I'm using almost six Cisco switches.
We use the solution for the LAN, Local Area Network, for the organization, or for business.
I'm using almost six Cisco switches.
We use the solution for the LAN, Local Area Network, for the organization, or for business.
The solution is very stable.
The scalability is good.
They are managed switches, and we can control and manage almost all of these switches - even individually, one by one, or through a central control center.
The initial setup is pretty straightforward.
The device age becomes an issue. For example, with the 2960 version, they're not supporting that one anymore. I find that the device or the model age is a little bit short. It is five or eight years. When we have a big organization, we have 100 or 200 switches, and suddenly it's out of support, end of support, or end of life, or whatever, it's difficult as we cannot change switches every five years. At a minimum, they should last ten years. That's better. To upgrade, it's a huge budget. Therefore, the age of the product itself is a little bit short. They really should make it longer.
The technical response could be faster in the future.
I've been using the solution for maybe ten years or so. It's been a while.
The solution is perfectly stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable.
The scalability is pretty good. If a company needs to expand it, it can do so. It's not a problem.
We have up to 600 or 700 users. It's not measured per user. Rather, it is per device. We have many devices on top of users.
We do plan to increase usage in the future.
I have contacted technical support in the past. They are fine, however, they are a little bit slow.
We did not previously use a different solution. We've always used Cisco products.
The solution is easy to install for administrators and network engineers. People who are qualified in networking shouldn't face any issues. It's fine, it's easy.
The amount of time it takes to deploy a switch depends. If it is at layer switch, it will not take more than one hour, maximum, for each switch. However, if it is a core switch, it might take one day.
The size of the team you need for maintenance also depends. If we are going for an upgrade, we need a big team. However, if it is just for troubleshooting, only two engineers are required.
We can handle the implementation ourselves. We do not need any integrators or consultants.
We can use the switches without licenses. However, with licenses, yearly licenses, it is better, as we will have more troubleshooting options and control options, through a control center device.
We use various versions of the solution. For the access layer switch, we have different models, including 2950 and 2960. Now, we are using the 9K series, 9200. The latest one. This is for the access layer. For core and distribution switches, we have 6500 and 4500 versions.
I'd recommend the solution to others.
I would rate them at a nine out of ten.
When it comes to Cisco Catalyst Switches, one can say that the legacy switches are stable. We have been using them for so long and there are many who feel comfortable with their use. This can vary with the business size, some being entry, medium or enterprise level, which means its use is geared towards every level.
All other modules have comparatively many more functions or power than regular Catalyst switches.
We have been using Cisco Catalyst Switches since the outset, for more than 20 years.
Being legacy switches, Catalyst switches are stable. We have been using them for many years and there are many who are comfortable with their use.
Nexus, which uses NX-OS, runs on a different operating system than CatOS, which means that the latter tends to run on OS - just like a Cisco router - only with the functioning being a bit different. While NX-OS is very different, even when it comes to the command line, most things are the same.
However, NX-OS already introduced a different concept, which is more like a carrier level. They have a dedicated command management module. All other modules have comparatively many more functions or power than regular Catalyst switches.
Catalyst is a legacy system and we are already utilizing the 9000 series, including 9200, 9300 and 9800 for different use scenarios. As Catalyst covers all levels and areas, I cannot think of anything needing improvement. It is getting to be very good, performance-wise, at the moment.
We are talking about a network portion. Catalyst and Nexus switches are all part of the network domain.
I rate Cisco Catalyst Switches as a nine-point-five out of ten, since it is a great, albeit imperfect, product.
We primarily use it to provide a hierarchy in the data center, enterprise solutions, and high availability solutions.
The performance of this equipment is much better than other options. The warranty on offer is perfect for me as they attend to issues in a maximum of four hours or within the next business day.
The solution is easy to implement and quick to deploy.
The solution is very stable.
I found the scalability to always be good.
The technical support, in some cases, should be faster and could improve.
I've been using the solution for ten years. It's been a decade. I've dealt with Cisco for a while.
The product is stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable.
The scalability potential is very high. I can put many types of equipment on it and the solution will keep in the same level performance. It doesn't dip.
Currently, we have 1,000 people on the solution.
I do plan to implement the solution in future projects, as, so far, it has been issue-free and works very well.
Technical support could be a bit more responsive.
in terms of the initial setup, and how easy or hard it is, it depends on the technical knowledge base and on the person that will be implementing the solution.
I was working with data center providers, and, for us, with our level of knowledge, every time it was very easy to implement this equipment.
The deployment is pretty fast. After a couple of hours, you should have it up and running. We had a big team as well, which helped ensure it didn't take us long.
We have about 15 people at three technical levels that can handle maintenance tasks.
I implemented the solution myself. I did not need an integrator or consultant to assist.
Likely, after three or so years, you may see an ROI.
The licensing costs vary. If you buy a lot, the costs are lower, however, if you only need a few, the costs are very, very high.
You can also pay for additional support that guarantees four-hour or next-day resolutions.
I am a solutions provider. We're consultants and we help other companies implement this solution.
I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten.
I would recommend the solution to other users and organizations.
We use Catalyst switches to extend our network throughout the facility. It's a big facility, so we need to use switches the ABS to get the signal out to the entire facility.
I like Cisco because you are dealing with something old that the new generation doesn't know about, like telnet or how to configure the switch. I don't like simple GUIs where you can do everything with a click.
I can't use older Cisco devices with newer versions of the controller or switches. For example, if a switch was manufactured in 2014, I can't use it with a controller made in 2019. I have to change the switch so that I can upgrade my network or my devices. I don't have the option to update the version I have on the image of the AP or the controller.
Also, in the K5 Series of the switches — Cisco calls them "Core" switches — they have some commands that Catalyst doesn't support, so you have to know the command lines for two different devices to configure them. It's a bit confusing when you are working on both at the same time, and you have some problems, then you notice that you didn't use the correct command for that switch.
I've been using Cisco Catalyst for five years, but I've only been working with the solution in-depth for the past few months.
Catalyst Switches are reliable. We don't have major problems like lost connections, and we only have a minor issue with something every few months. In the last five years, a switch broke down once, and that was due to human error.
Cisco customer service is excellent. We had some issues with devices, and Cisco replaced them for us. We had some significant problems with one of the switches because they changed the image. It took a while, but overall, the support is good.
It's not hard if you have some networking experience. I didn't deploy the switches by myself. We had some help from the vendor, and I supervised them.
With some competitors, yes, it's about, let's say very high price. Half the price you can get Jupiter, or I think also, I forget the brand, TP-Link, you can have something like that, but half the price with it, with maybe also advanced features to deal with it.
I would rate Cisco Catalyst switches seven out of 10.
My primary use case is providing Catalyst switches for the edge and campus networking. You may have lots of IoT switches, like surveillance access points and you need to implement IPE switches that deliver the power and networking through the endpoint sensors. Most of these are considered access switches. We then implement the distribution layer that links all of the access switches and network traffic, then move to the course switches that handle all the packets and connect all the buildings to each other. After, the core is connected to the firewall, from Cisco as well, to get out of building to the internet. So the core portfolio comes from access to the core. I end with the firewall and the routers to the internet.
Cisco's support is called SMARTnet, but we provide support to customers in case of any troubleshooting or if it's on-premises. We act as a mid-layer between the customer and Cisco. Most customers deploy it on-premises, but some prefer to build their own private cloud.
The most valuable feature is that Cisco comes with built-in software access for network devices. You may use SDN for SD-Access, so you don't need to configure each switch with its own configuration, but can deploy the configuration from a single point of management. You can also monitor the traffic and access for the users. Especially if they are using their own laptops, you can make a VLAN for each switch. Cisco is a very stable portfolio format considering the network features and the heavy duties of traffic.
The prices could be improved. Cisco is dedicated to providing their customers with the latest technology, but it comes with a price. It's very expensive and when compared to competitors' products, like HP or Aruba, this is the most expensive one.
I can't think of any additional features I would like to see in the next version. The features included are sufficient.
I have been working with Cisco Catalyst for more than ten years.
Cisco is famous for its stability and operating system. It's a very stable platform for heavy-duty network traffic.
Catalyst is easy to scale, especially because of stacking. The stack member can reach out to each member per the tech stack group as well as for Catalyst. As long as you have a sufficient number of ports in the core and distribution, you can scale and connect as much as you need in the access layers. If you exceed the number of ports existing in the distribution, you can add another distribution layer and connect them together to extend the number of endpoints.
I have been satisfied with technical support. Especially when it comes to hardware attachments, their response is very fast, and almost by the next business day, we're able to go and replace it on-premises for a customer.
The process was simple and straightforward. Most of us started our first year by taking Cisco courses, so we are talented at implementing and configuring Cisco switches. It depends on the project, but if you are looking at full premises with maybe 20 switches, the setup should take around three or four days.
We implemented through an in-house team. We are partnered with Cisco and have our own professional service team certification in data center, networking, security, and collaboration systems.
This is expensive, even when compared to competitors' products.
The Catalyst doesn't come with licensing, but it comes with models. It comes with nine key series, each with its own purpose: some are for access, some for distribution, and some for the core, so it's not a matter of licensing. The only licensing that you are using with Catalyst is either the Essential or Advantage licensing, which represents Layer 2 or Layer 3 switches. If you are going to use Layer 3 for routing, use the Advantage license. Otherwise, use the Essential license, which is meant for the access switches.
Dell EMC has a magnificent working portfolio, but customers still may not trust its durability and reliability. Most customers will choose Cisco rather than Dell EMC, even though Dell EMC has a reliable reputation and is very cost-effective. Yet, from my side as a partner and someone who works a lot with technology, I would recommend Dell EMC for customers with a smaller budget that needs a flexible and a cost-effective solution, rather than picking a small solution from Cisco. I would commit to buying a large solution from Dell EMC, then going with a reliable solution provider.
I would recommend Cisco Catalyst for its abilities, durability, and the support. Cisco is very familiar—all engineers know Cisco very well—and we can handle the troubleshooting and configuration.
The Advantage license is suitable for large companies. All of the oil and gas sectors use the Advantage license for their switches. Even they are not going to use all the layers or access switches, but they invest a lot and have a huge budget for networking. For a small or medium company, you could use and split the Essential license and the Advantage one based on building needs in order to optimize the cost and make sure your solution is cost-effective.
I would rate Cisco a nine out of ten. Not a ten because of the high price.
We are using all the three hierarchal models of Cisco Catalyst: 2960, 4500, and 6800. It is perfect for an enterprise setup where you have multiple buildings and you want to aggregate in a single building.
I think one switch should go beyond the 10 gig connectivity to 40 gigs.
I've been working with Cisco Catalyst switches for more than 10 years.
Cisco Catalyst switches are resilient.
We can have multiple Cisco switches, like seven or eight, on a stack for 300 users. So it is highly scalable and easy to manage. There are 15,000 users on our campus total.
Installing Catalyst Switches is straightforward, just like with any other Cisco device. For the Alto switch, it hardly takes 20 or 30 minutes. I believe we used a configurator. All in, it takes seven to eight people to deploy because we have a large number of switches. And on the operations team, we have seven to eight people managing them.
I rate Cisco Catalyst switches nine out of 10. I would definitely recommend them to others.
We use Cisco Catalyst Switches for the office network.
It can be expanded.
The integration is quite easy.
While it is scalable, it could be better.
I have been working with Cisco Catalyst Switches for more than two years.
We are using the latest version.
The stability is good. We have not had any stability issues with Cisco Catalyst Switches.
Cisco Catalyst Switches is a scalable product.
We have 450 people in our organization who use this solution.
We have no plans to increase usage at this time.
We don't have any issues with technical support.
When we report a problem, we receive the assistance we require.
Positive
We also use ATI.
The initial setup is quite straightforward.
The configuration is easy.
The installation took less than an hour.
You can do the installation yourself.
This solution is being maintained by a team of three people.
The licensing, and maintenance fees are paid on a yearly basis.
You can also choose between a three-year and a five-year licensing fee.
When you select the longest subscription period, you will receive a discount.
No
I would recommend this solution to others.
I would rate Cisco Catalyst Switches a nine out of ten.
We primarily use the solution for our server. It's a network solution as well.
It's a very popular solution.
We find the product very easy to configure.
The stability is very good.
The product can scale quite well.
Cisco is basically the number one switch in the market. It makes it hard for other options to compete.
The solution is expensive. Sometimes we will choose some cheaper options even though they are not as stable as Cisco's offering. However, if it is a small project, it may not be worth paying Cisco prices to get it done.
I've used the solution for two or three years at this point.
I have found the solution to be very stable. The performance is good. It doesn't crash or freeze. it's reliable.
The scalability has been excellent. A company shouldn't have any issues with expanding it if they need to.
We have three to five people that directly work with this product.
We already use so many Catalyst switches. I'm not sure if we intend to add any more.
We don't really need any support as we have a network engineer on staff that can help us troubleshoot if we have issues.
I can't speak to the initial setup. In terms of the installation process, we have a network engineer that will help us to install the switches when we need them.
The solution is expensive. There are other cheaper switches on the market. However, they may not necessarily be as stable as this option.
When you buy the Cisco, the price already includes a software license.
I'm not sure which version of the solution we're using. It might be the latest.
I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten. I've been pleased with its capabilities overall.
