BPM Manager at a transportation company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Product review for hp quality center
What is most valuable?
It is an application lifecycle management product for IT projects. It is powerful to manage the requirement traceability, coverage, test case design, mapping, test execution, defect tracking, reporting.
What needs improvement?
A little slow
Agile model support not very good
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
QA Expert at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Versatile QA management tool but expensive
I have used HP Quality Center (QC) for over 3 years in industrial setup. QC is an versatile Quality management tool that offers test case and defect management capabilities along with a customizable reporting process. It also integrates with other defect and requirement tracking tools making it a good fit in multi-team environments as well as integrated application environment. QC does have an involved initial setup but once done, it is fairly easy to use by
testing and defect management teams. However, as QC comes with a high license
and maintenance cost, it is more suitable for large projects in terms of cost.
Pros:
1> Intuitive GUI: Fairly easy to use and follow. For using QC, deep knowledge of the tool is not required.
2> For each test case, a test script with detailed steps can be created. This makes it easier to run the test script.
3> Provides interface with other test management systems like JIRA.
4> Excellent reporting process including customizable reports and charts. This is very useful for monitoring the progress of QA cycles and communicating the same to the higher management.
5> It stores test cases, test scripts and requirements in a modular fashion which can be easily copied and modified to create new test cases.
6> An extremely useful feature of QC is that it allows linking defects with higher level artifacts e.g., a defect can be associated both with failed test script and the unmet high level requirement. It allows traceability of a defect with varying granularity of information.
7> No extra form required to perform searches on defect list. Search is available for each field right on top of the list.
Cons:
1> High licensing cost.
2> QC lacks a "watch" feature thus disallowing independent actors such as managers / leads to track progress of issues. For example, for each defect only the assigner and the assigned receive any updates / notifications. Everybody
else has to employ external means e.g., e-mail to get these updates /
notifications thus introducing humans in the loop.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Application Quality Management
May 2025

Learn what your peers think about OpenText Application Quality Management. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2025.
857,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.
QA Expert at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Extremely versatile QA management tool, but costly
Valuable Features:
1> Intuitive GUI: Fairly easy to use and follow. For using QC, deep knowledge of
the tool is not required.
2> For each test case, a test script with detailed steps can be created. This makes it easier to run the test script.
3> Provides interface with other test management systems like JIRA.
4> Excellent reporting process including customizable reports and charts. This is very useful for monitoring the progress of QA cycles and communicating the same to the higher management.
5> It stores test cases, test scripts, and requirements in a modular fashion, which can be easily copied and modified to create new test cases.
6> An extremely useful feature of QC is that it allows linking defects with higher level artifacts e.g., a defect can be associated both with a failed test script and the unmet high level requirement. It allows traceability of a defect with varying granularity of information.
7> No extra form required to perform searches on the defect list. Search is available for each field right on top of the list.
Room for Improvement:
1> High licensing cost.
2> QC lacks a "watch" feature thus disallowing independent actors, such as
managers / leads, to track the progress of issues. For example, for each defect, only the assigner and the assigned receive any updates / notifications. Everybody else has to employ external means e.g., e-mail to get these updates / notifications, thus introducing humans in the loop.
Other Advice:
I have used HP Quality Center (QC) for over 3 years in an industrial setup. QC is a versatile Quality management tool that offers test case and defect management
capabilities along with a customizable reporting process. It also integrates with other defect and requirement tracking tools, making it a good fit in multi-team environments, as well as integrated application environments. QC does have an involved initial setup, but once it's done, it is fairly easy to use by testing and defect management teams. However, as QC comes with a high license and maintenance cost, it is more suitable for large projects in terms of cost.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Senior Manager of QA at a tech company with 51-200 employees
Flexible, customizable and easy to integrate, but high licensing cost
Valuable Features:
* Flexible licensing (In-house hosting or Cloud-based).
* High capacity. Have heard of two Telco clients who have up to 4,000 licenses each.
* Easy to use
* Highly customizable
* Can be integrated with a variety of automation tools
* Can be integrated with a variety of Requirements Management tools
* Can be integrated with a variety of Defect Tracking tools
* Can store pretty much all testing artifacts (requirements, test cases, defects, automation scripts, and miscellaneous files)
* Good linking between requirements, defects and test cases
* New version of Quality Center comes with an advanced test case runner called "HP Sprinter".
* Highly customizable reporting (now uses VBA for formatting reports)
* Good technical support from HP and specialized consulting firms
* Lots of new features being rolled out by HP including Business Process Testing (BPT) module which is at the cutting edge of testing (manual and automation wise)
* HP is also adding new features for Total Application Lifecycle Management (including Performance Testing Module, Project Tracking Module, etc)
Room for Improvement:
* High licensing cost.
* The Version Control feature is still quite primitive.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Whats is the cost of License spanning 200 Projects and 3000 Users ?
QA Expert at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
The best test resource management tool for a large company
Quality Center is a great tool for a large enterprise. It maintains data integtrity and allows for flexibility through a robust API. Its not for novice users, and it allows you to shoot yourself in the foot readily, but competent users will be able to do more with it than any other test resource management tool [since it allows you to relate your test requirements to test cases to test execution to defects reported].
I wrote this additional comment when I didnt see my earlier one post.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
QA Expert at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
Robust API and maintains data integrity very well. Great for larger organizations.
Valuable Features:
Very robust API to interface with the tool and you can customize how its used. Maintains data integrity very well.
Very customizable.
Great for larger organizations.
Room for Improvement:
Reporting is almost useless, but it does allow you to extract information directly from the database through a robust API and report with your favorite tool [excel, Crystal].
Not easy for lay people to administer.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Senior Manager of QA at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Very good all around test management tool
Valuable Features:
Traceability of bugs to script execution (Test Lab) to Script (Test Plan) to Requirements,
Easy to use.
Web based, so it is easily accessible at multiple sites worldwide.
Room for Improvement:
Expensive Maintenance & Support (M&S), Annual fee.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.

Buyer's Guide
Download our free OpenText Application Quality Management Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: May 2025
Popular Comparisons
Microsoft Azure DevOps
OpenText Software Delivery Management
Tricentis qTest
IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM)
Zephyr Enterprise
Planview AgilePlace
Panaya Test Dynamix
Buyer's Guide
Download our free OpenText Application Quality Management Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- Has anyone tried integrating HP ALM and JIRA ?
- Do you have any feedback on the HPE ALM Octane release that came out in June 2016?
- What is the biggest difference between JIRA and Micro Focus ALM?
- Has anyone tried QC - JIRA Integration using HPE ALM Synchronizer ?
- Integration between HP ALM and Confluence
- Which product do you prefer: Micro Focus ALM Octane or Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?
- When evaluating Application Lifecycle Management suites, what aspects do you think are the most important to look for?
- Looking for suggestions - we need a test management and defect tracking tool which can be integrated with an automation tool.
- Looking for a Comparison of JIRA, TFS & HP ALM as a Test Management Tool
- Do you have any feedback on the HPE ALM Octane release that came out in June 2016?
Very informative article. Being a Quality Center user myself I wanted to ask you about a potential situation that exists with QC. When a major new version of Quality Center is released, does your company always upgrade Quality Center to the newest version within a relatively short time frame? The reason that I ask is because upgrading Quality Center seems time intensive.