Git Reviews

I use the solution for process control and issue management.

The product protects our data. The solution allows us to have both public and private repositories. The product is integrated with other solutions.

The solution could be more user-friendly. Sometimes, I feel lost while using the dashboard.

I have been using the solution since 2016.

I rate the solution’s stability a nine out of ten.

Less than ten people are using the product in our organization.

The initial setup is not complex.

The deployment can be done in-house. We need one administrator and one developer to maintain and deploy the solution.

The product is mostly used by developers and DevOps teams. Bitbucket is more user-friendly than GitHub. If we have a GitHub account, we can invite users. People wanting to use the product should use the free version and understand the features well before buying the licensed version. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

I am an engineer and I am using Git for research. I follow the event issues that can take place.

The most valuable feature of Git is its reliability and user popularity.

If the solution could provide more language support options such as Korean, it would be helpful.

I have been using Git for approximately three years.

The stability of Git is good.

We have approximately 500 users using this solution in my company.

I have not used the technical support of the solution.

I have not used similar solutions to Git.

There is no installation for the solution because it is cloud-based.

I would recommend this solution to others. It is popular.

I rate Git an eight out of ten.

We use the solution for two purposes: first, we collaborate with the DevOps team, sharing our code; and second, we commit to a local repository, then push it to the distribution repository.

The most valuable feature is having access to the local country repository even if we have problems with distance access.

The UI can be more user-friendly.

I have been using the solution for two years.

I give the stability a ten out of ten.

I give the scalability a nine out of ten.

We have thousands of users.

We switched to Git because we had distance access issues with our previous solution.

I give the solution an eight out of ten.

I recommend the solution to other users. 

Git can be deployed on the cloud and on-premise.

The most valuable feature of Git is its ability to track updates, such as firmware documentation. Additionally, many people can make changes to code without problems. It is able to solve conflicts very easily.

Git can improve the size of the depository it can handle and add the capability to detect the change between common files, such as Excel and PDF documents.

I have been using Git for approximately five years.

Git is stable.

The scalability of Git is good.

We have only developed using this solution in my company.

I rate the support from Git a three out of five.

Neutral

We use another solution prior to Git.

Git is not simple to set up.

We did the implementation of Git in-house.

We did not evaluate other solutions.

We have one person that does the maintenance of the solution that accesses the cloud services.

I rate Git a ten out of ten.

We use this solution to assist with our development.

We are using the on-premise deployment model, with Git installed on our server.

The most valuable feature of this solution is the branch management functionality.

The GUI needs to be improved.

We have been using this solution for ten years.

The stability of this solution is very good.

For our use, scalability is not a problem.

We do not have a very complicated installation, with fifteen users. We do not plan to increase usage at the moment.

I have never used technical support, although support online is good. We have solved our technical issues by looking on the internet.

We did use another solution before this one but switched because Git was a better product.

The initial setup for this solution is complex. Specifically, it is difficult for the average user to configure. One person is enough to handle the maintenance.

We are using the open-source version, which is available free of charge.

We did not evaluate other options before choosing this one.

We are satisfied with this product, but updates to the interface would improve usability.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten. 

I use Git to store our code and maintain different versions, and for some projects, we use CI/CD as part of GitHub.

We centralize all our code in Git, which makes it very useful. Having the code centralized means we can easily access it and control its version efficiently.

The best feature is that we can access it from anywhere if we have GitHub credentials. There is also a private option where our code is accessible only to our organization. Additionally, if there are issues with a local machine, the code can be pulled from GitHub anytime, anywhere, which is another great option.

There is nothing that could be improved at this time.

I have been using Git for almost three years now.

Git is very stable. It never breaks down.

I never had to contact the Git support team for any reason.

The initial setup is easy to use. Anyone who needs version control systems can use it.

I would recommend Git to other people. I'd rate it nine out of ten.