We performed a comparison between ABBYY Vantage and Pega Robotic Process Automation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."ABBYY Vantage has been designed as a user-friendly solution, making the setup process require only a couple of days."
"The most valuable feature of ABBYY Vantage is flexibility. You are able to edit at a granular level providing good control over the process. Additionally, the brochures and guides were helpful in learning the solution."
"The OCR is the best on the market."
"ABBYY Vantage has reduced our data because it can classify and extract information from documents."
"Verification Station is valuable."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is its ability to extract content from documents. It is able to identify specific fields and special characters."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to scale for big processes. We are able to process 1 million pages a day. Its accuracy is also very nice. It is a good feature that they have. It is an independent platform, which is its biggest advantage as compared to other solutions. It is also very stable and powerful. It is 100% on time."
"We have found the solution to be stable so far."
"If you want to make any kind of base automation, you can easily code exactly what you want."
"They are leaders in the same industry."
"The most valuable aspect for myself was access to the .net framework. If I couldn't figure something out using the objects that they had provided, I could bring in the .net objects and do so using similar logic that I would in a .net or C sharp coding language. Having that familiarity was helpful."
"I am impressed with the tool's recording feature."
"The feature I like best in Pega Robotic Process Automation is that I'm able to add external DLL section codes. I can inject the JavaScript, and I can write VB.NET, C#.NET, and DLL codes, then inject those codes into the existing process. Mainly, from a development perspective, I like that feature a lot, so if anything is not supported by Pega Robotic Process Automation, then I can build that either in JavaScript or in .NET, then use those functions within the IP."
"The most valuable features are the loops to lookup tables to read the data."
"The low-code/no-code development aspect of the solution is great."
"The workflow system is very intuitive."
"In the future, I would like to see integration with Google Sheets."
"ABBYY FlexiCapture could improve the performance. We are looking for better performance because it can be a lengthy capture process and the accuracy needs to be enhanced when it comes to Arabic."
"The accuracy changes depending on the scenario so you need to test it before committing to this solution."
"ABBYY FlexiCapture could improve in the maintenance, and there are some issues. You have to make efforts to do corrections. Additionally, it could be more user-friendly in terms of connecting between different solutions."
"The price for trainings or certifications are on the very, very high side."
"Not a ten because sometimes some documents have handwritten data. If this improved, I would rate it a ten out of ten."
"The initial setup was relatively complex. The people who install it must be knowledgeable about what they are doing."
"Even though the training works, it's not as good as it is made out to be."
"The way integration classes are created could be improved."
"There have been some scenarios where the bot was not able to replace some of the controls and could not recognize and personalize the task we wanted to automate."
"The ease-of-use could be improved."
"Pega Robotic Process Automation scalability is too low."
"I would like to improve the tool's integration features and stability."
"Pega Robotic Process Automation can improve the OGR area. You don't have a feature to read documents in computer voices."
"In Pega, the UI has to be improved because that is the most challenging area that most of our customers ask for because we have to depend on some other React JS or some other tool to bring that kind of UI experience. So, there is a lot of room for improvement in terms of UI and UX."
"I would like to see an enhanced auditing feature included."
More Pega Robotic Process Automation Pricing and Cost Advice →
ABBYY Vantage is ranked 7th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 46 reviews while Pega Robotic Process Automation is ranked 9th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 22 reviews. ABBYY Vantage is rated 8.0, while Pega Robotic Process Automation is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of ABBYY Vantage writes "Genius-level AI with very easy setup and implementation processes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pega Robotic Process Automation writes "Great for UI creation, helpful support services, and reliable". ABBYY Vantage is most compared with UiPath Document Understanding, UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, HyperScience and OpenText Intelligent Capture, whereas Pega Robotic Process Automation is most compared with UiPath, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA), Microsoft Power Automate and Pega CRM. See our ABBYY Vantage vs. Pega Robotic Process Automation report.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors and best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.