Microsoft Project Server vs OpenText Project and portfolio Management vs SAP Portfolio and Project Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Microsoft Project Server, OpenText Project and portfolio Management, and SAP Portfolio and Project Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about monday.com, Broadcom, ServiceNow and others in Project Portfolio Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Project Portfolio Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,334 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I like the way you can build the schedule by the Don't Start Before or Don't Start After values. You can use it to build your schedule based on how you change your dates. This is how it actually builds the schedule.""It is well-established, reliable, and compatible.""In the competitive landscape of project management and portfolio management solutions, Microsoft Project Server stands out significantly.""Microsoft Project Server is simple to use.""SharePoint site integration""The scheduling and the customization are very powerful.""I like being able to manage the capacity in terms of the resources. I also like being able to share documents and information between teams. It's the best solution for collaboration.""Resource allocation is the most valuable feature of Microsoft Project Server."

More Microsoft Project Server Pros →

"Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM) has a very strong workflow engine.""Micro Focus PPM is flexible and easy to use. It's simple to customize and configure workflows.""Scenario comparison is the feature most valuable to us and the reason why we decided to choose HPE PPM over other portfolio management products.""Recent Program Management lifecycle, Program Management aggregation views due to interactive UI (selection of risks, issues, and changes in Program Overview) and “flash look & feel" of this functional chunk, which is different in comparison to other parts of HPE PPM.""Has a powerful workflow engine that allows creation of workflow complexities and processes.""Resource management: The resource management module is very complete and covers most of the time all needs of customers.""It's a very detailed tool. As far as an enterprise is concerned, it gives you the flexibility to manage everything: portfolios, projects, finances, proposals, resources, and time... It takes care of even the minor details that need to be captured. The project management functionality is configured really well within the tool. That stands out.""There are so many different pieces of functionality, and we use almost every single piece from deployment to demand, project, resource, and time management."

More OpenText Project and portfolio Management Pros →

"SAP is gradually introducing more flexibility and customization options to the system, allowing users to adapt it to their specific needs.""The integration portion with SAP models is valuable."

More SAP Portfolio and Project Management Pros →

Cons
"The product is difficult to use for complex projects.""EPM 2010 UI seems a bit dated now that 2016 is available.""Improvements are needed in the technical support process, aiming for a better user experience.""It may be considered expensive.""The solution should be made more collaborative.""There need to be more tutorials available to users.""It is not updated in real-time. Sometimes it, therefore, is not accurate.""The solution's synchronization with Jira Projects should be improved."

More Microsoft Project Server Cons →

"I would also like to see improvement in PPM's reporting and alerts. PPM has reporting capabilities, including HTML reports and portlets. But a majority of clients will build their own reporting platforms, or they will use external reporting platforms like Tableau and QlikView.""The user interface is very, very old and is missing some functions, such as, for example, re-do, follow, and share functions. The UI is not good.""Micro Focus PPM should be less dependent on coding. It could also benefit from some updates to the software architecture. These have been on the roadmap for years now, but they haven't been released.""They can make its UI better. Currently, the UI is a bit clunky.""We constantly put in requests for some of the things we need. One of those is being able to export just our standard request type to PDF.""User interface continues to be poor. The product does not have a similar view in the different modules, e.g., staffing vs financial management, it looks like you are working with a different product and it is not easy to use or intuitive.""The solution can sometimes be a little inflexible and a bit caustic.""I was not involved in the initial setup. I know that the project involved a lot of consulting that took a long time."

More OpenText Project and portfolio Management Cons →

"The system is old, so there are several issues that arise when we fetch data from integrated systems. Sometimes the data gets stuck, and there are instances where we need to access multiple pieces of information simultaneously.""It would be valuable if SAP integrated seamlessly with some products like Jira and Bitbucket."

More SAP Portfolio and Project Management Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I think they need more flexibility with licensing, because there are preconceived ideas that don't allow as much flexibility with the various licenses."
  • "The licensing was procured before my involvement."
  • "It has features that cannot be bought by other rivals, so cost does not matter."
  • "It is on the expensive side."
  • "There is a licensing cost."
  • "There is an annual license required for this solution."
  • "I cannot comment on the price as I was not responsible for purchasing the solution."
  • "I'm not quite sure about the licensing costs. We're probably paying somewhere in the neighborhood of about 80,000 to 90,000 a year for our current on-prem because we handle our own licensing. As far as Project Online is concerned, we're still trying to get a good handle on that. It looks like it is going to be in a neighborhood of about 120,000 to 150,000 a year, but we're getting a lot more capability out of it."
  • More Microsoft Project Server Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Support and license management are two hurdles for us. Every time we purchase new licenses, it has taken us half a year to implement those."
  • "It is SaaS without a base fee."
  • "HPE PPM SaaS model is comprehensive, however, the base fee component has customer resistance to its recurring setup,"
  • "Now, we also received an increase in the support license prices, without any advanced notice. At this point, switching to unify all our licensing under HPE and customer support has been poor."
  • "We have an annual license, and it is fairly priced in comparison to that of other solutions."
  • "A large organization will find Micro Focus PPM affordable, but it may be a bit costly for a small or medium-sized company. The license is based on the number of users."
  • More OpenText Project and portfolio Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.
    769,334 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The ability to track a project's progress using Microsoft Project Server is the most valuable aspect. It depends… more »
    Top Answer:The solution is very expensive. It is a part of my enterprise database. I am paying a subscription for it. It doesn't… more »
    Top Answer:Microsoft is going to integrate the Co-Pilot features into Microsoft Project. The AI feature is an additional feature… more »
    Top Answer:Hi, @Cheryl Joseph Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management solution could be a good candidate, see my review on… more »
    Top Answer:Micro Focus PPM is flexible and easy to use. It's simple to customize and configure workflows.
    Top Answer:A large organization will find Micro Focus PPM affordable, but it may be a bit costly for a small or medium-sized… more »
    Top Answer:The system is old, so there are several issues that arise when we fetch data from integrated systems. Sometimes the data… more »
    Top Answer:We use it for end-to-end project management as per the received requirements. There is a customized module called the… more »
    Top Answer:SAP is gradually introducing more flexibility and customization options to the system, allowing users to adapt it to… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    2,175
    Comparisons
    1,038
    Reviews
    26
    Average Words per Review
    356
    Rating
    7.6
    Views
    665
    Comparisons
    292
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    1,368
    Rating
    7.9
    Views
    1,033
    Comparisons
    868
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    945
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    MS Project Server
    Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM), HPE Project and Portfolio Management, HPE PPM
    Portfolio and Project Management
    Learn More
    Overview
    Microsoft Project Server 2013 is a flexible on-premises solution for project portfolio management (PPM) and everyday work. Team members, project participants, and business decision makers can get started, prioritize project portfolio investments and deliver the intended business value from virtually anywhere. Requires SharePoint 2013, sold separately.
    OpenText Project and Portfolio Management (PPM) combines workflows and data to align investments with strategy. Top-down and bottom-up analytics power this strategic portfolio and project management tool.
    Portfolio Management integrates information from existing project management, human resources, and financial systems to provide an overview of the project portfolio with easy drilldown to details for portfolio managers, project managers, and resource managers. This enables innovative and collaborative, cross-functional business processes. Project Management covers the entire range of project management activities in development and consultancy projects, from planning to implementation to project completion.
    Sample Customers
    Magnachip, Gwinnett County Schools, CLEAResult, Medbit Oy, Intelbras S.A., ETS, CORE Construction, Keller Foundations
    Bank Simpanan Nasional, Smart Communications, Aareon AG
    Joy Global Inc., Citrix, EMC Corporation, Concho Resources, Concho Resources, RZD Russian Railways, Family Dollar Stores Inc., Lenovo
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Manufacturing Company15%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government11%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm43%
    Insurance Company14%
    Non Profit14%
    Maritime Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company31%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Government10%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Energy/Utilities Company12%
    Computer Software Company8%
    Government5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise67%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise63%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise75%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise76%
    Buyer's Guide
    Project Portfolio Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about monday.com, Broadcom, ServiceNow and others in Project Portfolio Management. Updated: April 2024.
    769,334 professionals have used our research since 2012.