SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Reviews

I'm taking a look and digging into applications. I use it for general analysis. 

The visibility is very good. It allows me to go deeper into my investigations. It gives me the information I need. 

I do use the vulnerability scanning every day. It's excellent. I have no complaints. 

We do get false positives, however, it can be from downloading from dodgy sites or whatever the case may be. 

The mean time to detect is good. It's very fast.

It's good as is. From a beginner's perspective, while it's not necessarily complicated, it can be confusing. However, once you get the gist of it, it's pretty clear. For example, when you first go on it, you don't know what's going on. A few YouTube videos could be helpful. There isn't a lot of information out there to look at. 

I've been using the solution for roughly six to seven months. 

The stability of the solution is good. There is no lagging, crashing or downtime. This year we haven't had any downtime with the solution. 

The solution is very scalable. 

I've never contacted technical support. 

I did not previously use a different solution. 

When I joined the company, it was already being used; I did not set up the solution.

It doesn't need ongoing maintenance, although there are occasional agent updates. 

I don't know about the pricing or licensing. 

I'm an end-user.

I've never used the evidence-based reporting or the offensive or infrastructure-as-code scanning yet. 

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten. 

Our cloud security posture is managed with SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, a tool that identifies and highlights potential security weaknesses in our systems.

It is user-friendly.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security helps reduce the number of false positives by 20 percent.

In evidence-based reporting, demonstrating that a vulnerability can be exploited is crucial. This information allows us to directly address the issue through manual remediation.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security has improved our risk posture and has reduced our mean time to detection by 50 percent.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security has reduced our mean time to remediation by 30 percent.

The user-friendly dashboard offers both convenience and security by providing quick access to solutions and keeping us informed of potential threats.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security filtering has some areas that cause problems, and to achieve single sign-on functionality, a break-glass feature, which is currently unavailable, is necessary.

I have been using SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security for one year.

I would rate the stability of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security nine out of ten.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is scalable.

The technical support is good.

Positive

We previously used Prisma Cloud but when we would request a feature we had to wait until the next release. That is the advantage of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security.

The deployment took a few weeks to complete.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security falls somewhere in the middle price range, neither particularly cheap nor expensive.

I would rate SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security nine out of ten.

We have around five people working with SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security.

No maintenance is required for SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security.

We primarily use SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security for compliance purposes because we work with banks and the fintech industry, so we must follow some standards like PCI DSS.

We use SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security for compliance and security purposes, and it has helped a lot. We face many audits, and during each audit, we must conduct a vulnerability assessment. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security gives us a list of vulnerabilities that we remediate to raise our compliance score. It's our only tool for vulnerability assessments. The benefits are mostly immediate. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security helped reduce the number of false positives, which has been difficult.

We like SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security's vulnerability assessment and management features, and its vulnerability databases. The interface isn't too complex. It's quite easy to use. The agentless vulnerability scan is the feature we use the most.

The categorization of the results from the vulnerability assessment could be improved. 

We have used SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security for 2 years. 

I have never faced any downtime.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security's scalability is quite good. We have multiple projects, and scalability isn't an issue. 

I rate SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security 8 out of 10 based on the features I have used. I haven't used all the features, but I give the vulnerability and compliance features 8 out of 10. I can recommend SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security for vulnerability scanning and compliance. There are many competitors, but I find SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security quite good, which is why we haven't switched to something else for the past 2 years. 

I consider it a cloud security posture management tool. It is being used for the overall posture of the environment. 

By implementing Cloud Native Security, we wanted to monitor end-to-end misconfigurations. That is why we started with it. We are now also using one other module for detection and response, but mainly, we are using it to monitor misconfiguration and benchmark compliance.

It is pretty good. It has good coverage and a good reporting system.

There has been tremendous improvement since implementing Cloud Native Security. Cloud Native Security reports any misconfiguration that is there in the infrastructure. We do not have to go and check each service individually. It has helped a lot.

For compliance management, we can find the benchmark compliance status in Cloud Native Security directly. We do not have to do anything. Many benchmarks that we are supposed to follow are added by default. It is pretty easy for us to showcase compliance to anyone.

Misconfiguration detection has been the most effective for threat detection in our cloud environment. We are mainly focusing on the misconfiguration. I can see any configuration-related issues in all the modules.

Because it covers all the modules, every single aspect of the compliance has improved. We were able to find out the critical issues related to cloud infrastructure. It is a real-time monitoring system, so, at any time, we can check and confirm.

Cloud Native Security provides information about the exact affected area. We can easily locate a resource in a particular account or service. It is very clear from the Cloud Native Security report where to look for a particular misconfiguration. They have also added a graphical representation.

The reports tell us what is the impact, how critical it is, and how to locate the issue. That helps to prioritize things and fix a critical issue on an urgent basis. It is easy to analyze things from our side.

After implementing Cloud Native Security, we were able to implement so many best practices. Initially, we were getting different types of issues. We learned from those issues, and we are now implementing best practices based on that. We are also able to do real-time monitoring.

It has helped reduce the number of false positives we deal with. We are hardly getting any false positives. Previously, if we had four false positives, we now have only one false positive.

Cloud Native Security's ease of use and precision in detection have improved our risk posture a lot.

Cloud Native Security has saved our mean time to detect. It has saved a lot of our time. It has saved almost 95% of the time because we cannot go and check all the services in AWS. It is very vast. Cloud Native Security gives us specific information. There is no manual effort.

Cloud Native Security has not helped reduce our mean time to remediate because remediation depends on so many factors. It has nothing to do with Cloud Native Security. We are getting the issues, and the team is responding to them. After fixing them, there is a lot of improvement in the number of issues.

It is pretty easy to integrate with this platform. When properly integrated, it monitors end-to-end. The other thing is the coverage. As far as I know, it has pretty good coverage. 

It is very easy to use. I would rate it a nine out of ten for ease of use. 

We are getting reports only in a predefined form. I would like to have customized reports so that I can see how many issues are open or closed today or in two weeks. 

I have been using Cloud Native Security for around ten months.

It is stable. I would rate it a nine out of ten for stability.

It is scalable. I would rate it a nine out of ten for scalability.

Overall, we have seven users of this solution, but at a time, we only have two active users. It is being used in a single location.

Their support is good. Whenever we have doubts, we get proper support. We connect with them and resolve the issue. I would rate them a nine out of ten.

Positive

We did not use any other solution. This is the first one.

It is on the cloud. The implementation phase varies. It can take a few months.

It does not require any maintenance.

I am not involved in the pricing, but it is cost-effective.

I would recommend Cloud Native Security to others. Overall, I would rate Cloud Native Security a nine out of ten.

It's a cloud-based SaaS tool. It's a cloud security partnership management tool. It gives you an overview of misconfigurations, Kubernetes security, Docker security, vulnerability scanning, and secret scanning.

Atlas security graph is pretty cool. It maps out relationships between components on AWS, like load balancers and servers. This helps visualize potential attack paths and even suggests attack paths a malicious actor might take.

Maybe container runtime security could be improved. But with the acquisition by a bigger company, things might roll out faster, potentially including this feature.

I have been using it for six months. 

It's been stable in my experience. 

Since it's a managed service, Cloud Native Security handles scalability. There are around 15 end users in my company using it.

We could just contact the CEO directly with any questions. It was a small team back then, but I don't think that's the case anymore since they've been acquired.

Previously, it was just a 50-person team, and the CEO would hop on the call to solve the problem. 

The initial setup is super easy! It's a SaaS portal, so no deployment is needed. Just configuration that takes about half an hour.

It was reasonable pricing for me. The costing model might have changed now since they have been acquired. 

I would advise integrating your Kubernetes clusters for extra features.

Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten because I'm happy with Cloud Native Security overall.

The number of features Cloud Native Security offered with just a small team was phenomenal. Give them another six months to a year, and it could be one of the best tools out there.

The most beneficial aspect of adopting these solutions is gaining visibility. We manage false positives efficiently, using tools like Tenable, which also provide visibility and help differentiate between actual risks and false positives concerning vulnerabilities.

Visibility is the most important aspect. Azure Monitor, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, and other tools help gain visibility into our environments. Previously, we did not have any information about our environment. We now have visibility.

Evidence-based reporting is essential as it guides us in deciding and prioritizing vulnerability by improving our understanding of our environment. Before implementing these tools, obtaining information about our environment was challenging.

The documentation could be better. Besides improving the documentation, obtaining a professional or partner specializing in the implementation of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is very important, as it can save time during the implementation process.

I have used this solution for four or five years.

In my previous company, we once discovered a problem in one of our environments using SentinelOne, but I do not remember exactly what the problem was.

I have not used any similar solution. SentinelOne offers a comprehensive solution for the complete environment. It is very difficult to get the same results from different partners and manufacturers.

It is easy; it is not difficult.

Usually, we make a deal with a specific partner specializing in implementation. We do not implement it on our own.

Most security solutions are easy to use but require minimal knowledge to implement and maintain them.

Overall, I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

We have multiple AWS accounts and we use it for our products and deployments, et cetera, and they are being monitored by SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security for best practices and good security. In the past, we've had code exposed to the internet, and SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security has been able to catch such instances. Basically, it is for security and monitoring purposes. 

We've been able to integrate SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security with out AWS and deployed their agents to Kubernetes. For production and compliance purposes, it allows us to monitor actively for issues from one place. 

The solution reduces notifications.

We mainly use it for monitoring and security guidelines only. It's been really useful for us in terms of the developer accounts. If any have been exposed, we get notified and we can take care of issues before anything happens. 

We haven't seen any server downtime. It's always been available when we've needed it. 

The UI is very nice, and feature-wise, it's very good.

It has very good documentation. 

Support has been very helpful and provides regular feedback and help whenever needed. They've been very useful. 

The solution is very easy to use. We have not had to spend much time customizing or integrating items. We were able to integrate all four AWS accounts in order to centrally monitor everything.

There is evidence-based reporting which can help prioritize and solve cloud security issues. We haven't actively used it or set it up.

We use the infrastructure as code scanning feature. It's good for identifying pre-production issues. 

About six months ago, there was a major upgrade. We can see the containers running and which vulnerabilities appear, et cetera. 

We haven't seen any increase in false positives since using the solution. 

It's helped us improve our risk posture. We're more confident now that things aren't happening and getting missed. We're on the right track to adapting proper security rules.

More than saving engineering time, this solution has helped promote confidence is the security of our cloud accounts. We're more sure of our configurations and security posture. Since we don't have a cloud expertise team that might identify issues, it has helped us gain confidence in SQL deployments. 

There should be more documentation about the product. Sometimes we have to go to customer support to get clarification.

I've been using the solution for 1.5 years. 

The solution is stable. I have not seen any downtime.

We have around 15 users leveraging SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security. They are mainly admins and engineers.

Technical support is very helpful. However, the documentation needs to be better.

They tend to resolve issues within an hour or so. With most issues, they are very helpful 

Positive

We have a different pipeline product working in parallel to this solution that is also helping us reduce vulnerabilities. Something else, for example, monitors compliance for us. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is more of an additional tool than our main solution. We have been using open-source tools for scanning.

The development was just one configuration, and we were able to implement SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security in about an hour.

The solution does not require any maintenance. 

We have noted an ROI based on the amount of confidence we've gained having visibility into our vulnerabilities. I do not have specific metrics on hand to illustrate that, however. 

The pricing is reasonable.

We're a customer and end-user. I'm a DevOps engineer.

I'd recommend the solution to others. I would rate it 10 out of 10 as it currently meets all of our requirements. I can't speak to other companies that may have different requirements. 

Cloud Native Security offers the flexibility to create a customized solution that fits our specific needs. It's a comprehensive tool encompassing the central elements—PSC, PPP, and more.

It is advantageous in terms of time-saving and cost reduction.

There's an array of upcoming versions with numerous features to be incorporated into the roadmap. Customers particularly appreciate the service's emphasis on intensive security, especially the secret scanning aspect. During the proof of concept (POC) phase, the system is required to gather logs from the customer's environment. This process entails obtaining specific permissions, especially in terms of gateway access. While most permissions for POC are manageable, the need for various permissions may need improvement, especially in the context of security.

I have been using Cloud Native Security for the past six months.

I'd rate it an eight. It's a reliable solution that the organization is increasingly adopting for its robust features and security.

It is quite scalable. I would rate it an eight out of ten. 

They are helpful.

Positive

Prisma Cloud seemed limited in its solutions and had to acquire other companies for broader offerings, while Cloud Native Security provided more comprehensive and tailor-made solutions, especially in terms of authentic security features.

The setup isn’t easy because it doesn't support Azure. It's something on the roadmap. It doesn't limit itself to a particular hypervisor.

For now, we don't handle the maintenance. It's all managed by the vendor for our customers.

It's not expensive. The product is in its initial growth stages and appears more competitive compared to others. It comes in different variants, and I believe the enterprise version costs around $55 per user per year. I would rate the pricing a five, somewhere fairly moderate.

I would rate it 8 out of 10. 

Cloud Native Security is a tool that has good monitoring features. We get multiple misconfigurations from the monitoring on a daily basis. Cloud Native Security detects misconfigurations in real-time, like open ports.

If our team closes a particular alert triggered in Cloud Native Security, it should also be closed in Cloud Native Security. After closing an alert in Cloud Native Security, it still shows as unresolved.

I have been using Cloud Native Security for one and a half years.

We haven’t faced any issues with the solution’s stability.

The technical support of the solution is good.

Positive

Cloud Native Security is a user-friendly solution. If you log in to the console, you'll get all the misconfigurations, and the solution has recently integrated CI/CD. Sometimes, we get false positive alerts. Our team closely observes if there are any misconfigurations. If it is closed for a particular resource, it must also be closed from the monitoring dashboard, which is not happening. We have already raised this issue to the support team.

The solution's proof of exploitability gives complete data from the console regarding the issue, description, resolution, proof of concept, and closing of alerts. The main benefit of Cloud Native Security is that it detects multiple misconfigurations in our environment. If there are any unwanted port openings or any publicly accessible EC2, we will get to know about them easily from the monitoring tool.

Cloud Native Security is deployed on the cloud in our organization. Cloud Native Security has new monthly updates. We are continuously in touch with the Cloud Native Security team for anything that needs to be changed or modified or if there are any new requirements.

Overall, I rate the solution a 9 out of 10.