Alteryx is the ultimate replacement for a data shop. I use Alteryx in place of a data center.
We using Alteryx on-premise using gaming systems for performance.
Alteryx is the ultimate replacement for a data shop. I use Alteryx in place of a data center.
We using Alteryx on-premise using gaming systems for performance.
The most valuable feature of Alteryx is its unlimited handling capabilities.
Mastering Alteryx, a comprehensive solution, takes time. However, once you have gained proficiency with its layout and how to drag, drop, and connect components, it becomes remarkably easy, yet still thorough.
The visualization could improve in Alteryx. It is ideal to use another solution, such as Qlik, to make up for the lack of visualization.
I have been using Alteryx for approximately five years.
The solution is scalable. To scale the solution you will have to add more hardware to the on-premise setup, such as CPUs and memory.
We have received a return on investment using Alteryx after the first job.
The cost of Alteryx is approximately $2,900 annually.
When I first started using the solution I was working with the state and was given six years of pregnant women and children data and it took 35 minutes to process the data. I tested the same data recently and it took .3 seconds.
Data should be returned within 30 seconds to make to process useful and if the solution does not provide this, then it is not beneficial.
Cloud deployments are not as quick as the on-premise.
I would advise others that they need someone who understands their domain in terms of the field that they are in. They need to have someone to hold their hand for the first ninety days. Once they pass the ninety days they will be set for the future.
I rate Alteryx a ten out of ten.
I used Alteryx for a retail company's project. They wanted to generate quick results out of some analysis for their fast-moving products and manage customer profiles for starting campaigns only for these fast-moving items.
Alteryx enabled us to develop models and perform core Python coding, utilizing different approaches like the waterfall and agile frameworks. We sometimes use the SAFe agile framework.
I found Alteryx's ability to modify data on the fly, using in-memory processing, very useful. This feature prevents the necessity to store data temporarily.
The tool also provides functionality for dashboarding, report bursting, and handling multi-currency and multi-language situations. It helps in managing delivery for large teams.
It would be beneficial if Alteryx could lower its price or introduce a loyalty program for individual consultants and freelancers like me. It would help independent users manage projects for clients without facing high costs.
I have used Alteryx for about six months.
Alteryx is very stable. I rate it nine out of ten.
Alteryx is scalable, and I would give it eight out of ten.
I contacted customer support once or twice, and they were quick to respond. I would also rate them nine out of ten.
Positive
Different customers have different data tools like DataStage and Informatica. They also provide good data flow capabilities. Alteryx has a built-in robustness that I was very happy with.
I didn't set it up myself; there was a project manager who set up the whole thing.
Alteryx is expensive. It's beyond the budget of freelancers like me, even though companies usually purchase it for larger projects. There should be a desktop version available at a lower cost for freelancers.
I have used almost all the tools depending on the customer's technological inventory, such as DataStage and Informatica.
Alteryx is a futuristic tool. I recommend negotiating the price before using it. It's a stable tool, and I rate it eight out of ten.
We mainly use Alteryx for large files.
It's incredibly fast for loading and filtering the data. We use it to read clients' information and general entries. We have files of about 20 gigs with perhaps millions of records, and we use macros in order to filter the information.
The filtering is fast, and it provides a search tool that is great. Macros are useful and fast for reading a lot of files and then creating just one file.
Its price is not great for small companies.
The export of the final TXT is hard. It's slower. We have a local deployment, and it could be because of the hard drive. SSD would perhaps improve the speed.
I'd like to see more artificial intelligence business tools or features in Alteryx.
I've used Alteryx for about three years.
I'd rate it an eight out of ten in terms of stability. Sometimes, the app crashes when there are large files or when there is a huge amount of filtering data.
I'd rate it an eight out of ten in terms of scalability.
I haven't used their support, but the documentation is good enough.
I used IDEA, but it was too slow. It was on x86 support, whereas Alteryx supports x64. So, we moved to Alteryx.
We have seen an ROI, but we don't have many licenses because of the price.
It's very expensive. I'd rate it a four out of ten in terms of the price. It's great for big companies but not for small companies.
If you are trying to read more than 100 million records, I'd recommend Alteryx, but if not, you can use another tool that is cheaper.
I'd rate it a nine out of ten.
The use cases range from basic EPL to predictive analytics and spatial analytics.
For example, within our functions group and our larger finance organization, we have a number of use cases where people are doing a lot of manual work, mostly in Excel. This has enabled us to move away from that, resulting in not only streamlined processes and efficiencies but also a significant increase in our ability to have confidence in that data. If the need arises, we may need to refresh data or revisit something.
It essentially automates what would otherwise be some extremely tedious activities to rerun and re-perform.
I believe that the ability to leverage the gallery for scalability, as well as the general data blending functionality, is most beneficial to our core-based users. Obviously, there's a lot more to it, but these basic data prep and blending tools help us a lot.
In some ways, I believe it is not yet as integrated as it could be. I believe that the data integration inquiring component could be improved slightly.
The data integration component could most likely be improved to increase enterprise scalability.
I have been working with Alteryx for two years.
It varies, but it will be the 2021 version.
The stability of Alteryx has been great.
It is highly scalable for the vast majority of things you want to do. When it comes to extremely large data sets or very specific analytics that would be delivered at an extremely high scale, either really, really tremendous scale or tremendous volume may be problematic. However, those are only a small number of possible scenarios. As a result, it hasn't been a problem for us, but we've switched to another technology for those types of use cases.
The roles are extremely varied. We have over 100, and less than 200, but that will increase in the coming months.
We are currently at capacity in terms of licenses. So we're looking to go from the low triple digits to over 1000 in the next year, maybe a year and a half. I believe we will quadruple in the coming year.
Technical support is quite powerful. I believe you must know how to take advantage of it, but I believe they have the necessary infrastructure in place to get you where you need to go. I believe it is somewhat incumbent on the organization to have someone serve as that contact, that partner. They're fine as long as you keep your end of the bargain.
We switched because we wanted to. We didn't have anything that could do everything Alteryx did, in my opinion. We had some minor transformation tools and such, but nothing that could truly compete with Alteryx.
The initial setup is straightforward.
That's something we're still working on. We started with about 100 licenses and identified areas where we thought it could add value. That has been demonstrated, and we are working to scale significantly over the next year. It's been a two to four-year journey from discovery to widespread adoption.
The majority of the work is done in-house. We initially worked with Alteryx, but it was primarily done in-house.
It has certainly paid for itself on a per-user basis. We haven't done a group ROI yet. But it more than pays for itself. Our "highlights" are quite powerful. The more prominent business cases are extremely compelling.
It's not cheap, but they offer a variety of packages to help you grow in practices and programs that allow you to scale effectively while also testing how deep the use can penetrate while allowing you to really reduce the risk. They offer various bundles in which they offer free licenses as well, so you can essentially see if you're able to use them consistently. Then, the next time, you can add that number or various other programs. It's probably on the pricey side, but they provide some really useful ways to grow and test.
If you're serious about scaling, you'll need a product manager, which is a major cost aside from the license.
We evaluated other products.
Simply strike a balance between democratizing the use of data transformation and analytics and having a vision for how you might want to roll things out. I think it's not the easiest thing to strike that balance, but that's my recommendation. To try to have a plan, but also to make sure you're not putting up too many barriers.
I would rate Alteryx an eight out of ten.
Primarily, I use Alteryx for Excel. I also use it to automate pipelines whenever necessary.
The most effective feature of the solution is that it is a fast product with good performance compared to traditional solutions. The tool can deal with large or huge datasets.
I think the tool does not run on some operating systems. I think it would be great if Alteryx could provide an in-built machine.
The software is not fully optimized. What I try to do is use Microsoft tools if I have a heavy workflow. I move to a tool to be able to respond to the workflows for a few seconds. I have to wait until I am able to move to another table, and then I can't duplicate. There are too many optimizations to run.
I have been using Alteryx since 2018.
Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten. Overall, I have had a good experience. I encountered a few bugs, but I think it is okay because it doesn't happen every day and is normal.
Scalability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten. Currently, the tool also offers a cloud version. Usually, scalability is not needed in my environment. In my company, we only use desktops.
I think that, in my company, I work with the tool as part of a team. Additional departments also use the tool. My team uses Alteryx. A total of ten people use the tool.
The solution's technical support is okay. I posted a few queries and called up the support team for help. I felt that the support team was quick to respond and was also helpful. I rate the technical support a nine out of ten.
Positive
The product's initial setup phase is simple and straightforward.
The solution is deployed on an on-premises model with servers.
If one is a high price, and ten is a low price, I rate the tool's price as a one. The tool is expensive.
I think that apart from Alteryx, I have had experience with a lot of other products, including Sagemaker. I had purchased a product for one of my customers, who then compared it with Alteryx. I also know about some products like Talend and Rapidminer. I didn't like Rapidminer's interface.
I don't use the predictive analytics part in Alteryx.
I am not sure about the data blending part of the tool.
It is easy to integrate and set up the product with other third-party solutions or hardware. The biggest challenge with the integration is probably the need to get approvals and follow up with the organization. I think the process is quite easy.
My company has not had the opportunity to integrate Alteryx with AI tools.
I recommend the tool to others.
I rate the tool a nine out of ten.
In our team, we use Excel for a lot of calculations and automation workflows. We retrieve data from the database, perform calculations, and then distribute the results to various departments or customers.
Alteryx helps me do a lot of automation. The best thing about Alteryx is that you don't have to repeat the workflow over and over again. Unlike Excel, where you need to write formulas for each new file, Alteryx follows a consistent process. You can schedule and automate the workflow, even if the files change.
I think sometimes the solution doesn't load properly or takes so much time for the workflows. Though the workflow runs and completes the file in Excel, if you use the same formula, it's a bit slow. Also, the image processing is not so good because I tried to do some image processing and they were like, sometimes they put two to eight. In the document, it was two, but the OCR predicted it as eight.
I have been using the product for two years.
The tool is stable.
My company has more than 100 users.
I haven't contacted the technical support.
The tool's installation and setup are not difficult; you just need to install it.
You can use this tool if you want to do a lot of automation. It is easy for users to learn and use it. The drag-and-drop interface works fine for us. I rate it a seven out of ten.
We were analyzing data trying to find anomalies with the servers and things that were going wrong. Normally in what we do, it can be a very manual process looking for that kind of stuff. Therefore, using this product, I created a workflow that went out and looked across all devices for problems that are happening, and managed to cut down the number of issues that were being created daily.
The amount of labor that it takes us to find issues is pretty high. When you put the automation in place, that frees up your time to concentrate on the advanced analytics. We recognized right away in that first year that the amount of FTEs that we would have to acquire to do that work was a significant amount of money. It just stepped us into automation of many things that we do. That frees us up to be able to do a more mature analysis, and not that day-to-day stuff that you we have to track.
Not everybody's budget allows for having a team of 20. We just don't have that. It's saving us a lot of money in FTEs.
Right away we knew this has a lot of value, even from the perspective of data manipulation and automation.
There are all sorts of use cases that we could come up with. It does take a little bit of learning and figuring out how to work the tool, however, we've been really successful with it. I even went and presented at one of their conferences our use case.
Automation is the most valuable aspect for us. The ability to wrap business logic around the data is very helpful.
It not only helps us with efficiency. You can also flip the steps apart to make that data flow in various ways.
Most tasks run in less than two minutes and provide us with what we need very quickly. I can wrap rules around the data to look for certain things or to notify people.
The amount of manual labor that we're saving by writing those workflows is huge.
The solution does have a bit of a learning curve.
I initially managed the product completely. Then, when the user base grew, another group just took it over. What they're struggling with is it's not as mature as Tableau in the user management area. It was tougher to manage the server part of it right away, especially since the user base has grown. When you get hundreds of users in there, trying to manage access to the product is a little tougher than Tableau.
I've used the solution for maybe around five years or so.
The solution is quite stable. It's not as mature as Tableau in that stability area, however, it's pretty reliable. We don't have a lot of problems with it. Initially, we created a lot of cases as we didn't understand how to best manage the product. Now, very rarely do I open a case with support and have issues.
They recently moved to a different support model. Initially, when we came to the product, the support was pretty good. Now, when we open cases, it seems not so good. They're asking customers to pay more money to get a higher level of support. Of course, due to the fact that we don't open that many cases, it's not important to us to get to that higher level. That said, the response time given and the attention to us is not as good as it was initially.
When trying to pull large datasets into Tableau right away we realized that we had to do something different. Prior to Alteryx being available, I would use scripting to stage the data. I happened to notice an ad on LinkedIn for Alteryx, and I thought, "Wow, this is exactly what I need." I talked management into buying it. I was the first one in the company to start using the product.
We used outside vendors to come in and help in certain parts of the implementation.
It's more expensive than Tableau, for example.
There has been some scrutiny on the overall costs. We're trying to go to more open-source, with more products that don't cost so much. I have to continually work with folks on proving that the value of what we pay in licenses.
The solution has recently changed its support process and is now pressuring users to pay for a higher level of support services. That could potentially be an extra charge for some companies.
We are just customers and end-users.
I would advise other companies considering the solution that the training is important. They've been great working with us on free training for this, that, and the other. The company really does provide a lot of those resources. The community is very good. The knowledge base that's out there in the community is great. A company should just tap into that and any free training they can. It takes a little bit of time to get proficient at it, however, the payoff is there.
Overall, I would rate it at a seven out of ten.
Alteryx is primarily used for data transformation and ETL processes within our environment. We also utilize its machine-learning capabilities for regression and classification tasks. Our team leverages it for back-end calculations to enhance visualization performance.
The platform's user-friendliness, particularly for non-technical users, has allowed for more efficient data processing and the integration of machine learning within our workflows. It has streamlined our data transformation processes, ultimately improving the performance of our visualizations.
The product's most valuable features include its ease of use for non-technical users and machine learning capabilities. The flexibility to integrate custom code is also an important aspect of the platform for our use case.
The product could benefit from improved integration with visualization tools or even the inclusion of built-in visualization features. It would reduce the need to use multiple tools and pay for additional licenses.
I rate the solution's stability a seven out of ten.
I rate the solution's scalability a seven out of ten.
Alteryx is generally more suited for medium—to large companies due to its potentially high licensing costs.
I rate Alteryx a seven out of ten.