Oracle Hyperion Reviews

I use Hyperion for BI and BPM planning. 

Hyperion is helpful for all our budget processes.

I have a problem with Hyperion when I need to log some changes in the budget. It's hard to know who made which changes in the budget. Also, since I am using the old version, I'm having some issues with the compatibility between the software and the browser. I think Oracle should package Hyperion with a browser so I won't have these problems. 

I've been working with Hyperion for about a year. 

Hyperion is highly reliable. 

I think Oracle's support isn't very good. 

I rate Oracle Hyperion nine out of 10 because I very much like it. 

I'm working with the customers' company.

The most valuable features are those associated with modules and SP, IT in this space, planning, HFM, and PME.

They are in the process of completing their development. They're releasing new versions and developing new components.

The interface is good.

I would like to see more integrations with third-party vendors such as BigSense and SAP. I'm looking forward to seeing more interface-related content.

I have been working with Oracle Hyperion for nine years.

Oracle Hyperion is a stable solution.

It's a scalable solution.

From a support standpoint, technical support is a level of support, L1, L2, and incident management, change management, and problem management.

Technical support is good.

My career only began with Oracle Hyperion.

Oracle University in Reading, UK, is where I learned.

For me the initial setup was easy, but it depends on the environment.

Compared with MSBA, it is quite reasonable.

Oracle EPM is offered at a reasonable price.

I recommend that you pursue cloud initiatives. EPCS and PBCS are now migrating to the cloud.

I work for an Oracle company, and I have the highest rating for this Oracle Hyperion EPM.

I would rate Oracle Hyperion a ten out of ten.

We primarily use the solution for budgeting. 

It's basically the same as the other budgeting solutions. There's nothing different, no bells and whistles that are different. At the end of the day, it gets to the same solution.

The initial setup wasn't overly difficult.

I used other EPM software that probably had better reporting that came out of Hyperion.

I would have done some implementation a little bit differently, however, it doesn't mean that they don't have the functions available. 

I would love a drill-down feature. 

I would love more comment capabilities so that you could put in little notes, cheat notes.

We've used the solution for two years.

So far, the stability has been fine. There are no bugs or glitches. it doesn't crash or freeze. 

Hyperion is basically a jail and cost center platform where you couldn't budget any different than the rules of what Hyperion is telling you to budget buy. If you wanted to budget buy a product within a cost center, you could not do that. You would have to go to the actual cost center and budget it that way. For example, for commercial real estate loans, you would have to go into each individual course center and budget accordingly. I'm not sure if it's scalable in that sense as there isn't necessarily flexibility involved.

Our internal financing team uses it, and they are comprised of 10 to 15 people. 

It's being used almost every month as we do forecasting in it. There's monthly input-output. Hyperion on the accounting side is used on a daily basis to load the general ledger information. It's daily, weekly, and monthly. It's being used all the time. I don't know if it can go any further, as it is being used constantly.

We have our internal IT. They're the ones helping out with any questions. On the back end, in terms of direct contact with Oracle, that would be our finance department or accounting department. I don't speak with them.

I've used other budgeting programs, for example, Axiom.

We did not use a different solution. Coming to this bank a few years ago, this product was here. They went with this product as their GL system was sun setting. It was a management decision to stay with Oracle, with the GL and it made sense to get the upgrade for Hyperion.

The company already had Hyperion, however, they just upgraded to the cloud version. We went from software to the cloud. There were a few little obstacles when we implemented it last August. It was actually during the budget cycle, which was weird. I didn't see any issues for the most part. That said, I wasn't into the weeds of implementing, allocating, doing all the unit testing, UAT testing, and all that stuff.

I'm not sure how many people were used for the purposes of deployment or maintenance.

While it was mostly handled by the finance department, my understanding is that there was a consultant involved in the implementation process. The solution works, therefore, the process must have gone well.

We have seen an ROI.

I can't speak to any aspect of the costs. It's not an aspect I handle directly.

I'm just an end-user going into Hyperion.

We've just upgraded to the cloud. I'm the one that's going in and importing all the data into Hyperion.

I'm not sure which version of the solution we're using.

There are many on the market that do the same thing. Oracle has name recognition going for it, however. Personally, I would look at another product I used to use, however, that's just my preference. Many, many years ago, in my last job, I actually had Oracle. We didn't have Hyperion though and everything was sun setting on that. It was my job to go out and go find a solution. We brought Oracle in and Hyperion was a suite of products within the Oracle umbrella. I was looking for a one-stop-shop type of product. If someone's looking for that, this might fit those needs.

I'd rate the solution at a seven out of ten. We're not fully utilizing the product. That said, from what I've seen, what I use, and what I can generate from the product, it's decent.

Hyperion is a business analytics product. In addition to analytics. it calculates all the sales data and audits everything as well. 

Hyperion has much room for improvement, especially disaster recovery. You don't have the option to choose the proper disaster recovery method. We have Hyperion and an SQL server on the backend. We have active solutions for the backend database server, which aren't working for our people. They've asked us to remove the high availability to increase application performance.

Another feature that needs work is identity management. It's okay, but they still use old-fashioned ID integrations. Today, there are more secure types of authentication, but these options are unavailable.

Hyperion is a stable product.

Scalability isn't a problem for Hyperion.

Oracle support has a lot of room for improvement. Our requests for service, bug fixes, and new features take a long time. It's will take two or three years for them to add the features we want, and they haven't been able to provide a correct solution for these problems.

I rate Oracle Hyperion five out of 10. The process of fixing bugs is very slow, and there's no transparency. When I tell Oracle about a bug, they acknowledge the request, but customers have no way of knowing about the progress they're making. Customers should get an update about this. 

We're using the product for our OPEX planning and CapEx planning. We use it for the budget cycle. 

The most valuable aspect is that the time to market is very fast. You're able to finish your budgeting cycle in a very quick and fast way with a more detailed analysis.

The solution is reliable.

The scalability is good.

When you compare it with ERP, we want so many enhancements in that particular product.

Since we are the Oracle hub, we know how the Oracle forms work. All the fields are dependent on the previous field example. If I want to select a product, I can select the channel, and automatically, the products button to those channels will be filtered. That sort of filtration, we cannot apply in Hyperion. We cannot have hierarchy-level filtrations over there.

The initial setup can be complex. 

There's something known as a data block that Hyperion generates for each and every transaction. Sometimes it does not generate and we need to identify those issues and fix them manually. That is the only debugging process for me.

I've been using the solution for almost seven to eight years.

The solution is very stable. There aren't glitches. it's reliable. it doesn't crash or freeze. 

A company can scale the product as needed. It's not a problem.

We have around 20 to 25 people using the solution.

Once the budgeting process is finished, it is being used by the quality finance team only throughout the year, however, the main key users will be working in the budgeting cycle for one month or two months only.

In terms of technical support, we are providing it directly as an IT division.

The implementation process is a little bit complex. Anything we need to customize as for the business requirement can get difficult. 

We do have our own team that maintains the solution as necessary.

The solution was implemented by a partner.

I don't have any details about the licensing. 

We are customers and end-users.

I'm not sure which version of the solution we're using. It's the latest version. About six months back, they upgraded to the latest version.

If any company would like to implement this product they should first have the internal resources with the skill sets ready to be developed for this product.

Overall, I would rate the solution at an eight out of ten. It does have some small flaws here and there. 

Hyperion is one of the best tools in the world. We can do planning and forecasting and store large amounts of data. We can draw a large amount of data and multiple combinations.

We can integrate with any system and pull data from SAP or SQL Server. We can also design our own role files to establish how we pull the file data and store it in our database. 

Hyperion provides excellent security. We can control all the users with filters and access levels and set permissions for who can control the system or input and process data. 

We are still having some issues with the ASO Cube. It can take a long time to clear the data in the ASO Cube compared to BSO data-clearing operations. We don't have a specific calculation in the ASO, and we only have these aggregate options on the ASO side. If we need calculations, we have to calculate them in the BSO and pass the data to the ASO Cube for the reporting. That's one of the drawbacks. Oracle could also improve on the data logging side as well. 

I've been working with Hyperion technologies for the last nine years, so I have experience in SMPs, planning, and Smart View. I also have quite a bit of admin knowledge in the form of SQL. I can do installations and patterns. I have more than four years of development knowledge and then three-plus years of experience providing support for Hyperion. 

Hyperion is stable.

Oracle support is quite good. When we have any questions about the product, we can immediately write the service request and contact them. They will respond in a day and fix the issue based on the priority. 

I'm using Hyperion for planning, but I'm not currently using it for financial reporting. But OneStream also has similar functionality now.

There is a lot of planning that goes into developing our Hyperion application. We need to create a planning application and set up everything. Then we develop the forms, create the cubes, and make smart lists. Everything we use is customized. 

I rate Oracle Hyperion eight out of 10. My advice to prospective Hyperion users is to focus on your business requirements. You need to consider what your business is looking for and how you will perform the planning and budgeting process. You also need to think about your data, including what level of data you're storing, the size, the frequency, and the architecture. 

We still need to learn many things about the cloud part. Every APM is moving into the cloud now. There are other aspects, like integration services, ODA, etc. We are facing many challenges in development and support. We are all still learning the Oracle products, and they're coming out with new features annually. 

We use the solution for financial reporting and planning.

The solution has too many tools. 

The integration should be addressed. 

I found the initial setup to be complex. 

I have been using Oracle Hyperion for nine years.

The stability is fine and quite user friendly.

The scalability is fine. 

The initial setup was complex. 

I do not have any specific advice for others who are considering implementing this tool. 

I rate Oracle Hyperion as a nine out of ten. 

My primary use case of this solution is as a full EPM shop, with HFM ,planning and FDMEE reports, as well as all the features available under the EPM umbrella.

There is room for improvement in the on-premises software, which doesn't have as many features as the cloud version, such as the EPBS features or the ability to edit metadata for HFM. There are also a number of bugs and issues present in the product.

This solution's stability is a little problematic - every time we go to a new version, there are bugs and issues, and we don't always get a quick solution or support from Oracle. 

Scalability is one of this solution's big plus points.

The support could be improved as service requests can sometimes take a very long time to be dealt with - we have some SRs that are a year old with no solution. In addition, the quality of the answers from the support team is not always good - sometimes we've had scenarios where we've had to ask the same question repeatedly without getting a useful answer.

Prior to Hyperion, we used Oracle OFA. We moved over to Hyperion after OFA was decommissioned.

The complexity of the setup depends on the application being worked on - some are quite complicated, others are easier.

I would rate our ROI as three out of five.

As long as you are designing the product correctly in the current matter, it should work well. How you design the product should be the most important element of your implementation. The design of the applications is variable - some are well-designed, some are not. Overall, I would rate this solution as six out of ten.