We use Cynet to protect the endpoints that we are responsible for protecting.

We used the solution as a Managed Detection and Response (MDR) service. It detected threats, and the team managing our services took care of it. We did not face any major challenges or attacks, and memory utilization was minimal. It functioned very well.

It's an alternative to CrowdStrike with respect to MITRE comparisons. In terms of anti-malware and anti-malicious behavior, Cynet does at least as well, and if you believe MITRE, it can do better than CrowdStrike. 

It also comes with automated response and SIEM/SOC, which I'm not sure CrowdStrike has. I think they might have to get all that extra, and Cynet is a bit cheaper.

My clients have used Cynet since it is a very automated solution with excellent detection capabilities. Currently, I do not have clients who are actively using Cynet, however, I am in the process of finding customers for this solution.

We use Cynet for our entire security operation, primarily for endpoint security.

The product has various use cases, including NDA, EDR, memory protection, device control, and vulnerability management.

The solution has a lot of elements tied to traditional disruption. The specific product offers a combination of different components. Additionally, we offer software services that revolve around data management and responsibility.

We provide 24/7 monitoring of Cynet activities.

We use it in for internal security.

In my company, Cynet is used by those in SOC to detect threats and to use Cynet's functionalities for extended detection and response.

This is a very good solution for discovering malware and checking the behavior at user endpoints.

We use the product to detect email attacks, including phishing attempts and relevant vulnerabilities to our system.

As my customers are using it, I maintain close contact with them.

Clients employ it for detection, response, prevention, and to supplement their security operations center in various ways. Essentially, it serves as an all-encompassing solution for prevention, detection, and response. 

The primary use case of this product is to provide security. We monitor alerts that come in from Cynet. We are based in India, I'm the company's chief manager and we are customers of Cynet. 

As a reseller I have not used it in my own organization. We have SMB customers in retail and manufacturing, mostly with Microsoft-oriented IT landscapes, but also a few large financials and some (semi-)governmental organizations, all with complex hybrid IT landscapes. Cynet adapts easily to these different scenarios, and this is valid for the XDR software platform as well as for the included CyOps 24/7 SOC service.

With Cynet we are able to real-time monitoring from a SOC remotely.

We have extended real-time support for the product that is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

Cynet is an AutoXDR, and our customers are using it for that. Using one license, end users get all the features to protect the endpoint. The features include NTA, UBA, NGAV, EDR, and MDR, among others.

It's at present divided up into: Protector (Prevention, Detection & Operation); Responder (Automated Investigation & Response) and Correlator (Log Management & Event Correlation) and 24/7 MDR. I'm seeing the Correlator as a move towards offering SIEM capability.

We are protecting all our workstations. We have installed Cynet on all the servers as quite a lot of employees are working from home because of the situation.

I have certain requirements for our customers, like they want to have visibility over their network, and they don't want multiple solutions for agent patching and protecting the endpoints. My customers want a unified solution that meets the aforementioned requirements.

We use Cynet for deception, and it helps us with our customers.

It is like an antivirus. Cynet agent is installed on our PCs, and we are using its latest version.

It is being used for continuous protection. It is used as old standard antivirus and next-generation anti-malware using behavior and analytics. It provides defense against zero-days and living-off-the-land attacks.

I am absolutely up-to-date in terms of its version.

The solution is primarily used for classical continuous monitoring of what's happening on the endpoint and identifying unknown threats and new threats. It provides us with a level of security.

My company is using Cynet for endpoint protection. 

The solution is typically installed on endpoints. It offers many use cases. This is the great thing about this solution. We're focused on helping large enterprise systems or larger enterprise organizations that have a small support staff - and small support staff is the common denominator across both of these organizations out here now. Large or small, Cynet provides a lot of capabilities that reduce the need for full-time employees, if you don't have the bandwidth for them.

This solution covers the endpoint. It protects your files, users, devices, and network significantly better than the other solutions in the market.

Our primary use case would be incident response.

Our use cases are for UBA or EDR, and we use it everywhere; in medical education, commercial residences etc. It is deployed in the cloud, on-prem, and hybrid if needed. 

We use it for endpoint detection and response. We also use it as a next-gen antivirus.

We have its latest version.

It is like an EDR tool. We have its latest version.

Our primary use cases with Cynet are to secure our workstations, to react to some kinds of threats from malware and hostile environments, and to maintain proper activity of our users' functionality.

The main use case is just dealing with flat bounced zero-day threats. Clients typically migrate to older solutions. They can catch threats better. The solution is easy to manage and protects them. That's really what most of them want. A lot of the clients I deal with them are in the SMB space. Typically, they don't have anything too robust to begin with. They're just looking for something to get them to the next step, and this solution is perfect for that.

We're still getting to know them, doing the proof of concepts of their product, which we're very happy with. It's an EPP/EDR platform and that's our primary use case. I'm the Chief Information Security Officer and we are customers of Cynet.

We are a technical services company and we provide this solution to our customers, as well as use it ourselves.

Cynet is a breach protection platform. 

We are system integrators for Cynet and we also use this solution ourselves.

I have limited direct contact with end-users, but as far as I know, customers use Cynet for real-time threat detection and integrate it with other solutions.