We performed a comparison between Infor CloudSuite Industrial, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Microsoft, Oracle and others in ERP."The solution is particularly effective for ERP. The automation of emails is a valuable feature for me. The solution is stable. The solution is scalable. Infor CloudSuite Industrial is better for its development aspect. It allows us to customize and implement changes more efficiently. The initial setup was straightforward. I recommend the solution."
"The product's most valuable feature is production planning. It is one of the core features."
"Infor's environment—ION and Infor OS—is better than SAP's. The load time is shorter and Infor performs much better than SAP."
"It is a scalable solution."
"We did some research and chose CloudSuite because it has the flexibility to cover a range of areas. And there were many other factors like traceability, for example, which is crucial for food production."
"Infor CloudSuite Industrial is easy to setup. The built-in solution is already there, so we can start implementing it right away when we install it in an organization. After going through different test executions and workshops, any missing features can be added using Infor extension tables and other products. It will take at least eight to nine months to go live."
"Some valuable features include improved transparency in sales processes, which has been vital for our operations."
"From a product perspective, it's more lenient and suitable for using features in finance, such as reconciling our payments, accounts payable, accounts receivable, etc."
"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne has improved within all the solutions and there have been a lot of investments by Oracle in these solutions. Most of the functionalities, and business requirements, are available for the system in the solution and there have been enhancements to the processes, UI, and tools, which have been done on a regular basis."
"We find the ease of use, customization, and user interface valuable."
"The solution is very customizable according to business needs."
"The solution is very easy to set up."
"The interface is very user-friendly."
"A stable and solid product."
"With the new versions, it has become very user-friendly. We have integration with mobiles, and we have cloud-based solutions. There are a lot of things that can be done by front-end users without technical knowledge. They can create reports without having to do any coding, and it's very good now."
"Traceability is the most valuable feature of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne...The stability of the solution is excellent."
"Our data is much more manageable than before."
"The initial setup is easy."
"It is easy to use, and it works very well for small-scale companies."
"For me, the main strengths of Microsoft Dynamics NAV are that it's user-friendly and light. These are its major wins. I have used other ERPs and their architecture were a little more complex when compared to the Microsoft Dynamics NAV architecture."
"Microsoft products are very good in general. This product is flexible, easy to use, intuitive, and has good capabilities."
"The vertical covers all aspects of functionality and integrates easily with the existing Office products."
"All of the features are valuable, depending on where you implement them. I've done implementations in 60 countries, across 86 different companies and groups, and each company has a different reason for why they want to use it. Every single feature that I've implemented has been successful, and for some companies, where they didn't use the functionality, they have moved to external products or they've integrated into other applications."
"Microsoft Dynamics NAV's most valuable feature is the integration with other Microsoft solutions."
"The solution's support service could be better."
"The platform's distribution features need enhancement."
"There should be better clarity and agreement on all interfaces and requirements before signing a contract. This would avoid unexpected costs and complications later on."
"Regarding integration, specific third-party tools are not accepted, for example, on the old version of IBM or Oracle."
"Currently, there are some challenges with handling large reports, possibly due to setup limits or issues with the solution."
"Infor needs to work on its documentation. For example, if I need to create a business object deployment from LVN to element, the instructions for this are insufficient. Many specific use cases aren't covered in the manual."
"Planning needs to be improved. That is, industry-specific planning details need to be added and refined."
"Pricing is always an area where there is room for improvement."
"EnterpriseOne's integration could be improved."
"What would make JD Edwards EnterpriseOne better is more straightforward project implementation, including reducing the costs associated with upgrading projects."
"They have been improving it every day, but it could have more automation."
"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne could improve the speed because sometimes it takes time to load into the environment. This is typical when the ESU patch packages are used."
"Forms customization should be easier. Currently, it has to go through the development life cycle."
"Something that could be included is a supply chain management system. That's what we're looking for."
"The initial setup of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is straightforward. However, it could improve."
"Lacking in certain areas of support."
"The Power BI integration could be more seamless."
"The performance and virtual machine backup is not good with this solution and need improvements."
"I would like to improve the tool’s reporting and coding part."
"I would like a more modular and user-friendly interface."
"For a big company like us with millions of transactions, the scalability isn't enough."
"It would be nice, in Microsoft Teams, if we were able to type more information into the chat."
"Some of the control aspects such as auditing can definitely be improved. For example, auditing is not very easy, and the user permissions are complicated."
"The configuration packages can be somewhat tiresome at times, and they can be slow when loading data."
More Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central Pricing and Cost Advice →
