Microsoft Azure DevOps Reviews

I like the management features and the user interface is very friendly.

It is not clear what features have been added or enhanced since the last version. My customer used a previous version and it did not meet their expectations, so clarification with respect to the new version is needed on their website or other venues.

I would like to see more customization available to the administrator. You need to change the workflow of the end result.

Trial/evaluation for approximately one week.

I did not load the application heavily, but it was stable.

I only tested this solution with a single user. I think that it is scalable, as long as you increase the resources as you move to a larger scale.

I have not been in touch with technical support yet.

The initial setup is very simple.

I performed the setup myself, on my laptop.

I would advise someone considering this solution to use Microsoft because it is very user-friendly, it can run on small levels of applications, can be calibrated to the application, it can be scaled to a larger scale, from small scale to larger scale. It's very stable, you just need to increase the receptors if you need to scale to a larger scale. 

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

I have many microservices, and I am using Azure DevOps to deploy my microservices and build a global platform for payments.

Azure Pipeline and Azure Release are most valuable. I use Azure DevOps through pipeline and release.

It should have security features for scanning the code and checking it for vulnerability and security. Currently, I am using other tools for this. It should also have integration with other tools to improve security.

I have been using this solution for two years.

It is stable.

It is scalable. Currently, we have 400 users, and they are DevOps engineers and developers.

They have helped me with the problems. They are very good.

I have only used Azure DevOps.

It is very simple to install. Its deployment takes a very short time.

I would recommend this solution. I like Azure DevOps.

I would rate Microsoft Azure DevOps a nine out of ten.

Public Cloud

Microsoft Azure

We are a software development company and we use DevOps practices to manage our application development lifecycle. This is our primary use case. We don't have a production environment for the applications that we develop. Rather, they are given to our customers when they are production-ready.

The management includes service requests, incidents, issues, etc.

The most valuable feature is that it brings order to our projects, and we know the status of each one at every moment.

This product would be improved if the helpdesk were included.

We are a small company and have not had any problems with scalability.

Technical support is good and we haven't had any problems with them.

We don't have any complaints about the pricing.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

Public Cloud

Microsoft Azure

We use this solution for cloud administration, cloud infrastructure, the database, as an application server, development, and more.

I like the cloud infrastructure of Microsoft Azure DevOps.

I would like to see new features added.

My corporation is currently using this solution.

I have had no issues with the stability of this solution.

Scalability-wise, I have not had any problems.

Everything is fine with our internal customers and our corporation.

Technical support is good.

I don't have a problem with the pricing.

I would rate Microsoft Azure DevOps a ten out of ten.

Hybrid Cloud

We are a service provider. We work with our customers to enable them with these services. We have a lot of customers that we work with.

Our customers use Microsoft Azure DevOps for their business needs when it comes to DevSecOps and scalability. Perhaps the integrations with many other diverse tools that they work with are key advantages. No organization would use just one vendor, and the goal is about what works well, is scalable, performs well, and offers a reasonable total cost of ownership.

It's difficult to say because today, you have so many products available in the ecosystem. If there is a gap, partners like us play a role by potentially recommending other tools within the ecosystem and helping customers integrate them, which works well. Instead of customers having to try many options themselves, they benefit from practitioner recommendations.

About 10 years now.

Everything works ninety-nine percent well. There may be instances here and there, but this happens globally and it's not unique to our customers.

We have professionals on our platform, and many times, Microsoft refers us to their customers because we perform well. I don't frequently engage with their direct support.

Neutral

It depends on the process needed for the customer. The complexity varies between mid-size and enterprise customers due to different requirements and diversity. Most products cater to about eighty percent of common features, and decisions depend on specific customer needs.

There are many metrics, but I can't detail them as they depend on individual customers.

There are many, including AWS, GitHub, ServiceNow, and Salesforce. They all compete in the same segment.

I take an independent position and do not favor any tool. It depends on the customer's specific use case and needs. For our customers thinking about AI, we have implemented Copilot for several and are exploring AI opportunities. I've never needed direct support as we are often referred by Microsoft. I rate the overall solution an 8 out of 10.

Microsoft Azure