My use case for Radware Cloud WAF Service is for blocking malicious IP addresses.
SOC analyst at Adani Enterprises Ltd
Automated threat detection and mitigation secure our network effectively
Pros and Cons
- "Radware Cloud WAF Service blocks threats effectively, providing a comprehensive report that shows the traffic and denied traffic from malicious IPs or specific countries, so I am satisfied."
- "The required IP addresses sometimes get blocked, so that needs to be enhanced."
What is our primary use case?
How has it helped my organization?
Radware Cloud WAF Service blocks threats effectively, providing a comprehensive report that shows the traffic and denied traffic from malicious IPs or specific countries, so I am satisfied.
Radware Cloud WAF Service has reduced the false positive rate, and it's beneficial for our organization. By using Radware Cloud WAF Service, 30% to 40% of false positives are reduced.
For zero-day attacks, Radware Cloud WAF Service integrates threat intel, which detects anomalous traffic and blocks it automatically, preventing attackers from entering our organization or attacking our domains. Source blocking is effective because it has good capability to handle things automatically without human intervention, as a human cannot handle all the alerts and traffic.
The real-time BLA detection and mitigation of Radware Cloud WAF Service strongly performs to mitigate and take action against contamination. Radware Cloud WAF Service is quite effective and handles all traffic to HTTP or HTTPS effectively.
What is most valuable?
My organization is quite large, so we have to monitor activities promptly. Since it's not possible for a human to detect and address every threat, we implemented Radware Cloud WAF Service, which automatically detects and prevents DDoS threats and traffic without human intervention, making it better for us and protecting our organization.
With the automated analytics of Radware Cloud WAF Service, if multiple logins occur from the same malicious IP in the same pattern, the AI automatically recognizes it and takes the appropriate action, such as blocking or allowing, which is beneficial for us.
What needs improvement?
Improvement areas could be some of the AI capabilities related to false positives. The required IP addresses sometimes get blocked, so that needs to be enhanced. The AI recognizing features can be improved. Recognition aspects could be refined; it's performing at almost 99%, so there's a small margin for improvement.
Buyer's Guide
Radware Cloud WAF Service
October 2026
Learn what your peers think about Radware Cloud WAF Service. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: October 2026.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Radware Cloud WAF Service for three years in my organization.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is stable. I would rate it a ten out of ten for stability.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is scalable. I would rate it a nine out of ten for scalability.
We have about 35 users working with this solution.
How are customer service and support?
I would rate their customer support a ten out of ten.
How was the initial setup?
It is easy. It takes 10 to 15 days.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing for Radware Cloud WAF Service is moderate; it's not expensive. We can't say it's low and we can't say high; it's moderate, and I got that perfect point.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
It is easier to use with a moderate cost than others.
What other advice do I have?
To assess Radware Cloud WAF Service for blocking unknown threats and attacks, we have found that if an IP is identified as malicious, we can block it, and we utilize the graph chart provided. Using the CDN with Radware Cloud WAF Service is easy to implement and use; it's not a headache for us.
I would rate Radware Cloud WAF Service a nine out of ten.
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
Cyber security Engineer at Mirae Asset Capital Markets (I) Pvt Ltd
Protection has strengthened sensitive domains and reduces daily web attacks efficiently
Pros and Cons
- "The best features of Radware Cloud WAF Service are valuable for protecting our domains with day-to-day attacks, including fake URLs, so that we can maintain our domains to best practice for the users."
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for Radware Cloud WAF Service is to protect domains with the WAF services. I am mainly using Radware Cloud WAF Service to protect my web services, and it has helped me address SQL injection, DDoS, and every malware attack which we are protecting our domains.
What is most valuable?
The best features of Radware Cloud WAF Service are valuable for protecting our domains with day-to-day attacks, including fake URLs so that we can maintain our domains to best practice for the users.
Since using Radware Cloud WAF Service, when we onboard our domains in the WAF, it has become very easy to track down things for the domains, allowing us to protect against fake domain attacks and track with that false domain.
It reduces incidents and also saves real-time because our domains contain very sensitive data, which gives us a clear vision to protect that with the WAF.
What needs improvement?
Radware Cloud WAF Service must improve by providing clearer directions; it is not recommended for new users to have bulky features, but the WAF is doing very well as we receive prompt responses regarding alerts, and we can track easy logs findings.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Radware Cloud WAF Service for the past four years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
In my experience, Radware Cloud WAF Service is stable with no downtime or reliability issues, and we receive notifications regarding any changes or downtime prior, which makes it easy to notify our users.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Radware Cloud WAF Service can handle growth easily as our needs increase.
How are customer service and support?
The experience with customer support is very good because when I raise a case, I will receive prompt responses and continuous follow-ups regarding the tickets.
What was our ROI?
I do not know regarding money saved, but definitely, the time saving with the WAF is very useful because nowadays, saving time for employees and your organization is the best practice.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Regarding pricing, if an organization wants to protect their domains with a clear and very good experience with WAF services, I do not think the price is an issue because for perfect security with the domains, you will get the best services for the pricing.
What other advice do I have?
I would advise others looking into using Radware Cloud WAF Service to go for this WAF because it is very helpful and very protective for the domain.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Other
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
Last updated: Mar 31, 2026
Flag as inappropriateBuyer's Guide
Radware Cloud WAF Service
October 2026
Learn what your peers think about Radware Cloud WAF Service. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: October 2026.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Analista de cybersecurity at Globalhitss
Cloud security has protected our client websites and blocks injection and zero‑day attacks
Pros and Cons
- "Radware Cloud WAF Service is very good, and there are various features such as DDoS for blocking mass attacks."
What is our primary use case?
The main use case my organization has for Radware Cloud WAF Service is the protection of websites. A concrete example of how my organization uses Radware Cloud WAF Service to protect these websites is that the platform is protected by hardware against attacks such as SQL Injection.
What is most valuable?
Radware Cloud WAF Service is very good, and there are various features such as DDoS for blocking mass attacks. The best features offered by Radware Cloud WAF Service include that it is SaaS. The features I consider to be the best include a user-friendly interface, very good support, fast response times, and very advanced tools for blocking Zero-day attacks. The positive impact of Radware Cloud WAF Service on my organization is the defense of the websites of our clients, since hackers constantly attack the websites and Radware Cloud WAF Service protects our websites. Since using Radware Cloud WAF Service, we have experienced measurable benefits such as the blocking of SQL Injection, XSS, RFI, LFI, and various injection attacks.
What needs improvement?
An aspect that could be improved in Radware Cloud WAF Service is having more reports. I would prefer that part to be improved by having the data presented in charts and more visual dashboards in order to have a more accurate analysis of what is happening in real time.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Radware Cloud WAF Service for two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I consider Radware Cloud WAF Service to be a stable solution.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I have not needed to scale the initial service yet, as it still meets my needs.
How are customer service and support?
I would rate Radware's customer support for Radware Cloud WAF Service as very good. On a scale from one to ten, I would rate customer support a ten.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We used other solutions before Radware Cloud WAF Service, and then we migrated to Radware.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Before choosing Radware Cloud WAF Service, we evaluated other options, considering it being SaaS in the cloud because of the ease of configuration and maintenance.
What other advice do I have?
I rate Radware Cloud WAF Service a ten overall. I give it a ten because I appreciate the platform, the support, the blocking capabilities of the tool, the features, the infrastructure, and the ease of use. I would advise other professionals considering using Radware Cloud WAF Service that it is very good, very fast, and very simple to understand and configure, although I do not have information about the price.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Other
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Last updated: Mar 30, 2026
Flag as inappropriateSolution designer at a government with 10,001+ employees
Consistent web protection has secured our applications and blocked malicious attacks
Pros and Cons
- "On a scale of one to ten, I rate Radware Cloud WAF Service a ten because I believe it is a perfect tool."
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for Radware Cloud WAF Service is that I rely on it for protection for at least two years, and before that, for five years.
How has it helped my organization?
Radware Cloud WAF Service has positively impacted my organization, and I consider that its best feature for us.
Specific outcomes that show how Radware Cloud WAF Service positively impacted my organization include the threat detection and API protection.
What is most valuable?
The best features that Radware Cloud WAF Service offers include my involvement in multiple projects; one was four years ago, and one was two years ago, where we successfully implemented Radware Cloud WAF Service for both projects.
The features of Radware Cloud WAF Service that stood out to me the most were suggested by our cyber security division at the start of the project, and we successfully implemented those features.
I would add that we had some security issues in one project where we found our site had been hacked, and some malicious files were injected into our server.
What needs improvement?
Regarding improvements for Radware Cloud WAF Service, overall, we do not have any issues after implementation. I believe it effectively blocks many malicious calls.
For how long have I used the solution?
I was involved in two projects using Radware Cloud WAF Service. Approximately five years ago, we had a project that was public-facing, so I was helping to implement Radware Cloud WAF Service as a WAF and DDoS protection solution, and two years ago, I was working on another project.
I have used Radware Cloud WAF Service in several projects for a number of years, specifically five years ago.
How was the initial setup?
In terms of deployment, we do not have any issues because our cyber security division hosted the service and quickly deployed it for us.
What other advice do I have?
I have played multiple roles while using Radware Cloud WAF Service, sometimes as a developer, sometimes as a designer, and also involved in application architecture. On a scale of one to ten, I rate Radware Cloud WAF Service a ten because I believe it is a perfect tool. Our organization engages with Radware Cloud WAF Service closely while deploying other public-facing applications using Radware Cloud WAF Service.
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
Last updated: Oct 15, 2026
Flag as inappropriateSysadmin at Grandvalira
Security service has significantly reduced website intrusions and improved access control
Pros and Cons
- "Radware Cloud WAF Service has had a positive impact on my organization through its great ability to detect unauthorized access, as incidents have decreased and the performance of our machines has improved."
- "I would rate the customer support of Radware Cloud WAF Service as very improvable since they provide only pre-packaged answers."
What is our primary use case?
My main use of Radware Cloud WAF Service in my organization is preventing intrusions on the websites and unauthorized access.
What is most valuable?
Radware Cloud WAF Service has been essential to my organization. Radware Cloud WAF Service has had a positive impact on my organization through its great ability to detect unauthorized access, as incidents have decreased and the performance of our machines has improved. I can provide an approximate figure that the improvement in performance or the decrease in incidents is by 80%.
What needs improvement?
I think Radware Cloud WAF Service could improve by simplifying the SSL certificate renewal process.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Radware Cloud WAF Service for 4 years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I consider Radware Cloud WAF Service to be a stable solution.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I rate the scalability of Radware Cloud WAF Service positively.
How are customer service and support?
I would rate the customer support of Radware Cloud WAF Service as very improvable since they provide only pre-packaged answers.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Before using Radware Cloud WAF Service, I was using the firewall's own WAF.
What was our ROI?
I have not seen a return on investment from using Radware Cloud WAF Service, as it could not be calculated.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
In terms of pricing, I find Radware Cloud WAF Service very expensive, and customer support is very improvable.In terms of pricing, I find Radware Cloud WAF Service very expensive, and customer support is very improvable.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We have not changed from using Radware Cloud WAF Service; we still have it and have added an extra layer of security.
What other advice do I have?
My advice to other companies considering implementing Radware Cloud WAF Service is that it is a good solution, although it is expensive.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Other
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
Last updated: Apr 20, 2026
Flag as inappropriatePresident & Group CIO, head of Operations, Service Delivery, Corporate IT & CISO function at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Cloud-based protection strengthens internal and customer application security effectively
Pros and Cons
- "The most important aspect of Radware Cloud WAF is that it is over the cloud, offering a comprehensive solution that includes WAF, API protection, bots, and Layer 7 DDoS."
- "The reporting features could be more intuitive with more real-time monitoring, which would help make faster decisions."
- "The initial setup was complex and took a long time to complete."
What is our primary use case?
We are a Data Center company with a lot of internal applications and customers. Our primary use case is to protect all internal applications hosted on Public Cloud with Radware Cloud WAF. This protection is crucial for safeguarding our customers' applications from external threats and ensuring high availability and security.
What is most valuable?
The most important aspect of Radware Cloud WAF is that it is over the cloud, offering a comprehensive solution that includes WAF, API protection, bots, and Layer 7 DDoS. This combination efficiently blocks a large number of unknown threats and ensures high security and uptime for our internal applications as well as our customers' applications, making it a revenue-generating tool. Cloud WAF provides excellent analytical dashboards that allow us to report, track, and resolve many issues quickly.
What needs improvement?
The reporting features could be more intuitive with more real-time monitoring, which would help make faster decisions. While false positives have reduced by 35%, more granular control can simplify it for new users. The initial complexity should be reduced to make it simpler for new customers. Furthermore, support staff needs to be more proactive so that issues can be resolved at lower levels without escalation.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Radware Cloud WAF for four years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
There has been downtime only once in the last year. Otherwise, the product has been stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Since it's a Cloud WAF, it is always scalable. We can subscribe to more applications and protections as needed.
How are customer service and support?
We have ERT premium support with a five-minute SLA, and the service has been reliable. We have additional support from Radware management. The quality of support is excellent, and we haven't faced any major issues.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Previously, I used to work with F5 WAF in my earlier company, not the current one.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was complex and took a long time to complete.
What about the implementation team?
We used a dedicated team for deployment as we wanted to train our team thoroughly.
What was our ROI?
Radware Cloud WAF has helped reduce false positives and efforts, which in turn, improved the total cost of ownership by freeing up time to focus on other projects.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Pricing could be more competitive, especially for smaller customers. However, the technical excellence of the product balances out the pricing aspect.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Earlier, I used F5 WAF in a different company.
What other advice do I have?
Overall, I would rate Cloud WAF nine out of ten.
Despite its initial complexity, the product is a one-stop shop for our cloud security needs. It integrates well with applications, simplifying protection and operations.
I recommend Radware can make further improvements in pricing and simplifying initial use for new customers.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Hybrid Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Other
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor. The reviewer's company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Department of Protection Control of Information & Communication Systems Head at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Protection has ensured continuous web availability and now lets us focus on core financial services
Pros and Cons
- "Radware gives us greater confidence in the availability and security of our assets, allowing our team to focus less on infrastructure protection and more on our core responsibilities."
- "The main area for improvement is the flexibility of the security rule engine."
What is our primary use case?
The product is used for the protection of our financial institution’s web applications and digital assets against DDoS attacks and other OWASP threats.
How has it helped my organization?
Radware gives us greater confidence in the availability and security of our assets, allowing our team to focus less on infrastructure protection and more on our core responsibilities. The product also provides a comfortable and intuitive UI with a wide range of useful security features.
What is most valuable?
Anti-DDoS protection is one of the most valuable features for us, particularly because availability is critical for our organization. At the same time, the overall WAF functionality is equally important, as it provides an additional layer of protection against web-based attacks and helps us secure our applications more comprehensively.
What needs improvement?
The main area for improvement is the flexibility of the security rule engine. Compared with some other vendors, there are fewer available conditions and limited support for complex rule logic. For example, there is no Destination Port condition, port-based restrictions cannot be expressed through URI matching, and the UI does not appear to support nested logical expressions beyond ALL and ANY. More granular conditions and support for nested AND/OR logic would make the solution significantly more flexible for advanced security policies. The limitation is the inability to construct something like: (A AND B) OR (C AND D) / A AND (B OR C).
For how long have I used the solution?
We have used the solution for one year.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We previously used another security solution. We decided to move away from it because it did not meet our expectations, particularly regarding its cloud-based capabilities. We are more satisfied with Radware Cloud WAF and would recommend it over the previous solution, especially for cloud-based web application protection.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
There are no comments.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We considered other solutions such as Barracuda, Imperva, and Cloudflare.
What other advice do I have?
NA
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Last updated: Aug 31, 2026
Flag as inappropriateDeputy Manager at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
Email alerts and early warnings effectively manage DDoS and zero-day threats
Pros and Cons
- "The most advanced feature is the DDoS protection and the way this web handles DDoS attacks, as I am currently working in the SOC team and managing the Radware administration part."
- "The dashboard of Radware Cloud WAF Service could be more interactive and user-friendly."
What is our primary use case?
The core use cases for Radware Cloud WAF Service are web application firewall functionality, DDoS protection, and protection against zero-day vulnerability and emerging threats.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable aspect of Radware Cloud WAF Service is that it supports mode detection and provides email alerts on sudden alert spikes and early warnings. The most advanced feature is the DDoS protection and the way this web handles DDoS attacks, as I am currently working in the SOC team and managing the Radware administration part.
Regarding zero-day attacks, Radware Cloud WAF Service helps us actively receive early warnings, and we raise those to the relevant teams. The services related to zero-day attacks and threat intelligence are very effective.
What needs improvement?
The dashboard of Radware Cloud WAF Service could be more interactive and user-friendly. While implementing it for the first time, it requires core technical knowledge, and without that knowledge, implementation can be quite challenging. However, the support from Radware is excellent when support cases are raised.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Radware Cloud WAF Service for three and a half years in my career after joining my current organization.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Regarding stability, I have not experienced any lagging, crashing, or downtime in my experience with Radware Cloud WAF Service.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Radware Cloud WAF Service is scalable; once we set up the entire service and it is up to date, we can onboard as many applications as our license allows.
How are customer service and support?
I have contacted Radware's technical support many times, and their quality is very good as we receive timely support according to the case priority. Their engineers are skilled and capable enough to resolve issues quickly.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have used alternatives to Radware Cloud WAF Service, specifically Akamai Web Service, which is a very popular service. One of its disadvantages is that it does not support custom ports like Radware does.
How was the initial setup?
The entire process of onboarding the application for the first time with Radware Cloud WAF Service requires core technical knowledge, but with the support of Radware, it becomes much easier.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
The pricing of Radware Cloud WAF Service is lower compared to Akamai, and while the price in the industry is acceptable, it is not too expensive.
What other advice do I have?
The combination of negative and behavioral-based positive security models provided by Radware Cloud WAF Service is very important for my organization's security strategy, as the main purpose of Radware WAF is security.
Regarding maintenance, we receive quarterly reports, which are sufficient.
On a scale of 1-10, I rate Radware Cloud WAF Service an 8.
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
Works at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
Real-time protection and comprehensive capabilities enhance security management
Pros and Cons
- "What I appreciate most about Radware Cloud WAF Service is that it includes all the aspects that an organization wants to run smoothly, such as overall configuration and real-time protection methods, customization of rule creation, fast deployment, and vital visibility in environment maintenance."
- "In some cases, if the configuration of rules is too strict or complex, there might be a possibility that genuine traffic gets blocked or considered a false positive."
What is our primary use case?
In my organization, we are focused on using various security measures to protect against threats, particularly those related to bots. The key product we have employed is Radware Cloud WAF Service, which primarily provides DDoS protection. This service helps us block large-scale attacks aimed at exploiting network vulnerabilities and other weaknesses in our applications.
Additionally, we utilize the Radware Cloud WAF Service to safeguard our websites and application APIs from threats like SQL injection and other malicious activities, employing various authentication methods for enhanced security. I am also working on learning about bot management, as I have been assigned a task in this area. So far, I have been studying behavioral analysis and detection methods that can identify and block malicious bots effectively.
I have worked with the API feature of Radware Cloud WAF Service and have experience with the GraphQL endpoint. While I haven't worked on advanced web attacks, I am familiar with common ones. As many applications heavily rely on APIs, it's obvious for attackers to target them. The WAF provides mobile and web app backend security for protection, and I have mainly used the bot detection and mitigation feature to detect and block malicious bot attacks.
How has it helped my organization?
Zero-day attacks can be particularly challenging because they exploit vulnerabilities that are not yet known to the software vendor. However, certain solutions can effectively address these threats. One of the key benefits of Radware Cloud WAF Service is its ability to detect potential vulnerabilities before they can be exploited by attackers.
Currently, there is a growing trend towards using machine learning and AI models, which can provide proactive defenses against zero-day vulnerabilities. As we know, a zero-day vulnerability can pose significant risks to any organization or system. One concept that is crucial in this context is behavior-based analysis and detection. This involves analyzing incoming suspicious requests to identify patterns that do not align with normal behavior. When such anomalies are detected, the system can alert administrators to take appropriate action. Another important feature is virtual patching. This technique can block known vulnerabilities at the edge, even before an official patch is released by the vendor. This proactive approach helps mitigate risks while waiting for a formal solution.
Source blocking is a method we employ in our organization to block incoming requests from specific sources based on the type of traffic. This approach helps us effectively identify and filter out malicious or unwanted traffic. By recognizing certain requests as malicious, we can prevent them from reaching our systems. We have blocked specific IP ranges, known malicious URLs, and other sources based on geographical locations, depending on our organization's needs. To strengthen our defenses, we use various filters tailored to our requirements, along with threat intelligence feeds and behavioral patterns. Overall, source blocking plays a crucial role in preventing attacks and enhancing our security posture, especially against brute force attacks originating from known malicious IPs.
Radware Bot Manager, a security tool that helps identify and manage bot traffic and malicious bot attacks, is important for organizations that face heavy traffic loads. Bot Manager helps reduce bot attacks and secure us from threats. I have experience with behavior analytics, custom rules, and the bot detection engine, which focuses on identifying malicious bots and securing APIs from automated abuse.
What is most valuable?
What I appreciate most about Radware Cloud WAF Service is that it includes all the aspects that an organization wants to run smoothly, such as overall configuration and real-time protection methods, customization of rule creation, fast deployment, and vital visibility in environment maintenance. Its maintenance cost is very low unlike others, and the real-time dashboards show us who is attacking and what types of attacks are happening in our environment or any endpoints or devices being targeted.
I appreciate the real-time protection part, especially against SQL injection and Zero-Day exploits. Radware Cloud WAF Service is beneficial for detecting Zero-Day vulnerabilities before they are exploited by attackers. With a focus on machine learning and AI models, it offers proactive defenses against these vulnerabilities. The WAF utilizes behavior-based analysis to identify anomalous requests and can virtually block known vulnerabilities at the edge before vendor patches are released.
What needs improvement?
In some cases, if the configuration of rules is too strict or complex, there might be a possibility that genuine traffic gets blocked or considered a false positive. The complexity can be lowered to improve the understanding for users or customers.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Radware Cloud WAF Service for nearly one year.
How are customer service and support?
I have contacted the customer support of Radware and generally received responses within the scheduled framework, ensuring that my tasks are completed on time. I am quite satisfied with their customer support.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
The initial deployment involves a specific set of stages that are quite transparent. There are several steps we typically encounter during this process. While I wouldn't describe the configuration as overly complex, I would categorize it as moderate in difficulty. I would rate it as moderate. It’s not too challenging, but it does require some attention.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate Radware Cloud WAF Service a nine out of ten.
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
Manager - SOC at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
User-friendly interface significantly improves threat blocking and strengthens web application defenses
Pros and Cons
- "The interface is quite concise and clear, and it is easy to navigate."
- "Malicious user agents are something that we get frequently and it has been blocking the majority of the threats, almost about 97-98% of threats are blocked, almost to 99% itself."
- "They can work more on the documentation part. The documentation I found is quite vague."
What is our primary use case?
Since many of our businesses are on this application and web applications, we have a huge environment. There are more than hundreds of applications that we have. We are using it for WAF-based production, for bot and for DDoS protection.
What is most valuable?
The interface is quite concise and clear, and it is easy to navigate. I have worked with other WAFs, however, Radware Cloud WAF Service is quite easy to navigate compared to others.
I have never had a problem with the application or any websites. Many threats are getting blocked here. Since I joined this organization and had the opportunity to compare early deployment statistics with current ones, we can see that many threats have been blocked, resulting in a very good return on investment.
With Bot Manager, we get many detections which are actually blocked, especially related to application headers. Malicious user agents are something that we get frequently and it has been blocking the majority of the threats, almost about 97-98% of threats are blocked, almost to 99% itself.
Our first line of defense for our web applications, especially on the cloud, is Radware Cloud WAF Service. Whatever comes through, including reconnaissance attempts, different types of targeted attacks, targeted threat vectors and many APT groups targeting our environment, they are getting blocked in the recon phase itself thanks to the Bot Manager.
What needs improvement?
They can work more on the documentation part. The documentation I found is quite vague. There can be more practical examples, and since we are a paid customer, they can give us arranged training. They can arrange sessions or trainings regarding using Radware Cloud WAF Service and what further things we can do. I recently learned about source blocking, so training or sessions can be organized, along with improving documentation with practical examples.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using it for two and a half years since joining the new company. The company has been using the solution for quite a long time.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
In the last two and a half years, I have not seen any kind of lags or issues.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Scalability is good. Our organization is quite big, so we keep on adding applications behind it. I never found an issue with lagging or non-working components due to scaling limitations. The solution is providing scalability in all aspects.
How are customer service and support?
The speed and quality was good. We got a good quick turnaround time, especially in cases where we were actually under attacks and wanted blocking to work as soon as possible.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
In my previous company, I have worked with other WAFs, including the F5 WAF and the cloud native WAF. I have also worked with Akamai. I found Radware Cloud WAF Service to be better compared to others.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was quite easy. I moved around, did some R&D on my own, and it was easy to navigate.There are clear and concise filters that I can apply. Everything was on the screen. Whatever I wanted to try or do was available on the screen. I could move around in the console and try all kinds of experiments. It was quite easy and user-friendly.
What was our ROI?
Since I joined this organization and had the opportunity to compare early deployment statistics with current ones, we can see that many threats have been blocked, resulting in a very good return on investment.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Pricing is something that is decided by the top management. I am more of an operations person.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We do not use the CDN services.
What other advice do I have?
I have not used the API Discovery completely, however, I have checked out the API security that comes under the WAF part, specifically the threat detection part that we are focused on. I am hearing about source blocking for the first time, which would be helpful as we would not have to manually block it.
We are using the DDoS protection and it has been blocking many DDoS attacks that we have observed. Many times when traffic slips through our DDoS protection pipelines, they are definitely getting blocked by Radware Cloud WAF Service, including anomalous rate limiting.
It took me about a week to learn the system, as I am a quick learner. There is no required maintenance as it is already taken care of by Radware. We get notifications regarding maintenance upgrades and everything, mainly for the IP blocking parts.
On a scale of one to ten, I rate this solution a nine.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Other
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Radware Cloud WAF Service Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: October 2026
Popular Comparisons
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks
Imperva Application Security Platform
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall
Fortinet FortiWeb
Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)
Akamai App and API Protector
Azure Front Door
Aikido Security
F5 Advanced WAF
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
F5 Distributed Cloud Services
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Radware Cloud WAF Service Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- Which lesser known firewall product has the best chance at unseating the market leaders?
- Which WAF solution would you recommend to cater to 100 to 125 concurrent sessions?
- What do you recommend for a securing Web Application?
- Fortinet vs Sophos? Help choose a NGFW solution that can replace Microsoft TMG.
- Imperva WAF vs. Barracuda: Which One is Better?
- F5 vs. Imperva WAF?
- When should companies use SSL Inspection?
- How does a WAF help to protect against DDoS attacks?
- NGFW with URL Filtering vs Web Proxy
- What's right for me? Fortinet or Citrix?
















