SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Reviews

We use it to monitor Azure and AWS accounts. We also use it to monitor the GitHub account for any data leakage and misconfigurations and also to have proactive configuration checks.

We were looking for a CNAPP solution that could provide details about cloud misconfigurations, compliance, and any risks. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security provides that. The feature of offensive security has been very helpful for us.

We only use agentless scanning. We have not installed agents anywhere. It collects data and provides information.

We use SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security's Offensive Security Engine. The analytics features of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security are something that other providers do not provide. They have scanning on the port base and simulation of attacks. It is a very helpful feature to proactively resolve issues. It handles verifying actual exploit paths and prioritizing breach potential very well.

The proactive approach and offensive security have helped us to fix things in advance before they can be exploited.

We were able to realize its benefits immediately. As soon as you configure it, it does its job. It takes a day to configure it and discover the assets. It is easily deployable, and it immediately starts providing inputs.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security helped reduce the number of false positives. It also helps with our SOC monitoring. The alerts are reduced, and we are in compliance.

We get details about how much we are compliant with different frameworks. It helps us to evaluate the risk posture as well. We use the reports to evaluate our risk posture.

The proactive approach and advanced fixes reduce the number of false positives, but it is difficult to know if SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security has reduced our mean time to detect. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security has definitely reduced our mean time to remediate.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security has not had an effect on the collaboration among various teams because, in our environment, everything is done by IT, but we have visibility across all the domains. We can work together if needed, but it is not yet applicable to our organization.

The offensive security where they do a fix is valuable. They go to a misconfiguration and provide detailed alerts on what could be there. They also provide a remediation feature where if we give the permission, they can also go and fix the issue.

They also support private clouds to a certain extent. It is pretty easy and customizable.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security's interface is pretty easy and comfortable. They keep on improvising it. When you are configuring, it is pretty easy.

It is a very secluded solution. It works only as CNAPP. It does not bring much threat intel from the outside world. All it does is scan. If it can also correlate things, it will be better. It can discover the threats from the outside world. It can discover the threats or vulnerabilities happening across those assets. If it can bring that in and evaluate, it will be good.

We have been using SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security for a year.

It is stable. We have not observed any issues.

We have not increased our assets, so it is difficult to say anything about the scalability part.

I never had to contact their support.

We were not using a similar solution previously.

It was pretty easy. It was very straightforward. They had many things available. We got the scripts on Azure, AWS, and GitHub, so the installation was pretty easy. It took a couple of hours.

It is a cloud solution. It does not require any maintenance.

We implemented it on our own. Only one person was required from our side.

Their support was not required. They offered to help. They assigned a customer success manager, but it was easy to deploy, so we did not require much help from their side.

Its pricing is okay. It is in line with what other providers were providing. It is not cheap. It is not expensive.

We evaluated 2 more products. One was Zscaler, and the other one was Wiz. Offensive security and support for the private cloud were the reasons for going for SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security.

I would advise evaluating SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security based on the use cases. You should know what is required and how SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security can support that. If SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is able to fulfill your cases, it will be good. A thorough evaluation and mapping of the organization's objective should be done before buying SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security.

I would rate SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security an 8 out of 10. It is good.

Cloud Native Security helps us identify security issues related to cloud configuration and containers. We leverage cloud synchronization for real-time incident notification.

Cloud Native Security is easy to use. Its user-friendly features make integrating new tools a breeze. Everything can be connected through a simple API. The intuitive dashboard and effortless ticket submission further enhance the user experience.

One of Cloud Native Security's most valuable features is its offensive security engine. This engine excels at identifying vulnerabilities caused by misconfigurations, which could potentially be exploited by external attackers. In these cases, Cloud Native Security's offensive security engine findings are highly accurate, with a proven positive detection rate.

Cloud Native Security has helped reduce the false positive rate. The reduction in false positives has improved our operations.

As a small startup, implementing all security best practices across the organization can be challenging. Additionally, security awareness may not be widespread. However, Cloud Native Security, a cloud-based security tool, helps us address these limitations. Cloud Native Security acts as a vigilant watchdog, continuously monitoring our infrastructure for misconfigurations. This includes detecting unauthorized access attempts, such as someone opening a specific port or granting historical access from an external AWS account. By integrating Cloud Native Security with our Slack channel, we receive immediate alerts whenever such suspicious activity occurs. The notification will highlight the potential risk and provide details, allowing us to investigate and take prompt action. Previously, we unknowingly stored sensitive information, known as hard-coded secrets, in our public GitHub repository. Since integrating Cloud Native Security with GitHub, these secrets are identified immediately and flagged through Slack alerts. This enables us to address the issue swiftly and reduce our overall security exposure.

It is far more effective at reducing our meantime to detection compared to the open-source solution we used previously.

Cloud Native Security's findings have led to increased collaboration with our infrastructure team. While our application is a separate product and doesn't reside in the cloud, Cloud Native Security has still proven valuable in this way.

Cloud Native Security's best feature is its ability to identify hard-coded secrets during pull request reviews. This helped my organization identify nearly 10,000 secrets added across our repositories, many of which had a significant security impact. Integrating Cloud Native Security with GitHub alone allowed us to identify all these secrets. This is a key feature that has been instrumental in improving our security posture through testing.

Secondly, Cloud Native Security's cloud SIEM feature has been essential in preventing our most critical security incidents.

We are experiencing problems with Cloud Native Security reporting. Our organization primarily uses Jira for issue tracking. While Cloud Native Security offers input options for reporting vulnerabilities, the "connect action" it provides to link issues isn't replicating information to Jira. This is happening for approximately half of the company and is causing difficulties for developers and stakeholders in fully understanding the reported issues.

Cloud Native Security's proof of exploitability is not that useful when it relates to container images. More detail should be included in the reporting.

Cloud Native Security can identify hard-coded secrets within our code and tell us if they're valid or not. However, in some cases, Cloud Native Security may flag a valid secret as hard-coded without specifying its exact location within the codebase. This lack of detail makes it difficult for developers to identify where the secret is used. Ideally, Cloud Native Security should provide the specific location of valid hard-coded secrets. This would significantly improve the developer experience by allowing them to easily locate and manage these secrets.

Cloud Native Security integrates with Jira and Slack through APIs, which is great. However, I would also like to see Cloud Native Security offer APIs that allow us to directly build dashboards within the platform. This would be incredibly helpful for visualizing vulnerabilities, security settings, and Cloud Native Security usage reports. Imagine if Cloud Native Security provided these APIs. We could create custom dashboards for specific purposes, like offensive security, cloud misconfiguration monitoring, or even integrating ISS scans. Essentially, any customer could easily build dashboards tailored to their needs. Unfortunately, Cloud Native Security doesn't currently offer this functionality. Other security products provide this level of customization. Adding this feature to Cloud Native Security would significantly improve its overall solution. 

I have been using Cloud Native Security for two years.

Cloud Native Security is extremely stable and we have not encountered any issues.

Cloud Native Security is scalable.

We contact technical support weekly. They are helpful and respond quickly. Additionally, there is a built-in chatbot that allows us to submit support tickets.

Positive

We also rely on AWS built-in features that alert us if there are any misconfigurations along with Cloud Native Security.

Regarding the license model, I believe their approach is appropriate based on the customer workload data we're tracking. It seems like an ideal way to proceed.

For pricing, it currently seems to be in line with market rates. However, I recall Cloud Native Security charging a slightly higher premium previously.

I would rate Cloud Native Security nine out of ten.

We receive notifications from Cloud Native Security whenever maintenance is required, and they provide instructions to complete the process.

New users should be prepared to have a dedicated staff member manage Cloud Native Security. This person will handle alerts, configurations, and integrations. You should continuously evaluate all the findings that Cloud Native Security provides, as it performs daily scans. However, it's possible to miss vulnerabilities that have already been fixed. Therefore, careful attention is needed when raising issues with developers. To optimize your use of Cloud Native Security and potentially reduce workload, consider providing feedback to improve the product. Additionally, try to utilize as many features as possible, as they can all have a positive impact on your organization's infrastructure.

My company uses Cloud Native Security as our CSPM solution to discover vulnerabilities in cloud-based configurations. We take alerts from Cloud Native Security and forward them to the DevOps team to remediate them manually. 

Cloud Native Security helps reduce the number of false positives we receive. We receive notifications and alerts from various channels, such as AWS CloudTrail and Microsoft Defender. These products generate alerts based on their policies. I can feel confident that Cloud Native Security isn't giving any false positives. We get a few, but they are rare, and I can immediately alert the team to redefine their policies. 

Cloud Native Security's most valuable feature is its offensive security engine. I have worked with many CSPM solutions. What sets Cloud Native Security apart is the security engine's ability to provide evidence about the potential for vulnerabilities to be exploited or endpoints exposed with credentials.  

The evidence-based reporting is helpful. It shows us all these details that help us do more research. We are working with various stakeholders to remediate those misconfigurations immediately. No other solutions provide this feature. We can research other resources affected by the same kind of vulnerabilities or misconfigurations. We can prioritize fixing them and work on them immediately. That's beneficial to everyone on the team, and they are learning a lot with this feature from Cloud Native Security itself.

While Cloud Native Security is mostly easy to use, the interface has a few trouble areas. We have faced some challenges with filtering. The Cloud Native Security team is working on that, and they're fixing it immediately. They take feedback seriously. There is no break-glass account feature. They should implement this as soon as possible because we can't implement SSO without a break-glass feature. 

We have been using Cloud Native Security for one year.

Cloud Native Security is stable. 

I rate Cloud Native Security 9 out of 10 for scalability. There is no lag, and the application doesn't break down. 

I rate Cloud Native Security support 8 out of 10. We contacted them about adding some policies and creating plugins based on our requirements. 

Positive

We previously used Prisma Cloud. Each has its own feature set. Prisma is on a higher level, and Cloud Native Security is a startup that's building its feature set and taking feedback from all the customers. That's one advantage Cloud Native Security has. They're responsive to feature requests. If I suggest a feature for Prisma, I will need to wait until the next release on their roadmap. Cloud Native Security will add it right away.

Deploying Cloud Native Security wasn't too easy or difficult. It was manageable. I did the deployment by myself. I'm the Cloud Native Security admin for my organization responsible for onboarding all the cloud accounts for AWS, GCP, and Azure. 

We also looked at Orca Security. Like Prisma, Orca is one of the top solutions on the market. Most of the CSPM solutions have the same features. Cloud Native Security stood out for two reasons: One is the offensive security engine. That is the main thing. The second thing Cloud Native Security offers is evidence-based reporting. That helps us a lot. These two features are unique, which is why we chose Cloud Native Security. 

I rate Cloud Native Security 7 out of 10. 

We use the product across all of our entities for EDR, threat detection, and response methods.

We wanted a solution for protection. We had a number of entities with various EDR solutions. We wanted to centralize under one EDR solution, and we wanted one that was efficient and easy to manage with a small team.

The biggest thing for us was getting to a single platform. A single pane of glass has been nice. The ability to segment various sites out. The R-Back involved is super helpful for us as we are a multi-company organization. In general, the time has been greatly reduced for incidents.

The ease of use of the platform is very nice. The console provides excellent visibility into events that occur and, in general, the wide range of tools that are built into the agent itself.

My impression of the product's real-time detection and response capabilities is good. It definitely is a little bit different. It takes a little bit more time to learn than some of the other solutions that we have worked with in the past. Once you do understand it and once you're capable of running through the GUI and you understand what the logs and various windows they're trying to tell you, it's fairly straightforward.

The solution's automated remediation is good. I like that you can segment it into four options. You can choose to kill it at any time in the kill chain, so you can choose to quarantine it, you can choose to remediate, you can choose to roll back, you can choose to let it run. Being able to choose how far along you want those events to get is pretty nice.

The historical data record provided by the solution after an attack is decent. It gives you a flowchart of the attack. All along the processes you get good visibility and see all that were detected. Definitely, from a post-incident analysis perspective, it's very strong.

The solution has helped reduce our organization's mean time to detect by 20% to 30%. Given that extra 20% to 30%, it frees us up to focus on other items. 

The solution's impact on our organization's productivity is good. It provides robust whitelisting capabilities and improves our productivity. 

Agent releases need to be more stable before being pushed out. 

Bugs need to be disclosed quickly.

The reporting, and the logging visibility, are not there. It's very, very crude and simple. It needs to be drastically expanded. 

They need to expand their third-party integrations with SIM tools, and sites need to be given the option to expire at the end of the contract as well.

They could expand their integration with Kubernetes. They are trying to build out their third-party integrations. It does work well on Windows and Mac. 

I've used the product for three and a half years. 

Agent stability and communication with the console and agents going offline can be an issue. It can be time-consuming to coordinate and fix. However, the cloud console is very resilient. It's mostly the agent releases where we might have issues. CrowdStrike agents seem a little more stable. 

We have about 3,000 users using the solution.

Scaling is no issue. 

Technical support is hit or miss. We have worked with some good agents and some less knowledgeable. 

Positive

We have used different solutions, including the fact that we still CrowdStrike at a couple of companies. We are now moving more fully towards SentinelOne.

The simplicity and ease of use were big and where SentinelOne stands out. It's a set-and-forget policy. Based on what we saw in testing, it was the best option. 

In terms of telemetry data, we were all over the board.

The initial setup was a little more complex when we first started. However, they've smoothed a lot of their implementation out and so it's gotten easier over time. It took us a couple of weeks to a month to deploy. About 20 were involved in the deployment. We have 30 to 40 companies around the world and it's across every company and every department. 

The solution does require maintenance. You need to have agents up to date and cases closed properly. It does require you to be invested. 

We have witnessed ROI. It's comprehensive in its detection capabilities and has saved us from multiple attacks. We've likely saved 30% based on prevented attacks. 

The solution is relatively cheaper and is willing to work with companies on pricing. 

We are customers.

For those who believe they already have a continuous monitoring solution in place, I'd advise that SentinelOne knows its own product. They can provide that extra confidence that nothing gets missed. And if you see a high number of alerts, they're able to really help you discern those and get down to the ones that matter most.

The solution doesn't affect our ability to innovate one way or another. It doesn't hold us back.

I'd recommend the solution and advise running a POC in your environment. It's good to run against CRowdStrike. They are seriously contending against CrowdStrike.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. 

SentinelOne's Singularity Cloud Security streamlines our cloud security by minimizing false positives. Previously, we were inundated with alerts from various sources like AWS Cloud and Microsoft Defender, making it difficult to distinguish real threats. Now, with Singularity's cloud-native security, I can confidently address genuine threats and efficiently alert my team about relevant Defender policies.

We implemented Singularity Cloud Security to reduce the number of false positive alerts we were receiving.

I would rate the ease of use a seven out of ten.

The Proof of exploitability in evidence-based reporting helps us during our investigations.

The IaC scanning helps identify preproduction issues.

By analyzing alerts from various channels against our defined security policies, Singularity Cloud Security significantly reduces false positives. This allows our team to focus on real threats, and when a rare false positive does occur, we can quickly notify the security team to refine the relevant policy.

Our false positives have been reduced by over 80 percent.

It has improved our risk posture.

Singularity Cloud Security has improved our mean time to detect by 20 percent and has improved our remediation time by allowing us to see the details of the vulnerabilities in one place.

Singularity Cloud Security has saved our engineers around 25 minutes of time.

The key strength of Singularity Cloud Security lies in its ability to pinpoint vulnerabilities in our cloud accounts and identify suspicious activity that warrants further investigation.

Unlike Prisma, which schedules feature additions for its next roadmap release, Singularity prioritizes user feedback and strives to implement feature requests as quickly as possible.

Singularity Cloud Security currently lacks a break-glass account function, which is a critical component for implementing Single Sign-On as it allows for regaining access in emergencies.

I have been using Singularity Cloud Security by SentinelOne for one year.

I would rate the stability of Singularity Cloud Security six out of ten. There are times when I click on a topic and it freezes.

I would rate the scalability of Singularity Cloud Security seven out of ten.

The response time needs improvement.

Neutral

I would rate Singularity Cloud Security by SentinelOne eight out of ten.

There are ten users in our organization.

No maintenance is required from our end.

I recommend Singularity Cloud Security. After using the solution for a year and a half, our organization has found it valuable in identifying vulnerabilities within our environment.

We use SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security as our CSPM. Integrated with our environment, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security scans for vulnerabilities and recommends remediation.

We implemented SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security to monitor our cloud security for vulnerabilities in the configuration.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is easy to use.

The evidence-based reporting provides details of the vulnerability and the steps we need to take to resolve it.

The SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security scanning engine provides valuable evidence by identifying and reporting vulnerabilities that could be attacker targets. This evidence of exploitability is crucial because it allows us to prioritize and patch vulnerabilities effectively. Without this information, we might not be able to address critical vulnerabilities promptly.

Thanks to SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, our security posture has improved significantly. Our team has been able to effectively address all critical and high vulnerabilities identified by the platform.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security has improved our mean time to detection. Without a CSPM tool, we would not be able to identify vulnerabilities.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security facilitated collaboration between our cloud security, application development, and AppSec teams. The evidence provided by SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security streamlines collaboration and vulnerability resolution across these teams.

The collaboration has saved engineering time by up to 40 percent.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security's improved compliance monitoring capabilities have helped us achieve a more secure posture.

All the features we use are equal and get the job done.

We encountered issues with some of the configured security rules. The vulnerability recommendations provided by SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security were inaccurate. In some cases, the rules are strictly enforced but do not align with real-world use cases. To address this, I recommend revising the security rule definitions to better reflect practical scenarios and provide clearer explanations.

We encountered a problem with SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security. They required a broad security policy, but we requested that they implement least privileged access and grant fewer permissions than they initially required. It took them over six months to respond to our request.

I have been using SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security for 1.5 years.

I would rate the stability of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security 8 out of 10.

I would rate the scalability of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security 9 out of 10.

The technical support teams' response time was good but they were lacking a deep understanding of the different environments which caused delays in resolving our issues. 

Neutral

The initial deployment was straightforward and took 2 days to complete.

Two people from our team were involved in the deployment.

I would rate SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security 7 out of 10.

Four people in our organization utilize SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security.

No maintenance is required from our end.

I recommend SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security to others for CSPM. 

We use the solution for security posture management. It's a safeguard for our cloud. It helps flag misconfiguration or any kind of vulnerability. There are also remediation capabilities, although we're only subscribed to alerts.

It's a safeguard tool for our cloud. When I'm using my cloud I need to make sure whatever I'm doing is secure. So we needed a gatekeeper or something acting as a gatekeeper, to keep an eye out since people can sometimes make mistakes. If there is any kind of event error, it helps us get alerted.

It's a real-time monitoring tool that runs 24/7.

I like the security capabilities. The availability and stability are very good. 

It is very easy to use, and the graphical user interface is nice. It's great that they provide information regarding issues on the front end. The evidence-based reporting is good. There is some heavy investment there. The user interface and ease of use for security operations are very helpful. Everything is easily available, and that's very impressive. 

It works within a certain set of rules. It has enough information to cover 100% of the services we are using. For most of my expectations, the product has covered my needs. They are also adding new features and functionality.

We use the infrastructure as code scanning, which is good. There's very good security scanning. We can scan non-production environments and get a report. We get notifications of issues immediately. Before moving to production, we always look at reports to check for issues. 

We're almost 99% compliant based on the compliance regulations we follow. It's helpful to have good compliance scanning. 

We've been dealing with fewer false positives. It's improved over time. It's too early to say, percentage-wise, how many fewer we're seeing; however, it is noticeable. 

It's lowered our risk posture. We have been satisfied so far. It covers what we need to be covered.

The mean time to remediate has been lowered by about 20% to 30%.

We now have very good collaboration between our cloud security, application developers, and AppSec teams. There's better communication in terms of response. We haven't calculated if it's saved us any engineering time, however. 

They could improve their mean time to detect. It's good, however, it could be lowered further. Detection should be in near real-time. We need these alerts fast as security is our greatest concern.

They could improve reporting and offer better, faster notifications. 

I've used the solution for almost 2 years.

I'd rate the stability 8 out of 10.

We have 10 to 15 people using the solution. 

I'd rate the ability to scale 8 out of 10.

We've had our support directly reach out to theirs. Sometimes they address items slowly; sometimes they are faster. The support response time could be improved. 

Positive

We did use something prior to PingSafe. We had a few things on-premises and on our private cloud. We liked the pricing and feature offering of PingSafe and decided to implement it. 

The initial setup was pretty straightforward. We had to do some integration and it was simple. The deployment itself hardly took an hour. It's integrated with our AWS and that was pretty seamless. 

I don't worry about maintenance. I don't take care of that aspect. However, PingSafe works in the background, maintaining and upgrading the system directly. 

We had a few people from PingSafe involved in the implementation. 

I'm a customer and end-user.

It's a 100% available solution. It covers most of our cloud security requirements and has a nice interface. Support could be faster, though. When we're dealing with security, we don't want lots of time between responses. 

I'd rate the solution 7 out of 10.

We use the solution for security and monitoring. It helps maintain compliance standards. Multiple policies can be mapped and evaluated and alerts can trigger your attention.

We're using multiple cloud environments and multiple providers, such as AWS, Azure, GCP, and Postgres. It helps us manage multi-cloud security.

The UI is very good. The solution offers very good adaptability.

Its ease of use is pretty good. After using it for nine months, I'm pretty comfortable with it.

The evidence-based reporting helps us prioritize and solve issues. This is a feature that is missing from most platforms.

We use agentless vulnerability scanning. It's a good aspect of the product.

The proof of exploitability and evidence-based reporting are excellent. They gave me a detailed idea of what was exposed. 

We use the infrastructure as code scanning. It really helps manage the policies, which I have been working on. 

The compliance capabilities are helping me most of all. The reports and alerts we get help manage everything and act on issues.

We've reduced the number of false positives we receive by 35% or so.

We've reduced our time to detect by about 20%.

It does take time to remediate, however, we've saved time in terms of time to remediate since we get more details around alerts and can go in and look and solve issues. We've reduced our mean time to remediation by about 30% to 35%.

It can be complex to use at the outset. 

They could have better support. We've had support issues in the past. They need more experienced support personnel. 

I've been using the solution for 8 to 9 months.

The stability is okay, however, it needs more maturity. 

We have 2 to 3 users on the solution currently. We have it in one location right now. 

The scalability depends on the integration.

Technical support has room for improvement. 

Neutral

We did previously use a different solution. We used Prisma. It did offer good pricing and good scalability.

The initial setup only took about 1 week. I was not directly involved in the customer onboarding process. 

The solution does not require any maintenance. 

We see an ROI in the fact that we can better map our best practices. From a security perspective, we're saving around 30% to 40% and we're able to implement more best practices.

The pricing is pretty good. It's comparable to or better than others on the market.

I'm a partner.

The solution is cost-efficient, yet it needs more support accessibility. However, I would recommend this solution to others. I'd rate the product 5 out of 10 overall. 

We utilize SentinelOne Singularity Cloud to safeguard our clients and servers from viruses and to perform forensic analysis on threats.

We are a service integrator in the public sector in Italy, and we implemented SentinelOne Singularity Cloud because we lacked an antivirus solution.

The real-time detection and response capabilities of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud are excellent. We have implemented automated remediation on the Singularity platform. I have tested this on both our tenant and our customers' tenant, and we haven't encountered any issues with this method.

Singularity offers profound forensic visibility, which proves highly advantageous for in-depth analysis of events. Through a single console, we can observe comprehensive event details from start to finish.

The historical data record provided by Singularity after an attack is valuable. It allows us to identify any misconfigurations and has assisted us in rectifying errors during the deployment of group policies in Active Directory. This capability helps us manage group policies more effectively, particularly in terms of security policy deployment.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud has been immensely helpful in mitigating issues for us. Our organization consists of approximately five hundred employees, including technicians and administrators, and Singularity has played a vital role in safeguarding our organization.

It has helped us reduce our MTTD. 

Singularity helps us reduce our MTTR.

We have saved time. The automatic remediation helped me a lot when an event occurred, as it analyzed and remediated the issue automatically. This saved a significant amount of time.

Singularity operates smoothly and does not cause our laptops to experience any performance degradation, which has been very beneficial.

Deploying SentinelOne Singularity Cloud is a simple process that requires only three clicks. 

The management console is highly intuitive to comprehend and operate.

The cost has the potential for improvement. I would appreciate it if the full edition could be made more affordable, allowing me to upgrade from the intermediate version.

I have been using SentinelOne Singularity Cloud for more than three years. 

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud is incredibly reliable. I have never come across a crash or experienced any downtime. I have never needed to initiate a support case.

The SentinelOne Singularity Cloud exhibits high scalability. We only need to incorporate licenses to facilitate scaling, eliminating concerns regarding servers or databases, as it functions as a cloud-based platform.

The initial setup is straightforward because the platform is cloud-based, allowing accessibility from anywhere, and deploying the agent is as easy as clicking three times.

Two people were involved in the deployment.

We are a system integrator and we implemented the solution in-house.

As a partner, we receive a discount on the licenses. Currently, we possess over 250 licenses, but there is potential for the licenses to become even more affordable.

We evaluated various products such as Trend Micro, Symantec, and Sophos. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud stood out among the solutions we evaluated as the easiest to manage and with the best performance.

I rate SentinelOne Singularity Cloud a nine out of ten.

SentinelOne is a novel form of endpoint detection and response that has assisted us in effectively managing our clients and servers. It provides us with substantial visibility and aids in safeguarding our infrastructure against emerging threats.

Regarding maintenance, I check the event logs every two weeks, in addition to reviewing emails, and I update the schedule to manage the agents.

The interoperability with third-party solutions is good. We don't have any compatibility issues.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud is updated bi-weekly or monthly and the signature to the client is updated every two days.

Evaluating SentinelOne Singularity Cloud is made simple by installing the client and logging into the console.

We use SentinelOne's Singularity Cloud Security as our Cloud Security Posture Management solution, to proactively identify vulnerabilities within our cloud configurations. Security alerts generated by the platform are then forwarded to our mitigation team for prompt remediation.

The solution is easy to use.

The evidence-based reporting is helpful to our DevOps team who manually mitigate the vulnerabilities.

Singularity Cloud Security offers a flexible agentless vulnerability scanning solution that allows me to receive alerts directly to my personal email, a feature missing from AWS GuardDuty.

Evidence-based reporting that demonstrates how a vulnerability can be exploited is crucial because it allows me to prioritize alerts based on their severity level. This ensures I focus on the most critical issues first.

Singularity Cloud Security has improved our organization's security by proactively identifying vulnerabilities that could have significant detrimental effects.

It has decreased the number of false positives.

Before implementing Singularity Cloud Security our mean time to detection was three to four days.

Singularity Cloud Security has significantly improved our mean time to remediation from one hour to just 15 minutes.

SentinelOne stands out with its responsiveness to feature requests for Singularity Cloud Security. This means they can adapt the product to our specific needs, whereas Prisma Cloud forces us to wait for their pre-determined release schedule.

SentinelOne currently lacks a break glass account feature, which is critical for implementing Single Sign-On. SentinelOne should prioritize the development of a break glass account feature.

We've encountered some filtering difficulties, resulting in a few areas of the interface needing improvement.

I have been using Singularity Cloud Security by SentinelOne for one year.

Singularity Cloud Security by SentinelOne is stable.

I would rate the scalability of Singularity Cloud Security nine out of ten.

The technical support is good. They've assisted us on multiple occasions with implementing new policies and creating custom plug-ins to meet our specific needs.

Positive

I successfully deployed the solution in collaboration with a cloud-native administrator. The deployment process went smoothly and we encountered no complications.

I would rate Singularity Cloud Security by SentinelOne eight out of ten.

We have over 400 users in our organization.