We performed a comparison between Apache Airflow, Bizagi, and IBM Case Foundation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."Its user-friendly interface makes it straightforward to operate, offering a plethora of features for data preparation, buffering, and format conversion."
"The solution is quite configurable so it is easy to code within a configuration kind of environment."
"Since it's widely adopted by the community, Apache Airflow is a user-friendly solution."
"It's stable."
"The most valuable feature of Apache Airflow is creating and scheduling jobs. Additionally, the reattempt at failed jobs is useful."
"Since the solution is programmatic, it allows users to define pipelines in code rather than drag and drop."
"The solution is flexible for all programming languages for all frameworks."
"Every feature in Apache Airflow is valuable. The number of operators and features I've used are mainly related to connectivity services and integrated services because I primarily work with GCP."
"What I find most valuable is the flexibility, I find it very easy to use and very flexible for my purpose. I can use it without any particular problem, and it's very intuitive and easy to understand."
"The most valuable feature is the simulation."
"The free online Help and E-Learning is very strong."
"Bizagi is flexible. I can share things with other consultants because it is the most commonly used software in my community. It has been a great and good resource for us in making sure that we adhere to the process."
"The main feature of Bizagi is the speed to which we can automate processes and how we can modify them without a strong impact on the end users."
"Bizagi is simple. It's simple to learn."
"The amount of control that this solution provides is great."
"I like all of the features. I like that you can simulate the processes and add the time standard."
"The most valuable features are those involving decision making, analysis, and anything related to event documents because those processes are related to content as well."
"The most valuable feature is its stability, which is why we are using it."
"Case Foundation provides a strong security boost."
"The content management is great."
"It provides us the capability of producing business processes for documents that are launched immediately when a document comes into the repository."
"Flexible and the ability to divide search screens, and to search for documents. The ECM feature inside the system is great."
"A valuable feature includes seamless integration with the document management system, along with robust capabilities in analytics and reporting."
"The solution is scalable."
"We're currently using version 1.10, but I understand that there's a lot of improvements in version 2. In the earlier version that we're using, we sometimes have problems with maintenance complexity. Actually using Airflow is okay, but maintaining it has been difficult."
"The solution could be improved by simplifying the integration process."
"I want to see Apache Airflow have more integrations with more production-based databases since it is an area where the product lacks currently."
"The problem with Apache Airflow is that it is an open-source tool. You have to build it into a Kubernetes container, which is not easy to maintain, and I find it to be very clunky."
"Apache Airflow could be improved by integrating some versioning principles."
"I would like to see some no-code capabilities and drag and drop abilities in Airflow."
"Airflow should support the dynamic drag creation."
"The dashboards could be enhanced."
"The performance could use improvement. We couldn't connect the processes to on one file. The performance is an issue for us."
"The gateway through which it connects with other vendors, specifically RPA vendors, is one aspect that could be improved."
"They should improve the migration process between major versions, from version 9 to 10, we had to redo our implementation."
"It is difficult to drive ROI on types of processes involving complex business rules."
"It needs an easier setup for the Bizagi Engine."
"In terms of what needs improvement, the costs can be lowered."
"We have migrated to the cloud, but there are a lot of issues while integrating with the cloud. There are a lot of things to improve with the cloud and reporting. We were previously working with on-premise solutions, and we had access to a lot of things, but with the cloud, they changed a lot of functionalities. Some of the things we know, but with some of the things, we are having difficulties."
"Bizagi needs a way to define categories such as process groups like the APQC framework, PCF, and handle the processes within it."
"The cloud version could use more stability."
"IBM needs to update the user interfaces of all its products to make them more intuitive and accessible to beginners. Compared to Microsoft products, IBM solutions are less user-friendly. IBM programs are hard to master. It's a problem in my region because it's hard to find IT staff who can work with IBM."
"The service as it currently stands is out-of-date and lacks flexibility."
"We are now using microservices but there are some areas where the coordination with FileNet is problematic."
"There is a need for more open and flexible integration capabilities, allowing seamless collaboration with a broader spectrum of business process management solutions, beyond the confines of IBM's document management offerings."
"The solution can be quite expensive."
"There are some features that could be enhanced like the document viewer"
"The interface needs to be more user-friendly."
