I'm a pre-sales architect. I architect, and I sell them as a partner with Pure Storage on the VAR side. Our customers use it for storage, mainly block-based storage and virtualization storage. Some solutions have both block and file storage, and some solutions only have file storage from Pure. 

We put the solution onto the VMware environment and all the Microsoft SQL servers. We do the synchronization between two data centers, so that is has a very low latency. We just have a few milliseconds of latency which is a ready performance, and near perfect. 

We make use of the solution primarily for storage and DR replication.

We use the most recent stable version, as the latest one is still in a beta stage and too new to be employed.

We are in the health industry and use this product for block storage. We have VMware hosted on our Pure FlashArrays and we have a Citrix environment. We also have Oracle running as our SQL database. Our VMs run from Pure.

We have also done a couple of PoCs with the Blade solution for using the file share system.

We have FlashArray and FlashBlade. We're using FlashArray primarily for VMFS storage tools for the VMware environment.

We have its latest version. It is on-premises, but we operate a private cloud.

We primarily use the solution for storage. 

We use Pure Storage FlashArray for machine learning, storage, backups, and computing.

This product is for database usage and consolidating performance.

My primary use case of this solution is array management. 

We use it for block storage workloads. We don't use a lot of the features on it.

We use Pure Storage FlashArray in a couple of backup products. Our DDP offerings, data platform offerings, is where we use Veritas with Pure Storage FlashArray. Then, we use the Pure Azure Service model with the secure multi-tenancy features. Pure Storage FlashArray can be managed centrally.

In individual file cases where most customers were looking for performance-based, minimum latency applications, we have deployed Pure Storage FlashArray.

We are a solution provider and the Pure Storage FlashArray is one of the products that we implement for our customers. I have installed three of them in the past month.

The primary use case for this product is high-performance storage.

We use FlashArray for proofs of concept and to bring the clients our infrastructure to test them. We have six clients using the solution. Most of them are using the ActiveCluster configuration.

We primarily use the solution for general block storage. Usually, the storage product owners are the users.

We use this solution to assist with our on-premise database workloads; In conjunction with our Oracle database and SQL server database.

Within our organization, there are roughly four people using this solution.

At the moment, we're migrating our complete infrastructure onto Pure Storage. All of our storage is going onto it.

We are using its latest version.

Pure Storage FlashArray is our main SAN solution. It's for SAN for service for data storage.

We are using the latest version. 

We are basically using it for the department of space and online education purposes. We are using its latest version.

Our primary use case is to keep the disc for all the critical systems in the company.

We use flash storage for VDI architecture and database architecture.

I use the solution for the storage of our database and to run some algorithms to analyze data we retrieve from the internet.

We are using Pure Storage FlashArray for all of our data. We use the deduplication feature and it is working well.

We are using Pure Storage FlashArray for data backups.

We use this solution for block storage.

FlashArray is our main repository for all our VMware.