Share your experience using Saleswhale

My main use case for Outreach is for prospecting and calling, cold calling, cold emails, and communication with ongoing prospects. In my daily workflow using Outreach, I have call tasks queued up and email tasks queued up for my prospecting to try and get first meetings with new prospects. I primarily specialize in new logo business sales at a SaaS company. Here at Ignite, that is what we are, and I use it every single day to do call tasks and call through to try and reach prospects. The biggest thing about my main use case is calling and emailing.

The best features Outreach offers are the organization of having the tasks for the day lined up and showing activity as far as being able to put down notes and record activity that I have had within Outreach. Outreach has positively impacted our organization by helping us as sales representatives to organize our tasks for the day and reach out to our current customers and our prospects that we are trying to sell to.

Outreach can be improved in several ways. Every now and then, it will have sync issues, especially with voice headsets. Sometimes it will have sync issues with headsets or sync issues with recording the calls that we made into our CRM, which is Salesforce. For the most part, it is pretty good, but these challenges do arise.

Integration with Claude or Gemini would be fantastic. It would be nice if Outreach had more integrations with AI chat models such as Claude or Gemini. Additionally, it would benefit from more functionality on the account research side, not just the task side. I rate it a seven because overall it is good and works well for what we need it for.

I have been working in my current field for about five and a half years.

Outreach is stable for the most part.

Outreach's scalability seems easy enough. I am not an implementer of it, but it seems fairly simple.

The customer support for Outreach is pretty good. I have never called Outreach customer support directly. I work through our channels internally on Slack, so based on what I have seen in the quickness of them working with our point of contact, I would probably say it is about a seven or an eight.

I did not use a previous solution before using Outreach.

I have not seen a return on investment for Outreach. I cannot share any relevant metrics such as time saved or other benefits because I am an end user.

I do not have any visibility into pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Outreach. I am an end user.

I did not evaluate other options before choosing Outreach. I joined Ignite and that is what the company was using.

I do not have anything else to add about the features. Regarding Outreach's AI capabilities, I do not know much about its governance and security. Regarding Outreach's AI capabilities, I think its accuracy and reliability of output are pretty good. I would rate Outreach a seven overall.

My main use case for Outreach is prospecting new leads to open new opportunities with clients in my day-to-day work.

A specific example of how I use Outreach for prospecting is that I make different sequences to send multiple emails from different ICPs and maintain a record for all my calls while using Outreach Dialer to make outbound calls from the ICPs.

Outreach fits into my workflow significantly because we constantly need to open the market with different industries and different people, so contacting a lot of people becomes easier with this tool.

In my opinion, the best features Outreach offers are the sequence, the dialer, and the AI that analyzes meeting recordings.

The sequence feature, dialer, and AI analysis have helped me significantly, as the dialer is the most efficient tool for my work throughout Latin America, and I am based in Mexico, making it essential to contact people across different countries.

The AI analysis is excellent because I can see the insights and highlights of meetings, which I can share with others on the team to help them learn, and the AI enables me to make better decisions about next steps in deals, making it a very important aspect of the tool.

Outreach has positively impacted my organization by helping us reduce the sales cycle from nine months to six months, which is very significant.

The principal factor that has helped us shorten the sales cycle with Outreach is the automation.

I have been using Outreach for almost two years.

Outreach is stable for us, and we have not faced any issues with downtime or reliability, which is one of the reasons we switched.

Outreach's scalability is very smooth; if we need more seats, we can easily make that transition.

Our experience with customer support has been positive; we have a very good account manager who assists us with any billing issues, and technically, we are in good standing.

Before Outreach, we used Gong, which is good and quite similar, but we switched to Outreach because it is a more complete tool that represents the next step for us.

The principal return on investment from Outreach is that the reduced sales cycle allows us to secure money more easily and in a shorter time frame, which we consider significant.

I find the pricing, setup cost, and licensing of Outreach to be fair, as we can afford it considering the benefits versus the cost, making us better and more reliable with the current pricing, and we have the necessary number of seats.

We only evaluated Outreach before making our decision.

My advice to others looking into using Outreach is that it is a very easy tool to use, and they have a very good AI feature in the tool that can help improve your work. Everything about Outreach is excellent. I would rate this product a 10.