Fortinet FortiEDR Reviews

We work with the end-to-end Fortinet portfolio, especially their UTM firewall, anti-APT, and EDR solutions.

Fortinet has improved our customer satisfaction. This is primarily what I see.

Fortinet FortiEDR is easy to use. It is easy to deploy, manage, and configure.

Fortinet helps free up around 14 percent of our staff's time to work on other projects.

Fortinet is very user-friendly for customers. The support is also very good.

To improve Fortinet, we need to see more features and technology areas at the endpoint level introduced.

We are a global system integration partner with Fortinet, and we have been reselling Fortinet products for more than ten years.

I give the stability an eight out of ten.

I give the scalability a seven out of ten. Fortinet must consider performance when scaling, and ensure that the performance is not impacted.

The technical support is good.

Positive

We switched to Fortinet because it is easy to use.

The initial setup is straightforward. The deployment configuration is straightforward.

We are a reseller, so we implement the solution for our clients.

We have seen a return on investment in the form of time saved and increased customer satisfaction.

The pricing is good. Prices used to be lower, but I think they are getting higher.

I evaluated Palo Alto and Check Point firewalls. Fortinet is user-friendly.

I give Fortinet FortiEDR an eight out of ten.

The time to value depends on the complexity of the solution and can take anywhere from two to fifteen days.

This is my third time attending RSA. I always look forward to meeting my old friends, and I always come away with a lot of knowledge.

Attending RSA gives us the opportunity to explore new cybersecurity vendors for potential future purchases.

We use Fortinet firewalls for perimeter security at six to seven of our locations.

It provides extreme perimeter security, especially for VPN and application profiles, and seamless security monitoring through FortiAnalyzer.

As a firewall the solution is great, we never had any issues.

We saw time to value within three to four months of the firewall deployment.

Fortinet FortiEDR's firewalling, rule creation, monitoring, and inspection profiles are great.

Integration with Azure and SaaS provisioning tools could improve Fortinet FortiEDR.

I have been using Fortinet FortiEDR for almost five years.

The stability is generally good. We had one problem once, but otherwise, it has been good.

I don't think Fortinet FortiEDR is scalable with other vendors and new cloud provisionings, such as Azure or other cloud providers. I need to evaluate it further.

Technical support is good, but there are sometimes problems with reachability.

Neutral

I used Check Point and Cisco firewalls in my previous companies. At my current company, we use Fortinet, which I find to be a good firewall.

The initial deployment was complex, but that is expected in any firewall environment.

We use a migrator for the implementation and they were good.

We have seen a return on investment over the past four years. We can be assured of the perimeter security system's stability and ability to sustain itself in good conditions.

I'm not familiar with pricing, but it looks a bit costly compared to other vendors.

Fortinet FortiEDR was installed before I joined my organization but it was a good choice.

I give Fortinet FortiEDR an eight out of ten.

We are looking for max solutions from vendors. We may look at VPN solutions as well.

Attending RSA is an opportunity to network and compare products from vendors around the world which are interesting.

Attending RSA gives us the opportunity to compare products and understand the latest technology. This is something that is really valuable.

We use FortiAI, FortiSIEM, and FortiEDR.

Fortinet helped us scale large-scale deals with clients because of its strong offerings.

Fortinet is very straightforward to use. I have access to a lot of technical resources, and I have been able to use them effectively.

Fortinet has helped free up around 20 percent of our staff's time to help us out.

We saw time to value within two weeks of implementing the solution, which strengthened our use cases.

I would say FortiSIEM, is a good alternative to Splunk.

The focus area for analytics is to tie it into the firewall components within SD-WAN.

ZTNA can improve latency. I believe that a lot of the focus is on SD-WAN.

I have been using Fortinet FortiEDR for four years.

I rate Fortinet's stability a ten out of ten.

I rate Fortinet's scalability a nine out of ten.

Fortinet's technical support is top-notch. They have a partner manager, technical account reps, and a lot of ongoing community activities to ensure that people stay up-to-date on the latest information.

Positive

The initial setup requires a lot of communication with the business to gather and clarify requirements.

We worked with Fortinet to implement the solution, and then our team of technical staff deployed it.

We have seen a return on investment. Teams are being hired and staffed to meet the demand of having Fortinet implemented on our client projects.

The pricing is typical for enterprises and fairly priced. Deals are negotiated with an account manager.

We evaluated Palo Alto Networks. However, we felt that they did not have the entire suite of analytics that I was looking for. Fortinet, on the other hand, seems to have a more diversified offering in this area.

I give Fortinet FortiEDR a nine out of ten.

The RSA conference helps me stay up-to-date on technology. It also helps me think differently about my use cases. Sometimes, a feature is supported, but other times, vendors may not have it. There may be a reason why they're not doing things the way they say they will.

Attending RSA has an impact on our organization's cybersecurity purchases. In fact, some of the vendors I spoke to told me that a group had already scheduled a meeting with us, which I was unaware of.

We are an incident response team, and we use Fortinet FortiEDR for our cyber protection-related activities.

Fortinet FortiEDR has helped our organization by providing reports that identify network weaknesses.

With the proper training, the solution is easy to use.

In some cases, the solution has freed up around three and a half hours of our staff's time so that they can work on other projects.

The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure.

FortiEDR can be improved by providing more detailed reporting.

I have been using Fortinet FortiEDR for seven years.

I give the stability of the solution a seven out of ten.

FortiEDR is a scalable solution because it has a well-structured and manageable report that is easy to understand.

We previously used a different solution, but I cannot recall its name.

I give Fortinet FortiEDR an eight out of ten.

I came here to test ICS points and get some tools for VFDs. API security is becoming increasingly important, as we use a lot of APIs in our government. We need to test APIs to ensure they are secure, especially as ransomware attacks are also on the rise.

This is my fourth time coming to this RSA. I bought a new product here this time. We can see everything in one room, which makes it easy for us to understand and also make new contacts.

We primarily use the solution as an EDR. We use the product to keep things homogenous as the company uses a lot of Fortinet products. 

The solution was relatively easy to deploy.

Our whole environment is using Fortinet and this integrates well into it. 

I've never tried the solution in mixed environments. I'm not sure if it would work well in an environment with Palo Alto or Cisco.

The support needs improvement. 

It is not a good product for smaller organizations or organizations under 500 endpoints. 

Having a fully integrated team would be nice. Recently, we had to use a third-party team. 

We only started using the solution about 12 months back.

I'd rate the stability six out of ten. It does take quite a bit of memory. Sometimes this is not the most stable of platforms. 

I'd rate the scalability at seven out of ten. 

We had issues with scaling. We had to use a third-party team which was an issue with the deployment. When we had to expand there were complications. We ended up exceeding the number of endpoints we signed up for. It was not sized properly.

The companies using the solution would have to be large or medium-sized at least. It wouldn't be economical to use for a small company. If a company has under 500 endpoints, it wouldn't necessarily make sense to use the solution. 

We've been disappointed with technical support. They need to improve their services. Having a fully integrated team would be nice. Right now, we deal with a third-party team and have had some issues with them.

Neutral

I also use Cynet and prefer that to FortiEDR.

Cynet is easy to use. It's basically launch and leave.

It is straightforward to set up and easy to deploy.

The pricing for FortiEDR is pretty high. It's not affordable for small companies. I'd rat the affordability three out of ten in terms of affordability, with ten being affordable. 

I'm an end-user.

I can recommend this solution, however, it wouldn't be at the top of my list in terms of recommendations.

I'd rate it six out of ten overall. There is quite some space for improvement.

We are primarily using the solution for endpoint detection response. It's endpoint security.

We do POCs for people who wish to purchase the product.

The performance has been fine.

It's good for the detection and response to threats.

The setup is pretty simple.

Technical support has been decent in the past.

We have seen an ROI. It is worth the cost.

The stability could be better.

The scalability could be improved a bit.

We find the solution to be a bit expensive. 

I've been using the solution for approximately one year. I haven't used it for that long just yet.

The solution is mostly stable and the performance is okay. It could be better, however.

The scalability is fine. I'd rate it eight out of ten, although it could always be better. 

We have around 2,000 users. At this time, we do not have plans to increase the number of users. 

We've used technical support several times. They were fine. I do not have any complaints about the level of service.

We did not previously use a different EDR solution. This is the first product of this nature that we have used. 

The setup is pretty simple. The deployment takes less than one month. For the most part, the setup process is pretty reasonable and not complex.

We have a few people that are able to handle the deployment and maintenance. 

We have witnessed ROI. It is worth the money. 

The pricing is a bit expensive. I'd rate it eight out of ten, with ten being very expensive. 

We're using the latest version of the solution.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten overall. I'd recommend the solution to others. 

The primary use case of the solution is to help protect our components.

Forensics is a valuable feature of Fortinet FortiEDR.

When the Fortinet FortiEDR is enabled sometimes our applications stop. The solution causes our applications to crash. There is room for better integration to prevent stability.

The exception handling for the on-prem version has a cap compared to the cloud version and can be improved.

I have been using the solution for ten months.

The solution is not stable. I give the stability a two out of ten.

The solution is scalable.

We have 2,000 people using the solution.

We have a premium technical support service through Fortinet.

The initial setup is complex. I give the deployment a three out of ten.

We are still in the process of deploying the solution.

The price is comprable to other endpoint security solutions.

I give the solution a five out of ten.

Three dedicated people are required for maintenance.

I do not recommend the on-premise version of the Fortinet FortiEDR. I recommend people use the cloud version instead because it is more stable.

We use FortiEDR to detect malicious activities that primarily occur on the endpoints. For example, it can catch a server downloading malicious software or a user accidentally accessing a harmful URL. Three or four engineers manage the solution.

The console is easy to read. I also like the scanning part and the ability to move assets from one to the other.

FortiEDR could add a separate scanning dashboard. In incident management, we prefer to remove the endpoint system from the environment and scan the system. We typically use Symantec for that, but if we want to use FortiEDR for that, then we need a scanning tab to clarify things. 

If I'm scanning assets from the backend, I should be able to tell from my end if any malicious files were installed onto the server. It may be any server like Windows Server or the operating system for an endpoint laptop or desktop. 

We deployed FortiEDR around eight or nine months ago.

I rate FortiEDR 10 out of 10 for stability. 

Fortinet support is excellent. I don't deal with the Fortinet firewall, but a few of my colleagues are on the firewall team, and they say their T1 or P2 calls are handled smoothly.

Setting up FortiEDR isn't difficult. 

I rate FortiEDR 10 out of 10. I say go for it.