Selenium HQ Reviews

I have used Selenium in many test automation projects from web report applications to internet banking.

Selenium has helped to complete tests in less time, which would not be possible relying on manual testing only.

Compatibility with all major browsers; it has become the industry standard.

It is programming language agnostic, you can write tests in most currently used languages.

• To simplify the development process, everyone needs to do a Selenium Framework to acquire the web application functions and features from Selenium methods.
• It would be very great if Selenium would provide some framework examples so newcomers could get started more quickly.

We took Selenium for web product test automation and as it very well suits as it has capacity to execute in different browser, different environment. Also it has lot other capacities to scale up test automation and yield better ROI.

Web-based application automation are mostly done using Selenium. It's the right automation tool as a replacement for manual regression testing that indispensably reduces the testing time due to its cross-browser, parallel, and remote executions.

- Most importantly, it is an open source tool.

- Parallel executions (same browser in parallel, different browser in parallel).

- Remote executions using Node and Hub.

- Integration with CI tools like Jenkins

- Multi-platform support (for details have a look at http://www.seleniumhq.org/about/platforms.jsp).

- Cross-browser Support (Chrome, Firefox, different versions of IE, Safari, Opera).

- Supported environments are Windows, Linux & Mac.

- Supports different scripting languages (JAVA, C#, Perl, PHP, Python, Ruby, Objective C, Javascript).

- Huge user community.

It has extensive support for Chrome and Firefox, but more is needed for IE, Edge and Safari.

To some extent it is unstable while executing against different versions of IE browser, but that could be overcome through some work-around and framework design. Edge browser executions are not stable as IE browsers.

Obviously, we have better support from various users as it is an open source tool. We have a huge number of customers in the open community at different levels to provide support.

Basically, to start with setup is straightforward and easier. If you use the remote web-driver, it is slightly complex to make the setup.

Our in-house team is used for the entire implementation of the framework. Being open-source, lot of valuable additions are made in a free-flow while developing the framework.

It's an open source tool.

We use it to make our UI functional tests, layout test, and any tests related to the browsers.

1. We have automation tests (API, UI, unit, integration tests, and etc.). It saves on our manual QA time.
2. It reduces our manual QA repeatable works.
3. It saves our manual QA's energy.
4. The QA time move from manual QA to automation QA, and improve the relationship between developer and QA, Since automation tests make them work closer.
5. QA becomes more technical and love to know more about technical and architecture of the code such as they have to use GitHub, CI system, servers, and etc.
6. QA know more about tests such as unit tests, integration tests, and Selenium UI tests.
7. Make QA life much fun/easier.
8. Deduce the developers work such as automation QA/developer develops the test library and test framework, both developer and QA, some times, PM also can develop their own tests by using the test library and test framework.

1. Selenium is a good tool to do UI testing
2. It works with many popular programming languages such as Java, JavaScript and etc.
3. It supports most of the mainstream browsers such as Chrome, Firefox, IE and etc.
4. It supports mobile local application as well and work with Appium.
5. It is free.
6. Selenium grid is a wonderful tool.
7. BrowserStack and Sauce Labs work with Selenium.
8. Headless browser, such as Xvfb and PhantomJS, can work with Selenium as well.
9. Selenium works with CI system such as TeamCity, Jenkins, and CircleCI.
10. Selenium can work with most programming languages. I use Java more as I am really comfortable using it.
11. I do not use Selenium IDE, but it can help the beginner to learn how to find the elements by XPath, CSS selector, and etc.
12. New geckodriver in new version of Selenium.
13. It is able to work with Galen test framework to do layout test.

1. Stability.
2. Documentation, the Java doc description for most of the API is almost empty. No example with no detail.
3. It is not easy to make IE plus Selenium work good as other browsers. Firefox and Chrome are the best ones to work with Selenium.
4. Java gets a lot of supports. Python as well. However, it seems not PHP. It is amazing, and Selenium can work with a lot of programming languages.
5. Firefox IDE tool needs to be improved.

Some times with timeout issues.

When your tests number increases, driver manager and Selenium Grid performance become important.

There are a lot of test frameworks that support Selenium.

Selenium web driver - Java.

As traditional load testing we use some expensive tools available in the market, but with the help of Selenium we started automating the browser and done load testing for light application.

Handling frames and windows needs to be improved.

I've been using it for one year.

No issues encountered.

No issues encountered.

No issues encountered.

9/10

Straightforward by using Selenium IDE.

We did an in-house implementation, doing our R&D over the internet.

Hot tool in market. Makes thing easier to use and implement. Demand increases cost.

Since it is an open source. It is free to use. However my company see it as the future of load testing.

You'll have a lot to do when automating many different applications. Just practice.

• Support for UI Automation
• Language support - since it supports Java and other programming languages it is easy to integrate with other systems
• Multiple browser support
• Selenium Grid supports the execution of test case in distributed way

• It's open-source, so there's no need to pay for a license
• Support different programming language hence DevOps and QA work together to built better test suite
• Since it is a lightweight tool, hence it helps in running test cases fast

There is no good tool to find the Xpath. They should provide a good tool to find Xpath for dynamic elements and integrate API (REST/ SOAP) testing support.

I've been using it for five years.

There were no issues with the deployment.

There have been no issues with the stability.

There have been no issues with the scalability.

I have used Silk Test and QTP before using Selenium. The reason for choosing the product can be found in answer 4 and 5.

I used SilkTest and QTP before using Selenium

It was easy to set-up.

We did it in-house one, you choose the solution which best suite your needs. Don’t spend to much time in building robust solution unless it is really required.

I have invested my time in learning the tool and got good recognition for creating automation framework. It can continue to run as open source tool.

You just need to choose the solution which best suites for you.

All the features in Selenium to automate the UI.

Reduced license cost

I've used it for four years.

There were issues.

There were issues.

There were issues.

5/10

5/10

Selenium Grid set-up is bit complex.

I would advise you that it's a good tool to automate UI. There have been issues in the product.

FitNesse: The ability to present your tests on a wiki page and hooking them up to the scripts/fixtures. This is an amazing feature as you could literally ask your product owner, business analysts/developers to go to wiki and see all tests that are written and running automatically. Using the Gherkin format this can be very user readable, and one can also run those tests from the wiki themselves. They can even write their own tests using the available functions. Can easily be connected to Jenkins as well.

Selenium: The part with Selenium I like the most is the ability to parse and select an element from DOM. The various selectors make the job easier! At the same time one has to be careful of the selectors one uses, as it can make performance inefficient. With Selenium, one has a lot of freedom to choose the rest of the tools needed to make a full-fledged automation framework. You can use Cucumber/testing/JUnit as your test engine. You can use something else for reporting, etc., etc. It's available in so many languages, so you can choose the one which is close to your application. It’s not like a separate tool with its own scripting framework lying and maintained on the side. If your application is in Java, you can also choose Java for Selenium. If its C#, you can choose C# for Selenium. So your developers can also contribute to your framework and code.

It has largely improved our efficiency in QA. So every regression we don’t have to run a lot of repeatable test cases for which the flow didn’t change. However they are important to execute, so automation helps us there. Daily Smoke runs and weekly regression runs ensure that Build is continuously tested, which helps in Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery. I must be cautious here: You cannot automate everything as you still need the exploratory and cognitive behavior of a human being. So a part of testing over releases will still be manual. Efficiency can be achieved on repeatable tasks, which is still quite a gain.

Selenium could offer better ways to record and create scripts. IDE is available, however, it can be improved.

About four years.

No issues with stability. The Selenium community maintains it well.

Depends on the hardware we choose to host the automation scripts. No issues there.

There is enough material on the internet and the community answers questions/problems pretty fast. So, very good!

In the past I have used HPE QuickTest Pro, now ALM. Also Coded UI. However, Selenium is better for web applications, although the others provide more versatility in terms of supporting more than just web applications! They come with their license fees as well.

As Selenium is just a library, you have to build the whole framework around it yourself. There are enough templates available on internet to give you a head start, though.

There is no pricing cost. License is Apache License 2.0.

Ours is a web application and, considering my experience with other tools, our choice was easier. We did try Protractor and Jasmine, however Protractor is also based on Selenium. It works better with angular pages. For us, Selenium was enough and we want to use FitNesse.

If you have a web application, I would strongly recommend this, as it has a lot of benefits as described above.

Selenium WebDriver and Selenium IDE are useful.

Selenium IDE is able to record and playback. It was useful for me when I did not know coding. Selenium WebDriver has got packages which help in automating test cases.

The best part of Selenium WebDriver is that it supports multiple web browsers, thus, helping in cross-browser testing.

It is free to use and is not limited to any scripting language.

It has helped our organization as automating the test cases is much easier and faster now. It covers a wide range of test cases and in many browsers.

Selenium has room for improvement as it does not support the tests and result-sharing in anything but a manual way.

I have been using it for six months now.

There were some stability issues with Selenium. Sometimes my tests were not stable.

I have scalability issues with Selenium.

I did not use any technical support other than the help from my colleagues.

I have used Tricentis Tosca before, but I find Selenium much better as it is an open source tool and free to use.

The initial setup wasn't easy as I didn't know what packages to use and which ones were useful for my project.

Pricing: It is free to use.

I would advise others to use Selenium WebDriver and to understand all the packages useful for their project.