We performed a comparison between ADONIS and OpenText Documentum based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."The best features of the system include good analytics for business processes including the calculation of time and cost."
"It seems that the process mapping and modeling features are well and thoroughly covered."
"It's easy to handle the solution thanks to being drag and drop"
"It's a very complete solution."
"The product is useful for designing business processes and for repositories."
"It is a stable solution."
"We haven't ever needed to take service breaks and we can scale it throughout our company without any problem."
"The storage of metadata content, workflows, and life cycles are the most valuable features of OpenText Documentum."
"It provides possibilities for us to save documents and supporting the business process while doing so."
"It is a very secure system. It is reliable, and that is one of the reasons people manage their content within Documentum. It gives them the confidence that the content is accessible to the right people and not to the wrong people."
"The most valuable feature is that it's a central repository for everything, whether it's videos, documents, Excel sheets, etc."
"It stands out for its impressive records management capabilities and the ability to handle an extensive volume of documents, even reaching into the billions."
"OpenText Documentum has improved availability and performance in our organization."
"The most valuable feature of OpenText Documentum is the versioning."
"The tool's most valuable feature is ACL, which helps to control the user groups that access the documents."
"Rearranging things to get information from the objects and the model together to get a report out of them could be done better."
"The solution is in English and we have added certain parts in Russian as this is easier for our students. It would be useful to have the system in Russian."
"When you update a page, the information on the quick links sidebar on the left side doesn't stay in the same place. It moves down, so you have to scroll to find it. That's not very user-friendly."
"There is a function to check if the model BPMN is being used correctly, but the report from the check is not always very clear."
"We have to use a different solution to automate our business processes."
"This solution would be improved if 24/7 support were available."
"If there's no WiFi connection, you can't access ADONIS."
"The user interface can be a bit more intuitive."
"It's difficult to manage and customize Documentum."
"An area that needs to improve is how to reduce storage space on the AWS site."
"I would like to see performance improvements, especially regarding slow response times."
"The vertical application could be improved."
"OpenText Documentum's user interface could be improved a little bit."
"It should provide more tools to help clients upgrade solutions based on Webtop."
"One area for improvement in OpenText Documentum is its handling of outdated documents, especially technical ones."
ADONIS is ranked 17th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 7 reviews while OpenText Documentum is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Content Management with 26 reviews. ADONIS is rated 7.8, while OpenText Documentum is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of ADONIS writes "A strong choice for business process modeling with an easy-to-use drag and drop approach". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Documentum writes "Saves time and increases an organization's productivity". ADONIS is most compared with ARIS BPA, SAP Signavio Process Manager, Camunda, Bizagi and IBM BPM, whereas OpenText Documentum is most compared with OpenText Extended ECM, SharePoint, IBM FileNet, Hyland OnBase and Alfresco.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
