Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Reviews

I have been working with Qualys for approximately two and a half years. I have used this module to manage security postures in cloud environments, and it is essentially used for hybrid management systems. This allows me to adhere to security practices across cloud environments.

I appreciate the feature that simplifies cloud security posture, offering insights into vulnerabilities, and reducing the complexity of managing the security program. It provides a proactive security posture, identifying risks before attempts are made. It is also scalable in hybrid management, offering dynamic capabilities in cloud environments, providing visibility to thousands of assets. Additionally, it is beneficial in discovering what's occurring in the cloud environment and provides visibility in asset discovery. It helps monitor assets continuously, granting real-time visibility, which aids the IT environment in maintaining these assets. External attack surface management allows me to consider things from an attacker's perspective. I've improved on faster remediation and reduced risk breaches, as the module enables me to quickly identify vulnerabilities and take necessary actions. Decision-making is straightforward, allowing risk prioritization and action accordingly.

Qualys is continually developing, adding new features each year. Previously, there was no on-demand scan feature in a cloud agent, but multiple features have since been added to my cloud agent module. In CSAM as well, I expect features that make security and IT team tasks easier, eliminating manual efforts. Features enhancing the interaction with IT or security teams should be added, such as a ticketing feature that, if an issue arises in the CSAM module, enables direct ticket creation in systems like ServiceNow. This would streamline assigning tickets to appropriate teams.

I have used the solution for two and a half years.

I do not think there are any issues.

It's scalable. I do not face any limitations.

I would rate the technical support nine out of ten. They are effective; if I raise a ticket, they directly contact me and solve my problems, whether related to deployment or unresolved vulnerabilities.

I have been using Qualys from the beginning and have not used any other solution extensively. However, I have some familiarity with Rapid7, but it lacked the level of detail found in Qualys.

The initial setup was smooth, particularly with the cloud agent installation and sensor deployment. After the initial stage and the licensing part were completed, I became involved in creating user IDs and as an administrator, I managed user access, including giving privileges to admins. I coordinated with the Linux, Windows, and Mac teams to download and install the agent and conduct testing.

I received assistance from the Qualys support team, specifically from the ACCPL team provided by Qualys. It was a third-party team.

As mentioned earlier, it saves time and facilitates direct communication with real issues I have faced.

At present, I do not think so; however, I may consider CrowdStrike as it has some features, though not as detailed.

The CSAM module is great and continually improving with updates. I would rate it nine out of ten. However, based on the company's budget, Qualys offers limited features, which can also be utilized in other environments. I rate the overall solution nine out of ten.

We use it to collect all software-related information, including external attack surface information. All of this information is validated here.

We were facing issues with collecting information about external facing assets and getting vulnerabilities for assets not managed by us. We also wanted visibility into particular IP address configurations or domain-based information. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management helps us with visibility into the assets that we do not know about or that someone is misusing.

Other than that, we are using it for software inventory purposes. We can see whether any unauthorized software is registered on any machine or whether any required security tool is not installed on the machine. We can also see if any specific assets are critical and if there is anything we need to focus on from a network perspective. From the portal, we can get all this information as a report.

The visibility into all the assets is the main improvement. We are able to see any new external-facing assets, as well as the assets that we do not manage. For example, for the asset that we do not manage, we could get information about a particular port being open on an IP address or operating system. It helped us with about 20% of our assets.

Management of unmanaged assets enhances the organization's risk assessment capabilities.

The TruRisk mechanism helps us in some scenarios by giving an asset criticality score. It helps us focus on critical assets.

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management helps us identify any end-of-life software or unmanaged assets. With the CAPS mechanism, the Qualys agent can validate unmanaged assets and provide information.

Authorized and unauthorized software visibility is the best feature for me. It helps me understand security controls on our network and where we lack visibility. With a single security tool, we are able to get an extensive list. 

Additionally, I can verify version controls and port details for major applications.

There can be further simplification to reduce the overall noise and provide ESAM-related data. Some data modification might also be required, but that is not as critical as noise reduction.

I have used Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management for over three years.

Its stability is good. I do not have an issue with it. I would rate it a ten out of ten for stability.

Its scalability is good. I would rate it a ten out of ten for scalability.

We are located in different countries. It is being used by our admin team with more than 50 people.

I would rate their support a nine out of ten. We might not always get a good solution. We might get only a workaround.

Positive

From the start, I have been using this solution in this organization.

It is very easy for me to deploy. There is no complexity. 

Its implementation takes about a week, but it can vary.  

Being a SaaS solution, it does not require much maintenance. It has an uptime of 99.9%. It is working perfectly with the scheduled information.

It has reduced resources and the time spent on gathering and combining data from different tools into a single tool. It used to be a tedious job, but it has now been reduced with the single software.

I would recommend this solution if you want a unique software to collect all the inventory data and have information about the attack surface.

I would rate Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management a nine out of ten.

Currently, we are using it for asset inventory to determine how many Windows machines and how many Linux machines there are. Accordingly, we categorize them. 

We prioritize the assets according to vulnerability and risk score, identifying the most critical and vulnerable assets. We obtain this information from Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management and use it for vulnerability remediation and prioritization.

We have visibility into public-facing IPs and open ports. It helps us in covering the entire attack surface.

We are able to discover various assets such as servers, endpoints, and different operating systems. It is connected to the VMDR console, patch management module, and cloud agent. We can see all the information through the console. We are able to see any outdated versions of software or end-of-support devices. We can then take action accordingly.

We were able to see its benefits immediately. Previously, we used a formula, but now, CSAM enables vulnerability prioritization without spending time creating or applying formulas.

TruRisk Score provides insight into an asset, indicating its risk score and vulnerability. If the score exceeds a particular threshold, we focus on the asset and consider a risk exception. If vulnerabilities are not remediated, we attempt remediation by consulting the TruRisk dashboard. This dashboard is also used to showcase to management without needing customization.

It provides most of the information needed regarding the assets, including the operating system and whether the assets are network devices or servers. The device type is available as well. We can prioritize vulnerabilities and assign a risk score. 

The main aspect that needs improvement is the user interface, which should be more intuitive. It is not easy for a new user because it provides a lot of details. Capturing information quickly is difficult. The user interface should be improved to make information more accessible.

I have been using it for two years. We got it along with our VMDR.

There are no stability issues, and I would rate it a ten out of ten.

I would rate it a seven out of ten in scalability.

Sometimes, when I encounter challenges or discrepancies in the console data, I communicate with support and receive good responses. The technical support of Qualys is noteworthy, as I have not experienced delayed responses.

Positive

We have not used any other solution before.

Deployment is easy because we do not need to configure much on CSAM. It automatically populates data, requiring us to only focus on cloud agent deployment and scanning, which makes it very easy.

The full implementation took about a month. We had 2,500 assets. Initially, we only onboarded servers. That was easy. After that, we onboarded endpoints. Overall, it took three to four months to populate all the data.

It does not require any maintenance from our end because we are using the cloud version.

The entire team, consisting of four people, worked on the Qualys implementation.

The pricing is reasonable relative to the features provided, as it collects all module data and operates as a main, centralized inventory, making it a cost-effective solution.

Qualys offers an automated solution for asset inventory. I would recommend it to anyone looking for a similar solution.

I would rate the solution an eight out of ten.

We use Qualys CSAM for information related to EOL and EOS applications. For the machines connected to Qualys CSAM, we have information about the serial number and hardware ID. We have some integration mechanisms with AD. All these helped us to make sure the agents and applications that we use are good enough to run in our infrastructure.

We have a mechanism called authorized and unauthorized applications inside our organization. Qualys CSAM helps us implement this by reporting unauthorized applications through pop-ups or alerts. This mechanism ensures that any unauthorized application is quickly identified, and appropriate measures are taken swiftly. The tool provides valuable insights into our infrastructure.

For external attack surface management, we have a configuration profile that we configure with the domain name. With this domain name, we get all the information from Qualys. They have integration with Shodan and their own scanning mechanism to get publicly exposed IPs or domains for our organization and its subsidiaries. 

It is a useful solution for us for IT-related or security-related activities. We get information about all the assets in our organization, and we also get to know if any ports are open or exposed to the Internet.

It helps us with risk prioritization. It highlights any vulnerabilities that are exploitable. We have various reports. We can see EOL or EOS software or any unauthorized applications. All these reports are triggered in a daily manner. We get the latest list every day. We can also use the dashboard.

In addition to the asset criticality score that we have configured, we have the TruRisk score. All this data helps us to prioritize the assets and vulnerabilities. 

The most valuable features of Qualys CSAM include the ability to manage authorized and unauthorized applications efficiently. This feature helps in validating applications and maintaining a secure environment. 

Additionally, Qualys CSAM offers comprehensive data, including serial numbers, BIOS information, and software details related to EOL and EOS. These capabilities are crucial for ensuring infrastructure readiness and security.

In my opinion, the area that needs improvement is the role-based access control (RBAC). The access privilege management needs to be more robust and streamlined to enhance user access management. Additionally, improvements to the user interface could be beneficial.

I have been using Qualys CSAM for one and a half years.

I would rate the stability of Qualys CSAM a ten out of ten. The agent-related stability is excellent, and we have not experienced any lags.

The scalability of Qualys CSAM is good. It is a SaaS platform. I would rate it a nine out of ten for scalability.

We have it at multiple locations and countries. We have multiple networks and subsidiaries. We have about 300k users.

The customer service is excellent. I would rate them a nine out of ten. Although there have been occasional delays in response time, the support generally addresses issues promptly and effectively.

Positive

I have only used Qualys CSAM in this organization and have not switched from any previous solutions.

We have a hybrid setup. The initial setup is straightforward, requiring a single code within an agent file, making the deployment process very easy.

Other than the upgrades, it does not require any maintenance from our side.

I would strongly recommend Qualys CSAM to other users because of its reliable detection logic and high level of support. We have not seen any glitches with it. In the case of any issues, we can get them resolved promptly, maintaining efficiency. 

I would rate the Qualys CSAM a ten out of ten for its overall performance.

I am working as a senior security analyst. I provide enterprise vulnerability management solutions. CyberSecurity Asset Management helps us categorize all the assets and products. We can see the current software assets and the software or product lifecycle. We can see details about the end-of-life or the end-of-support in CyberSecurity Asset Management.

We create customized tags for the assets. In my environment, there are IT servers and OT servers, so we need to customize the tags based on the servers. 

We can deep dive into asset inventory and check the external attack surface. We do attack surface management for the servers that are external or public-facing servers. We need deep investigations of assets to see if there is any vulnerability or suspicious activity in the server. For that purpose, I utilize the Qualys CSAM module.

It is able to discover assets or servers that are public-facing. For example, if there is a domain in the organization with a lot of external or public IPs, and these IPs are being used for an e-commerce website or any kind of website, hackers would want to hack these websites using ransomware. They might also do a DDoS attack to take down these websites. For such websites or web servers, we need such a module so that we can proactively gather any vulnerabilities that can be exploited and take the required steps to mitigate them before exploitation.

Qualys CSAM has saved a huge amount of time and manual effort. Features like Asset Purge Rule and dynamic tags have reduced a lot of time and manual effort of the team. In Qualys CSAM, we can get the EASM module. We can integrate CSAM or ESAM with any kind of ticketing tool, such as ServiceNow. When integrated with a ticketing tool such as ServiceNow, a vulnerability incident is created in ServiceNow for any critical or high-severity vulnerability. The incident is assigned a remediation owner. We just need to investigate whether the vulnerability is a true positive or a false positive and if remediation has been done or not. Previously, these all things had to be done manually, but now, we have automated them using Qualys CSAM. It has saved a lot of time and improved vulnerability discovery and asset segmentation in our estate.

We are able to identify two things. The first one is the vulnerability level or risk factors. The second one is the product life cycle, which is also important, so we can determine if a product is end-of-life or end-of-support. If it comes under the end-of-life or end-of-support category, we need to check with the vendor team, and we need to ask for possible workarounds. Otherwise, we can go to the project team and tell them to upgrade the product or operating system. There is a risk factor when a product is end-of-life or end-of-support. It becomes a vulnerable product. This is an additional benefit that we get, and we can ask the vendor or the project team to mitigate the issues.

When I need to prioritize external or internal facing servers, I use TruRisk Scoring. It is very effective. When I need to prioritize vulnerabilities, there are a lot of attributes that I need to keep in mind such as CVSS score, severity, etc. There are a lot of factors, so when I need to determine the top ten vulnerable servers, I use TruRisk Scoring. It is very helpful.

We have implemented cloud agents and deployed specific sensors. In our environment, we have on-premises servers and Azure and AWS clouds. We have implemented cloud agents and designed the configuration profile for those cloud agents. In Qualys CSAM, we can visualize if the cloud agent is active or not and if the scan frequency is working fine or not. We can monitor these from the Qualys CSAM module. When we implement the Asset Purge Rule on-premises or on cloud servers, there should be two sources in Qualys CSAM. One is the IP-based source, and the second one is the agent-based source. They are also monitored by Qualys CSAM. We can generate a report in Excel or CSV format, and by using the report, we can do the risk assessment and prioritize things.

I have four years of experience in cybersecurity, and I have used a lot of tools. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management has some advantages over others.

The first one is a feature called dynamic tag. When you implement a dynamic tag using a query, you do not need to manually tag all the servers. It categorizes all the servers that come under that query. The tagging part is automatically done within a few minutes. It reduces the effort.

The second feature is a feature called Asset Purge Rule. For example, there might be some servers or products that have not been used for the last 90 or 120 days. If they are still being reported in Qualys, it will be difficult to prioritize the servers or products to determine the top ten vulnerable servers or products. Previously, if we wanted to purge those assets or remove them from scanning, we had to do that manually, whereas Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management provides a feature for that. We do not need to do anything from our side. A server older than the last 90 days will automatically get purged or removed from the account or scanning scope. Whenever we generate the scan report, there will be only assets or servers that are reporting in Qualys. The ones that are not reporting are automatically purged. This is known as data sanitization or vulnerability report sanitization. This is done by Qualys CSAM through the Asset Purge Rule feature. These are its core features for me.

In Qualys CSAM, there is a module called EASM. One improvement that they can make in the EASM module is the scan frequency. After EASM is configured the first time, it allows you to do the complete configuration, but if you want to reconfigure it, it will not ask or provide any option for scan frequency. For that, you need to raise a case with Qualys and talk to the Qualys team.

It only allows us to add the domain. There are only certain criteria that we can use to create a new profile inside EASM. I know that EASM is a new module in Qualys, and it is improving day by day, but it currently does not have the same configuration area that CSAM has. In the future, I hope it will be improved so that we are able to handle the configuration of EASM on our own. We do not have to raise any kind of vendor ticket or Qualys support ticket for that. Mainly, the configuration area needs improvement. Currently, we do not have all the rights to do the configuration. For any critical change, we cannot wait for the vendor to resolve the ticket. Just like CSAM, we should be able to do the configuration on our own in EASM.

I have been using it for two years. I have been using it since 2022.

It is stable. I would rate it an eight out of ten for stability.

It is scalable. I would rate it a ten out of ten for scalability.

It is being used in multiple locations such as India, Germany, and the UK. As of now, there are 15 users. In the future, we will onboard more.

I was previously working on other projects where I used Tenable Nessus and Rapid7.

I joined this project about two years ago. It was a new project, but I knew the advantages of Qualys. I have done certification in Qualys. It was the VMDR or Vulnerability Management Detection and Response certification. At that time, I got to know that Qualys has a lot of advantages. I knew that if we could implement this solution, it would be helpful to prioritize the vulnerabilities and vulnerable servers and products in our overall estate. That is why we switched and started implementing Qualys in the organization.

Overall, with Qualys as a tool, not only CSAM, we can do everything. We can do on-premises vulnerability scanning and cloud agent scanning. If we want to do security policy compliance, that also comes under Qualys. Qualys CSAM has various features for assets and custom tagging. There are lots of features.

It is a hybrid deployment currently, but in the future, it will completely be on the cloud.

Its deployment is straightforward. Everything is mentioned in Qualys documentation. We can find information about all the states and configurations. Even if we have a basic license, we can raise a case with the vendor. They are helpful. They can help us to resolve any issues or problems. They help to solve the problem as soon as possible. It has been a great experience.

If we start from the documentation part, it takes us more than one week because there are some client approvals we need. To cover everything, it takes almost 12 to 13 days to complete the overall process and start working with the tool.

Two people are fine for its deployment. If there are three, that will be an advantage, but it does not require more than three people.

It has saved time and resources. Previously, tagging took a lot of our time. We also needed more project members. When there are 5,000 servers, doing it manually takes a lot of time. It has reduced the time and resources required. It is cost-effective. It has saved about 45% of the time.

It is cost-effective because, in a single tool, we are getting everything. All the solutions come in a single license or price. In my opinion, Qualys is one of the best solutions available in the market for vulnerability management, policy compliance, and security compliance.

I would recommend this solution because by using a single solution, we can cover the three main pillars of CyberSecurity: vulnerability management, asset and product lifecycle management, and compliance management. It is the best product. In a single product, we can do all these things. These are the three pillars of cybersecurity.

Nowadays, cyber threats are increasing. As vulnerability analysts and managers, our prime focus is to gather all the servers and categorize the servers based on the operating system technology. It can be an IT or OT server. It can be public-facing or private-facing. Our main focus is to gather vulnerabilities, and based on the severity of the vulnerabilities, we have to prioritize the servers. We can shortlist the top ten vulnerable servers. The remediation team can then focus on them to mitigate vulnerabilities. To implement that solution, we need to categorize everything. The categorization part has to be done as per the CSAM model. If we want to do external server categorization, we have to go for external attack surface management or EASM, or we can use CSAM for internal servers.

When you get the product license, external attack surface management is not available. It is not activated. You need to activate it from CSS and configure it. It asks for domain details and the domain you want to focus on. Based on the domain details, it configures external attack surface management. You also need to consider the scan schedule, such as, after how much time, it will launch a discovery scan. You need to provide information about how many servers or products are managed by Qualys or how many are unmanaged but still detected in Qualys. After the configuration, you have to wait for the first discovery scan. When that is completed, Qualys looks for the domain name mentioned in the configuration area and pulls out details related to that domain. It shows the status and any vulnerabilities, and whether an asset is managed or unmanaged. You have the overall data, and you can also define or prioritize based on TruRisk Score, which is generated by external attack surface management.

We are not using the CMDB Sync feature. We have integrated Qualys CSAM with ServiceNow CMDB, so all the onboarded servers or products are directly reflected in ServiceNow CMDB. When any high-severity vulnerability is detected by Qualys CSAM through discovery scans, it automatically raises a ServiceNow incident, which is automatically assigned to the asset owner or product owner. This automation has been implemented by our team.

Overall, I would rate Qualys CSAM a ten out of ten.

Our primary tool for asset inventory is Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, which our software asset management team also utilizes to check our software library.

We deploy Qualys Cloud agents as passive sensors to gain comprehensive asset visibility and identify gaps in policy agent coverage. Additionally, we are collaborating with our cyber defense center team to enhance external service management.

Our cyber defense center team effectively utilizes Qualys CSAM, an external service management tool, to cover the entire attack surface.

The external service management tool has helped discover over 6,000 assets that were previously discovered.

We immediately saw the benefits of Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management. As platform owners, we collaborate with the validation and cyber defense center teams to ensure asset availability and address any discrepancies.

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management helps identify all risk factors using the TruRisk score.

TruRisk Insights assists in identifying vulnerabilities and prioritizing them from highest to lowest risk.

We have begun utilizing Qualys Cloud agents as passive sensors and are currently investigating the necessary protocols to maximize the effectiveness of this feature. 

Our cybersecurity, IT, and cloud software teams effectively use Qualys to gain comprehensive visibility into our software environment, aided by excellent support. This visibility enables us to integrate Qualys into various facets of our operations, including our internal tools, allowing us to efficiently share updates with both the IT team and end-users, thus streamlining our workflow.

The most valuable feature is the Management sensor, which helps identify gaps in policy agent availability, thereby improving agent utilization. Additionally, the tool's code aids in risk identification and mitigation.

The Qualys CAPS service requires further exploration and improvement, particularly in its handling of protocols and reactivity with MAC and IP addresses for CAP agents. Enhanced functionality in these areas would increase the service's effectiveness and efficiency. We anticipate updates that will address these issues and optimize our use of the service.

We have been using CSAM for more than two years. 

We have not encountered significant stability issues with Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management. The design appears robust, and we have not experienced any latency problems.

Qualys Cybersecurity Asset Management has proven to be a highly scalable solution for us over the past couple of years, seamlessly integrating new features as we have expanded from a few licenses to a much larger deployment.

We receive excellent support from Qualys. Our Technical Account Manager is very responsive and helpful in addressing any concerns that arise.

Positive

The initial deployment was straightforward. We integrate CSAM with other Qualys modules including VMDR.

The Qualys Cybersecurity Asset Management pricing is well-aligned with our usage.

I would rate Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management ten out of ten.

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management does not require maintenance on our end.

To gain comprehensive visibility and reporting within the policy, new users should deploy the agent. This action provides a complete overview of vulnerabilities and support statuses, offering valuable insights for both IT management and cybersecurity purposes.

We primarily use Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management for zero-day vulnerabilities. Essentially, this is one of the critical aspects we maintain. The main point is that within Qualys, we receive solutions based on the criticality of the issue. Assuming it's a zero-day vulnerability, we have fixes that provide extensive information on addressing these issues.

I would rate Qualys ability to cover the entire attack surface a nine out of ten.

Previously, we used Tenable as our preferred tool but switched to Qualys for the cost-effectiveness. However, upon switching to Qualys, our primary concern was ensuring the seamless deployment of agents across our infrastructure. Fortunately, Qualys agents proved to be remarkably lightweight. Additionally, Qualys excels in network security, allowing us to identify vulnerabilities, track SSL and TSL certificates, and monitor their expiration dates. Qualys also offers robust password management capabilities, surpassing Tenable in this regard. Moreover, Qualys' reporting functionality is unparalleled, outperforming competitors like Tenable and other tools in the market.

Qualys identifies all risk factors for our assets. For example, assigning a globally traceable computer name or using easily compromised passwords can create vulnerabilities. Qualys provides immediate alerts if any compromise occurs in our environment, highlighting specific loopholes. Consider a scenario where a programmer in a testing environment uses a simple password instead of a complex one. Hackers can easily exploit this, and Qualys will immediately identify the issue, generate a report pinpointing the responsible individual, and notify us. This real-time identification and reporting capability surpasses traditional PAM solutions, allowing for swift remediation of potentially exploitable changes.

We use the risk scoring to prioritize the issues by criticality.

We use Qualys to convert deployed cloud agents into passive sensors for VM ESX. Whenever new servers or network devices are added, Qualys immediately detects them and flags them as unregistered assets on the network. Based on this information, other teams often reach out to us to onboard or install an agent for enhanced visibility and management within Qualys.

The most valuable aspect we receive from Qualys is the remediation. It provides detailed solutions in a user-friendly manner that our IT team finds easy to understand.

After exporting the reports, we used to receive them in CSV format. The most important aspect of these reports is their customization. While the reports are already good, they have the potential to be even better, which is what I expect. Additionally, the agent's processing speed and CPU utilization should be improved significantly. Currently, whenever the agent is running, it consumes over ten percent of my CPU, indicating that CPU consumption is another area Qualys needs to address.

The cost aspect of Qualys is an area of improvement.

I have been using Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management for almost seven years.

I would rate Qualys' stability a seven and a half out of ten. Occasionally, there's slowness from an agent or potentially a network issue on our end when pushing data to the core server. This can cause slight delays, depending on the environment.

I would rate the scalability of Qualys ten out of ten.

The technical support is a major advantage of using Qualys. Whenever we encountered any difficulties with generating or scanning, they were quick to assist us.

Positive

We previously used Tenable but switched to Qualys primarily because of CPU utilization. Qualys also offers solutions that are much easier to use compared to Tenable, which simplifies our workflow. Although I'm unsure how Qualys delivers their solutions, it significantly improves our experience. This ease of use was the main factor in our decision to switch from Tenable to Qualys. Even though Tenable's results were very accurate, Qualys provided easier remediation solutions. Additionally, Qualys' security and detection timing were also favorable factors in our decision.

I strongly prefer Qualys over Tenable. I'm a huge fan of Qualys, and I believe people should recognize its capabilities.

The deployment in our environment was straightforward. The deployment took one week for over 4,000 servers. One person was enough for the deployment.

In a testing environment without the usual deployment setup, we might deploy hundreds of servers for testing. At that time, we lacked other tools and had to individually dump data and run scripts due to credentials and other factors. Domain-based environments linked through Azure are easier, but workgroups that don't communicate with public or private networks are more challenging. Fortunately, most of our machines were domain-related, simplifying Qualys deployment.

The cost for Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management is high.

I would rate Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management nine out of ten.

No maintenance is required from our end other than managing our database.

I recommend running Qualys in a test environment first before deploying it to production. This process is simpler in an agentless environment.

This is the main product that we are using for managing assets, including  hardware assets and software assets.

There are multiple features that are very useful. The first one would be the inventory that allows us to actually manage those assets and see the assets based on the cloud agents and based on the scanning that is performed periodically. 

Another useful feature would be the tags. Tags are very useful for us since we can tag virus applications in infrastructure types such as databases, operating systems, or web platforms. 

On top of that, there are software rules that we can define. Some of those rules can outline which mandatory agents need to be on an asset before going into production, for example. Some emphasize potential software that can potentially cause cyber security challenges. Having those rules in place is very useful.

The external attack surface management covers the entire attack surface. This is one of the newest features, and this is extremely useful. It allows us to see the external posture from an attacker's perspective, and we are broadly using that. We have been able to find domains that were previously not covered. We did find a few domains that were supposed to be shut down. We can better keep track of these now to validate that the domains that are listed for us are the correct ones. We can go over the newly discovered assets to validate which belong to us and which do not. 

It identifies all other risk factors for our assets. Now, it identifies the assets. It also identifies the end-of-life and end-of-life support software, and that allows us to plan ahead in terms of what needs to be upgraded or if we have to budget for a software change. That's both from an operating system perspective and also from a third-party software perspective.

This more thorough identification of risk factors has positively affected our security. Qualys is one of the main pillars that we use for monitoring our cybersecurity posture. Being on top of inventory-related operating systems or types of clients has been very helpful. The inventory features also allow us to monitor any new asset. We use this together with another platform from Qualys for network passive sensors. We can see in the inventory, including new assets identified that were connected to the network anywhere in the network. This includes workstations, laptops, cell phones, et cetera.

We leverage the solution's ability to convert already deployed Qualys Cloud agents into passive sensors that may be detected and connected to the network in real time.

Most of the assets, the ones that the ones that have CloudAgent, we monitor that. They are also discovered by the passive sensor. On top of that, they are periodically IP scanned. The cloud agent and the IP scanners complement each other and discover different types of vulnerabilities. The inventory shows up from one of three main sources: the CloudAgent, the passive sensor, and the IP scanner.

The passive sensors affected our ability to identify potential risks in real time. They dramatically improve our ability to monitor risk in real time as they show the assets connected to the network in real time. We are validating those findings with the appropriate teams in order to address issues accordingly.

We use the CMDB sync feature. That is one of the features that allows us to reconcile the inventory between Qualys and CMDB. This is also the feature that actually showed us some of the discrepancies between our two platforms. The integration allows us to automatically assign vulnerabilities and monitor the SLA. That integration is one of the main operational integrations that we are using in order to make sure that the vulnerabilities are remediated in a timely manner.

It's a superior solution as we can monitor both on-prem and on the cloud. Having the ability to manage the inventory, the hybrid inventory, in one platform, is very, very important.

It is automatically exporting the vulnerabilities and the assets. However, it would be useful to have the ability to select or filter which we would like to export. As of now, anything and everything is automatically exported. We cannot choose. 

I've used the solution for the last five years. 

It's usually very stable. However, sometimes some of the queries crash. I have opened a few support cases. Some of those support cases were solved right away. Some of those were pending a new release. Generally, it's working most of the time.

I've never had issues with scalability. You do have to choose the right sizing, however, it can scale out of the box. 

Most of the time, the technical support is very effective and responsive. They have a nice feature that allow you give feedback after a case was opened. The knowledge of the team is good. They also have the appropriate documentation to they can direct you to when needed.

Positive

We did previously use a different solution. However, there were a number of drawbacks. We were not able to both monitor and discover. After CSAM, we were able to access a full inventory and a fuller understanding.

The deployment is straightforward. You can use add-on features of cloud agents or passive sensors, once it's deployed and assets are IP-scanned, the system can automatically share the asset details. The modules are automatically activated for the agent. The cloud agents are deployed by the infrastructure teams. They are responsible for deploying the cloud agent. The network passive sensors are deployed together with the network team. Activating the modules and monitoring is handled by Qualys.

Once everything is up and running, no maintenance is needed. It's just monitoring and reporting once it's implemented. 

The pricing is fair. We don't have any objection to the current pricing model.

I'm an end-user.

When we first started using the solution it had fewer features than it has today. That said, it still was the platform that allowed us to manage hardware and software assets on-prem and in the cloud.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten. 

It's a good idea to start with Qualys training, and I have to say their training is outstanding. Their training provides the best way for a new user to learn how to work with the platform. The platform itself can be very complex and there are many features that might affect one another.