Trend Micro Deep Security Reviews

We primarily use the solution for security purposes. 

I cannot speak to any specific feature that has wowed me. 

It serves its purpose and works well.

The initial setup is easy. 

The stability of the product has been good over the last 12 months. 

We have found that the solution scales well.

The cost is very high. it would be ideal if they would work on the pricing.

Technical support could be much better.

The product should be able to host a vulnerability scanner. Right now, we need to pay extra. It would be ideal if they could do a vulnerability scan of my endpoints. 

I've been using the solution for 12 months or so. It's been about a year. 

The stability has been very good in the year that we have used it. I haven't found any issues. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze.  It's reliable.

The scalability is very good. If a company needs to expand its usage, it can do so. 

Technical support has been below expectations. They don't seem to be as helpful or responsive as we need them to be. 

The price of the product is high. It's expensive. 

I'd rate the solution at a seven out of ten. It's been an okay solution, however, there still needs to be more done in certain areas. 

We are primarily using the product for IDS, IPS, and deep security.

It provides the type of data and availability that we need to have. We don't have to worry about intrusions.

• They delivered what they said that they would.
• The IDS and IPS features.

Trend Micro is not government certified or federal complaint. If they could become compliant/certified, this would make it easier for us to use it for our government projects.

I would give the product's stability a high rating. We trust the Trend Micro brand.

We are not that big in size, so we haven't had any scalability issues.

We are experiencing major technical support issues right now, and the technical support has been reasonable about fixing them.

The integration and configuration of Trend Micro in our AWS environment was easy. We haven't had any issues with this at all.

We did not purchase it through the AWS Marketplace because we have used Trend Micro in the past. We have not compared the pricing and licensing of buying it on the AWS Marketplace.

We also considered Pure Storage. In the end, we decided to only pursue Trend Micro because it is easier for us to install and use. The decision to use Trend Micro was based on cost, brand name, and ease of use.

I would recommend Trend Micro. We are happy with them. In the current world, you have to earn the business because it is like a subscription, and they keep us happy.

We don't have Trend Micro integrated with any other product except for our internal cloud solution. We just use the AWS version of the product.

There are several features I find valuable, including the fact that it's agentless, each module can be installed on its own, it provides a single pane of glass for managing it, its integration with VMWare (NSX), and items are auto-added as soon as they're discovered. Ease of use is a big plus because of the foregoing items.

We were having some AV issues around 2010 and the incumbent product had gotten big and clunky and was interfering with several desktops performance. When the solution let 3 viruses in over a few weeks I deemed it no longer suitable and we chose Trend Micro Deep Security as the replacement.

Right from the start it was easy: the installation routine very kindly sought out and removed the previous solution, greatly reducing deployment time (we implemented OfficeScan first) and DS uses auto discovery. Updates are automatic and run smoothly in off hours (except for pattern updates of course).

The Trend Micro solution was stable after a few tweaks and was instrumental in stopping an incursion of ransom ware that could have brought the company to its knees. Instead we had only a few file directories encrypted and we were able to restore those in about a day. We spend way less time on AV issues since implementing Trend Micro Deep Security.

There are several areas for improvement:

• The ability to manage agent-based AV (i.e. integrate Officescan into Deep Security) for desktops and laptops;
• Streamline the install (specifically configuring of external product requirements i.e. the VMware side); and
• Better integration with Control Manager (had a few issues with it not recognizing the DS server).

I've used it for over five years.

Deployment went surprisingly smoothly. Mind you we had a Trend Micro tech (Trevor) do the initial config.

We've had no issues with stability.

We've had no issues with scalability, but we're not a big shop (under 200 VM’s).

Trend Micro's service has always been one of its strong points. I don’t particularly like the online case management tool, but response has always been good. Local support is stellar (Vancouver, Canada area) – both reps and support techs.

Technical support is excellent. A Trend Micro tech was always available to me locally and this helped reduce the time-to-resolution of the few issues that came up.

Yes, we used Symantec. We found it was getting a larger footprint in memory and was starting to cause performance issues. When it failed to stop viruses 3 times in 3 weeks, I had enough. On all counts, Trend Micro is a superior product with superior people, and I have never regretted the switch.

It was a fairly standard install as we were not a large data centre. Trevor (then Martin) – both local Trend Micro techs - took about a day to get it all settled down. Over the next month, I made several support calls but mostly because I did not yet have the experience with it. After a month or so, I no longer needed the support.

The install was done by a Trend Micro tech (Trevor) and later supported by Martin Sima. Both are excellent fellows.

I'm not exactly sure what our ROI is as we did not quantify it. But I can say that supporting our users got a whole lot easier and we had a significant reduction in time spent on AV issues at the desktop. Management was easier (auto add new VM’s, etc.) and Control Manager provided reports for my bosses.

Trend Micro now does certificates and this made getting certs easy and fast. Pricing was competitive, although I have not looked at pricing recently. Licensing was also easy as each additional module could be licensed separately.

I was pretty aware of the market in 2010. I knew Symantec was not doing the job anymore and I had used Trend Micro in a previous life and knew the OfficeScan product. I also considered Sophos as they have a large local presence. I do not ever want McAfee again (bad experience back in the ‘90s). And I didn’t trust the Russian product.

Make friends with your local rep and support tech – they can help you over the gotchas and issues that invariably arise with a new implementation. There is lots of online training also from Trend Micro. And classroom courses are available; I took the Deep Security course in Ottawa the first year we had it.

The most valuable feature for us is moving the AV scanning engine to the hypervisor and removing it from the virtual machine. We also use the compliance reporting (reporting in general) feature.

It's given us a significant reduction of CPU/memory footprint required to run traditional AV products inside a virtual machine (VDI).

I'm not sure how this product could improve, although we did have some compatibility issues between it and versions of vSphere.

We've used it for 13 months.

During deployment, we had the issue of compatibility between vSphere and Deep Security.

The stability issue we had was with regard to vSphere.

We had no issues with scalability.

Customer service was initially very poor, but once we reclassified our account from mid-size to enterprise, the support was very good.

Technical support is above average.

We previously used Symantec SAV, but it was too heavy for VDI.

Our initial setup was somewhat complex and required a significant interaction with Trend Micro support. This is a very new concept of taking the AV engine outside the VM and it took us some time to feel comfortable with the whole idea. It also required some deep understanding of how Trend Micro Deep Security “embeds” into a VMware environment, and that was not a easy task to master.

We did the initial setup with our in-house team with significant help from Trend Micro technical support. I'd rate them very poorly because they completely missed the compatibility with vSphere issue. It took us a lot of time to fix the entire mess.

Our ROI is still unclear, but I'll have more details once the entire enterprise is moved to Trend Micro Deep Security.

Get a good reseller (our original VAR, MicroAge, had a difficult time clarifying some of the licensing vs. maintenance costs).

ESET and Symantec

Make sure your VMware SME is plugged in from the very beginning, do a limited low-level impact POC, and plug into the Trend Micro user community.

Trend Micro Deep Security is a complete solution and all the threat management has been taken care of.

I have been using Trend Micro Deep Security for two years.

I have not used technical support.

The price of Trend Micro Deep Security could be less expensive.

My advice to others is they can use Trend Micro Deep Security for their server-side instead of choosing Azure Firewall or AWS Firewall, which is a lot costlier when compared with the others. All threat management is taken care of, such as DDoS protection, and ransomware attacks.

I rate Trend Micro Deep Security an eight out of ten.

The most valuable feature for us is mainly the fact that we can control what the PC or server is doing protection-wise, even remotely. We use this protection feature all the time.

The main benefit it provides us is that it will show what the issues might be and it's scalable. It allows us to know that if we have an issue somewhere on one device or endpoint, we can correct it or get down to a level where we can find out what the problem is. For example, we can apply exclusions to set policies for a certain type of group that can scale for a lot of environments, whether it's Linux or Windows servers or Windows 10 endpoints.

I'd like to see some sort of database out-of-the-box. Deep Security uses its own database, with which we have some issues, but we just go right to SQL or another database. Right now, the standard database as to be converted to SQL or Oracle, but that's something that should be out-of-the-box standard.

We've used it for four years.

We've had no issues with deployment, other than the database issue.

We had one failure, but it came back up within twenty minutes, so we've really had no downtime.

Yes, it's been scalable. In the coming year, we're going to be testing many more policies and deploying it out in our system.

The setup was a little complex on the security side. But the endpoints -- desktops, laptops, were pretty easy. The server environments were a little more complicated and in-depth.

We implemented with a vendor team.

We very much have an ROI, and although I don't have numbers, I can see that we've been able to catch problems before they happen.

Make sure you perform thorough testing as there were different situations that came up for us that we didn't account for. I think that a POC would really be worth the investment because you can find out what the structure can do and what it can't. That's really important.

It gives clients an additional view of what's happening in their data centers.

Deep Security is on-prem at this stage, but it has got cloud workload protection that has similar functionality in the cloud.

In addition to providing our clients a view of what's happening in their data centers, it also does virtual patching in the data center. It enhances the security in the data center big time.

What this product lacks at this stage is the ability to have automated workbooks to do the response. At this stage, the response is more manual, and it is not automated. If there is a response functionality in Deep Security, similar to what we have in EDR these days, to automatically respond to some of the threats, it would be cool. So, we'd like to have an automated response. There should be a response functionality.

We have been providing this solution for a few years.

It is stable.

It is scalable, but it is fairly expensive.

In terms of its usage, we're not using it internally. We have three clients at the moment. They are fairly big clients.

Their technical support is good.

It is a bit more difficult because it needs a bit of hardware, etc. Deep Security is more complex to set up than web security. Implementing Deep Security properly is usually about a week's worth of work because of the change control in the company. It is the change control that's an issue.

In terms of people required for its deployment, one engineer is usually enough.

Most of it is annual at this stage.

I would definitely recommend it for medium enterprises. 

I would rate it a seven out of ten.

Virtual Patching (part of Integrity Monitoring module) is the most valuable because it shields vulnerabilities in critical systems until an actual patch is available and deployed reducing the downtime, and protecting unpatchable systems extending the life of legacy systems and applications. Also, the possibility to know which files have been changed in the host machine.

The possibility to extend the security of the datacenter to cloud using API integration to AWS, vCloud, Azure and others in a single management console is also valuable.

In the past, we had to search for a window of time to patch the OS and some applications and it took a long time up a virtual machine and make it available for our needs because its update process was very slow. Now, we don’t have to wait for this process because when we need a VM we can just boot one up and run and patch the VM at an opportune time.

We use it to help a large payment company in Brazil to process millions of credit card transactions a day, and others company with similar challenges.

It needs real-time anti-malware support for Amazon Linux and an option that allows you to classify and mark reports using tags like Top Secret or Confidential which are missing in Deep Security 9.5 but are in v9.6, which was released in January. We're still homologating 9.6 version with this new feature.

An improvement on its Control Manager integration is also needed because it's insufficient for individual and granular management. Control Manager is a console that integrates all Trend Micro products.

I've been using it since it was first released in 2010 and have used it in two different ways. At my own company, it's used to protect about 40 VMs on two hosts using VMware. It's also used for installing and supporting 36 clients over 250 servers and millions of transactions per day.

I'm one of the founders of company and I've been working as a technician from the beginning, my role was design, deployment planning and pre-sales support until the end of the last year with our support team. Now, I'm dedicating my time to executing our vision as CEO.

We have had no issues deploying it, especially when following the guides.

It has been stable in our deployments.

We have no issues scaling it when we need to.

Trend Micro has a Channel Partner ecosystem highly prepared to solve any questions and they work very closely with Trend Micro support services to deliver the best experience to their customers.

We did not have anything in place previously.

The deployment depends on how you set up your VMware environment and what features you’re using. Following the steps described in the Administrator and Deployment guides helps you to avoid any complications.

The implementation team was formed with inside analysts and vendor specialists. It's strongly recommended to use someone with the necessary skills to work with VMware and have someone familiar with infrastructure and security analysis.

Start with a small group of servers and the most important modules for your company. Depending on the way you buy the product, you have the benefit of renewing discounts up to 50% in the next year.

It's a hybrid platform with about five modules that will help you to manage and secure your datacenter and cloud initiative with multi-platform support. To get the same solution, you may have to contract at least four different vendors.