We have a wide array of applications. It extends beyond mere container and threat management; in fact, we extensively utilize it across all facets of our cloud data management. It offers comprehensive security for our entire infrastructure, encompassing containers, Kubernetes, cloud services, and more. Its scalability is particularly beneficial for our operations.
Cyber Security Manager at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
Great auditing and streamlined compliance management with helpful support
Pros and Cons
- "Cloud Native Security has helped us with our risk posture and securing our agenda. It has been tremendous in terms of supporting growth."
- "They could generally give us better comprehensive rules."
What is our primary use case?
How has it helped my organization?
We receive Slack alerts for any vulnerable resources within our inventory. These alerts indicate if a particular resource is vulnerable and requires attention, ensuring timely action for remediation. Additionally, critical events are promptly communicated to us, enhancing our overall security posture.
Furthermore, we are provided with compliance metrics, allowing us to gauge our level of adherence to regulatory standards and guidelines.
What is most valuable?
Cloud Native Security's automation features have revolutionized our approach to cloud-native security, making it a standout solution in the market. With its seamless automation capabilities and timely alert notifications, Cloud Native Security ensures that we stay ahead of potential vulnerabilities, providing peace of mind in our dynamic cloud environment.
One of Cloud Native Security's greatest strengths lies in its ability to streamline compliance management. While specific controls are not directly provided, Cloud Native Security's automated assessment of our cloud and server infrastructure empowers us to maintain compliance effortlessly. The platform offers comprehensive insights into our compliance status, allowing us to identify areas for improvement and scale up our operations with confidence.
During our initial implementation, Cloud Native Security proved invaluable in tackling the challenges posed by our extensive resource inventory. By providing a detailed breakdown of resource utilization and associated vulnerabilities, Cloud Native Security enabled us to take proactive measures to enhance our security posture. The intuitive dashboard interface offers granular control and simplifies decision-making, sparing us the burden of manual inspections.
Cloud Native Security's automated auditing feature sets it apart, offering a comprehensive overview of our cloud resources with minimal effort. The asset inventory feature provides detailed insights into resource usage, ensuring that no stone is left unturned in our quest for security and compliance excellence. While there may be a slight learning curve initially, Cloud Native Security's user-friendly interface makes navigation a breeze over time.
The evidence-based reporting functionality of Cloud Native Security is a game-changer, allowing us to prioritize and address critical security issues efficiently. While occasional false positives may occur, Cloud Native Security's continuous improvement efforts ensure that such instances are minimal and swiftly addressed. Integration with our existing security infrastructure further enhances its capabilities, providing a holistic approach to our security strategy.
Overall, Cloud Native Security has been instrumental in fortifying our risk posture and facilitating our growth trajectory. With a significant reduction in mean time to detect issues and improved visibility for our development teams through DevSecOps integration, Cloud Native Security has truly become an indispensable asset in our security arsenal.
What needs improvement?
While we do encounter occasional false positives, we appreciate Cloud Native Security's efforts to address this issue.
In terms of improvement, we believe there's room for enhancing the comprehensiveness of their rule sets. Specifically, if we have unique requirements for our cloud security and need to establish custom rule sets, we require more comprehensive options than currently available. While Cloud Native Security has provided a feature for this purpose, its implementation is currently challenging. We see this as an area for improvement where Cloud Native Security could refine its offerings to better meet the diverse needs of its users.
Buyer's Guide
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security
October 2026
Learn what your peers think about SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: October 2026.
919,003 professionals have used our research since 2012.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using the solution for 1.5 years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We have not found any glitches or suffered any downtime.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Currently, we have approximately three platform engineers actively utilizing the solution.
The solution demonstrates excellent scalability and offers considerable flexibility.
How are customer service and support?
Technical support is good. They help us out on certain details. We can submit tickets in order to get assistance.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Previously, we didn't employ a different solution; instead, we relied on various open-source tools. While these tools weren't direct competitors, their functionalities didn't fully align with what we needed. Since adopting this solution, we've witnessed significant improvements in scaling our security measures effectively.
How was the initial setup?
The initial onboarding process for Cloud Native Security resources presented some challenges, albeit manageable ones. However, the deployment itself was remarkably swift, typically taking only 15 to 20 minutes. Incorporating Cloud Native Security into our original deployment was crucial for establishing permissions effectively. To manage power demand efficiently, we required running scripts consistently.
As a Software as a Service (SaaS) solution, deployment to multiple locations wasn't necessary. Cloud Native Security is hosted on their cloud platform, eliminating concerns about maintenance or internal management on our end. We can rely on the provider for seamless operation without the need for internal intervention.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing is fair, as it is determined by the resources we utilize. We have the flexibility to adjust our resource usage according to our needs.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Prior to implementing this solution, we didn't assess any other options.
Currently, the market offers numerous products for cloud-native security. Despite the abundance of choices, we received excellent guidance with this solution. The support provided was invaluable, demonstrating their strength in customer success.
What other advice do I have?
As end users, we don't maintain a direct relationship with the company.
I highly recommend this solution to fellow users.
In terms of rating, I would give the solution a solid 9 out of 10.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
Security Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Single agent, user-friendly console, and fair price
Pros and Cons
- "We like the platform and its response time. We also like that its console is user-friendly as well as modern and sleek."
- "If I had to pick a complaint, it would be the way the hosts are listed in the tool. You have different columns separated by endpoint name, Cloud Account, and Cloud Instances ID. I wish there was something where we could change the endpoint name and not use just the IP address. We would like to have custom names or our own names for the instances. If I had a complaint, that would be it, but so far, it meets all the needs that we have."
What is our primary use case?
We are using it for endpoint detection on all of our EC2 instances and hosts in the cloud. Along with it, we are also going to be using it for AV.
We do not have any EDR protection on our host. We would like to utilize it for AV to put some protection on our host. The pricing for the tool that we are using for AV has gone up, and they are not giving us a lot of things we need. Also, to use their EDR tool, we have to install a secondary agent, whereas, with SentinelOne, everything is included in the same agent.
How has it helped my organization?
Singularity Cloud Workload Security helps with forensics and extra protection on our host. We have not had any incidents where we had to fully use it or fully go into action with it, but we are hoping that it will provide the extra protection that we need to help resolve some blind spots that we have specifically on our hosts.
Singularity Cloud Workload Security has forensic visibility or deep visibility into the Linux kernel, but we have not used it. It is something that we will work on and use with our SOC team and the implementation team if an incident were to ever happen.
The historical data record provided by Singularity Cloud Workload Security after an attack will be useful if an incident happens. It will help us build a timeline of historical reference. It is easy to have it all in one place to build a timeline. We can see from start to finish where the incident started and where it occurred versus having to go in and do things manually by sifting through logs. The fact that SentinelOne is able to have that information or data and a single pane of glass is something that we like about the tool.
Singularity Cloud Workload Security helps to cut down the mean time to detect by having the historical reference and by being able to stop the incident with the hit of a switch. We can see from where it started, which is helpful. When you are an organization managing hundreds of accounts, it is hard to sieve through logs and get that information together, which increases our mean time to detect, whereas with SentinelOne, from the things we have seen and tested out, it seems simple and easy, and we are hoping that it will help us cut down on that time.
We are also hoping that it will reduce our mean time to remediate. We have not come across any actual incident to be able to fully know, but based on what we have seen so far in the tool, it seems it would.
Singularity Cloud Workload Security has not necessarily freed up staff to work on other projects, but it does reduce some time. It helps cut down on things. It does provide an easier capability. We have come from the old-school way of looking at logs. It seems that this tool will provide something much sleeker and easier for our SOC team to use.
Singularity Cloud Workload Security has not yet had much effect on our productivity. We have only had it for two months, but we like what we are seeing. We like implementing it. We like that it has a single agent and we can use it as AV. It seems to make things easy. It seems to be a more productive tool for us, but until we have an incident, I would not be able to say for sure. As of now, it looks like it has the capability.
Its interoperability with third-party solutions, such as Kubernetes, seems top-notch. We have integrated it with a couple of our solutions here, such as Kubernetes and containers, and we have not had any incidents or any problems to follow up or dig deep into. So far, the ability to look at our containers and to see into those clusters is something that puts Singularity above all others. With CrowdStrike or Trend Micro, we were not able to do that. We were not able to have the same visibility. SentinelOne Singularity made that easier for us.
Singularity Cloud Workload Security supports our ability to innovate from a standpoint where we know that our application teams and developers will be protected. When new applications are created, we will have some sense of security and some sense of safeguard for our teams. We did not have the visibility and the tools to protect us in the manner we would like, but with Singularity Cloud Workload Security, it looks like we can just put it on our endpoints and tell the teams to go and do as they wish because we know at least on this end, they will be protected.
What is most valuable?
From our tests and the things that we have done, we find Singularity Cloud Workload Security’s real-time threat detection and response capabilities attractive. We like the platform and its response time. We also like that its console is user-friendly as well as modern and sleek. Those are the things that are attractive to us.
We like the automated remediation feature. It is not something that we are going to use for automated remediation, but we do like the fact that it is there and can be utilized.
What needs improvement?
If I had to pick a complaint, it would be the way the hosts are listed in the tool. You have different columns separated by endpoint name, Cloud Account, and Cloud Instances ID. I wish there was something where we could change the endpoint name and not use just the IP address. We would like to have custom names or our own names for the instances. If I had a complaint, that would be it, but so far, it meets all the needs that we have.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using it for two or three months. We went through a test trial, and we are finalizing the official purchase request to purchase it and start using it fully.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We have not experienced any issues so far.
How are customer service and support?
We have not interacted with their support. We have only contacted our customer manager and our onboarding specialist. We have not had to submit any tickets.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We have not used any other similar solution previously.
How was the initial setup?
It is a cloud deployment. I was involved in its initial setup. Its deployment was straightforward. There were a couple of questions that we had. Some of the documentation was not written in the best way. There were some hurdles when moving to the tool and understanding it, but for the most part, it was straightforward. We got all the instructions on how to deploy or install it. We were presented with a customer service rep who was an onboarding specialist. This customer service rep specialized in deployment for us, so everything was a simple setup.
What about the implementation team?
We mainly did it ourselves, but we also had an integrator consultant from SentinelOne who was on the site. They answered all of our questions for anything that came up. For anything we needed, they were there to help us. We had three individuals full-time, and then we had a contractor.
In terms of maintenance, there is nothing required from the SentinelOne side. Once we onboard a lot of our hosts, we just need to organize it in a way that is easy for us, but from the SentinelOne or Singularity folks, nothing is required.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing is fair. It is not inexpensive, and it is also not expensive. When managing a large organization, it is going to be costly, but it meets the business needs. In terms of what is out there on the market, it is fair and comparable to what I have seen, so I do not have any complaints about the cost.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We did evaluate other options. We tried Trend Micro Vision One. We also looked at CrowdStrike.
We went for Singularity Cloud Workload Security because it was built and made for the cloud. That was a big thing. The second big thing was that they utilize all of these different features with one agent.
The CrowdStrike solution is not built for the cloud. They have a cloud add-on, so it did not translate for us. The Trend Micro solution is somewhat built for the cloud. It is more of an on-prem tool that is moved to the cloud, but we have to utilize at least two agents to get all of the coverage, meaning AV and endpoint detection. With Singularity Cloud Workload Security, it is all covered in one agent. There is no need to put multiple agents on our host and go through that with our customers. It also allows us to place that agent using AWS Systems Manager, so the implementation in the cloud and launching of the agent is intuitive and easy. It was a no-brainer once we started looking at the tools in terms of how to implement them and what we would like in our organization. Singularity Cloud Workload Security took the top place.
What other advice do I have?
It has a single agent to cover all aspects. You can save money and costs with data ingestion by using the Security DataLake from Singularity. There is also the ease of use of its console. There is also the ease of deployment by it being cloud-based. If you are looking for a tool that is perfect for cloud solutions and protects your cloud host, Singularity Cloud Workload Security would be at the top of my list.
To someone who does not think that they need a Singularity Cloud Workload Protection Platform (CWPP) because they have a continuous security monitoring (CSM) solution in place, I would recommend looking again at Singularity because there is one agent and the ease of transitioning and deploying into the cloud. Another big thing about Singularity is the holding of the data. We utilize Splunk. However, with Singularity, we do not need to ingest all the data because we can also utilize their data lake. The query or the information that we can look up at Splunk can also be looked up in Singularity, so there is no need to take all that data from Singularity and ingest it into our Splunk and increase our license. We can utilize our license and capabilities. We can just use the data lake that comes with Singularity and utilize logs in that manner. In the end, it is saving us costs when it comes to our SIEM tool ingestion, so I would recommend looking at these top aspects. It is easy in the cloud. It helps save data on your SIEM tool. It saves the ingestion costs. There is also a single agent.
I would rate Singularity Cloud Workload Security a nine out of ten.
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
Buyer's Guide
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security
October 2026
Learn what your peers think about SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: October 2026.
919,003 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Senior Software Engineer I at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Provides excellent workload telemetry, hunting capabilities, and deep visibility
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature is the ability to gain deep visibility into the workloads inside containers."
- "Sometimes the Storyline ID is a bit wacky."
What is our primary use case?
We use Singularity Cloud Workload Security for our production and build workloads.
We implemented the solution to simplify the deployment of forensic tools, including EDR, into our cloud infrastructure, where it may be difficult to install an agent.
We have a hybrid deployment, with an estimated 8,000 to 70,000 cloud workloads. We serve a customer base of nearly one billion people, including 700 million current EA subscribers. Handling this workload is no small feat. The estimate is so broad because we do not own or control every AWS, Azure, or GCP account; studios use this infrastructure without our help. We are still in the discovery phase of trying to determine the exact number of workloads. There are thousands of Kubernetes clusters.
How has it helped my organization?
Singularity Cloud Workload Security's real-time threat detection capabilities are good. We recompeted SentinelOne against fifteen or twenty different AV vendors over the course of 2018 and 2019 and found SentinelOne to be superior in virtually every possible way.
Forensic capabilities are now excellent. When we started, we had a contractual agreement with SentinelOne to improve deep visibility to match our current toolset, Carbon Black Response. Over the course of two years, they delivered everything we could get from Carbon Black and even more.
The visibility of workload telemetry is excellent, and the hunting capabilities are second to none.
When no human intervention is required Singularity Cloud Workload Security detects and remediates nearly instantaneously.
Our MTTD is sub 30 days.
Our MTTR is seven days after detection for most instances.
The interoperability with third-party solutions is great.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature is the ability to gain deep visibility into the workloads inside containers.
What needs improvement?
Sometimes the Storyline ID is a bit wacky. It's not that the data is inaccurate, but the threat item that's flagged can sometimes point to a storyline that's not relevant to the hunting object we're looking for. In short, Singularity Cloud Workload Security can sometimes take us on a roundabout way to get to where we want to be when using Storyline ID.
I would like a public repository for CWPP. Having to request a script from SentinelOne to deploy CWPP is not ideal, and this is true for all of the tools, including the Linux agent. Without a public repository, when a deployment team needs something like a GPG key to validate the image, we have to request a signed copy of the software. This is not ideal because it removes our ability to self-serve. Therefore, if I had to ask for anything to make it easier, it would be signed images that are GPG signed and a public repository where we can get the bits from.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Singularity Cloud Workload Security for over four years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Singularity Cloud Workload Security is stable. No lag, no crashing, no downtime. The joy of running as a container is that it doesn't break the other parts.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The Singularity Cloud Workload Security auto-scaling feature is great.
How are customer service and support?
Technical support is excellent. One of the selling points of SentinelOne is the incredibly good support.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
The initial deployment was straightforward, but only because I had to obtain a script from SentinelOne. I completed the deployment myself.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Our three-year renewal with SentinelOne this year was shockingly expensive. In fact, covering our 50,000 endpoints would have nearly bankrupted most security programs, even well-funded ones like ours. The sticker shock is real. I understand that SentinelOne is a market leader, but the bill we received was astronomical.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We evaluated a few application security tools, but CWBB is only a software opportunity. SentinelOne has become our primary solution for all aspects of endpoint security. Therefore, when we considered adding detections for cloud workloads, it made sense to choose SentinelOne as the ideal solution.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate Singularity Cloud Workload Security nine out of ten.
To someone who doesn't think they need CWPP because they already have a continuous security monitoring solution in place, I would say, Consider the old security adage that they are not currently free of malicious items. They have them, but they just don't know where they are.
We have an upgrade policy for maintenance purposes. We need to implement the upgrade policy, but we do this through Chef automation. Writing Chef automation for this can be a bit complex, but it is not impossible.
SentinelOne Cloud Workload Security's ability to be innovative is excellent. I'm a big fan of SentinelOne's API, which has allowed me to develop some creative solutions. I'm actually the only SentinelOne administrator at my organization, so in terms of innovation, it's probably the best tool I've ever used. I've been able to create an automated "one-man army" using SentinelOne.
I recommend deploying a test environment. Do not try to deploy this into an existing environment and test there. It's a bad idea. Not from a SentinelOne perspective, but I'm not much of a Kubernetes expert. I know it can be dangerous, and we tried to do this in a test environment of a live production environment and had a lot of trouble. Not because of SentinelOne, but because of our Kubernetes deployment. Having to complete a bad Kubernetes environment with little knowledge of CWPP basically made getting it working very difficult. So my advice would be to build a clean, industry-standard test environment that can be broken with no risk.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
IT Engineer at a construction company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Evidence-based reporting shows all the findings and severity, helping us to prioritize issues
Pros and Cons
- "We're monitoring several cloud accounts with Singularity. It is convenient to identify issues or security failures in any account. It's nice to have all the details we need to solve these issues."
- "We repeatedly get alerts on the tool dashboard that we've already solved on our end, but they still appear. That is somewhat irritating."
What is our primary use case?
We have one client, and we need a portal to manage security. We use Singularity to provide security information and identify vulnerabilities or malicious scripts that need to be fixed. It also provides recommendations about each of the vulnerabilities that are helpful.
How has it helped my organization?
We provide cloud services on our site using AWS. Singularity detects flaws that we must close for security reasons. We use Singularity to observe those findings and fix things based on the customer's requirements. Previously, we used to segregate issues and look after them. Singularity helped us secure our infrastructure. We've significantly reduced our potential security breaches to a minimum.
It has improved how we operate on a larger scale. We set up the platform, onboarded the info, and then gradually moved further. Over time, it helped us slowly resolve those issues. We were using the cloud platforms' native security tools, but those were unhelpful. Now, we rely on this more than those services.
Singularity reduced our false positive rate by about 60 percent. We've had even better results in terms of our risk posture. We can rely on this tool to improve our security conditions on a broader scale. If I gave our security posture a percent rating, I would give it 89 percent.
The solution saves time by giving us everything in one place. You don't need to manually check every account. It tells us a lot. Singularity reduces our detection time by about 60 percent.
Singularity has improved collaboration among cloud security, application developers, and AppSec teams. Previously, it would take around a week for engineers to address issues. Now that we use this tool, we resolve issues in one or two days.
What is most valuable?
We're monitoring several cloud accounts with Singularity. It is convenient to identify issues or security failures in any account. It's nice to have all the details we need to solve these issues. Singularity is easy and convenient to use. It is extremely easy for a novice to understand what the dashboard is trying to say and the terminology's meanings.
Evidence-based reporting is excellent for auditing. It shows all the findings and severity: low, high, medium, or critical. We solve the low-level and medium issues. Next, we resolve high-level and critical problems. It's easy to fix the security breaches.
What needs improvement?
We repeatedly get alerts on the tool dashboard that we've already solved on our end, but they still appear. That is somewhat irritating.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have used Singularity Cloud Security for about six months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I rate Singularity nine out of 10 for stability.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I rate Singularity eight out of 10 for scalability.
How are customer service and support?
I rate SentinelOne support nine out of 10.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
Singularity took about a week to deploy. A team of 40 to 50 people was involved.
What other advice do I have?
I rate SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security nine out of 10. I would recommend the tool to others. It's a convenient and cost-effective tool for identifying security breaches. You get everything in one place, saving you time and costs.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
Cloud Engineer at ACC Ltd
Improves security posture, reduces false positives, and speeds up remediation time
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable aspects of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security are its alerting system and the remediation guidance it provides."
- "In addition to the console alerts, I would like SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security to also send email notifications."
What is our primary use case?
Our infrastructure is on AWS and we integrate SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security with our enterprise accounts to identify misconfiguration on the Cloud.
How has it helped my organization?
The offensive security engine helps us visualize any potential attacks.
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security helps us maintain and improve our security posture.
It has helped reduce the number of false positives.
We have improved our mean time to detection with SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security.
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security has improved our mean time to remediation. The alerts provided included details that help us address the issues quickly.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable aspects of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security are its alerting system and the remediation guidance it provides. This combination helps us identify misconfigurations and vulnerabilities in our systems and swiftly address them.
What needs improvement?
In addition to the console alerts, I would like SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security to also send email notifications.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security for one and a half years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is scalable.
How are customer service and support?
The technical support is helpful and responds quickly to our requests.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We previously used AWS Security but switched to SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security because of its wider scanning range and centralized console for maintenance.
How was the initial setup?
The initial deployment was straightforward and took one month to complete.
What about the implementation team?
We completed the implementation in-house with the help of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security eight out of ten.
I recommend SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security to others.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
Works at a comms service provider with 1-10 employees
Easy to use with a simple setup and good dashboard
Pros and Cons
- "It's positively affected the communication between cloud security, application developers, and AppSec teams."
- "We've found a lot of false positives."
What is our primary use case?
We use the solution for security purposes. We deploy it into our infrastructure in the cloud. We want to make sure that all everything is secure, for example,if APIs are getting accessed, that it's by the right people. It's a security hub for us.
What is most valuable?
The solution is very good at tracing issues.
The dashboard is quite helpful. It's easy to use. The product is flexible and can be used in multi-cloud setups.
It's an easy solution for a beginner.
We've taken advantage of the reporting, which is quite good. It provides us with all the information we need. They have proof of exploitability capabilities, which is important to use.
The solution has agentless vulnerability scanning, which we use. You can look at extra ports. It's a great feature.
Its infrastructure of code scanning is useful. I can see it in the container configuration file. It's good for identifying preproduction issues in the container configuration files. It's working well. However, it's not dynamic. It's static.
We were able to witness the benefits after some time had passed. Within a month or two had passed, we began to really witness change. Previously, we were running blind, and now we can see where things might go wrong.
Our risk posture has improved. Both time to detect and time to remediate have improved.
It's positively affected the communication between cloud security, application developers, and AppSec teams.
What needs improvement?
They could have more comprehensive reporting. I'd like to see more details.
We've found a lot of false positives. It has not helped us reduce our level of false positives.
We'd like them to work on integration between networks. If I deployed the solution with another layer of security, they can't talk to each other. PinGSafe basically needs to integrate with more tools, especially on the security side.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've used the solution for 1.5-2 years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability is good. I haven't noticed any lagging or crashing.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution can scale fast. The dependency is on the API side, however.
How are customer service and support?
I've contacted technical support in the past. The quality is good. However, sometimes their staff don't know the details. The speed of response is good.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have used other solutions, including Prisma and Datadog.
How was the initial setup?
I was involved in the initial deployment of PingSafe. It was very easy to implement. We had two to three people working on the set up process.
There is no maintenance needed for the solution once it is up and running.
What other advice do I have?
I'm a PingSafe customer.
I'd rate the solution 8 out of 10. If someone is looking for a CPSM tool, they should look into PingSafe's capabilities to see if they match what a company needs.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
Software Developer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Good code scanning and evidence reporting with helpful support services
Pros and Cons
- "There's real-time threat detection. It can show threats and find issues based on their severity and helps us with real-time monitoring."
- "There is a bit of a learning curve for new users."
What is our primary use case?
We use the solution for monitoring the security of our infrastructure. It helps us identify all the vulnerabilities.
How has it helped my organization?
We had code and infrastructure, and we just weren't sure of all the vulnerabilities within them. This knowledge has helped protect us from security loopholes.
What is most valuable?
It's integrated with all of our cloud services on our accounts. It automatically fetches all the resources, scans through the code, and reports back on our vulnerabilities. It helps with all of our overall security standards as per the industry, and it can give us a rating. If I go to the compliance section, it gives me an idea of how I'm performing with respect to compliance metrics.
There's real-time threat detection. It can show threats and find issues based on their severity and helps us with real-time monitoring.
It's fairly easy to use. I'd rate the ease of use 7 out of 10. There is a learning curve around the initial issues. However, we can look at issue descriptions and what to do. It gives us a lot of details about an issue, so that helps.
Evidence-based reporting helps prioritize and solve our cloud security issues.
PingSafe includes proof of exploitability in evidence-based reporting. It's really important. If we did have any proof, it would be harder to pinpoint false positives. I like that it gives proof.
The code scanning is helpful. Whenever somebody commits a recent code, it helps identify that immediately and check vulnerabilities.
It has positively affected our exposure. Before we implemented it, we were having lots of issues, and now, with PingSafe, we're up to 87% compliance with respect to all security metrics. It's been a gradual process, however, we're getting better and better.
We've been able to reduce mean time to detect. It's gotten a bit faster. If you have a solution like this, you can take a more proactive approach. When a vulnerability happens, you can act immediately. Our mean time to detect has improved by about 80%.
It's also helped us with our mean time to remediate. It shows recommended actions and helps tell us what could possibly remediate the issue.
The product has positively affected collaboration among our cloud security, application developers, and AppSec teams. PingSafe, however, is more centered around our infrastructure security and doesn't impact developer productivity much.
The compliance monitoring capabilities are helpful. We're a venture product, so we need to be compliant with everything. When we get a report, we can see what we need to do for compliance, and it helps us identify issues and mitigate them effectively to increase compliance.
What needs improvement?
There is a bit of a learning curve for new users. The ease of use could be better.
We've had an issue where we muted a false positive, however, when we made some changes to a cloud configuration, it popped up again. So it hasn't really reduced false positives; you just need to manually ignore them.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've used the solution for one year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution has been stable throughout.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We have three to four users that are actively using PingSafe. They are admins and engineers.
So far, we haven't had any scalability issues.
How are customer service and support?
They have great technical support.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We didn't use a different solution previously.
How was the initial setup?
The initial deployment was pretty quick. When you integrate any of your cloud service providers, it doesn't take long. We had it implemented in a few days. One of our reps can just work with the team to get it ready.
It's not integrated with any other security tools, however, it is integrated within our infrastructure.
No maintenance is required.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I don't have any visibility on the pricing of PingSafe.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We have not evaluated other solutions.
What other advice do I have?
I'd recommend the solution to other users. Overall, I'd rate the product 8 out of 10.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
Cloud Engineer at a wholesaler/distributor with 10,001+ employees
Helps save time, improves collaboration, and identifies misconfigurations
Pros and Cons
- "The cloud misconfiguration is the most valuable feature."
- "I would like SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security to add real-time detection of vulnerabilities and cloud misconfigurations."
What is our primary use case?
I work for an insurance company whose infrastructure is on the cloud, so we use SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security for security management and vulnerability detection.
How has it helped my organization?
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is a valuable tool for managing infrastructure security. It offers advanced features like container security management, microservices security management, and Configuration Drift Remediation, which helps identify and address unauthorized configuration changes. These features are comprehensive and adaptable. Even for custom infrastructure modifications, such as XYZ, the SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security team can be contacted for guidance and policy adjustments to ensure a smooth adoption process.
Infrastructure as Code is valuable because the code itself defines the infrastructure. This means any vulnerabilities or misconfigurations in the IaC code will be deployed to our infrastructure. However, IaC tools can scan the code and alert us to potential problems before deployment, allowing us to fix them proactively.
We saw the benefits of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security immediately.
It helped reduce the amount of false positives.
It has reduced our mean time to detection and remediation.
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security improved collaboration between our cloud security developers and the application security teams.
The collaboration helped us save time, which is one of the reasons we have continued to use SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security.
What is most valuable?
The cloud misconfiguration is the most valuable feature. It highlights any misconfiguration that can make our infrastructure vulnerable.
What needs improvement?
I would like SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security to add real-time detection of vulnerabilities and cloud misconfigurations.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security for almost 2 years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I would rate the stability of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security 10 out of 10.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I would rate the scalability of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security 10 out of 10.
How are customer service and support?
The technical support is good. They are knowledgeable and prompt.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
The deployment was straightforward. One person was required from our end.
What about the implementation team?
The implementation process itself was very smooth. The SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security team provided excellent assistance in integrating the solution with our existing infrastructure and account. This made the integration process hassle-free. We've also recently integrated a new CDR feature using SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security 10 out of 10.
No maintenance is required for SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security.
Once you've acquired SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, it's essential to review all your existing organizational policies. If these policies are compatible with your infrastructure, you can proceed without modifications. However, if there are any incompatibilities, you'll need to make adjustments to ensure your infrastructure triggers accurate alerts. Skipping this step can lead to a flood of false positives.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
IAC scanning picks everything up and is effective and proactive
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is its integration with most of our technology stack, specifically all of our cloud platforms and ticketing software."
- "The recommended actions aren't always specific, so it might suggest recommendations that don't apply to the particular infrastructure code I'm reviewing."
What is our primary use case?
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is our primary security monitoring tool used for identifying vulnerabilities and misconfiguration.
How has it helped my organization?
I would rate the ease of use of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security eight out of ten.
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security offers a variety of dashboards, but the issue dashboard is my favorite due to its clarity and simplicity.
The evidence-based reporting is great and I appreciate the details the reports provide.
The IAC scanning picks everything up and is effective. The IAC scanning is proactive.
The two biggest benefits of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security are the centralized reporting dashboard for all my accounts and providers and the ability to track remediation progress.
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security has helped reduce the number of false positives we receive.
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security helps us manage our risk posture.
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security has reduced our MTTD thanks to its comprehensive coverage and centralized reporting capabilities.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is its integration with most of our technology stack, specifically all of our cloud platforms and ticketing software.
What needs improvement?
I wish SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security provided clearer solutions or remediation steps. The recommended actions aren't always specific, so it might suggest recommendations that don't apply to the particular infrastructure code I'm reviewing.
I would appreciate the ability to customize the severity levels in SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security as the current defaults do not meet my needs.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security for one year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is stable. I have not encountered any downtime.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is highly scalable.
How are customer service and support?
Technical support is usually great. While it can sometimes be a bit curt or dismissive, for the most part, getting help is easy and responses are quick.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is easy. One person is required for the deployment.
What about the implementation team?
The implementation was completed in-house.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I'm not familiar with SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security's standard pricing. While it seemed like a good value, I'm on a partnership plan that offers a discount in exchange for feedback. Therefore, I can't speak to the typical pricing.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security nine out of ten.
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security requires monthly updates.
Preparing for SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is fairly straightforward, especially if you're familiar with cloud security posture management tools. However, if this is your first time using such a tool, be prepared for a significant number of findings. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security will uncover security issues that manual efforts might miss.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor. The reviewer's company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Lead Data & Cloud Security Engineer at a media company with 501-1,000 employees
Is easy to use, improves our security posture, and reduces false positives
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable features of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security are the asset inventory and issue indexing."
- "SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security can be improved by developing a comprehensive set of features that allow for automated workflows."
What is our primary use case?
We use SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security as our Cloud Security Posture Management tool.
How has it helped my organization?
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is easy to use. While some features, like advanced graphics and custom drag-and-drop filters, might have a learning curve, most functionalities are intuitive. Clicking on "Asset Inventory" provides a clear list of all our assets. The filters are logically organized by resource type, account ID, and other relevant categories. In short, most of the platform is straightforward, allowing users to become comfortable within 15 minutes. However, advanced capabilities like custom visualizations and automated filtering through drag-and-drop may require additional time to master.
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security creates a comprehensive inventory of all resources within our cloud infrastructure. It automatically identifies any misconfigurations for each of these resources. The easy-to-track capabilities are further enhanced by automatic integration with Jira. Additionally, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security serves as the primary source of evidence for audits and compliance purposes. It documents the resources we identified with misconfigurations and demonstrates that we have rectified them. This functionality simplifies the process of providing evidence to auditors.
We experienced the benefits of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security immediately after onboarding our entire Cisco setup. However, there was likely a waiting period of up to six hours for the platform to fully populate with information about our infrastructure, resources, and so on. Despite this wait, some immediate benefits were gained. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security likely identified a list of potential misconfigurations across our accounts. This provided a starting point for further investigation and remediation. Of course, to fully leverage SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security's capabilities, we might need to integrate it with our existing external tools. However, the initial onboarding process itself yielded some valuable insights.
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security reduces the number of false positives we encounter. Initially, we relied heavily on custom engineering, which created a lot of noise. The code might not have been scalable, or it might have only triggered under specific conditions. We struggled to manage this custom tooling as our environment grew. When we considered scaling our operations, we realized this approach wouldn't be sustainable. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security provided a well-designed system that addressed these challenges. Even during configuration, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security can determine if something is misconfigured or not. However, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security also allows us to suppress findings that might be flagged as security vulnerabilities in a traditional sense, but are expected behavior in our specific context. For example, we might have developed a custom way to handle a specific situation like a three-bucket container for a site. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security allows us to suppress these findings, resulting in a significant reduction in false positives. Integration with SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security was very straightforward. Furthermore, suppression occurs at the source where misconfigurations are generated. This eliminates the need for an additional filtering layer. Imagine having 100 issues to address, and needing to manually filter out the ones that are not genuine issues. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security takes care of this filtering within the platform itself.
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security has improved our risk posture by giving us greater visibility into our infrastructure. This includes niche resources and misconfigurations that we weren't previously tracking or aware of. Unlike traditional tools that focus on specific resources or make assumptions, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security performs a holistic scan of our entire account. This has given us a much better understanding of our current attack surface. Once these vulnerabilities were identified, we were able to prioritize and remediate them, leading to a long-term improvement in our overall security posture.
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security has reduced our mean time to remediation. It's slightly better than our previous approach because we were also scanning daily. However, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security also includes scanning for many more resources than we were managing ourselves. So, while the time to fix individual problems might be similar, perhaps slightly less, the reports generated by SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security are more comprehensive and complete than what we had before. Additionally, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security helped us identify a number of additional resources that need fixing, which we weren't adequately tracking in the first place. Once a problem is identified and confirmed as a true positive, it takes no more than 15 minutes to fix it.
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security facilitates collaboration between our teams. We have three main groups: application security, infrastructure security, and compliance. The infrastructure team handles the entire SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security process, from generating reports and onboarding resources to acting on them. This has streamlined our workflow by consolidating everything into a single view. I now have all the information I need in one place. However, it's important to note that our application security team doesn't currently interact with SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable features of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security are the asset inventory and issue indexing. Once I've onboarded all the cloud accounts I want to manage with SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, it can automatically create an inventory of all resource types across AWS. Additionally, it can identify misconfigurations for those specific resources.
Another key feature we appreciate is the ability to create custom rules for up to ten users. This functionality is useful because SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security also collects generic information and metadata about each resource. This allows for granular filtering. For example, we can easily query to find only servers with a specific tag. This filtering capability is valuable for investigations, ad-hoc queries, and data gathering.
Finally, the integration module deserves mention as well. We use Jira internally to track all our tools, security reviews, and bugs. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security can directly push issues to Jira, making it very easy for us to track them. This eliminates the need to constantly return to the SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security platform to see which issues were generated.
What needs improvement?
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security can be improved by developing a comprehensive set of features that allow for automated workflows. While the current dashboard is functional, it could be made more actionable by incorporating additional functionalities. For instance, drag-and-drop functionality would simplify the creation of integrations. Additionally, valuable data can be retrieved from the platform using APIs and displayed on the dashboard, potentially using tools like Tableau for visualization. This is just one example, but it highlights the potential for expanding SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security's capabilities by enabling greater integration with other tools, even those not currently supported.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security for six months.
There was a phase where we built a proof of concept using the SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security platform to understand if it could directly address the problems we're currently facing. After finalizing the POC, we conducted testing and identified a baseline for future comparisons. Then, we moved into the implementation phase, and now the system is fully operational.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is scalable. We have not encountered any issues with the number of accounts and services we are using.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Previously, we managed our cloud security posture with in-house solutions built using open-source tools and custom code. However, as the number of accounts grew, this approach became difficult to scale and maintain. Additionally, the reporting capabilities of our custom tools didn't meet the increasingly stringent compliance requirements. To address these challenges, we sought an external, vendor-managed Cloud Security Posture Management tool.
How was the initial setup?
The initial deployment of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security was easy because their implementation team collaborated closely with one of our cloud security engineers. Since there were no agents or software to install, onboarding accounts simply involved creating a role for them. This role grants the platform read-only access to our infrastructure. The process is very streamlined; our team can onboard an entire account within minutes. However, the first time an account is onboarded, it takes some time to ingest all of its resources and information.
The entire deployment took less than a week. This included not only onboarding accounts but also gaining a holistic understanding of the platform and its capabilities. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security also came to our office to showcase the modules we could leverage and how we could use them effectively. Since this was our first time working with SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, our team actively collaborated with them to resolve any issues we encountered.
What about the implementation team?
One engineer from our organization worked with a team from SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security to implement the solution.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Pricing is based on modules, which was ideal for us. We weren't interested in the platform's full capability at first. Our priority was to establish foundational practices like maintaining an asset inventory and identifying misconfigurations. We then aimed to streamline these processes. Thankfully, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security's modular pricing allowed us to pay for only the features we needed, unlike Wiz. With Wiz, we would have paid for the entire platform upfront, potentially leaving us with unused features. This would have been a poor return on investment, especially considering Wiz's high cost. In essence, their pricing model wouldn't have suited our needs. Even if we had eventually used all of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security's features, the initial cost would still have been lower than Wiz in the long run.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
After evaluating several options, including SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security and Wiz, we determined that SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security was the best fit for our needs, particularly in terms of cost. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security provides a comprehensive view of potential security issues in our cloud infrastructure, allowing us to map them to relevant compliance frameworks, custom security requirements, or internal engineering standards. This enables us to effectively track and remediate these issues, ensuring a more secure cloud environment.
The Wiz platform offered a wide range of features that weren't essential for our current needs. For instance, they provided data security and AI-powered security posture management. However, our current security maturity level wouldn't allow us to fully utilize these capabilities. Additionally, Wiz is a comprehensive platform, and individual modules aren't available separately. In contrast, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security allowed for closer collaboration. They could customize the platform's functionalities to meet our specific requirements. Moreover, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security was significantly more cost-effective. While I can't recall the exact price difference, it was a substantial saving. Furthermore, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security's support team was incredibly responsive. They were receptive to our suggestions for features that might be beneficial in the future. This flexibility, along with the platform's affordability, ultimately led us to choose SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security eight out of ten.
We initially considered the agentless vulnerability scanning as a cloud security management tool, not a host-based security solution. Therefore, we opted against installing agents. Instead, we simply connected our AWS accounts through IAM, allowing the scanner to comprehensively scan all necessary resources and gather the required information.
The maintenance is taken care of by SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security directly.
Before deploying SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, it's important to fully understand all its capabilities. While we're currently using one specific feature, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security offers a wide range of functionalities. Gaining a clear internal understanding of your specific needs for SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security will help you determine the optimal model. Focusing solely on features without a defined purpose can lead to unnecessary costs. It's more efficient to obtain a quote for the model that aligns with your current needs. As your requirements evolve, you can then expand functionality by integrating additional modules.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
Buyer's Guide
Download our free SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: October 2026
Product Categories
Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) Vulnerability Management Cloud and Data Center Security Container Security Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) Compliance Management AI ObservabilityPopular Comparisons
Qualys TotalCloud
SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint
Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks
Check Point Cloud Firewall (formerly CloudGuard Network Security)
Varonis Platform
Qualys Exposure Management
Buyer's Guide
Download our free SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- Does SentinelOne have a Virtual Patching functionality?
- When evaluating Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP), what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- Why is a CNAPP (Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform) important?
- What CNAPP solution do you recommend for a hybrid cloud?
- Why are Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) tools important for companies?
- When evaluating Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) solutions, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- Why is Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) important for companies?
- What Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform do you recommend?



















