We performed a comparison between JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, Penta, and SAP S/4HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Microsoft, Oracle and others in ERP."The solution can scale."
"The product can scale."
"Flexibility is the most valuable aspect of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne because it allows customization."
"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne's most valuable feature is its one consolidated platform that runs all the different aspects of companies."
"We did not have any problems with the scalability of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne."
"It is easy to inquire about any account in our company."
"I think it is strong in sales, inventory, and pricing."
"Its user interface and ease of navigation are valuable."
"I believe Penta costs less than SAP"
"I have found the most valuable features are the interface, which is very good for all users, and the database performance is good."
"The functionality of SAP S4HANA is very good when comparing it to others, such as Oracle, Microsoft, and other ERP solutions."
"I have been using SAP for more than 13 years and the new SAP S4HANA was not only a simple upgrade, they have made a lot of improvements. They have simplified a lot of the functions, the all-new interface gives users a better experience. The database itself is quite efficient in nature and it provides effective data queries. It is a good upgrade from the previous version of SAP R/3."
"The finance solution and procurement functionalities are good."
"A robust product with integration between all modules."
"The most valuable feature is the perfect end-to-end integration."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"S/4HANA offers a lot of additional capability with respect to performance due to its in-built architecture for many functions including finance, production, quality, manufacturing, inventory or sales distribution and logistics."
"We’d like to see technical support integrated within the application so that it is not required to raise additional incidents or do manual outreach to support."
"We originally used EnterpriseOne for preventative maintenance, but it is not very good at that so we migrated to Maximo for that task."
"I haven't come across any downsides just yet."
"They have been improving it every day, but it could have more automation."
"From the operation perspective, it could offer more functionality for the APIs."
"The only issue with the solution that it yet to consider improvements in its price."
"The licensing is expensive compared to other solutions on the market."
"The flexibility of workflows and multi-industry implementation support should be improved."
"However, the production guys tell me that Penta is not suitable for mass production. If we build a hundred cars per day or more, then we'll have problems. At the same time, I can't say whether the issue is Penta or our process. In other words, maybe we have too many manual projects in it."
"S/4HANA could be improved with better integration. At the moment, a main issue I see is that there's so much growth in the functionality, complementary modules, and cloud solutions which were acquired by SAP and which extend the functionality of the SAP ERP suite. It looks to me that they tend to acquire more and more functionality from acquisitions, but they don't invest enough effort into making them integrated with S/4HANA or ERP. I would say that the functionality is great, but integration is something which still needs more attention. Instead of focusing on acquisitions, they should invest, integrate, and better the existing portfolio of products in SAP. It would help us, as implementors, to have a more complex or compact solution."
"The two things that need to be improved are price and customization."
"There should be a place where I can get the best available applications in one place. Currently, Fiori applications are available in different tiles on the dashboards. If anyone wants to check the financial, sales, and inventory reporting in one place, it is not possible in Fiori. We would have to develop a custom Fiori application. If that feature can be incorporated into the standard Fiori, it will be helpful for us."
"This product would be improved by adding more reports."
"The resource usage could be improved - it's memory-hungry, so mid-range servers struggle to run it."
"It is simple to implement SAP S4HANA. If you are already in this type of environment, then the transition is not very complex. However, if you do not then it can be difficult."
"This solution works with the configuration, if the prerequisites are very clear and can be configured it works perfectly. If you need to simulate something, as a predictive tool this kind of simulation is not very accurate and it has limitations. This is something that could improve."
"The solution could be more user-friendly for regular users and developers."
Earn 20 points