VMware Aria Operations Reviews

We use it for proactive and reactive monitoring. 

I just came off a contract where capacity management was a major issue. They hadn't planned for it or made any provisions for it. So, they were looking at the operations teams to sort of do capacity management for them. This project came along, I picked it up, used vROps, and was able to say, "This is what's going on. This is what we are going to have to do. This is what we need to do to be where we want be."

Its ability to resolve an issue from within the application rather than going somewhere else to resolve it.

The dashboard is a single pane of glass for troubleshooting.

I've never had an issue with stability.

It is very easy to scale. However, in the beginning, I picked up an implementation that had been designed wrong from the ground up.

Ideally, somebody using the technical support when I found out the configuration was incorrect.

I still received a lot of help from the support agent who dealt with my case. What he couldn't do was tell me what to do to bring it back into line. However, he told me what it needed to look like, which was very well documented anyway. Though, having someone point you in the right direction can be a good thing.

The initial setup can be complex, but it is not too complex for me. I consider it straightforward.

We are an integrator.

We have seen huge ROI. 

It has certainly reduced troubleshooting, especially when we have less experienced support technicians than engineers looking at it. It guides them as to where to find the solution. Now, I have a lot less junior staff coming up to me asking what has gone wrong because it displays on the dashboard what they can do to resolve it.

In terms of integration, between this product and everything else in the VM product line, it is very easy to just pick this up as opposed to looking elsewhere.

Use it! It makes perfect sense.

It is very intuitive and user-friendly. The solution is a lot more intuitive and user-friendly these days than it was before.

We are deploying this solution to monitor our customers' environments. We use it to look at IOPS and the VMs and for monitoring consumption.

This solution has helped improve our organization because we can now monitor our customers' environmental problems as well as our own and give the correct answers as to what the source of a problem is. 

It has also reduced the time it takes to troubleshoot problems and has improved the quality of service for our users.

Monitoring is the most valuable feature for us. When our customers have a problem and we can monitor it in real time or evaluate the history of the problem.

We have found this solution to be user-friendly because it's fairly simple to navigate. We can see if it connects problems with storage, consumption, or other issues.

I rated this solution an eight and not a ten because we work to give a multi-tenant product to our customers and vROps doesn't meet our needs.

The stability is good because we can do an HA environment. 

Scalability works well. We have many customers and have never had any issues with it. 

We got this solution because we knew we needed a monitoring solution. We decided on this specific solution because of its direct integration features.

The initial setup was straightforward. It was a simple deployment. 

We implemented it ourselves. 

Our ROI is that we have been able to reduce the time it takes to look into a problem. 

Cost isn't a problem for us because it's included in our licensing. 

Opsview was another vendor we looked at. We didn't go with it because we liked vROps' use case. It allows us to see simply and graphically what a problem is and we can export a report of the problem for our customer, which is very valuable to us. Opsview gave us some information but we found it to be slower. With vROps, we can monitor every feature and vendor; we can monitor the environment which means we can monitor everything. 

Cost savings isn't a problem for us because we have enough resources with the cloud provider.

If you're looking into vROps and similar solutions, I would recommend vROps because it's a good program.

I use it for full diagnostics and predictive problems for the applications or services that we run.

Over-provisioning helps us a bit, and we have a lot over-provisioned VMs. Thus, we show different teams that this type of resource can help manage their environment.

With over-provisioning, we track it all. This is one of the main benefits as it is a reactive and proactive full diagnostic. We can see if the servers are behaving differently and why: Is it quiet or busy? The system is quite good.

• I like the dashboards. We can view in our service groups before something in our service goes wrong and causes issues.
• It is user-friendly, because you can visually set up dashboards for people, such as traffic light systems. 
• The integration with vCenter is what makes it a superior product. 
• There is no hassle setting it up, as it works straight out-of-the-box.
• It has a nice user interface.
• Its ease of use.

In vCenter 6.7, there are themes. I would like to see that add to vRealize Operations as well. It is very nice.

The stability has been good. It is just an appliance that needs to be installed. Give it an IP address, name it, and it works fine.

The scalability has been fine.

The technical support has been fine.

We had a license already for this product. Therefore, we thought we would use the license rather than buying a new product.

The initial setup was easy. We installed the appliance, gave it an IP address, and assigned the relevant passwords.

We installed it ourselves.

If the VMs were trimmed, then we wouldn't have to buy as much software/hardware, and this means less licenses. While most of it is VMware licenses, which are relatively cheap, there are SQL licenses for Microsoft, and this is where we could start saving a lot of money.

I would recommend to try the solution.

We use it for monitoring and troubleshooting the performance and stability of our VMware.

If we get reports of applications that are running slowly, we are able to drill into the VM and all the statistics, and see where the bottlenecks are or what the issues are.

The solution has helped reduce the time to troubleshoot issues. It gives us greater insight into all capacity utilization, which helps us plan better.

For us, the most valuable feature is the insight into real-time performance.

At times we find the solution to be intuitive and user-friendly. It's getting better. Version 6 was terrible but 7 is a lot better. There is still room for improvement. It needs to be a bit more intuitive.

I would like to see more integration between vRealize Operations, Log Insight, and Network Insight. It would be nice if they worked a bit better together.

So far, stability is fine.

As for scalability, we've already added an extra node and it was a nice and simple, click, click, done. The scalability is good so far.

We have not had to use technical support yet.

We didn't have a solution that gave us in-depth performance stats or capacity planning in the VMware stack. We were a VMware customer, so it made sense to go with a VMware product. Compared to other products the feature set, use cases, and costs of vROps are fine. It's the integration points that led us to go with VMware, there's better, tighter integration using vROps.

The initial setup was straightforward. It took us half a day.

We used a consultant for the deployment. We used Assist Inc, and they were brilliant.

In terms of ROI, we're getting there. However, it's only been live for a couple months.

We've looked at other solutions before, but we've never found one that does what VROps does. We've looked at Veeam ONE and VMTurbo, but I don't think they're around anymore. That's part of the problem: There were vendors that did the monitoring and they've all crashed and burned. VROps wouldn't do that.

My advice would be, do a hands-on lab. Get to grips with it before you deploy it.

I rate it at eight out of ten. It's a great product. It integrates well with the VMware stack. It covers all the VMware technologies. I just need it to be more intuitive, so that's why it's an eight and not a nine or a ten.

The primary use case is that we are transforming our customer's physical and virtual infrastructure, who are afraid of anything that can happen in a virtual environment. Our job is to make a sort of private cloud, not to sell virtual machines, but to host the workload.

The main point of installing, deploying, and troubleshooting with vRealize Operations is to provide visual dashboards to ensure that the entire workload is functioning properly. Because we sell our infrastructure to clients, they need to be able to operate it. Therefore, they must have the visibility, even if they don't know how the system works from the inside.

We have to be stable to provide high availability because it's a high value market. Therefore, we have to ensure everything works all the time.

It is intuitive and user-friendly.

We are looking to optimize all the parts. For example, vCenter can be fully deployed automatically, which is not the case with vROps. We can click some next buttons to integrate vCenter and would like these type of features for vROps, if possible.

It is stable.

The technical support is good and helpful. 

The initial setup is easy.

We bought the server from a third-party. 

The first thing that we did was ask VMware what type of hardware we should buy. They helped us by providing insight in which type of server to buy, then they helped us by providing the support to integrate the solution.

We chose VMware and its solution because it was the most easily supportable. We know some of their consultants and our people know the products.

Use VMware to support the solution. Don't go at it alone.

We use it to monitor our virtual infrastructure for VDI. It is also used in our server infrastructure for basic monitoring or solving issues.

Our organization is a government company which is focused on thinking about other nations and companies.

It can compare hardware to software, and I have all the information in one place.

It is sometimes quite hard to use. If I need details, there is a huge amount of information that I need to review. It isn't a three-click solution.

We would like better integration with other systems (e.g., Zabbix). We would also like to increase our network monitoring in one place.

We haven't had problems with the stability. It is okay.

We are so small. We don't need to scale.

We don't directly use technical support. We have suppliers who help us.

When we are looking for new solutions, we usually ask the vendors. We ask them directly and they present their products.

We didn't do the first setup. Everything was integrated for us, and we just use it.

We use an integrator, who is very good. He has helped us outside the standard hours.

The solution has helped to reduce the time to troubleshoot issues.

I can recommend the solution for VDI.

We use it to monitor applications, infrastructures, and operating systems.

The real-time notifications are the most valuable feature.

I would like to have external add-ons and third-party support added to the solution.

It was not intuitive and user-friendly in the versions leading up to 6.5. After version 6.5, it improved and has been user-friendly.

It has issues that require manual handling, such as the server allows metrics. However, this is difficult to set up.

I have never had stability issues with this platform.

I haven't tested scalability.

I have never needed to use technical support.

I was holding the license, so I decided to give it a try. The solution proved itself.

The initial setup is very straightforward. The platform and add-on solutions are straightforward.

I implemented it on my own.

I have evaluated SolarWind and Microsoft SCOM. 

vROps's key value is its ability to have a hypervisor metrics of monitoring, which other products do not have.

If your infrastructure is VMware-based, you will get the most value out of the solution.

Our primary use case for this solution is to troubleshoot workloads. 

We have effectively reduced a lot of our memory and we love the Idle VMs. We can scale back the over-provisioning of systems based on actual facts and metrics. We've really been able to tidy up the over-provisioning. 

The charts, form, and metrics that you can visually display out to other sites that IT can't, and the visibility are the features that we have found most valuable. 

We do not find this solution to be user-friendly. There's still a lot of work that needs to be done and a lot of work has to go into getting the graphs right. It's not a "plug and play" type of thing. You really have to put in a lot of work. You always have to be aware of what's going on within the machines. It needs to be improved from end-to-end. 

I would like to see more visibility into the machine's working and an easier way to find out what the workings are. There are agents but they're tricky. I would like to see something more agent-less. 

I have rated this solution an eight because it's at an excellent level but it's still lacking on the end-to-end side. It has gotten better, visually, but it's still not quite there. It's clunky looking and they could have done a lot better with the interface. 

There are problems with stability. 

Scalability is getting better. It needs to be resized and it's not that easy. 

I recently used technical support to do an upgrade. They did excellent work.

I have a contact at VMware who I spoke to about software issues and he pointed us to this solution. We used RVTools many years ago but we needed something more enterprise. 

The initial setup was complex. 

This solution is expensive. Businesses don't see the true value of it, whereas IT operations do, which makes it a hard sell. 

IT sees a lot of benefit from this solution, mainly regarding troubleshooting, identifying issues, and retrospective trouble-shooting. It offers a timeline in which you can go in and see how the machine was behaving. It identifies deep issues at high levels. 

I would tell someone looking into this solution that you need high-level tools. You can't be relying on the free tools or on vCenter free questions. You need a step up to aggregate that information. I would look at all of the available solutions.