We performed a comparison between OpenText ProVision and Pega BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."OpenText ProVision's best feature is the capability to attach a variety of attributes and extract and analyze that information."
"The stability of the product is very good."
"All the features come as part of a standard license."
"The technical support of Pega BPM is very good."
"The solution's case management is its most valuable aspect."
"Pega BPM's most valuable features are case management, integration, the convenience of using REST APIs, and the ease of changing things at the UI level."
"The solution is operating well overall."
"Pega BPM's most valuable feature is the use of CDX to solve problems."
"The solution has very helpful technical support."
"Pega BPM offers a lot of out-of-the-box functionalities."
"The solution is able to support the size and scale required."
"Integrating with or interfacing with other tools like data management tools would be very helpful."
"Lacks the ability to have your own in-house developments."
"OpenText ProVision's collaboration management is quite complicated and difficult to use."
"The solution could be more scalable."
"The way the IDE works with the chatbox and the taxonomy imports could be a little smoother."
"The previous versions had good training documents but the updated versions need to improve the documentation."
"I think there is room for improvement in the low code/ no code environment that they're promoting now. That needs to be aligned a little bit more. I still feel that it is not that friendly for a person who has no experience with Pega to just go in and try to create something."
"It is not fully compatible with all versions of Internet Explorer, so sometimes, it does not work."
"We have experienced a few technical challenges, particularly triggering the workflow through file drops and accessing files."
"Pega should work on redefining their model and creating a demand for their skills."
"Business specific functionality is needed."
OpenText ProVision is ranked 35th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 3 reviews while Pega BPM is ranked 3rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 55 reviews. OpenText ProVision is rated 6.4, while Pega BPM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of OpenText ProVision writes "Good attribute attachment but problems with collaboration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Low code with great APIs and good flexibility". OpenText ProVision is most compared with ARIS BPA, Visio, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and SAP Signavio Process Manager, whereas Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, Microsoft Power Apps and IBM BPM. See our OpenText ProVision vs. Pega BPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.