We use the F5 Web Application firewall to protect our corporate web server. The security of our web is our absolute highest priority.
Security Specialist at a energy/utilities company with 51-200 employees
Scans a lot of traffic to protect the corporate web server
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature is artificial intelligence and to get extra internal access."
- "The administrator's user interface and some of the settings can sometimes be very complicated to understand."
What is our primary use case?
How has it helped my organization?
We've only been using this solution for six months now, so we can't really see any improvement yet.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature is network detection intelligence and the ability to get extra internal access. I don't have knowledge about all the functions but, because it is a fully automatic process, the devices scan a lot of traffic. It is automatically set up to protect our web.
What needs improvement?
The administrator's user interface and some of the settings can sometimes be very complicated to understand. It would really help if they could be easier and more user-friendly. Perhaps the developers can add a training video that shows users what to do. I am sure it is a good product and you only need some experience to become familiar with it.
Another thing that may need improvement, is upgrading from one version to another. It is good, but it can be faster.
Buyer's Guide
F5 Advanced WAF
June 2025

Learn what your peers think about F5 Advanced WAF. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2025.
857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
For how long have I used the solution?
We've been testing the F5 -BIG-AWF-VE Web Application for six months now and we plan to implement the solution in July.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is a very stable solution. We currently have three administrators and about 300 users working on it.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability is great because we can change or set this device up for almost everything. We can even extend to other functions and buy new licenses - this product will automatically adapt to these new functions. For example, we can buy a license and F5 will automatically extend to these functions. It is a very simple process to extend functionality to this device. You only need to install the license and configure it.
How are customer service and support?
The technical support is perfect. Our company is a corporate partner, and we can also use services directly from other international support centers.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
It was a very difficult decision to find the right solution. We used open source software before to protect our system's open source architecture.
We switched to F5 WAF because, for us, professional services are absolutely necessary. There are other cheaper options on the market, but when you need support, it can sometimes be a problem.
How was the initial setup?
We've incorporated our partner and he initiated the setup of this device. He used both the manual and the automatic setup options, and then he compared the two options. And now, as we are in production, we choose either automatic setup or manual setup. The automatic setup is quite easy, but the manual setup is complicated. It all depends on what you want from the product.
What about the implementation team?
Our partner was responsible for the initial setup.
What other advice do I have?
I will rate the product a nine out of ten.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.

Security Consultant at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Offers a plethora of features and has perfect stability
Pros and Cons
- "I like them because I like the security solution. They get extra marks compared to other solutions or competitors. There are more features than any other product I can think of. They're always monitoring, and the security features offer more than other, lesser products."
- "You have to buy another module with an extra license, to have the authentication feature."
What needs improvement?
In general, the web interface is not really catchy. It's very powerful, very customizable, but it doesn't have a very nice GUI interface for a new adopter. For them, they'd have to do a lot of configuring. At least the reporting and monitoring parts, let's say, to be honest, should have a better interface. A few other products have very nice dashboards, out of the box, and F5 is not that friendly to use.
Also, when you buy WAF, you have to buy another module called APM to do authentication. You have to buy another module with an extra license, to have the authentication feature. Other vendors have it interwoven. For example, I don't know if Barracuda has it, but Citrix has it under the same license. So maybe add authentication functionality in the AOS license, and not separate.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using the solutions for 10 years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability is perfect. 10 out of 10. We've not had any trouble with any deployment ever. And they are very big deployments: service providers, TelCos, banking, everywhere. Even on distant parts of the network, we have not had any kind of performance issues. Of course, as long as the sizing is within the appliance performance range. But it never has had a failure in performance or degradation of service or anything like this, as long as the full-time traffic is within the box capability, we've never had an issue.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It's scalable.
What other advice do I have?
We are a partner for F5, or a system integrator, not the client. So we do the implementation for other companies. I've been working with F5 for more than 10 years, so I know them very well.
I like them because I like the security solution. They get extra marks compared to other solutions or competitors. There are more features than any other product I can think of. They're always monitoring, and the security features offer more than other, lesser products.
I would rate this solution 10 out of 10.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner.
Buyer's Guide
F5 Advanced WAF
June 2025

Learn what your peers think about F5 Advanced WAF. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2025.
857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Network Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
Reliable with good WAF and APM modules
Pros and Cons
- "It can scale."
- "The BNS module needs improvement."
What is our primary use case?
Most of the time, we use it as a load balancer. It's for the client’s applications. They then apply WAF policies, of course, if the customer wants, and also an APM solution, like VPN access or Web Box, like a web and reverse protocol. Customers vary in terms of what they want.
What is most valuable?
The WAF and APM are very useful. I like the modules.
The solution has been mostly stable and reliable.
It can scale.
What needs improvement?
The BNS module needs improvement.
For how long have I used the solution?
I’ve been using the solution for the last four and a half or five years. It’s been a while.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Most of the time, the stability is okay. For the most part, we don’t have issues with bugs or the solution crashing. It’s fine.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution can scale as necessary.
We have a lot of telecom and banking clients that use the solution. I’m not sure how much in total each client has in terms of users. Whoever would be using it would be more on the technical side.
We do plan to increase usage and to continue to offer this to our clients.
How are customer service and support?
We help with the support as well as implementation. If a client runs into issues, they can always talk to us.
I’ve contacted the technical support of F5. However, I haven’t used them that much. They have always been okay. I’ve never had issues with them.
How was the initial setup?
Sometimes the setup is straightforward. Other times it’s more complicated. It depends on the client and the project. How long the deployment takes depends on what they want.
You only need one person to handle deployment and maintenance tasks.
What about the implementation team?
We are an integrator and can help customers set up the solution.
What was our ROI?
While there may be a potential for ROI, I don’t track it.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I’m not sure about the licensing. I don’t handle this aspect of the product.
What other advice do I have?
We’re platinum partners with F5 in Greece. We’re integrators and resellers. We work with different versions.
The solution can be deployed both on the cloud and on-premises.
I’d recommend the solution to others.
I would rate the solution nine out of ten. We’ve been pretty happy with its capabilities.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Microsoft Azure
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Reseller
Security Technical Manager at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Helpful support, stable, and useful local traffic manager
Pros and Cons
- "One of the most valuable features is the Local Traffic Manager."
- "The Sandbox integration feature could be improved."
What is our primary use case?
We use the F5 Advanced WAF for TicTac on house applications at our Induction University.
What is most valuable?
One of the most valuable features is the Local Traffic Manager.
What needs improvement?
The Sandbox integration feature could be improved.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using F5 Advanced WAF for approximately one year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
F5 Advanced WAF is reliable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution is scalable.
We have one customer that has multiple sites that use this solution. They have 24 universities using the clusters.
How are customer service and support?
The technical support is good.
How was the initial setup?
The installation is straightforward.
What about the implementation team?
I am able to do the installation by myself.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
There is an annual subscription for this solution.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend this solution to others that are satisfied with the load balancer provided. If not then they could go to another solution with different load balancers for their needs.
I rate F5 Advanced WAF a nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Integrator
Technical Product Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Great accessibility features and useful for web application security
Pros and Cons
- "The solution is easily accessible on mobile and laptop devices."
- "The delay times on firmware patches and software updates could be better and improved."
What is our primary use case?
Our primary use case for this solution is web application security. We deploy this solution on-premises.
What is most valuable?
We have found the accessibility feature most valuable. For example, the solution is easily accessible on mobile and laptop devices and allows you to send and receive money from anyone.
What needs improvement?
The delay times on firmware patches and software updates could be better and improved.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using this solution for seven years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution is scalable.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is complex but easy once you understand the product.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Their pricing is very good for the quality of the product they have delivered in the market. It is a standard licensing cost annually.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We chose this product because we believe it is the best product for us. There are other firewalls in the market, but you always look for the best as a vendor.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner

Buyer's Guide
Download our free F5 Advanced WAF Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: June 2025
Product Categories
Web Application Firewall (WAF)Popular Comparisons
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
Azure Front Door
AWS WAF
Fortinet FortiWeb
NetScaler
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall
Imperva Web Application Firewall
Imperva DDoS
Akamai App and API Protector
Azure Web Application Firewall
Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline
Radware Alteon
NGINX App Protect
Buyer's Guide
Download our free F5 Advanced WAF Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- Does F5 Advanced WAF work with Azure App Service?
- Which is better, Barracuda Web Application Firewall or F5 Advanced WAF?
- Which lesser known firewall product has the best chance at unseating the market leaders?
- Which WAF solution would you recommend to cater to 100 to 125 concurrent sessions?
- What do you recommend for a securing Web Application?
- Fortinet vs Sophos? Help choose a NGFW solution that can replace Microsoft TMG.
- Imperva WAF vs. Barracuda: Which One is Better?
- F5 vs. Imperva WAF?
- When should companies use SSL Inspection?
- NGFW with URL Filtering vs Web Proxy