We performed a comparison between Citrix Endpoint Management and Digital.ai App Management [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, VMware, ManageEngine and others in UEM (Unified Endpoint Management).
"One of the standout features of Intune is its seamless accessibility to work data, eliminating the need to be tied to an office or a desktop."
"It's normally able to meet 100% expectations of our customers."
"The feature I like the most is that we can perform remote tasks. If we want to retire or wipe out personal data or corporate data from a device, we can use Microsoft Intune remotely, and with the click of a button, data is removed automatically. Nothing needs to be done from the end-user side."
"Intune's unified endpoint management platform is invaluable."
"It is user-friendly, and the performance is also good. It is a convenient product"
"For Windows services, there are multiple options within Intune to modernize it to be more internet-facing and dynamic."
"The stability of Microsoft Intune is good."
"Application deployment and keeping the devices secure no matter where they are, by having this cloud solution — that has been great."
"ShareFile, in particular, is valuable with its ease of sharing, and the best category security that is in the hands of users."
"We have seen improvements in compliance management on the devices."
"The product is capable of acting in many different ways to help secure architecture."
"A valuable feature of Citrix Endpoint Management is that it's stable. The stability is not a challenge among the move to the cloud."
"The MAM applications of the product are great."
"One key feature is secure application delivery, which enables the secure delivery of mobile and web applications to end-user devices. This ensures data protection and compliance with corporate policies."
"Allows apps to be distributed to contractor's devices not on company managed MDM."
"Speeds up app deployment and management."
"The reporting and cost have room for improvement."
"Microsoft Intune needs to improve the initial login process."
"The solution can have some compliance problems in general and the end-point user can bypass easily the company policies in Intune."
"There should be more focus on mobile device security and integration."
"They can improve their MAM policies a little bit more and make them more granular. They should include more granular group policies. They are there, but they need to be more granular. Its stability should also be improved. It is not very stable. Sometimes, it shows some inconsistencies across tenants."
"We faced issues with macOS support. The product should have better inventory and asset management."
"One area for improvement is app deployment. Another is the Windows update rollout. If you're rolling out an object to a device that's offline, Intune stops trying to reach this device after it sits idle for a bit. We are forced to find a workaround that could help manage that."
"Microsoft needs to enhance device-level security, as sometimes when using Microsoft Intune, the device's operating system becomes stuck and requires a full uninstall to remove the Intune bug."
"The tool’s battery usage was high."
"Requires integrating with ABM before enabling some of the features."
"Citrix needs to improve the architecture. They also need to strengthen the application integration. They keep referring to some things to be required as security, and they keep selling the next level and on-premise separately. They should give the customer the opportunity to decide whether they want to use the next level on-premise or on-cloud, but they should not charge additional fees if the customer wants to deploy the next level on-premise because the customer is already being charged as the end user. They should allow next level on-premise optimization without any additional charges."
"Citrix often depends on other services like backend data centers, network security, and application firewalls. Issues in these areas can be misinterpreted as Citrix issues by users."
"Support for inventory management of Apple devices should be added."
"Better support for Office 365 integration would help improve it further."
"Needs a better API."
Earn 20 points
Citrix Endpoint Management is ranked 7th in UEM (Unified Endpoint Management) with 10 reviews while Digital.ai App Management [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in UEM (Unified Endpoint Management). Citrix Endpoint Management is rated 8.2, while Digital.ai App Management [EOL] is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Citrix Endpoint Management writes "Offers flexible application management that allows secure delivery of applications to endpoints, enabling users to operate applications on the go". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Digital.ai App Management [EOL] writes "We launched Apperian in June of 2015 to improve quality of deployment process for a native mobile app on Android & iOS, successfully implementing single sign-on with our corporate security". Citrix Endpoint Management is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, MOBI, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) and CyberArk Identity, whereas Digital.ai App Management [EOL] is most compared with .
We monitor all UEM (Unified Endpoint Management) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
