We performed a comparison between SAP HCM and Work.com based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Workday, Oracle and others in Cloud HCM."The valuable features of SAP HCM include managing employee data from hiring to retirement."
"Customers can create custom infotypes to store any custom data points."
"The stability of the solution is good."
"The tool's most valuable features for our HR operations include easy reporting capabilities, which allow us to generate reports for management meetings and auditing purposes. Additionally, it supports appointment preparation and processing benefits."
"Technical support is excellent."
"It has the best data management features."
"All of the core processes are very valuable aspects of the solution. These include personnel, administration, organizational structure, and payroll."
"SAP HCM can handle a large number of employees. We can easily process payrolls and check the arrangements, and the client can also check the performance of the employees. Additionally, it has some advanced features."
"We have found value in Work.com because it gave us a central place for capturing any opportunities-related information, such as client-related information. Additionally, it is a place for storing this information. Anyone in the organization, if it was being updated actively by the people or by the sales team, could have access to it. Once the contact information is there about any client, then it stays there. If you are approaching a client, you are able to check if there's any history. It's a good tool, but it all depends on how disciplined the sales team is in entering the information regularly."
"It is a bit tedious and manual to work with."
"SAP HCM cannot integrate with other third-party applications. One of the drawbacks we encounter with SAP HCM, specifically in payroll management, is the limitation regarding changing payroll areas within the same month. For instance, if an employee transitions from staff to non-staff status during the month, we face difficulties because the system doesn't allow us to change the payroll."
"The solution is rather expensive."
"SAP HCM has many different channels for communication with the consultants which makes it complex. There are delays when there is a problem."
"There are already success factors for the cloud solution which cannot be integrated into S/4 HANA."
"The product's license is very expensive."
"I would like it to move more towards a single data space, a single data source. SAP as a platform relies on multiple data sources because traditionally, it's been bolted together by the acquisition of other products rather than a single database. That's why there are lots of points of failure and lots of required points of integration. They need a single integration point."
"The product's learning and development features could be better, including new exclusive LMS tools."
"I found Work.com a bit clunky. There were too many fields, but maybe that was the design. It could be company-specific to me. There were overlapping fields and sometimes it was confusing."
Earn 20 points
SAP HCM is ranked 3rd in Cloud HCM with 46 reviews while Work.com is ranked 17th in Sales Performance Management. SAP HCM is rated 7.6, while Work.com is rated 6.4. The top reviewer of SAP HCM writes "Efficiently handles the entire hire-to-retire cycle management within an organization and the ability to scale is outstanding". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Work.com writes "Centralized management, useful information storage, but can feel clunky". SAP HCM is most compared with SAP SuccessFactors, Workday, Oracle HCM Cloud, ADP GlobalView Payroll and PeopleSoft, whereas Work.com is most compared with Workday.
We monitor all Cloud HCM reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.