Trend Micro Deep Security Reviews

The virtual patching features of Trend Micro Deep Security are very good. If you're running an unpatched server and you need to do n-1 patching, you need to wait for a month for the patch to be rolled out. That one month is a long time for an attacker to do an attack. Virtual patching is a wonderful feature where we do a recommendation scan and an internal assessment on the server, and it updates the IPS signatures to block any attack. I have seen instances where it has prevented attacks on the end-of-support servers such as 2018 R2, and many years ago, even 2007 servers that were end-of-support. It certainly helped there.

Another big advantage of Trend Micro at the time was that it supported Linux. Nowadays, most of the vendors seem to be supporting the Linux operating system, but Trend Micro was the initial organization that started supporting Linux and anti-malware solutions. It only had the anti-malware solution. It didn't do file integrity monitoring or other things.

Trend Micro Deep Security is easy to use and deploy.

I've not worked with CrowdStrike Falcon, but one of our customers also had CrowdStrike Falcon on some of the devices. I was only supporting Trend Micro. They had a ransomware attack, but Trend Micro didn't detect that particular ransomware attack, whereas CrowdStrike did. I was not a big fan of CrowdStrike till then, but when I saw that Trend Micro couldn't detect that particular attack but CrowdStrike could, my opinion changed. All the servers with Trend Micro were impacted, but all the devices on which CrowdStrike agents were running weren't impacted. CrowdStrike detected and blocked the attack immediately. From that perspective, I have high regard for CrowdStrike because the role of an EDR is to detect and respond immediately and block an attack. Containment is the first priority. Trend Micro can give numerous ifs and buts about why it couldn't detect that attack, and even though I'm a fan of Trend Micro and have extensive experience with Trend Micro Deep Security and Trend Micro Apex One, in that particular instance, CrowdStrike literally beat Trend Micro.

A disadvantage of Trend Micro as compared to CrowdStrike is that it doesn't work well with other solutions. If you have McAfee for anti-malware and IPS and the firewall of Trend Micro, they don't go very well. I had challenges deploying it with Carbon Black as well as McAfee and Symantec. It's because of the way Trend Micro works. It integrates with the NIC driver, so if two agents are running, it doesn't work well because they both want to integrate with the NIC driver.

It's easy to deploy. I've deployed it for more than 12,000 devices, which includes endpoints and servers. It's easy to deploy and easy to manage. You can do it automatically through the script. The ease of implementation and ease of management are there, but there are a few challenges. Linux compatibility has some issues because it's a kernel-based rollout. Especially with CentOS, I face challenges. CentOS is now Red Hat, so if we are running CentOS, we have to deploy Red Hat agents and not CentOS agents. It's not that easy to manage on Linux. If it's a stable, standard Linux version, it works, but with beta versions, there are some challenges.

CrowdStrike had an advantage over Trend Micro when it came to pricing. Trend Micro had several modules, so it was a little priced up, but CrowdStrike was not. However, even CrowdStrike has increased their price now, so probably both of them are on par, but the number of modules that Trend Micro has is far more than CrowdStrike. It comes with file integrity monitoring, application control, and web reputation. It has outbound URL protection, and it also has ransomware protection for servers, whereas CrowdStrike Falcon is a straightforward solution. It isn't an apple-to-apple comparison. It's a big apple versus small apple kind of comparison.

My general advice to everyone is to first define your must-haves. What is it that you are looking for in a product? Nowadays, there are so many products with overlapping features, so you need to first decide what it is you are looking for. From a feature perspective, you should define must-haves and nice-to-have. 

You also need to test it out if you are running multiple products on the same server. You need to test it out on the utilization side because there is a huge utilization hit if you are running multiple agents on the same server. You need to work it out because Trend Micro, CrowdStrike, or any other agent would require a good amount of memory. There should be dedicated memory for them. If there is a 16-gig memory, at least 2-gig memory should be dedicated to them. There should be 2 gigs for it to just work and 8 gigs for the OS, so we are talking about a minimum of 10 gigs. If your servers are running on low memory, there'll be a huge utilization hit on the servers. Therefore, you need to choose the right agent. If you are running multiple agents, then you probably need to do a capacity evaluation before purchasing any of the tools. There are trial versions available, and PoCs are also available, so you can certainly check on it and see the utilization. Do proper homework before purchasing the tool. The tool is good, and it will perfectly work fine, but it also depends on the implementation.

At this time, I'd rate it an eight out of ten because of the challenge that I faced when I was dependent on this, but it couldn't protect the server. However, by now, Trend Micro would have fixed the problem that I faced a year ago. I know their Singapore EDR team. I worked with them, and they are quick in terms of fixing any bugs or issues. They would've definitely looked into it, but that was one instance for me where CrowdStrike outperformed Trend Micro.

We were using Trend Micro Deep Security for the sole purpose of virtual cloud management. It was the best VPM solution in the market, and other sites recognize the quality, such as the Gartner website.

The VPM is the most prized characteristic of Trend Micro Deep Security, which in addition addresses all zero-day vulnerabilities. This allows us to confidently transfer our system physically, as it presents to the external world, whether it be an intruder or a hacker, that our system is completely secure without any weak spots. Even if the latest security patches have not been installed or updated, the software virtually covers them for you.

There is room for improvement with Trend Micro Deep Security, as there are instances where installations may need to be redone. There seem to be glitches when working with older Windows servers, such as those from 2003 or 2005, requiring us to uninstall and reinstall the product to resolve the issue.

I have been using Trend Micro Deep Security for approximately two years.

The stability of Trend Micro Deep Security is highly reliable. The updates are done quickly.

Trend Micro Deep Security is highly scalable but requires licenses to be purchased for each endpoint that is configured. This may result in additional costs. However, it is compatible with a wide range of operating systems, including AIX, Linux, Windows Server, and Windows desktop operating systems.

We had two people managing Trend Micro Deep Security in my organization.

Most of the time, the support provided by Trend Micro Deep Security was limited to sending us troubleshooting steps that were already available on their public sites, indicating a need for improvement in this area. However, their response time was very quick, with a reply to my ticket within minutes, depending on the level of escalation. Overall, they were quite supportive.

The initial setup of Trend Micro Deep Security was easy. The setup process is GUI-based and straightforward. With just a few clicks, it can be installed on a virtual machine, and network access is then required. After installation, users can access the web application interface and proceed from there.

The deployment took approximately 10 to fifteen days if I exclude the network accesses.

If you want to scale the solution you will have to adjust the license.

If you manage a large IT infrastructure with hundreds of servers, it is not feasible to address them all at once, making Trend Micro Deep Security an excellent choice for first-time users. I highly recommend this solution to enterprise-level or large organizations that are hosting numerous servers. It is extremely helpful and saves a lot of time. 

It is one of the best vulnerability management systems available on the market, providing fast management solutions.

I rate Trend Micro Deep Security for approximately a nine out of ten.

We are using it for NetSpark, and I work for two organizations where I'm using this tool. In both, we are scaling our networks and endpoints, analyzing our traffic, and analyzing the endpoints and security.

In one organization where I started, we were using a SIEM solution and facing challenges like a lack of complete information. Deep Security has helped us to know where intrusion started, penetrated, and went within our network, thereby improving security.

I appreciate the complete visibility of information, including endpoints and detailed tracing from origin to navigation. It helps us detect and protect against network penetrations at the specific point of intrusion.

New patterns need improvement, as some new data access points are challenging to investigate and allow entry without detection. Improving this area and providing complete visibility would be beneficial.

I have been using this product for nearly eleven months.

I would rate the stability as eight out of ten.

I rate technical support a nine.

Positive

I previously used QRadar. Compared to QRadar, Trend Micro improves quickly based on feedback and provides more comprehensive solutions.

In one premises, we deployed it on the cloud, which was challenging at the start, while on another it was set on TensorFlow, which was comparatively easy.

Their team was very helpful during the deployment process. Trend Micro's team was particularly cooperative.

It has saved us time, money, and resources. We saved nearly forty percent of our time previously spent on manual investigations.

The pricing is very fair, although there are other cheaper options. Due to our limitations, Trend Micro was our best option.

I would rate it an eight out of ten.

I work in a finance-based company, so what we look at would be an anti-malware suite to inspect IPS policies, firewalls, and other such stuff.

The most valuable features of the solution are the log inspection and the IPS, which are the most effective compared to other tools.

Log inspection completely reviews all the logs on the machine rather than me going and investigating. I can take a quick look into the issues with Trend Micro Deep Security.

The tool needs to be made more user-friendly. The dashboard is there, but the solution's false positives are a bit higher.

I have been using Trend Micro Deep Security for three years. I am a customer of the solution.

It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a six to seven out of ten.

I have no complaints about the scalability of the product. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

If I speak about the support directly from Trend Micro's team, I rate the technical support as five out of ten.

If I consider the support that I get from Trend Micro's sales engineering team, I would rate the support as a seven or eight. The support team does not reply, and if they do, they provide a response after a week, even if you say that we urgently need their help. The local team in my country, which is the engineering team from the sales side, contacted us and asked whether they could help us in any way with the ticket raised from our end.

Neutral

The product's initial setup phase was super easy. Trend Micro's team was there to support us when we were setting it up. The sales team and sales engineering team were also helpful.

If ten means very easy setup and one means difficult, I rate the setup phase a seven to eight.

Within business hours, the solution was deployed in two days, considering that there was a need to set up policies and servers.

With Trend Micro's virtual patching in place, the IPS rules are quite effective, so I don't have to patch my systems right away. Trend Micro has been quite aggressive in releasing the IPS rules, which protect our servers from any such incidents.

I wouldn't think that I have seen any reduction in security-related costs since implementing the solution. I have not seen a reduction in the pricing of the security suite, given the fact that the risks have been increasing worldwide or at a global level. We have to put more money to protect ourselves.

I would not blame Trend Micro for not ensuring that users see the cost reductions. Considering the many developments in the general market, the tool has to stay updated.

The compliance management in Trend Micro Deep Security has not very much improved the security audits, especially since we are using the on-prem version. With the on-prem version, you don't get much of the compliance management part. The SaaS version is quite different and we are looking to switch to it.

The fact that Trend Micro Deep Security has integrated everything with Trend Vision One is something that is more than sufficient.

We are using the tool's on-prem version, so I don't think I have seen anything related to AI.

I have not seen anything related to automation in the tool.

The suite is better, so when you are buying a product, make sure that you squeeze everything into one since that is where the real money lies.

I think the major value for my company does not come from Trend Micro Deep Security but from Trend Micro Vision One, XDR Telemetry, and everything else.

If a person has completed the integration, you don't have to look at the different modules of Trend Micro Deep Security, as you can just log into Trend Vision One and do all the XDR analysis.

I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

We use Trend Micro Deep Security for servers and not for endpoints. So when it comes to the server, the key feature or reason why we went for Deep Security is because of its virtual patching. Usually, the server owners don't tend to keep their servers updated with the latest Microsoft patches. Trend Micro Deep Security provides a layer of security and virtual patching. So even if the server is not patched manually, it ensures that it is protected through this virtual VM.

Virtual patching is one feature I found to be the most valuable in the solution.

In the solution, servers often go offline for various reasons, requiring us to manually check the cause or issue, such as connectivity issues, and to find out why the agent went offline. The aforementioned details are to be considered for improvement in the solution.

I would like the solution to improve its stability and ability to go online and offline.

I have experience with Trend Micro Deep Security for four years. Also, I am using the solution's latest version.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten. No solution is fully secured or always up to the mark. All solutions have pros and cons.

It is a scalable solution. If required, we can scale it more. That's not an issue. Three engineers in my company use the solution.

Our company has contacted the technical support of the solution, and they were good.

The solution's initial setup process was straightforward. For deployment, we have more than a thousand servers. So, it took a month to roll out. One of the steps in the deployment process is leading the team involved in the technical part. We are deploying using Microsoft SAP. So through that, we push the agents to all the servers, and sometimes it requires a restart in some of the agent updates, and sometimes it doesn't require a restart. So, coordination is required during deployment.

For deployment and maintenance, four to five engineers are required.

Our company usually opts for vendor support and principal vendors also.

I would recommend the solution to those planning to use it. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Agentless protection is very good for certain use cases.

The agentless protection is very nice in Trend Micro.

The implementation is hard to deploy, and it should be easier. There is room for improvement here. 

The implementation can be inflexible and not easy, as it requires knowledge of things like virtualization and administration on Windows.

I have been using Trend Micro Deep Security for two years. 

It is a stable solution. There is always room for stability.

I would rate the scalability a nine out of ten. 

The customer service and support team is good. 

I have also used Kaspersky and VMware. 

The deployment process was long. It took about two months for the last implementation I did.

A few teams are involved in the deployment and maintenance process, such as the team that changes the tools, the team that handles the solution, and the team that handles devices.

The license cost is based on the socket of the server's host and the number of hosts that will be integrated. I wouldn't give it a perfect ten because the license situation can be improved.

I would recommend it. It's a good antivirus solution and helps to secure the system and investments.

Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. 

We primarily use the solution for security and analysis. We provide the solution to our customers who want to protect endpoint security, and this offers a level of protection for endpoints. For customers using the solution for development and in the production environment, it can be used on the server.

It has application control, log integration, and monitoring. Everything there is in Deep Security. They can look at the product to see how it is working and what its usage is. 

The solution offers many good features, including application control, IPS engines, logging, anti-malware, and integrated monitoring. The IPS is the best.

It offers a good level of protection. 

It is easy to setup.

The solution is stable.

It can scale well.

Technical support is very good. 

We're using the manager and cloud security. The cloud security does have different features available.

If they continue to offer better protection, we can do a better job of offering protection at the first level.

Sometimes the patching is a bit slow.

We need to have them do a better job of protecting the servers. 

There needs to be a bit of maintenance time before running the solution on production.

The pricing could always be better. Some clients would appreciate it if the pricing was reduced. 

I've been using the solution for four years. 

The solution is stable. However, we have to do some workarounds. We need to keep monitoring to ensure it is stable. We need to keep up with everything and how it will work together in order to ensure security. We don't want to affect the applications before placing them in production mode, so we need to provide all of the requirements and policies before going live. 

The scalability depends on the customer. It can scale by storage or endpoints. There's no problem with extending it.

We have various clients on the solution. Some clients have different departments. We've had 60 to 70 customers on the solution, and we provide the solution to them according to their needs. 

Technical support is very helpful and responsive. They work based on priorities. If it is more critical, they move the ticket up. We get answers within a day or two depending on the severity. 

We find the solution very easy to set up, even for enterprises. We can set it up on primary and secondary servers.

Based on the requirements of the customer, we'll deploy the solution to match their needs.

We can install and implement the solution within one to two hours. It can be set up in 20 minutes; however, testing the use cases takes one to two hours on top of that. 

We always recommend a check of the servers before beginning. Whether it is Windows or Linux, we make sure we implement the latest security measures. 

We give the clients a checklist and go through everything once we begin the installation. Then we deal with the dependencies and the connectivity. 

I'm able to assist clients with the implementation.

Licensing depends on the requirements. You can extend the license and grow it if you need to.

The solution isn't overly expensive. However, it can vary from quarter to quarter. 

I'm on the technical team, so I can't speak to the exact cost. 

I'm an implementor. We provide the endpoint and server security.

I'd recommend the solution to other users. 

I would rate the product nine out of ten. 

In our company, all critical systems are connected to a Security Operation Center (SOC), and we use Trend Micro Deep Security on these servers. Our company is in the manufacturing industry, dealing with metals and mining processes, and many of our solutions are hosted on public IP and accessed from outside organizations' networks. Installing Trend Micro Deep Security helps us prevent ransomware attacks and other unauthorized access attempts. Since we are connected to SOC, we receive detailed information on any attempts to penetrate our systems from outside, apart from just letting us know if there are any vulnerabilities or not. Additionally, Trend Micro Deep Security provides features like sandboxing. However, we have not been able to utilize these features fully.

Since I wanted to know the additional features that Trend Micro Deep Security offers beyond what we currently use in our solution, I was trying to find a comparison between Trend Micro Deep Security and Trend Micro Apex One.

Virtualization and sandboxing are the two features available in the solution. I learned about these two features from our service provider, through whom we secured the license required for the solution. So, our service provider is a reseller and not directly related to Trend Micro. Also, I am yet to go through the technical documents of the solution since I couldn't find much information about the solution online.

Regarding the deployment process, we first conducted a study to identify potential vulnerabilities and cybersecurity requirements for the business. Once we clearly understood these objectives, we began exploring solutions that could meet them. We then evaluated options such as a Security Operations Center (SOC) and Trend Micro Deep Security as part of this process.

I haven't received any distribution emails from the Trend Micro team regarding recent vulnerabilities and their efforts to mitigate them. It would be helpful if they could send emails notifying their users about the recommended upgraded versions to address the newly discovered vulnerabilities. This is an area that could be improved from more of a marketing perspective than a technical aspect.

In our company, we have been using Trend Micro Deep Security for at least two years now. Presently, we are using the latest version. So, we keep updating the solution. We provide the solution to the servers on a public IP.

It is a stable solution.

It is a scalable solution. Considering the different price ranges available, one needs to buy a device. It needs device-based licensing. For instance, if 50 more devices in our organization require Trend Micro Deep Security, then I have to purchase 50 more licenses. So, scalability is not a challenge in the solution. Also, we have around 100 people in our organization using the solution.

The solution is being used very extensively in our organization. In the company where I work, we have only a single solution for all of our servers. That single solution is Trend Micro Deep Security. Also, we have been using Trend Micro Apex One for the past two or three years.

I need to check with my team to know whether we ever interacted with the solution's technical support team.

The solution's initial setup was straightforward. It's not kind of a cumbersome one.

The deployment process did not take more than two months post-order placement for the solution. So, Trend Micro Deep Security and SOC are two separate parts. For SOC's deployment, we took around six to nine months. Trend Micro Deep Security is a type of endpoint security solution which, post procurement, takes around four to six weeks to configure.

Regarding the solution's deployment model, the managing, monitoring and diagnostics part of the solution is on the cloud, while all of our clients have chosen an on-premises deployment model. Basically, the clients are installed on physical devices.

Previously we had support for a deployment and maintenance procedure from the service provider. Currently, the solution is managed by our team as it is deployed on-premises.

We need to make yearly payments for the solution's licensing. There are different pricing models, like subscription-based and perpetual. Our company has chosen perpetual pricing. So for us, multiple reassignments are possible. If I choose one license and assign it to one device, I can later remove it from that device and assign it to a different one. Given the requirements that our company has, the solution is not too expensive.

According to our process, our organization usually explores three solutions by making a detailed technical comparison. After that, based on the business requirements, pricing and technical ratings that our experts provide, we go ahead with one of them. I do not know which two solutions were compared with Trend Micro Deep Security.

Currently, my organization relies on Trend Micro Deep Security to meet its business needs in the cybersecurity space. It is important to stay vigilant and explore all possible cybersecurity interventions. Despite having access to many of the solution's features, my organization has not yet deployed them all. As our organization and its systems and solutions continue to grow, in our organization, we want to enable all of the solution's potential, which can provide us with security. Therefore, I was seeking to compare the additional features available within the solution to identify any that could provide significant security benefits to my organization.

I would definitely recommend the solution to those planning to use it. Overall, I rate the solution between eight to nine out of ten.