Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
reviewer1300365 - PeerSpot reviewer
General Manager - Site Reliability and Software Enginee at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Easily identify and manage compliance and vulnerability issues in a single, centralized view
Pros and Cons
  • "SaltStack has given us the ability to deal with systems at scale and rectify issues at scale."
  • "There is a little bit of pain when it comes to libraries and what is needed to run the product."

What is our primary use case?

We are using SaltStack SecOps for a rather large fleet of VMs that include a mixture of both Linux and Windows, with many different OS versions for each. It is used to view the compliance of the systems within our infrastructure.

This product brings all of the rich data that it collects under once central view. It makes the remediation of compliance or security issues quick and easy to understand. Being able to see this data allows us to be agile and we are able to make changes on a massive scale, thus reducing the manpower needed to implement changes. 

How has it helped my organization?

SaltStack has given us the ability to deal with systems at scale and rectify issues at scale. This, along with the fact that SaltStack is a event engine, allows teams to be able to to creatively attack problems and view problems within our infrastructure.

The SecOps product allows us to see where there may be issues, what a current patch level may be at, and what the recommended patch is.

As far as compliance, SecOps is able to reduce the time it takes us to verify our systems are compliant with policy.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature is the ability to see both compliance and vulnerabilities in a dashboard view. Being able to see that data in one place is a real game-changer. This, along with the rich metadata from our systems allows us to be able to drill down to very specific facts about each and every system. With this level of insight, we are able to make changes both at scale as well as at an individual system or application level.

SaltStack SecOps has the ability to react to events and also allows us to start reacting automatically to issues that might be in that infrastructure.

What needs improvement?

SaltStack is still growing, and so there are still those growing pains.

Sometimes in order to get the functionality you want, you need to update to the latest and greatest of the software.  For companies that traditionally like to wait for bugs to be found, this can be a bit painful.   Most of the downsides are because the product is growing and is becoming more and more useful, so I can't complain too much about that.  It's evident that SaltStack is listening to it's customers and wants to create a fully functional piece of software.

Buyer's Guide
VMware Aria Automation
June 2025
Learn what your peers think about VMware Aria Automation. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2025.
862,514 professionals have used our research since 2012.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using SaltStack for three months.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

This product seems to handle our scale issues so far.

How are customer service and support?

From our experience, there are not very many issues that we've found with the product in of itself. I'm sure that as we need to scale out, there may be some help/guidance that we need to inquire of support/professional services, but I'm confident that those groups within SaltStack will be able to provide the guidance that is needed to be successful.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Prior to this, we used Puppet/SaltStack open-source. The Puppet solution had scale issues, and SaltStack Open Source didn't have the SecOps product

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We did not evaluate other options before choosing this solution.

What other advice do I have?

SaltStack, when viewed in the light that it is an event engine, is a very powerful tool.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Solutions Architect at a healthcare company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Video Review
Real User
It improves time to market and makes a developer's life easier
Pros and Cons
  • "In terms of scalability, vRA has connections to a lot of different systems. It's very flexible and an impressive product."
  • "vRealize automation stability is pretty good. They are always fixing bugs. The product team is doing a great job of addressing any issues that we might have."
  • "vRealize Automation has improved the speed of provisioning just by automating things, making people think about whether a human really needs to do something or can we make the machines do it for us. It is a lot faster to deploy things now."
  • "vRealize Automation on the back-end is still a little complicated. It has a lot of moving pieces, simplifying that from a pure infrastructure point of view would be a good thing. I would then like to have more out-of-the-box functionality and integrations with VMware components."

What is our primary use case?

Our primary use case for the product is self-service IT. VMware builds it as a portal for self-service and infrastructure as a service, which is what we are using it for, as we roll forward automating and orchestrating more tasks and being able to push things out of the hands of sys admins and into the hands of the users and app admins.

How has it helped my organization?

Digital transformation is more of a people problem than a technology problem in many cases. It is getting people used to the idea of self-service people and not having to go talk to the sys admin all the time, and empowering people to get things done. That's a real big thing. That's probably the biggest part of the change that this tool has on our organization: empowerment.

What is most valuable?

The solution has increased the infrastructure agility from people's perceptions of the infrastructure: Having an actual private cloud or something on-premise, which people can turn to a Window and provision things when they need it. The end result is it appears to be more agile, then the back-end is just the back end. 

  • vRealize Automation has improved the speed of provisioning just by automating things, making people think about whether a human really needs to do something or can we make the machines do it for us. It is a lot faster to deploy things now.
  • It has improved time to market. Just by improving them, making provisioning increases, time to provision, time to market is a definitely improved. 
  • It makes a developer's life easier. They don't have to interact with their sys admins for everything anymore. It's an empowering thing.

We can automate a number of things which weren't automated before, then tie into things like VMware NSX and vRealize Operations Manager. We put things into their hands directly that were never there before, so not only do they feel empowered, but they can get their job done faster.

What needs improvement?

vRealize Automation on the back-end is still a little complicated. It has a lot of moving pieces, simplifying that from a pure infrastructure point of view would be a good thing. I would then like to have more out-of-the-box functionality and integrations with VMware components.

For how long have I used the solution?

More than five years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

vRealize Automation stability is pretty good. They are always fixing bugs. The product team is doing a great job of addressing any issues that we might have.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

In terms of scalability, vRA has connections to a lot of different systems. It's very flexible and an impressive product. It's almost scarily flexible.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We came to the conclusion that vRealize automation was right for us as part of an effort on our campus to consolidate IT from a real distributed model into a less distributed model, but still retain a lot of local control with departments.

A lot of higher education institutions have similar problems. People want to retain local control, but all the IT is spread out all over campus. This is a real problem. 

As we talked to people, a private cloud was the way we felt we needed to go: To be able to do self-provisioning and self-service for groups who really wanted it. We also wanted to be able to add additional advanced features, workflows, integration points, and approval processes, and vRealize Automation could do all of that. 

We were able to span from our simplest customer to our more complicated customer in the same product. This is why the product appealed to us.

How was the initial setup?

I was involved in the initial setup of our environment.

The vRealize Automation team, when they released version 7 awhile ago, made immense improvements as far as being able to install and deploy the product, which has been super helpful. 

We track vRealize automation versions pretty closely. There are always new features which are of interest to us, bugs which have been fixed, and the upgrade process has been really smooth lately.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

There is confusion between licensing levels. There are three different licensed versions of vRealize Automation, and there are different things which can happen in each of them. This is confusing.

vRealize automation really should be a front door to the whole VMware suite of products. The front door to a cloud: Just open it up, and let everyone do whatever they need.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We've been with vRealize Automation for a while now. 

OpenStack was pretty immature at the time that we were evaluating the solution. We also looked at Embotics and their stuff.

There are a lot of good options in this space. There is a lot of competition now. Do your due diligence around it. The VMware solutions stand on their own, but look around. Know what you are after: 

  • Are you after infrastructure? 
  • Are you after multi-cloud? 

Everything has a different focus.

What other advice do I have?

The solution is getting better. VMware has been paying a lot of attention to it lately, and it's been inheriting a lot of their cloud efforts, user interface improvements, and getting more intuitive. It's a nice thing. To be able to build custom forms and do more things, which directly respond to our customer's needs.

If I had to rate the solution one to ten, I would give it a seven. There is room for improvement, but it looks like they are making those improvements and putting a lot of work into it.

Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
VMware Aria Automation
June 2025
Learn what your peers think about VMware Aria Automation. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2025.
862,514 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Technical Manager at Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Real User
Significantly reduces the staff required to manage our environment
Pros and Cons
  • "Today, if I want to provision one VM, it takes me five minutes. Earlier, it would take a minimum of 30 minutes to go and choose everything. Now, I can just do one click and it can provision my whole VM. We also integrated with our Alexa, so even through voice functionality, I can create a VM. One of the guys at VMware, along with our partner, deployed that in our environment. If I say, "Hey, Alexa, I need a VM with four gigs of RAM," it will go and start creating it."
  • "The most valuable feature is, instead of doing the VMotion manually, we have automated everything with a script, using vRealize. That means I don't need to think about things like compatibility. The system will do everything for me and just give me a report."
  • "usability; It's very user-friendly. It is not hard to go and find things. There is a one-click Help that you can use to find all the documentation you need to manage it."
  • "compare-to-competition; Citrix was on our short list. But over the last ten years, we have been a big VMware shop. We wanted to continue with VMware because we are confident that VMware can address any kind of problem situation, any challenges. But with Citrix, we didn't find that kind of credibility when we did solution testing, a PoC."

    What is our primary use case?

    We use vRealize Automation for monitoring and for some administration tasks. Anytime we do upgrades or patching, we just read the reports and it makes our lives easier.

    How has it helped my organization?

    Earlier we used to spend a whole day to collect all the information regarding upgrades or patches. When we introduced vRealize, it reduced the time to between 30 minutes and one hour to finish the whole job.

    It has also improved provisioning a lot. Today, if I want to provision one VM, it takes me five minutes. Earlier, it would take a minimum of 30 minutes to go and choose everything. Now, I can just click once and it can provision my whole VM. We also integrated with our Alexa, so even through voice functionality I can create a VM. One of the guys at VMware, along with our partner, deployed that in our environment. If I say, "Hey, Alexa, I need a VM with four gigs of RAM," it will go and start creating it.

    In addition, it has reduced our CapEx and OpEx, especially the OpEx values. Initially, we had 25 people to manage it. After going with vRealize, 15 people can do all the jobs and they can concentrate on other improvements as well. It's good for our company.

    What is most valuable?

    The most valuable feature is that, instead of doing the VMotion manually, we have automated everything with a script, using vRealize. That means I don't need to think about things like compatibility. The system will do everything for me and just give me a report.

    It's very user-friendly. It is not hard to go and find things. There is a one-click Help that you can use to find all the documentation you need to manage it.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    From a stability perspective, VMware is number one compared to other products that are available in the market. We have never had any major downtime, after going to vSphere 6.5 and afterward. Earlier, yes, there were challenges, but nowadays it's very smooth and very straightforward.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    VMware products are meant for scalability. For example, today my environment is 1500 VDS's. We acquired a company with 300 users. To merge them, I didn't need to worry about anything like hardware because it was already there. I was able to do it on the fly in one shot.

    How are customer service and technical support?

    What we like about VMware, especially if I compare it with other vendors, is the support. When we call directly, the technical people jump in and start supporting us. Deploying the solution is, maybe. a three-month process. After that, managing it can be painful. So when a vendor is ready to offer that kind of support, a customer is ready to adopt their solutions. That's why we like VMware support.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    We are a VMware shop. We also have Citrix and Microsoft hypervisors but, compared to both of them, VMware is the best for us, for our environment.

    When selecting a vendor, price is not the only criterion. The product availability and how much better their support is, are also important.

    How was the initial setup?

    In the initial setup, I took care of the hardware part, but the software layer and other things were taken care of by my engineers. It was straightforward.

    Currently, we are upgrading the environment. Compared to the earlier versions, from my experience, the upgrade process is easier; for example, the compatibility checks. I also don't need to go and find out the resources that are required. It tells me in one report what the current environment is like and, if I want to go to the next level, what things I need to take care of. Based on that I can make things happen.

    What was our ROI?

    In a year, I used to spend, say, $10 per user. Now it's $5 per user. That is our approximate return on investment, 

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    Citrix was on our short list. But over the last ten years, we have been a big VMware shop. We wanted to continue with VMware because we are confident that VMware can address any kind of problem situation, any challenges. But with Citrix, we didn't find that kind of credibility when we did solution testing, a PoC.

    What other advice do I have?

    I rate VMware a nine out of ten. To get to a ten there are a few areas they could improve, especially vSAN. Performance-wise, there are no challenges, but from a product perspective, it is not that flexible. What we have in vSphere today is very flexible, but vSAN is not.

    Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
    PeerSpot user
    IT Manager at a individual & family service with 10,001+ employees
    Real User
    We're able to support developers, giving them the box they need within minutes
    Pros and Cons
    • "Even with the virtualization, it would take us at least three or four days to create a VM. With vRA we have brought that down to seven minutes. The solution has helped increase infrastructure, agility, speed of provisioning, time to market, application agility. Everything got super fast."

      What is our primary use case?

      It's our private cloud platform.

      How has it helped my organization?

      My engineers were able to pick it up quickly and we provisioned and created a private cloud in roughly three months.

      Even with the virtualization, it would take us at least three or four days to create a VM. With vRA we have brought that down to seven minutes. The solution has helped increase infrastructure, agility, speed of provisioning, time to market, application agility. Everything got super fast.

      It's also easier for IT to support developers. As soon as the developer wants a box, we can pretty much put it out there in a few minutes, instead of wading through a lot of manual paperwork and forms and email boxes and the like.

      What is most valuable?

      The solution is intuitive and user-friendly. It only took three months to start a private cloud. It was very good. Guys that didn't have a lot of knowledge in scripting picked up on it. Then I hired a VMware solutions architect and it just skyrocketed from there because he knew the ins and outs.

      What needs improvement?

      I can't say what new features I'd like right now because we're looking forward to the stuff that's in 7.5. I need some stick-time on 7.5 and then I can tell you what I want to see in 7.6 or 7.7.

      For how long have I used the solution?

      One to three years.

      What do I think about the stability of the solution?

      It's very stable. We haven't had any issues and we've been using it for roughly two years. We're upgrading to the 7.5 now.

      What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

      It scales fine. We've been scaling on storage but we actually have two divisions. We just deployed it to another division to help them out. The company I work for grows by acquisition so the new acquisitions are now getting this pointed to them so they can provision faster, with basically the same standards, instead of doing stuff manually.

      How are customer service and technical support?

      Regarding technical support, because we have a solution architect on board, we have a lot of problems but his questions are not normal questions. His questions almost have to be escalated to a developer immediately. He doesn't ask anything simple or even just plain hard. His stuff is nearly impossible.

      From that perspective, technical support has not done very well. But we have rockstars on the team and there's no way you're going to get great support because these guys are asking questions that even the rockstars of the VM world are scratching their heads about.

      Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

      I brought VMware into the company in 2004. Before that it was manual, bare metal boxes.

      How was the initial setup?

      I was involved in the initial setup but not as an engineer. Before I hired Alex, we had a guy put the stuff up. He did it in a couple of days. It was straightforward and it was functional, it worked really well. Then we got this new guy and he had so much insider knowledge. He worked out of Moscow. He was doing all the work for the all the other customers and we hired him in.

      We're on 7.4, we're going to upgrade to 7.5 after Labor Day. Since we've gone live, we've done three upgrades and they've all been really good. No issues.

      What was our ROI?

      I can't provide numbers off the top of my head but going from three or four days to seven minutes to create a VM - and that seven minutes can go up to 50 servers wide - means it has worked beautifully.

      Which other solutions did I evaluate?

      We evaluated Hyper-V, that was a big failure. We looked at KBM, that was pretty good. We're using Acropolis Hypervisor right now. Everything is still primitive, but among the other ones, AHV from Nutanix seems to be the most stable functionally but it is still missing a whole lot of toolsets that you need. So we're not moving in that direction any time soon.

      The other competitors are throwing everything at you for free but they don't have any management. You don't have the feature set that you have in vROps. vRA is much more sophisticated. You get what you pay for with VMware. You're getting all the feature set. Where everybody else is trying to give you stuff for free, they're harder to work with and then you spend more man-hours.

      What other advice do I have?

      Start with VMware vRA. Other solutions haven't been in the game long enough. You're going to have a lot of custom-scripting that VMware already puts in there.

      I rate it an eight out of 10 only because I wish we had a way to get through the technical support department faster. We've been with them long enough - and I've already talked to the sales guy about this - that they should almost have an "express lane." You lose two or three days going through the normal process. It goes to level-one and he bounces it to level-two, to level-three, when pretty much, because we've got this long history, they should know that when we call, it needs to be bounced all the way up to the top. That's just the reality.

      Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
      PeerSpot user
      Min Chan Myae - PeerSpot reviewer
      Project Manager at Access Spectrum Company Limited
      Real User
      Reliable, helpful support, and scales well
      Pros and Cons
      • "The most valuable feature of VMware Aria Automation is the versatile automation and deployments."
      • "VMware Aria Automation could improve reporting of the policies. They are difficult to customize. We have many policies but they are not able to be modified to what we want."

      What is our primary use case?

      VMware Aria Automation is used for automation.

      What is most valuable?

      The most valuable feature of VMware Aria Automation is the versatile automation and deployments.

      What needs improvement?

      VMware Aria Automation could improve reporting of the policies. They are difficult to customize. We have many policies but they are not able to be modified to what we want.

      For how long have I used the solution?

      I have been using VMware Aria Automation for approximately three years.

      What do I think about the stability of the solution?

      The solution has been stable and smooth in operation.

      What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

      We have one customer using the solution. The solution is best suited for enterprise companies.

      The solution is scalable.

      How are customer service and support?

      The support is good.

      I rate the support from VMware Aria Automation a nine out of ten.

      How would you rate customer service and support?

      Positive

      How was the initial setup?

      The initial setup of VMware Aria Automation was not difficult.

      What about the implementation team?

      We did the deployment of the test environment.

      What other advice do I have?

      I would recommend this solution to others.

      I rate VMware Aria Automation an eight out of ten.

      Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

      On-premises
      Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. partner
      PeerSpot user
      SrManage32bf - PeerSpot reviewer
      Sr. Manager, Open Systems Service Desk at a healthcare company with 501-1,000 employees
      Real User
      Streamlines DevOps, enables us to incorporate and automate Day 2 Operations
      Pros and Cons
      • "The most valued feature is the streamlining of the DevOps process, automation and orchestration. It provides the ability for the entire Dev lifecycle to actually be incorporated into a single stream."
      • "We still struggle a little bit with the configuration as far as making sure that we have all the endpoints where they need to be, because that's not as agile as we'd like in the back-end. We're working towards that with our DevOps teams to make sure that we're touching the right endpoints and getting the right data."
      • "in general, it took us a long time to get it off the ground. We had a lot of issues upfront and we determined that we just needed to scrap it. I think we scrapped it two or three times before we actually got it built the way we wanted, and we're still not where we need to be. We have had downtime. There have been some issues, but we're also two iterations behind on version."

      What is our primary use case?

      DevOps is our primary use case. It's performing okay. We're getting ready to upgrade and move into an HA environment, so it will be much better.

      How has it helped my organization?

      The benefit to our organization is time to market. It has streamlined the process so that they can deploy systems, test the systems, and get the product to market faster. Speed of provision is much faster than what we used to manage, especially when we incorporate Day 2 Operations. We can get that into the automation and allow for that to take place, as opposed to the DevOps teams doing that all manually.

      It has absolutely helped to increase infrastructure agility - not to its capacity by any stretch, but we're working towards that. It definitely has allowed us to be a little bit more agile.

      What is most valuable?

      The most valued feature is the streamlining of the DevOps process, automation and orchestration. It provides the ability for the entire Dev lifecycle to actually be incorporated into a single stream. That's our primary focus.

      What needs improvement?

      We still struggle a little bit with the configuration as far as making sure that we have all the endpoints where they need to be, because that's not as agile as we'd like in the back-end. We're working towards that with our DevOps teams to make sure that we're touching the right endpoints and getting the right data.

      Also, what we would like to see is a lot more integration across platforms, multi-cloud. I think that's coming.

      For how long have I used the solution?

      More than five years.

      What do I think about the stability of the solution?

      in general, it took us a long time to get it off the ground. We had a lot of issues upfront and we determined that we just needed to scrap it. I think we scrapped it two or three times before we actually got it built the way we wanted, and we're still not where we need to be. We have had downtime. There have been some issues, but we're also two iterations behind on version. We're getting ready to move to a new HA environment and go on to the newest product line.

      What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

      Right now, it doesn't scale for us, but it will once we move into the new environment. It will probably scale five years out, especially with the way that we can integrate different endpoints.

      How are customer service and technical support?

      Technical support has been phenomenal. Most of the time we get to the right person, but not always. We eventually do because we know who we need to talk to.

      Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

      Previously, we used a product called LiveManager. It was not across the entire organization, it was just a subset, so there was nothing really prior to this.

      When looking at a vendor, the most important criterion is how good a partner will they be? Will they be around? Is it somebody that we can trust and that has been utilized in the marketplace? In addition, is the solution scalable? And then we'll look at cost.

      How was the initial setup?

      No way was the initial setup straightforward. We scrapped it multiple times. Going through some of the sessions today, here at VMworld 2018, we see that they're incorporating some of the certificate management and so forth. That's where our biggest challenge was.

      Upgrading was pretty straightforward. In-place upgrades worked really well for what we've done. There wasn't a whole lot to that. It worked well.

      Really, it's all about the initial setup and making sure that it is set up right.

      What was our ROI?

      We haven't calculated an ROI but we've realized ROI in manpower.

      Which other solutions did I evaluate?

      At the time, there wasn't really any competition when we decided to go this route. It was really only VMware.

      What other advice do I have?

      In general, I'd recommend vRA but make sure that your framework is set, that you understand what your processes are so that you can fit into the framework.

      It's not intuitive and user-friendly but we've made it that way. We've allowed the DevOps teams to incorporate some of their components inside of the catalogs themselves, so we give them a little bit more flexibility, rather than dictating what they need to do. That way, it really runs true to their process.

      I rate vRA about an eight out of ten because of the inability to get this thing stood up, initially. We weren't the first to actually do it, and yet, it seemed like we were the first to do it. But because of its scalability, it's a product that we decided to go with.

      Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
      PeerSpot user
      CEO at Lidoma
      Real User
      It is a source for restoration services
      Pros and Cons
        • "The most important thing that we missed in vRanger was the possibility to mount several images instantaneously and present it so we can run it immediately."

        What is our primary use case?

        We primarily use it for restoration services.

        What needs improvement?

        The most important thing that we missed in vRanger was the possibility to mount several images instantaneously and present it so that we can run it immediately.

        What do I think about the stability of the solution?

        Stability is fine. 

        What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

        The scalability is not good. It is slow to scale to our needs. 

        How was the initial setup?

        The installation was complex and time consuming.

        What other advice do I have?

        I would not recommend this product. I think that there are better products to meet your needs that are competitors on the market. 

        Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
        PeerSpot user
        Cloud Architect at Swisscom
        Real User
        User-friendly and perfect for the end-user
        Pros and Cons
        • "For repeated installations and provisioning of VMs, we now have a clear definition of what has been installed, and we can monitor all that stuff."
        • "The initial setup was complex because we have a high availability cluster. Especially when it comes to upgrades, we have a lot of downtimes and problems. The upgrade experience has been painful."

        What is our primary use case?

        Our primary use case of this solution is to provide our clients with a virtual private cloud. It has been performing very well. We've had some multi-tenancy issues but VMware has been very supportive. 

        How has it helped my organization?

        For repeated installations and the provisioning of VMs, we now have a clear definition of what has been installed, and we can monitor all that stuff. There are some functions for the ICDs, and we have continuous development and deployment.

        It theoretically could help provision new clients faster if you adhere to the limits of the product then it makes provisioning the new client a lot faster. If you have customers like we have that are really demanding and want special solutions it will end up in huge customization.

        What is most valuable?

        We like the blueprint designer. We can create topologies with it. 

        I have found it to be user-friendly because it's very UI centric. We have a problem that most of our developers would like to have it more on a flat file format. For our end user, it's just perfect.

        What needs improvement?

        I would like to see multi-tenancy in NSX and better functionality. 

        For how long have I used the solution?

        One to three years.

        What do I think about the stability of the solution?

        We have found this solution to be stable as long as we don't test its limits. We have had huge installations where we had some problems with performance and stability. 

        What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

        If you have a normal use case like a conventional enterprise and use it for yourself then you might never test its limits. In our case, our customers are creating a lot of business groups and this led to a lot of problems later on.

        How are customer service and technical support?

        Their technical support is very good and swift. 

        Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

        We switched because we don't want to focus on the cloud management platform. We want to have this resolved and supported by a vendor because we are system integrators and want to supply the services and the knowledge above that. 

        How was the initial setup?

        The initial setup was complex because we have a high availability cluster. Especially when it comes to upgrades, we have a lot of downtimes and problems. The upgrade experience has been painful. 

        What about the implementation team?

        The product as a whole was offered by Dell EMC but we used VMware as an integrator and for the setup. We still have some VMware specialists working within our team.

        What was our ROI?

        We have seen ROI. 

        What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

        We built everything from scratch, it ended up being very costly. 

        What other advice do I have?

        I would rate this solution a seven because it hasn't perfectly adapted to our use cases with multi-tenancy. 

        If you're looking into this solution I would tell you that if you use this solution only within your own company, you'll be fine. If you have a business like ours, it can get complicated. 

        Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Partner.
        PeerSpot user
        Buyer's Guide
        Download our free VMware Aria Automation Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
        Updated: June 2025
        Buyer's Guide
        Download our free VMware Aria Automation Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.