Microsoft Azure API Management Reviews

We use this solution to integrate with a third party with API integration.

So far, we are satisfied with the product. The stability and performance are good.

It is easy to install, and it scales well too.

The technical support is good, and we get prompt support.

It could be more user friendly for developers. It would be nice if developers could view things more easily.

I've been using this solution for nearly six months.

It's a cloud-based solution.

So far, there's good stability, and we have not had any issues with it.

Because it is on the Azure platform, it is always scalable and is easy to scale as well. If you want to use it more, then we can add more resources.

We started using Microsoft Azure API Management six months ago as a POC, and now it's online. We probably have about 30,000 users.

We hope to increase usage by moving all API onto API Management.

Microsoft's technical support is good. We have the premium support package, so we get support straight away. 

The initial setup is straightforward.

Because you need to define the API contract, initially it may take about two months. However, this is not due to the Microsoft product.

We had our internal consultant handle the implementation. We had a team including an integration engineer.

We pay for a yearly license.

I would recommend Microsoft Azure API Management and would rate it at eight on a scale from one to ten. 

We are in the healthcare industry, so all the applications which are related to one hospital, it binds to Microsoft Azure API Management, and this is our use case for it.

I like the integration function of Microsoft Azure API Management. Integration of this solution is easy.

There's some area for improvement for this solution's performance. Sometimes it can be challenging. We're working with design patents and we're hoping to see the performance issues sorted out.

We've been working with Microsoft Azure API Management for a year now.

Microsoft Azure API Management is a stable product, but we have not been able to test it yet on a multi-cloud environment.

Microsoft Azure API Management is scalable. There are no issues with its scalability.

Microsoft has a good technical support team. They are very helpful.

Integration of this solution is easy. I won't call it an initial setup. It's an integration.

I was able to work with Apigee.

We used Microsoft Azure API Management only in the Microsoft environment, but not in a multi-cloud environment.

Microsoft Azure API Management is cloud-based, in particular, it is a single cloud centered around Microsoft components and not on the Cross components.

I have no idea on how long it took to implement Microsoft Azure API Management. The testing and development team is the best resource on how long it took.

The number of users of this solution in the group I'm associated with is 300,000. Increasing the number of users will depend on the mergers and acquisitions, and how the group is doing.

For maintenance, we have a backend support team that handles application support. The major point is that if the API has a lot of issues, particularly in data silos, Microsoft Azure API Management has made it more convenient to manage those.

We're still trying and testing the integration function of this solution, and we're also trying to go deeper into its performance.

My rating for Microsoft Azure API Management is a nine out of ten.

I don't have any variance data with Apigee. Apigee is better than Microsoft. I have more numbers for Apigee compared to Microsoft.

We primarily use the solution to manage our APIs.

The ease of use of the solution is excellent. It's a very user-friendly solution. 

The initial setup is quite straightforward. 

We found the solution to be very stable.

The solution can scale if you need it to.

Technical support is very helpful.

The solution has very fair pricing.

The lack of wording in the API could be improved. In the API you need to delete the suffix. It is annoying that you need to have a suffix. We can add a suffix at the API level, not at the operation level, and that could be improved on.

There are a couple of features that are lagging.

I've been working with the solution for five years or so. It's been a few years at this point. 

We have found the solution to be quite stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. Its performance is reliable. 

The solution scales well. If a company needs to expand it, it can do so with relative ease.

We have about 15-20 users on the solution so far.

Technical support has been very good. They are quite helpful and responsive. We are very satisfied with the level of support provided to us.

The initial setup is straightforward. A company shouldn't have any problems during the process.

The cost of the solution is very fair. It's not overly expensive. It offers very good value.

We are Microsoft partners.

I'd recommend the solution to other individuals and organizations. Overall, I've been quite satisfied with its capabilities.

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.

The solution has pretty stable capabilities.

Their construction tool allows users to easily publish information about the API. It's basically just one click.

You can configure the subscription management onsite and link everything.

The developer portal that exposed the API documentation is great. You can just test the APIs in a very easy way. 

The web portal is useful. You can build a pretty comprehensive portal where users can sign in and you can basically leave the API there.

The API management provided offers good integration with different management systems, like OpenID, for example.

The user management is pretty seamless.

Pricing is definitely an aspect that can be improved. They should offer an additional free tier. For example, if there was a tier for new accounts created, it may help their services by getting people onboarded. Once you will give access to someone and they try it they'll see, "Okay, it works and you can pretty quickly add something on top of it". After that, the client will end up staying, and probably paying.

The cost is also complex in terms of calculating how much everything will ultimately be priced at. It's not straightforward as it takes into account multiple factors.

Technical support could be more flexible and try to meet the client's needs a bit more effectively.

The solution needs to provide more use cases so that we can refer them to clients. It will help answer any questions in relation to performance and load management.

I've been using the solution for about a year at this point.

There are some bugs that exist in this construction tool for the developer portal. We are submitting these bugs to Azure, so they already know about it. Overall, it's pretty stable.

In terms of Azure technical support, we've had no issues in regards to response times. They are prompt. However, in some particular cases, they unable to be flexible. For example, with MQTT blockers, while you might want another port, they might tell you to use the hosted solution in order to get them to configure it. We'd just like them to have more flexibility with requests like this.

In terms of corporate security nowadays, it's very important to be flexible. At the end of the day we get stuck in the bureaucracy. If they could practice flexibility, it would be better for their clients, who may not have the wiggle room on their end.  

That said, we're mostly satisfied with their level of service.

The solution has a kind of calculator and it's not always straightforward to figure out the logic in pricing. There are lots of services that are managed in different ways. For a non-technical person, it's a nightmare to figure everything out.

At the end of the day, you have to build approximate pricing for the solution. According to my experiences in multiple projects, you do get preliminary pricing that is close to or the same as the estimate.  

Right now, for a particular client, we're using a managed version of the solution, however, in the future, I foresee us hosting it somewhere in the cloud.

We're using the most up to date version of the solution.

Overall, the solution has a lot of great features. There are a few bugs here and there, however, a the end of the day, there's lots of value provided.

I'd rate the solution at an eight, on a scale from one to ten. It's got a rather high cost and still has some areas that need some improvement. Otherwise, I'd rate it higher.

I primarily utilize the platform for integrations, monitoring, and process automation within our business workflows.

The solution's configuration capabilities are the most effective features for enhancing API security.

The product's navigation feature needs enhancement. 

I have been working with the platform for approximately three to four years.

I rate the solution's scalability around eight or nine.

The support services are good. However, they could be improved. 

Positive

The deployment process is not overly difficult. However, each API integration presents interface connectivity and parameters, which can introduce challenges.

The time required for deployment varies depending on the integration interface in question.

I rate the solution's pricing between three and four, as it could be more competitive.

The platform's insights improve over time, allowing us to monitor system health and receive notifications for updates.

We integrate it with Dynamics and other business tools, which enhances our data analysis and reporting capabilities. It facilitates better insights and easier data manipulation, although I rely on my team for detailed analytics.

I recommend the platform, particularly for organizations that require API utilization and integration, as it has proven to be effective in our experience.

Overall, I rate it an eight out of ten. 

The tool helps to manage APIs. 

The tool does what it's supposed to do. 

The product needs to introduce a developer portal. 

I am working with the tool for ten years. 

The solution is stable. 

My company has around 20-30 customers for the solution. Each customer can have about 100 users for the tool. 

Microsoft support is good. We have regular sessions with Microsoft where we can have private previews of new features. 

The tool's setup depends. If you use it in the CI/CD pipeline, then the setup is complex. To deploy the solution, you need to create a template and enable the features. 

There are different tiers for pricing. You can even use the free version. 

I would rate the product an eight out of ten. 

Our company has some internal APIs and we use Microsoft Azure API Management to help keep everyone on the same page.

The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure API Management is the developer portal because it's very quick and easy to get something published.

Microsoft Azure API Management could improve the documentation. The documentation feels like marketing information and not sufficient technical information. Your easiest option is to purchase services from a Microsoft partner and this is their marketing.

In a feature release, there could be a better Canary release. They have a release but you need to code it yourself.

I have been using Microsoft Azure API Management for approximately two and a half years.

We have approximately 30 people using the solution in my company.

The support from Microsoft Azure API Management is okay.

The initial setup of Microsoft Azure API Management took us three days.

We did the implementation of the solution in-house.

We are paying standard fees to use Microsoft Azure API Management.

My advice to others is before getting into the solution, it is best to be certified so that all of the details you would need to know that are not easily available online, you would be mindful. It is a very good solution, but some features feel hidden at best.

I rate Microsoft Azure API Management an eight out of ten.

We primarily use the solution for storage. It’s for a database backup.

We really like the scalability.

It’s easy to set up.

The cloud deployment performance could be better.

Technical support could use some improvement.

I’ve been using the solution for three years.

It is stable. However, its performance is not better than an on-premises deployment.

The solution can scale and is easy to expand. It’s actually quite impressive.

We have about ten clients using the solution.

Technical support could be better. There’s a lot of bouncing around. It’s not orderly.

It is a straightforward setup. The implementation is not difficult or complex. The deployment is quick as well. It only took two or three days to get everything up and running.

We have about five technical people who can handle the setup and implementation process.

We are a Microsoft-managed partner, so we do have some pricing from the distributor.

The licensing is dynamic as it is based on cloud usage.

I can recommend Azure Block Storage to other people. However, they need to have an open mind in order to use cloud storage.

I’d rate the solution an eight out of ten.