IBM FlashSystem Reviews

• User friendly interface
• Robust hardware
• Good support

VMware and Hyper-V datastore (with Fiber Connect). All virtual systems are running on the Storwize V7000 storage in our company.

Deduplication and DRC synchronization. Deduplication is small, limited. We need better deduplication and disaster recovery.

Since 2014.

Good stability.

No.

Global support is good.

Yes, I myself have used. The customer decided to switch.

Yes, it is easy in terms of management and installation.

Yes, I evaluated HPE, Dell EMC.

Check IOP values and disk speed. Check often for updates and firmware. Make absolute SNMP settings for warnings and alerts.

We use IBM FlashSystem for VM farms, physical SQL servers, and replication.

The solution is not easy to use and could improve.

I have used IBM FlashSystem within the last 12 months.

IBM FlashSystem has been stable in our operations.

The scalability is similar to the Nimble Storage solution.

We have approximately 200 users using this solution, and we have plans to increase usage.

We have not used the support from IBM.

We previously used free CSS Storage.

The installation is complex and it could be easier. The concept is quite different from traditional storage. The full process took approximately three days.

We used vendors' support for the implementation.

We had approximately three engineers for the implementation.

There are no licensing fees, it is a one-time purchase of the IBM FlashSystem.

I rate IBM FlashSystem a seven out of ten.

IT Improve our TPS (transactions per seconds)

Flash disk with Easy Tier option

Same GUI as v7000

When you provision a datastore auto-format takes a long time .. to disable is you have to redo the whole process. this is a bit difficult if you want to make adjustments on the datastore

none so far.

Scale in scale out design was implemented

Customer Service:

We have a good relationship with IBM

Technical Support:

Highly skilled implementor

Straightforward

HP, EMC,

The solution can be used for backing up data, such as in databases and local clouds.

One of the valuable features is the performance, it is one of the best in the market.

I have been involved with IBM FlashSystem for approximately four years.

The solution is stable.

I would recommend this solution.

IBM FlashSystem can expand very well, it is scalable.

The technical support is very good.

The installation is not easy. You need to have extensive knowledge to handle it.

We have a team of three engineers that do the implementation.

Overall the price of the solution is expensive and this includes the license.

I rate IBM FlashSystem a nine out of ten. 

I use it for virtualization and databases.

It is simple but stable storage. I use the Snapshot feature.

One to three years.

It is very stable.

Excellent.

I have never used technical support for this solution. I haven't needed support.

I did the initial setup based on the documentation it came with. It was very simple.

I looked at Dell and HPE solutions. I probably wouldn't buy a 3PAR but it does have more features than Storewize.

My most important criteria when selecting a vendor are price, stability, support, and scalability.

I would rate this solution a seven out of 10. It is a good storage solution, but there many other options out there with more resources.

My main use of this solution is for backup.

The data reduction pool feature sucks and is not recommended for use with heavy workloads. I also understand that the APIs don't work well and need improvement. In the next release, I would like to see a better monitoring system for metrics.

I've been using this solution for around five years.

This solution is scalable.

The technical support is good.

The initial setup is straightforward and can be done in an hour and a half by one person. 

IBM FlashSystem is fast and reliable. However, we also use Huawei, which is more reliable and has less frequent upgrades. I would rate this solution as eight out of ten.

Private Cloud

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Our clients use IBM FlashSystem for performance-oriented needs. It offers solid performance on demand and is competitively priced. It is especially beneficial for those seeking reliable and fast storage solutions.

The most valuable feature of IBM FlashSystem is its robust back code. When integrated properly into the environment and configured according to the guidelines, it provides a very solid infrastructure that does the job on demand. Additionally, IBM FlashSystem offers competitive pricing and reliable performance. The hardware is dependable, ensuring that it functions effectively when the setup is done correctly.

The deduplication technology in IBM FlashSystem needs significant improvement. Other vendors like NetApp offer better deduplication technology, which is noticeably advanced compared to IBM FlashSystem.

I started using IBM FlashSystem with IBM FlashSystem in 1996, and it has remained my primary focus since then.

The stability of IBM FlashSystem is high, and I would rate it as a nine. The firmware and software engine have fewer bugs, which enhances operational efficiency. However, ongoing maintenance and configuration management are crucial for optimal performance.

The scalability of IBM FlashSystem is exceptional, and I rate it as a nine. Despite experiencing challenges with the deduplication technology, the overall scalability remains impressive.

I rate the technical support from IBM as a ten. IBM has significantly improved in terms of listening to clients and providing quality responses, especially in the past two to three years.

Positive

The initial setup of IBM FlashSystem is neither easy nor overly complex. Like any product, it requires following the setup guidelines meticulously. If the foundational configuration is not done correctly, the system won't work optimally.

The return on investment in IBM FlashSystem is immediate due to the significant discounts we receive. The solution can comfortably be stretched from five to seven years without any failures, ensuring a long-lasting return.

NetApp offers interesting alternatives to IBM FlashSystem.

I would recommend IBM FlashSystem for situations requiring high performance. However, if a different product fits better and is cost-effective, alternatives might be more suitable. Skill and knowledge in integration, architecture, and operations are crucial. Often, there's a need to clean up and optimize configurations. I also rate the overall solution as eight.

On-premises