We performed a comparison between DX Unified Infrastructure Management and Nutanix Prism based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It gives us visibility inside applications. It helps us to dig down and find the root cause of any issue within the network."
"Monitoring infrastructure and business applications are the most valuable features."
"It is easy to implement."
"We are able to go in and actually leverage the thick client for a nice easy drag and drop solution."
"It's easy to push out across numerous servers. Very scalable."
"Monitors the infrastructure asset and also monitors as an IT service."
"It delivers our customers many metrics, so they may make decisions"
"It is the foundation for our monitoring solution."
"Has a user-friendly UI with a centralized console."
"Prism is easy to scale."
"Prism provides us with insights and the ability to access all the sub-components of Nutanix's hyperconverged platform."
"The auto-update option is a valuable feature for us."
"In the six years we have been using Nutanix Prism, we have never had a problem with stability."
"Its scalability is valuable. It's scalable and fast."
"The features that I have found most valuable are its storage flexibility, linear scalability, and perhaps ease of use and powerful support."
"Nutanix is a HCA product and includes VMware called Nutanix Express that has been fantastic for us. We have about 100 plus VMs without any trouble and we have VCDR."
"I'm very happy with DX Unified Infrastructure Management, but what could be improved is its user interface because currently, it has many wide spaces. All the information you need is in DX Unified Infrastructure Management, and it's a reliable tool, and though that's more important than the gaps in the user interface being smaller or wider, those gaps still need some improvement. I know the team is working on it. My company had some backend problems with DX Unified Infrastructure Management in the past that have now been solved. The setup for the tool also needs improvement because it's complex. Another room for improvement in DX Unified Infrastructure Management is its technical support because it's sometimes not as knowledgeable or responsive. What I'm suggesting to be added to the tool is an open-standard ELK Elastic-based database where you can put in all data, so that you can use the data in other systems as well."
"In the UMP, certain devices will show up multiple times and they don't correlate correctly. That's one of the issues."
"It would be good to implement views showing the aggregated status graphically."
"The only challenge that I have with this solution is the reporting part. The users are not really comfortable with the kind of reports they are getting. Sometimes, they want to see reports in their own format. Customizing those reports with Jasper is not very easy. It could be because of the knowledge gap. If you have the knowledge of how Jasper can be configured to suit customer requirements in terms of reporting, it is good. There was a time a customer complained about one issue related to Netflow analysis. Broadcom has a separate model for that, but the customer wanted everything bundled together. It could also have IP management so that I am able to see or analyze IPs so that the IPs that are already in use don't get assigned."
"There should be wider coverage of storage infrastructure."
"I think it can be improved by a greater provision of specialized technical support, as there are very few trained personnel there."
"The biggest feature that I've been hoping they would enhance on is inventory management: things like adding/removing nodes."
"I would like to see auditability. We've built our own audit functionality to ensure that every CI has the desired model configuration applied to it. And we run that on a daily basis. If that became part of the product, I think it might be a little bit less intensive in terms of resource, because we're doing it with scripts."
"The process of converting and importing virtual machines to the Nutanix environment is quite complicated."
"Sometimes the life cycle management function of Nutanix can't find the latest version of the firmware. The lifecycle management product could be more up-to-date."
"In the next release, I would like the ability to browse data stores."
"The product currently fails to provide a complete view to customers."
"It would be ideal if there was more of a community around the solution so that it would be easier to learn things about the solution from other users."
"Perhaps the interface can be more intuitive."
"Nutanix Prism can be more stable because it's not as stable as VMware."
"The solution could be a bit more user-friendly. The dashboard and configuration should be much easier to use."
More DX Unified Infrastructure Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
DX Unified Infrastructure Management is ranked 31st in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 120 reviews while Nutanix Prism is ranked 4th in Virtualization Management Tools with 57 reviews. DX Unified Infrastructure Management is rated 8.2, while Nutanix Prism is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of DX Unified Infrastructure Management writes "Easy to set up, simple to use, and offers great technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nutanix Prism writes "Having a centralized platform for infrastructure information has helped us with capacity planning". DX Unified Infrastructure Management is most compared with DX SaaS, DX Spectrum, SCOM, ManageEngine OpManager and SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor, whereas Nutanix Prism is most compared with Zabbix, VMware Aria Operations, Cisco UCS Manager, Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM) and Veeam ONE. See our DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Nutanix Prism report.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
