IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] vs Imprivata OneSign vs Symantec Siteminder comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
views| comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Imprivata Logo
1,066 views|637 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Broadcom Logo
1,605 views|1,220 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL], Imprivata OneSign, and Symantec Siteminder based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Auth0 and others in Single Sign-On (SSO).
To learn more, read our detailed Single Sign-On (SSO) Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The integration effort with the end application is quite straightforward and easy.""OAuth 2 is now the de facto standard for API protection and scoped authorized delegation. IBM TAM now supports OAuth 2 and can act as fully compliant OAuth 2 authorization server.""The Verify feature: A push method which customers are going for.""SAML 2.0.""Single Sign-On functionality is valuable because the core purpose of the product is to allow universal (or bespoke) SSO for application suites."

More IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] Pros →

"It has benefited my organization in the way that it makes it more secure by making it harder to hack.""It provides a service that allows users to sign in to whatever application they are using. This is the most important feature of this solution."

More Imprivata OneSign Pros →

"Federation is valuable, for sure, because we have a lot of third-party vendors that we need to integrate with, and this is a turnkey solution in some ways.""I liked the debugging part. There are only two files (trace file and log file) that you need to look into while performing debugging, and the logs give you the exact info on where and what needs to be fixed.""The single sign-on is the solution's most valuable feature""It has considerably reduced the amount of time that new users would take to join into the organization. Previously, it was a lengthy, manual process because it's a very secure environment, where they need to verify the user before they can actually grant him a user-ID and password. Integrating with the built-in custom application, and exposing CA Single Sign On to the internet, we were able to get the employees onboard. The time that we gained was: previously it would generally take from four to eight weeks for each employee, we brought it to one to two days.""SAML is the best thing we're using right now because there is no need for creating an external account.""The solution is easy to use for our managers.""The most valuable feature is the integration with the Active Directory.""It provides the breadth and the width to provide solutions for the different kinds of technologies which we have."

More Symantec Siteminder Pros →

Cons
"The profiling element is incredibly robust, but also equally as complex, it requires an off-site course to be able to understand the context or the plethora of options available.""Multi-factor authentication with social integration needs to improve.""The self-service portal needs improvement.""An Amazon Machine Image (AMI) for the newer appliance versions for hosting the virtual appliances on AWS will help.""Looking at their roadmap, they have a broad grasp of the security features which the industry needs."

More IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] Cons →

"I would like for them to make this solution compatible with Mac OS. I would also like for them to provide a portal so that users can easily integrate it with their applications.""They should have a landing page."

More Imprivata OneSign Cons →

"I'd like to see a rework of the user directory configuration.""In future releases, I would like to see maybe more capabilities with some more modern authentication.""The Federation part of CA Single Sign On, it's a bit complex to implement because it involves the SSL certificates, exchange of certificates, and lot of technical details. The documentation misses some important parts of this, so that's the reason it took some time for us to go live.""The GUIs are not very clear, especially when integrating with other products from CA.""The technical support could be better.""CA has reporting at the moment. With the reporting, every particular segmented product has a reporting engine. I would like to see centralized reporting for all of them together.""Better documentation. I went through some sessions on single sign-on for version 12.7.""Some of the new protocols, like OAuth 2.0, could be improved."

More Symantec Siteminder Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The IBM prices are, as ever, extortionate, even with a business partnership, and high levels of discounts."
  • More IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The price is reasonable, it's an affordable solution."
  • "At the moment, I believe the price is reasonable."
  • More Imprivata OneSign Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The price is quite comparable to the other enterprise-level solutions in that market."
  • "I recommend conducting a PoC on every available product before choose one."
  • "CA solutions are generally expensive but for the customer the ROI is big."
  • "Symantec Siteminder is expensive; they could definitely do better on the price."
  • "The licensing is fair for this solution."
  • "Siteminder is a little costly. You pay for licensing, and they offer packages, so if you have less users, then you have to buy different products at different prices. If you have more of a user base, then the package is different. They also include other features—for example, if you have a database and you're using Siteminder, then it's good to use a Semantic-specific database, but if you are using less, then you have to purchase the database separately. Whereas if you are going for a bigger license, then it comes within the package. It depends on which plan you are using."
  • "The pricing is reasonable."
  • More Symantec Siteminder Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.
    769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:It provides a service that allows users to sign in to whatever application they are using. This is the most important… more »
    Top Answer:They provide a license key. I am not able to disclose the pricing information. At the moment, I believe the price is… more »
    Top Answer:It's agent-based. It's convenient to deploy and integrate.
    Top Answer:It doesn't have a feature for... or maybe it has, but for modern authentication, like OAuth or OIDC. We haven't utilized… more »
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Single Sign-On (SSO)
    12th
    Views
    1,066
    Comparisons
    637
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    364
    Rating
    10.0
    15th
    Views
    1,605
    Comparisons
    1,220
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    298
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Tivoli Access Manager, IBM Security Access Manager
    OneSign, Imprivata OneSign Authentication Management
    Single Sign-On, SiteMinder, CA SSO, Layer7 SiteMinder
    Learn More
    Overview
    IBM Tivoli Access Manager is a robust and secure centralized policy management solution for e-business and distributed applications. IBM Tivoli Access Manager WebSEAL is a high performance, multi-threaded Web server that applies fine-grained security policy to the Tivoli Access Manager protected Web object space. WebSEAL can provide single sign-on solutions and incorporate back-end Web application server resources into its security policy.

    Imprivata OneSign delivers fast, secure no-click-access to the applications and information that care providers need, whenever and wherever they need it.

    Security and regulatory compliance requirements mandate user authentication technology for accessing workstations and applications. As a result, care providers need to enter unique usernames and passwords (or PINs) for order signing, documentation signing, medication reconciliation and most other applications throughout their workflow. These laborious login requirements can disrupt clinical focus and obstruct patient care.

    Symantec® SiteMinder is designed to secure the modern enterprise through a unified access management platform that applies the appropriate authentication mechanism to positively identify users; provides single sign-on and identity federation for seamless access to any application; enforces granular security policies to stop unauthorized access to sensitive resources; and monitors and manages the entire user session to prevent session hijacking. Finally, Symantec SiteMinder is battle-tested and has been deployed in the largest IT environments in the world.

    Sample Customers
    Essex Technology Group Inc.
    AZ Groeninge, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool Womens NHS Foundation Trust, Mahaska Health Partnership, Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital, Boulder Community Hospital, City of Marietta, Spencer Hospital, Southwest Washington Medical Center, South Shore Hospital
    British Telecom, CoreBlox, DBS, HMS, Itera ASA and Simeo
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Government25%
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Insurance Company25%
    Energy/Utilities Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization40%
    Healthcare Company20%
    Computer Software Company7%
    Government5%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm39%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Healthcare Company7%
    Retailer7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm35%
    Insurance Company10%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise62%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise49%
    Large Enterprise34%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business8%
    Midsize Enterprise4%
    Large Enterprise88%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise6%
    Large Enterprise82%
    Buyer's Guide
    Single Sign-On (SSO)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Auth0 and others in Single Sign-On (SSO). Updated: April 2024.
    769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.