and manage. With UiPath, we are able to monitor the workloads and orchestrate the different workloads within the app ecosystem itself.

The UiPath community has grown and is active. It is definitely helpful to be a part of it because others can assist us.

UiPath Academy courses helped reduce the learning curve.

You can speed up digital transformation and reduce the cost of digital transformation using UiPath. It provides a good orchestrator, and the fully managed option can help reduce the burden on IT staff.

We have been able to reduce human error by using UiPath. Suppose we need to move files from one place to another. If we move it through a system and predefined rules, the system will not make a mistake. It will always pick up the particular file and concatenate it where it is supposed to. However, a human can, by mistake, concatenate one file to another.

For small use cases, it would be great to have independent runner licenses with costs that are comparable to those of Power Automate. Then, UiPath would be a better alternative.

The AI functionality was not that effective in complex scenarios when I used it some time ago.

I would like to see a universal recorder feature added so that we can record Excel macros. You could then click a button to record the screen, and then all the actions across applications would be recorded. This functionality is available already in Automation Anywhere, but the last time I checked, it was not available in UiPath.

I've used it for over a year.

UiPath is a stable solution.

It is a scalable tool.

I found the initial setup to be straightforward, and it took less than a week. You don't need dedicated staff to maintain the solution.

We implemented it ourselves. We had a team of three who worked on the deployment.

We haven't seen much ROI; it has been average. As a result, we are moving to Power Automate.

The pricing is competitive, and for large-scale use cases, UiPath may make better sense cost-wise. However, it is not very viable for small-scale use cases. Power Automate is much cheaper and has similar functionalities.

UiPath offers two options. If you choose the on-premises option, then you would have to manage it yourself, but if you go for the fully managed one, then there won't be any overhead cost.

We are gradually moving to Power Automate and Power Apps because we are already on the Microsoft stack, and it helps us reduce the footprint. If the cost of UiPath were comparable to that of Power Automate, then UiPath would have been the better alternative.

In my previous company, we used Power Automate, Automation Anywhere, and UiPath. The only good aspect of Power Automate is that it has very minimal cost implications. IQ Bot from Automation Anywhere is slightly better than UiPath's AI capability. Also, the ease of building automations with UiPath is comparable to that of Automation Anywhere and Power Automate.

Overall, I would rate UiPath at eight out of ten.

We started by looking for something easy to change our process, and we liked a lot of systems that had low code. We started to submit and sell orders and transform reports into dashboards with the robot.

While we have used it for a short time, we see a lot of future potential for us. We have other departments, for example, finance, HR, and engineering. We can use this solution to improve our workflows, our reports, and dashboards across departments.

We are looking for ways to save time and free up people. It is important. We want to remove the mechanical jobs so that people use the time they gain to focus on other strategies and figure out how to add value to the business.

They make it easy to change the process inside the routine. We can find out how to remove gaps and change the process. There isn't just one way; we have a lot of exceptions in our business, and with the robot, we can change to meet our requirements. There isn't just one way to do things.

The user community is helpful. We know a lot of people inside of this process and a lot of good people with good tools that can help.

We are just starting with the Academy courses. We're in the process of learning and have a PMO that is using the Academy. It helps us to better understand use cases and other situations. 

We'd like the solution to allow us to remove all developers. In a situation where you need a developer, we'd like it to get to the point where we don't need them. It needs to be easier to use with more low code. Low code is the future.

I've been using the solution for five months.

We find the solution to be stable. It's not just building the robot - it's being able to sustain it. So far, we trust its capabilities and have not questioned its stability.

I've witnessed some proof that the solution can scale. 

We did not need any technical support. We haven't used support yet.

We used Pipefy in the past. It's a BPM that has automation processes inside it. That said, it's so different as it's just for Pipefy integration to another system. It's not a kind of robot, so there's no automation process. We still use it. We work with them and UiPath. Right now, we use the workflow, and, if the workflow doesn't work or is bad at automation, we use UiPath.

We just recently set up the solution and are still putting in the work.

We just started to use the solution as part of a trial. It's still too new to measure an ROI.

The solution is expensive. It's almost the same as other options. However, it is a bit cheaper since we don't need a developer. We can just buy the license and use the product. 

We looked into Automation Anywhere, IBM, and another startup. Once we started to use UiPath and found out how easy it was to build our first robot, we stopped looking into other options. 

We like to fix, build and change by ourselves. The other options required us to need someone from the outside and to pay for a consultant or contracted person to assist us. With UiPath, we have ultimate control, and everything is in our hands. 

At this time, we do not yet use UiPath to automate processes that involve a good cause, such as social responsibility.

Right now, we use UiPath on a virtual machine, yet we're hoping we'll be able to go more mobile in the future. 

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten since we've only used it for such a short amount of time. 

We have very restricted usage, primarily around integration situations where we don't have any APIs. We primarily want to do just unattended automation. We discourage attended automation at this time. We have ten to twenty processes happening right now.

The improvements we've seen are primarily around the time and cost savings that surround someone sitting and manually syncing data between SaaS platforms. Although we use the latest and greatest SaaS platforms, they still don't have to interact with each other. There are no APIs in most cases. In those situations, rather than having someone manually sit and do it or have the product vendor customize it, we use UiPath.

For example, a couple of automations save us at least a year's worth of manual effort. Day in and day out, there is a SaaS platform that creates new data, and that needs to go through the different SaaS platforms. And that's the major statement we have. Then there are a few legacy applications we have that are near end of life. We don't intend to bring new APIs to them. Instead, we use UiPath.

I personally use the Academy often, and I have encouraged a couple of .NET developers within the organization to take up the certification. We have system integrators and local offshore vendors. They don't have certification right now. However, I am encouraging them to get certified. They're using UiPath Academy.

For me, the biggest win for the Academy was around the infrastructure and the sales switch around it. In my role, I'm required to go and talk to business functions and technology leaders. I have to tell them what the product can do, how it is deployed, etc., at the level of ownership. Plus, thought leadership needs to come from me, and those academic courses help me a lot.

The user community is definitely robust. I see lots of contributions, and people are willing to come and respond to any posted queries. 

The key reason we are not able to adopt it fully compared to other customers is the security model. Usually, what happens is whenever we talk to a business stakeholder, the first concern is data security. The moment that you talk about a bot in an unattended fashion going and reading the data source, concerns arise since there's not much control at a certain point.

Security remains a concern. We have completed all our security assessments. However, that continues to be a key question. There are use cases that are based out of Europe. If we have an instance in North America, again, the question of GDPR and all those questions arise. For example, does that mean that we have to have multiple tenants in different geographies? We are still trying to solve those kinds of questions.

There are situations in the community where, due to the fact that the product is so rapidly evolving, lots of the content out there is outdated. It leads to that lost effort when you try to do what they're saying, and it doesn't work due to it being a different version. That's probably one problem that I have noticed so far.

I've used the solution for a little over three years.

The stability of the product is very good. 

If you look at the key components and the visuals, I mean the Studio, the Bot, and the Orchestrator, the Bot and the Studio are within our environment. We haven't experienced any issues. What is left is the Orchestrator, and we haven't seen any outages so far.

I don't have any concerns with scaling.

I haven't created too many support requests. That said, the most recent one did not go well. The engineer had some trouble understanding, and the issue is still ongoing.

It wouldn't be fair for me to judge their support just based on those one or two tickets I worked on. I'm sure they have a good team. It was just that one ticket did not work out.

This was our first RPA tool. 

I was involved in the development and deployment. 

The virtual machine setup and the Robot and Orchestrator connection definitely were a little challenging. However, in the current version of the application, Orchestrator, it's far more seamless. Three years ago, it definitely was not that straightforward. Everything has gotten easier. 

The first automation took between three to six months, from initial procurement and development to deployment.

I did the deployment myself. 

In terms of ROI, we are getting there. It's not like as good as I anticipated. That said, we are getting there.

The pricing is fairly decent. It was not crazy expensive. Their cloud deployment gives you that sweet spot in pricing. You don't have to spend $20,000 for the Orchestrator, for example.

We assessed all the market leaders and did a couple of proofs of concept. It turned out that UiPath checked all the boxes from a capability standpoint and user-friendly developer experience, plus the deployment experience. UiPath was a clear leader.

We do not use UiPath AI functionality in our automation program. At this time, it is limited to OCR capabilities.

We currently are unable to automate more complex or involved processes. It is still in the conceptualization phase. We haven't put it into production yet. However, we are exploring their invoice management capabilities and more.

We have yet to develop some sort of social responsibility initiative using UiPath. However, we might in the future. 

I would invite potential users to look at the library of activities that are there. Make sure that the kind of use cases that they're looking at are present, and the level of security that they are looking for in terms of data. If you have less intensive security challenges, it's a no-brainer to use UiPath in the cloud. However, it might get a little tricky if it turns out to be healthcare or anything of that sort. You'll have to work with your data protection team.

I'd rate the solution a nine out of ten. 

Our company uses the solution for financing, accounting, and commercial operations. Right now, we are automating the lowest-hanging fruit. We look at people or personal productivity and automate their desktop tasks. 

We currently do not use AI functionality. 

The solution saves our company 10,000 hours annually. Automations have removed menial tasks from people's desks so there is instant gratification.

Studio and StudioX are really powerful tools. From the development side, business users have realized much success and have made great strides with StudioX because it is easy to use.

Automations are really easy to build with a minimal technical background. For example, my background is in accounting and finance but I am the manager of an automation team so that speaks to how easy it is to learn and develop. 

It would be useful to have co-authoring because we have many staff members working on the same project. 

I have been using the solution for four years. 

The solution is fairly stable. We have to perform maintenance on things we are doing and see some infrastructure issues for on-premises users. Many of these issues would be addressed if we switched to the cloud so that is under consideration.

I can see the solution's scalability. I think you need the right organizational buy-in for scaling but there isn't anything that the solution should be doing differently. 

The community is great and we learn so much there. We would like the community to bring back in-person user groups because we found a lot of value in knowing and connecting with other customers in our area. But, the community as a whole is awesome and invaluable. 

When we started our journey with the solution, we utilized the Academy for training. Since then, we have used the Academy to train three new team members because it quickly gets them up to speed so they can start developing. 

Technical support is good and we utilize it a lot. Sometimes it takes a little while to hear back from support. Though we understand, it also causes us heartache when tickets are automatically closed without a response. For example, sometimes we contact support on a Friday and the ticket closes on a Sunday which does not give us time to review our email and can be difficult. Otherwise, we like the technical support provided and rate it seven out of ten. 

Neutral

Our company did not previously use another solution. 

I was not involved in the initial setup. 

The price is high in comparison to Power Platform that Microsoft provides as part of its enterprise license. 

The pricing can be a bit confusing because many new products have been added. We just renewed our licenses and got all new SKUs because products have changed so much since our initial implementation.

I was not on the evaluation team but I do not believe other options were evaluated. The solution was chosen because it was a known leader in the industry.

The solution is great, works well, and is learnable. Users will be able to pick it up easily. People who are interested in change will find a way to make it happen, so you might as well give them a good tool.

There is nothing comparable in the industry that provides the same ease of use, great community, and good products.

I rate the solution an eight out of ten. 

We started using it to automate manual processes from other departments. We service other departments, to begin with, including the media between the business and the IT departments. 

We started automating very repetitive manual tasks that the business side typically had. For example, if they had to open an application early in the morning to try to process transactions. Then, late in the afternoon, they would have to do the same thing as well. Now we have a robot that does that in the morning and the afternoon, which saves a lot of overtime since it has to be done at six or seven at night, and previously sometimes people would be forced to stay. Therefore, this way, we save that time and overtime. 

Another example would be we use it to download ATM transactions from a webpage. The robot downloads those transactions and then uploads them into our data warehouse, which reports for them. Normally, we don't have that information there.

Another use case would be in a department that would print a bunch of wires late in the afternoon. The department would print them out physically and store them somewhere where they review everything later. Now, with UiPath, we scan the transactions from the Fed, and we just print in PDF and send it to them via email, and it saves a lot of time.

The solution has saved us not just in automating but also in updates. For example, all these service charge codes for these particular lists of credit card accounts. We let the bot run. It ran for a really long time. I can only imagine how much longer it would've taken with humans.

I'm not sure of the exact cost savings. We just started asking about time savers. Some customers have told us it saves about 45 minutes a day. There's another process that only runs once a month. To put it in general terms, it reviews all of our credit card accounts and itemizes them, and makes them into a lot of reports. That saves about eight hours a month. Also, when it comes to helping us avoid overtime, there are 15 minutes of actions to be done, yet we are saving an hour or two of pay every time. 

The ease of automation is great.

The unintended robots are very useful. Just letting it run and having visibility, and controlling how everything works is definitely helpful. Sometimes they want it to run a certain way. Sometimes they'll tell us, "Oh can we tweak it a certain way?" And they do that more often than would I thought they would. It's simple to handle.

I really like the user community. When I go online to search for help or anything else, it's very valuable. Everyone's so helpful online. Whenever I'm stuck, and I'm basically self-taught when it comes to UiPath, I turn to the community. I've learned everything through the community. It is easy to learn.

While we haven't really taken any UiPath Academy classes, we were basically given the platform and just told to learn it ourselves. I did start doing the academy courses however, right off the bat, we had to develop already. I kind of had to do both at the same time, and that's where the online community comes in handy. The courses definitely taught me the basics, at least. And they helped me expand on that.

While UiPath works super well with other applications and browsers and app pages that we use in the RedLINK wires, when it comes to experience, sometimes it doesn't detect what it's supposed to be doing as easily. I have to do a workaround and so sometimes it can be tedious.

We've been using it for about two years.

We've never had an issue with performance stability.

We currently have 20 to 30 processes, and less than ten are via developers. We initially hired developers to help, and then they left, and now we are working on it ourselves. 

I see the potential of its scalability. We're still at a very small scale with it. 

I've used technical support once. They helped me. When the developers set up UiPath for us, it ended up being kind of faulty. What we really needed was the enterprise edition, and some other settings weren't configured for our purposes. I contacted them for help, and we had a Zoom call. They were very friendly. They helped me set it up correctly in the way we needed it. While there were some communication issues, they helped us in the end. 

Positive

We did not previously use a different solution.

I was not directly involved in the initial setup. However, the setup was not exactly right, and I contacted support for help. It seemed pretty straightforward in the end.

We had third-party developers from Peru that helped us to install it and then they just left. We were just given the platform, and we had to teach ourselves how to use it.

We have witnessed an ROI. The company has mentioned the hours saved, and I'm not sure about the money saved.

We did not evaluate other options. 

While we could use UiPath for good causes, like sustainability or the environment, we do not use it in that capacity yet.

We do not use the AI functionality just yet.

I'd advise other potential users to get a partner. We didn't have one. That's what we're doing right now. We're shopping for a partner so we can learn as we develop. Again, we were self-taught and it would've been much easier to dive in with a partner.

I would rate it ten out of ten as it does have massive potential. 

Our company uses the solution to automate formula-driven processes that are completed on a frequent basis. 

We create unattended bots to handle tasks for our finance, procurement, IT, and HR departments.  

At this time we do not use AI or ML.

UiPath has been instrumental to our success because we have an excellent relationship with our account executive and a lot of support from the leadership team. 

We have met with their C-Suites for one-on-one conversations and like that type of ownership. We appreciate their commitment and dedication to our success. 

The solution requires little or no code and can be operated with minimal technical skills. This lessens our dependency on third-party providers and allows use by citizen developers. 

AI and ML need further improvements to reach mature status. 

I have been using the solution for eight years. 

The solution is very, very stable with no issues when we deploy bots. 

The solution is very easy to scale. 

Technical support is stellar and available 24/7. There are no limitations on when support is available, including in the middle of the night. No organization is perfect and there is always room for improvement, support is rated a nine out of ten. 

The community forum is invaluable and very helpful for troubleshooting. For example, we sought support from different forums to learn how to use our in-house desk for L1 support.

Academy courses are used to upskill our team and keep up with the fast pace of new capabilities. The solution is always transforming and acquiring new technologies. 

Positive

I previously used Blue Prism, Pega, and Automation Anywhere. 

The initial setup is very straightforward and easy to use. 

Our team of developers and BAs are able to navigate the solution without requiring any handholding from the solution's SMEs.  

Our in-house team deploys the easier automations.

We work with multinational partners for more complex deployments. Our team is knowledgeable and has the same competencies as MNCs so that enhances the partnership. 

The solution has improved workforce efficiencies by 120% and reduced errors by more than 90%.

We saved several million dollars within three weeks of deploying the solution.

I love the flexibility because ownership is willing to work with us to make sure commercials are viable. They are committed to being our strategic partner and are reasonable in terms of our current appetite. 

Our company solely uses the solution. We find it to be more user friendly than other options. 

Most products are similar, so it comes down to commercials and that makes the solution much more cost effective than other options. 

You should consider using the solution because there is a reason why it is the market-leading RPA provider globally.

I rate the solution a nine out of ten.