We performed a comparison between Apache Airflow, Bizagi, and WorkflowGen based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."We have been quite satisfied with the stability of the solution."
"The product integrates well with other pipelines and solutions."
"The reason we went with Airflow is its DAG presentation, that shows the relationships among everything. It's more of a configuration-driven workflow."
"The user interface for monitoring and managing workflows has been excellent, particularly in the latest version. c"
"It's stable."
"The solution is quite configurable so it is easy to code within a configuration kind of environment."
"The product is stable."
"Since Apache works very well on Python, we can manage everything and create pipelines there."
"The approval process is simple."
"Agility, reverse engineering, customized portal web, help desk and user guides, easy deployment, simple to modify."
"The amount of control that this solution provides is great."
"The solution's simulation capabilities are the most valuable aspects."
"Your team can work on it having basic training about databases and BPM modeling."
"Its cost is the most valuable. It is not as expensive. It is also easy to make different types of processes for the users."
"It is easy to use and easy to learn. It is also fully compatible with BPMN virtual tool. Bizagi is very fast in responding to and fixing the issues."
"The product has a comfortable GUI and a good environment for users."
"We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do."
"I would like to see some no-code capabilities and drag and drop abilities in Airflow."
"The scalability of the solution itself is not as we expected. Being on the cloud, it should be easy to scale, however, it's not."
"For admins, there should be improved logging capabilities because Apache Airflow does have logging, but it's limited to some database data."
"The problem with Apache Airflow is that it is an open-source tool. You have to build it into a Kubernetes container, which is not easy to maintain, and I find it to be very clunky."
"It would be beneficial to improve the pricing structure."
"We're currently using version 1.10, but I understand that there's a lot of improvements in version 2. In the earlier version that we're using, we sometimes have problems with maintenance complexity. Actually using Airflow is okay, but maintaining it has been difficult."
"There is an area for improvement in onboarding new people. They should make it simple for newcomers. Else, we have to put a senior engineer to operate it."
"Apache Airflow could be improved with the addition of more frameworks."
"The product must make automation easier."
"The solution needs to make it easier to use RPA products on it. They may need an RPA specific interface. It would be better than having to make an RPA tool to use for viewing. Most of our work is about making RPA tools with the Bizagi, not using Bizagi itself."
"Its price can be improved. The price is high for the application as well as for maintaining and developing applications. When you develop, for example, a BPM, you need to pay a lot for Bizagi."
"Framework approach, which extends to reusability in tools, like Pega, for deployment management could be improved."
"It should provide the ability to create a simple application. It can be used for database modeling diagrams and forms, but it should also support CRUD, that is, create, read, update and delete."
"It would be helpful if they added some extra features in the next update."
"I would like to see simulation as a free feature again. In version 3.3 it was free, but in 4.0 it isn't."
"The open source version lacks the option to publish."
"This solution needs to be more customizable."
Earn 20 points
