CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Reviews

Every feature of this product - Password Management, Session Management and so on has its own value depending on different use cases, but I like:

• It's a clientless product and does not require any third-party product for any of its operations (Password Management, Privileged Session Management).
• For password and session management, it can integrate with any device/script with a password OOB or via a custom plugin.
• Compared to other products, CyberArk is extremely easy to install and configure.

Due to regular growth of an organization infrastructure, managing passwords within the organization becomes extremely difficult.

In larger organizations with a large user and infrastructure base, it can be very difficult to ensure that the passwords for privileged accounts are changed according to the organization security policy. This can be especially true in case of local admins for Windows and Unix boxes. Unmanaged/neglected local admins accounts lead to a major security threat.

Another major risk is to monitor activities and usages associated with privileged accounts to hold people accountable for their actions.

CyberArk helps organizations to manage all the privileged account passwords (server or workstation) in a centralization location as per organizational security policies. It also helps to hold people accountable by controlling and managing password usage using privileged session management.

Accountability is set up using CyberArk OOB temper-proof reports.

CyberArk has evolved a lot in the last 16 years and has nearly all the features required for effective operation. The only area for improvement is using a native client while connecting to the target device instead of the current method of using a web portal (PVWA). CyberArk seems to be working on this area and we expect these features in coming versions.

It would be great if in the future CyberArk considers launching an installer for Unix-based OSs.

I have been using this product since 2010.

In my seven years of experience with CyberArk products, I have never seen an unstable environment due to product functionality. It's always lack of proper planning, inexperience and faulty configuration that leads to an unstable environment.

CyberArk can be horizontally and vertically scaled, if it is well thought out during panning phase. As an example, if an organization feels that they may need high availability of Vault servers (CyberArk’s centralized storage for passwords and audit data) in the foreseeable future, they should consider installing CyberArk Vault in cluster mode instead of standalone mode. One can't use a standalone vault as a cluster vault or convert a standalone vault to a cluster vault, but in terms of increasing the number of passwords and session recording, underlying hardware can be scale to achieve desired size.

Three-year support (unlimited case and call support) is free with license purchase but I would say sometimes it's not sufficient to resolve the issues with this model.

Nonetheless, CyberArk Profession Services is quite impressive, even though it's a costly affair.

I was part of the PIM product evaluation team at my previous organization. I stayed with CyberArk because is it's extremely easy to implement, and very stable when implemented with well-thought-out planning and experience. It has all of the required features for a PIM product, it does not have dependencies on third-party products for it to function and it is clientless.

Initial set up is super simple and if planned properly, can be installed within a couple of hours.

I cannot comment much on this because CyberArk has different pricing for its partners or resellers, and might also vary according to size of procurement.

Before choosing this product, I also I evaluated NetIQ PIM, Dell TPAM, CA PIM and ARCOS.

Invest as much as possible in the planning and design phase. Consider at least future three-year growth in password and user base such as growth in virtual environments, and size accordingly. Also consider requirements like high availability of vaults, PSM and other components.

• Password vaulting
• Granular commands profiling with OPM

• Sys/DB admins no longer need to have system credentials (and the same for third parties)
• Access profiling
• Request demands from domain groups

The management console has a lot of functionalities, but is a little bit complex to use.

Customer support and technical support can be better, compared with the level of products.

I have used it for one year.

I have not encountered any stability issues.

I have not encountered any scalability issues, technically speaking. Issues with the licenses can occur; the pricing model is not easy to understand.

Technical support is 7/10.

I did not previously use a different solution.

Initial setup was very easy. We started integrating systems and providing access to systems within few days.

From my experience, for small environments, the subscription licensing model is very cheap.

We also evaluate other solutions in the Magic Quadrant for PAM solutions.

Before defining the solution’s architecture, clearly define your requirements and the kind of systems in scope. Some systems/device can be integrated out-of-the-box, others need customization.

Plus: easy to deploy, highly customizable
Minus: a little bit complex to integrate in large environment, complex rules/customization takes time

EPV (Enterprise Password Vault) is the most valuable feature of the product to me. It is the core of the product, where it stores the passwords it needs to protect. It protects privileged IDs within a secure digital vault.

User friendliness and reporting: While the PVWA (Password Vault Web Access) provides a web console for the end user and administrator to access the solution, there is room for improvement. (E.g.: show tips when the mouse hovers over.) Reportingprovides very detailed information; however, it requires customization before it is presentable.

I first got introduced to CyberArk around 2012.

No issue with stability. The solution provides an HA option.

I would say there are scalability issues. After the solution is deployed, resizing it is difficult. Therefore, proper sizing at the planning stage is important.

Technical support is excellent; one of the most knowledgeable and well-trained support staff.

I did not previously use a different solution.

Initial setup was complex. A typical deployment will require at least two months of full-time planning. In a large deployment, it can be over six months.

Before choosing this product, I did not evaluate other options.

A well-trained and experienced deployment team is critical. Sizing, safe design, and access management need to be discussed beforehand.

reason for not being a 10 is, there is always rooms for improvements.

With the Privileged Session Manager, we can monitor sessions in real time and terminate the session if there's any unnecessary activity found. For example: We give access to user to access the server only to update patches, but if we find any activity not related to patch updates, we can terminate the session.

Actually my company/previous company does not use this product, but we sold it to our customer. This product helped our customer manage their privileged accounts. It’s easier to them to manage and control the privileged accounts.

It needs more plugin connectors for all devices. CyberArk currently can manage or make it easier to manage about 80% of our total devices. The rest still need R&D to develop the plugin. If CyberArk had more plugin connectors, the customer would not need to raise plugin development requests for several devices and CyberArk could easily connect to these devices.

What I mean with CyberArk needing to improve plugin connector is that currently CyberArk is able to manage almost all devices (server, network devices, security devices etc.) which are more than 80% of all devices. In my experience device such as IBM OS/390 and Cisco TACACS still need custom plugin connectors developed by CyberArk R&D.

If CyberArk IS able manage more than 95% from total devices it would help the customer to using it without raising a support ticket to create a plugin connector. CyberArk will more easier to manage all devices with no compromise

I used this solution from mid-2013 until mid-2015.

So far, it is stable.

This product is scales easily.

Technical support is good. They have good technical teams around the world including southeast Asia.

Most customers using a different solution switch to CyberArk because CyberArk is more user-friendly than its competitors and have more plugins compared to the others.

Initial setup was actually easier.

Start small.

Yes, we evaluate other options. The issue was about price, stability, scalability and the development of this product to ensure support.

Contact the local distributor for help.

• Password management and accountability for Privileged accounts
• Identify, protect and monitor the usage of Privileged accounts
• Record and control privileged sessions on critical systems i.e. Windows, Unix, DBs
• Application credentials including SSH keys and hard-coded embedded passwords can be managed
• Control and monitor the commands super-users can run based on their role
• PTA is a security intelligence system that allows organizations to detect, alert, and respond to cyberattacks on privileged accounts.

Privileged accounts represent the largest security vulnerability an organization faces today. Most organisations are not aware of the total number of privilege accounts.

Compromising privilege accounts leads to various breaches. With this growing threat, organisations need controls put in place to proactively protect, detect and respond to in-progress cyberattacks before they strike vital systems and compromise sensitive data.

On implementing the CyberArk PIM solution, we are able to achieve this goal. Now, we are aware of the total privileged accounts in our enterprise. These are securely stored and managed by the Vault. The end users need not remember passwords for these accounts to use them.

E.g.: A Unix Admin who has to login to a Unix server using the "root" account needs to log in to CyberArk and search for the root account, click Connect and he can perform all of his activities. We can enforce a command list on this account, monitor his activities and also get to know who has used this root account. The access to this account can also be restricted. The user does not have to remember any credentials.

Integration of this tool with SAML is a problem, as there is a bug. We’d like to be able to integrate AWS accounts in CyberArk.

I have been using this solution for the past three years. I have implemented this solution for various clients from banking and pharmaceutical companies.

I have not really encountered any issues with stability.

I have not encountered any scalability issues.

I rate technical support 9/10, very good.

Straightforward, easy-to-install setup.

It is expensive.

Before we chose CyberArk, we evaluated ARCOS.

Go ahead and use CyberArk. Request a demo.

The most valuable feature is the password Vault which gives the administrator control over privileged accounts. The other components that are valuable are Private Session Manager, OPM, Viewfinity, and AIM, which came as an add-on to the organisation's needs. The ability to start the project, install and add the passwords in just a few days brings a big advantage for CyberArk.

The client can see all the users sessions through PSM, and can protect the applications on servers using AIM. Also, the Privileged Threat Assessment helps the organisation to see all the account risks, including accounts not managed by CyberArk, and accounts/machines with unusual behavior, etc.

The DNA scan should be able to scan Unix machines for privileged accounts.

PIM tested in the last 2 years.

We didn't have any issues with the deployment.

The product is very stable.

I didn't have any issues with the stability. I usually recommend the client to increase the system requirements with 10%.

Customer service is OK in Romania.

I had direct contact with the local team and they are OK.

No.

Straightforward when you have the use cases and a SoW. Usually you follow the Installation Manual, and perform the after-installation tests, and you are sure that everything is OK. The only issue I had was with the anti-virus that was left on the server and that deleted some PSM files. You must always double-check the prerequisites, as you can have some surprises with the GPO that overrides your settings.

I was part of the implementation team with support from the vendor.

We also looked at BalaBit Shell Control Box.

It has the ability to monitor privileged sessions.

Our security has improved since implementing CyberArk.

The user interface needs to be improved. It could be done by getting the GUI to work with other programs from within internet browsers out of box.

I've used it for one year.

No issues encountered.

No issues encountered.

No issues encountered.

It's good.

It's good.

I didn't use a previous solution.

It was straightforward as the documentation was rather clear. This made the implementation simple.

I implemented myself.

I didn't evaluate any other options.

The most valuable feature of this product is the Central Policy Manager. From the Operation and Security point of view a robot that can connect to destination machines, change passwords at fixed times, and put them in the vault, like a person, and therefore, is the best that you can ask for.

It combines more functionality in a single product and solve a lot of problem, from security to compliance.

It has improved many parts of the organization. From the security and audit perspective, we're now fully aware of who accessed data and from where they accessed it. This helped us with regulatory compliance. We've improved our level of security in many typically-unsafe environments, such as domains.

I think that this product can be improved in all the areas. The details usually are important as the funcionallity. So I think that understanding the request from the customer CyberArk, as is already doing, can improve day by day his product.

I have used Cyber-Ark PAS since 2008, so thid is the seventh year that I will be working with it.

Usually not. The biggest problem was the incompatibility or non-default installation of an OS to be managed by the Central Policy Manager.

Never encountered any problems with stability.

Never encountered any problems with scalability. The Vault, Central Policy Manager, Password Vault Web Access, Privileged Session Manager and Application Identity Management architecture are designed to support scalability.

It's improved over the years and now is very fast and efficient. We've got a very good Italian customer service.

Very high level of technical support. Fast and organized.

Never used a different solution.

The initial setup is really fast, simple and straightforward. It consist of a simple Windows installation (next-next type) for any component. The only requirement is to do the installation step by step following a list of components to do beforehand.

I work in a vendor team, and we installed the product in a large company.