Find out in this report how the two Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
Fortra's Automate has effectively replaced the workload of an entire employee, saving us significant time and money.
It has reduced our expenditures in terms of purchasing more products and employing more technicians.
On a scale from one to ten, I would rate the ROI as nine.
It is a community product, there is not much support we can expect.
The toolset is very intuitive, so we didn’t need to contact their support much.
They don't always understand the processes I'm trying to implement.
They handle customers like me to get to the exact issue, detailing where that issue originates from a technical point of view, the resolution, and the summary they provided.
I would rate the technical support as a nine out of ten because it is quite fast and courteous.
There is no direct scalability option.
If I rate scalability from one to ten, I would probably give it a six.
The scalability of Automate also scores a ten out of ten.
I can deploy it on multiple infrastructures such as cloud, on-premises, or in a hybrid model.
It is easy to increase one bot or one studio without needing to buy another orchestrator, which can be quite expensive.
The stability of the solution is a ten out of ten.
For stability on a scale from one to ten, I would give it a solid nine.
It has very robust features, and it is not prone to instability.
Reporting capabilities can be improved more, and community support should be increased.
For more mature environments, the integration to live systems is lacking, which affects its applicability.
The decision map could be improved to allow more than three options at a decision point.
This is a significant concern, especially with critical workloads where visibility into errors is essential.
My major recommendation would be for easier upgrade paths between major versions.
When new employees join our company, we created automation so they receive AWS credentials and all their AWS access and cloud access.
Bizagi's pricing is very aggressive, and it was one of the reasons we chose it.
Competitors are often more expensive than Automate.
It offered what we wanted at a good, competitive price.
It does a lot but also costs a lot.
It is open source.
The user interface is very good, making it easy for business people to understand.
Bizagi has rich functionalities; compared to other BPMN tools, it has more features.
Automate's non-reliance on additional orchestrators makes it quite cost-effective.
In my opinion, the best feature Automate offers is the scheduling.
Automate's compatibility with existing IT infrastructure has impacted our business operations positively by providing smooth integration with other software that we use, such as Gmail, Jira, and Microsoft 365 apps, which gives us a unified platform instead of having to keep switching from one software to another, saving a lot of time and streamlining the whole workflows.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Fortra's Automate | 2.1% |
| Bizagi | 5.5% |
| Other | 92.4% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 42 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 16 |
| Large Enterprise | 36 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 30 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 9 |
Bizagi is known for its compatibility with Visual Studio and .NET, offering flexibility and intuitive use. With strong process management capabilities, it supports BPMN 2.0, facilitating rapid deployment and modification, making it ideal for small to medium enterprises.
Bizagi provides strong simulation and automation features while ensuring agile development and integration. Users depend on its user-friendly interface and document generation capability, benefiting from its orchestration functionalities. Despite its advantages, users seek better external system integration, enhanced cloud support, and improved documentation, noting occasional performance issues with large processes. There is a keen interest in a flexible licensing model, more robust simulation features, improved reporting, automation, and machine learning capabilities.
What are Bizagi's key features?Organizations in sectors such as HR, IT, and finance employ Bizagi for process automation and modeling. It is widely used in educational environments and consulting firms focused on business transformation and process optimization. The platform supports process mapping and visualization and integrates with existing systems to improve operational efficiency.
Fortra's Automate offers a user-friendly platform for task automation, featuring a drag-and-drop interface that aids in scheduling, file management, and integrating with services like Azure and AWS.
Fortra's Automate provides substantial ease in automating complex tasks through its intuitive design. It offers seamless integration capabilities, especially with Azure and AWS, and comes equipped with strong error handling. Cost-effective and requiring minimal coding, it supports a broad range of industries by effectively automating tasks such as HR operations, invoice management, and data processing across servers.
What features stand out in Fortra's Automate?
What benefits should users consider in reviews?
In industries such as healthcare and transportation, Fortra's Automate facilitates the automation of client management, HR operations, and data processing, boosting efficiency. Banks utilize it for managing extensive invoice workflows, while distribution sectors rely on its capabilities for insurance checks and system support. Its applicability across servers makes it a valuable tool for any sector seeking to reduce manual workload and improve task accuracy.
We monitor all Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
