We performed a comparison between IBM Resilient, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, and SECDO Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, ServiceNow, IBM and others in Security Incident Response."The most valuable features of IBM Resilient are its flexibility and customization options for incident response."
"The solution is reliable in our usage."
"The initial setup of IBM Resilient is not that complex since my company already has a support license that we use internally. In general, the product's deployment phase is not that complex."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"As a whole, the product is stable...Technical support is very good."
"The solution is simple to use and to integrate with IBM QRadar."
"It's really simple and has a flexible interface."
"The most valuable thing about it is how easy it is to navigate the user interface."
"I have no complaints about Cortex's stability."
"We use the solution to automate our SIEM tools and incidents."
"It is a scalable solution. I would rate scalability a ten out of ten."
"The solution provides threat intelligence with EDR."
"It was useful as a ticketing tool."
"The product is quite easy to use."
"The repository of playbooks and the integration between Palo Alto and IBM QRadar are some useful features"
"I chose Cortex XSOAR because the client also has Palo Alto firewalls. I can incorporate the data from the Palo Alto firewalls into Cortex and send it into the same data lake to manipulate that data. It lets me manage and monitor the data in one place."
"Technical support is great. Palo Alto is extremely helpful and responsive."
"It basically automates the entire alert investigation process."
"The ease of deployment is a valuable feature."
"IBM Resilient is quite complex, including its configuration."
"IBM Resilient could integrate better with my tools."
"Its price needs improvement."
"One thing to improve is how it handles data formats, which currently might require scripting for conversion to CSV before uploading."
"This product could be improved with better customization. This product isn't the best on the market like QRadar, but it's actually a good solution. However, some competitors' solutions contain more integration, support, automation, or flexibility."
"The integration could be improved so that it is easy to integrate with other solutions."
"The tool needs to improve its documentation on license scripts."
"The initial setup is complex."
"It doesn't offer automatic internet reports out of the box."
"I would like to see Cortex become less dependent on Active Directory and group policies to manage the deployment. Maybe I need to update my understanding of how to deploy it, but that's the way I know how to use it."
"It is been decommissioned by Palo Alto."
"Palo Alto needs to develop more AI-centric products."
"I think they should increase their collaboration base."
"The configuration of the solution could improve it is difficult."
"Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR could improve the look, feel, and management of the cloud console. Additionally, the user could be more easily integrated."
"The integration could be better. Cortex, for example, does not work with iPhone."
"The price should be reduced in order to be more competitive in the market."
"Maybe the notifications setting could use a simpler setting."
"Many will try to use this as an out-of-the-box solution, however, it needs to be configured to fit what a company would like to do with it."
More Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points