Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) Reviews

The solution is for general protection, specifically for email scanning to protect against threats.

The value of the solution is the fact that it's completely already integrated into the Office 365 environment so you don't have to go do different things to manage and be able to control, configure, and integrate security as part of the overall Mailpack. 

For some customers, they don't feel comfortable having all their eggs in the Microsoft basket. Some prefer to have another scanner to do the scanning for protection.

The scanning is quite effective.

It's integrated right into Office 365.

The solution is stable.

It is scalable.

The biggest issue that I experience is that Microsoft keeps moving things around, and it's very inconsistent as to where you find the information when you're trying to work on different pieces. The fact that they keep changing it, keep changing the portals and moving things around, gets to be very frustrating when you're trying to get something configured for customers.

Technical support needs improvement.

The solution is a bit pricey. 

I've used the solution for quite a while at this point. 

We've had no issues with stability.

We've had no problem with scalability.

We deal with support all of the time. Technical support could be better.

Negative

The implementation is somewhere in the middle of easy and difficult. You do need to know what you're doing, and you're not always sure of both the level of the spam policies and the protection you're putting on, for example, what it's actually gonna do to mail. It takes experience. Somebody new is not generally going to figure it out quickly.

The level of maintenance depends on the size of the organization. That said, it doesn't take a lot of care and feeding once it's set up properly.

The pricing is moderate. I'd rate them five or six out of ten. They are a bit expensive, considering I'm already paying for staff in the portal. 

I spend 99% of my time working with Microsoft products. We do resell Microsoft. We're a small business partner. 

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. 

I primarily use Online Protection for technical support.

Online Protection has allowed our customers to keep their data on our site using the DLP the solution offers.

Online Protection's most valuable feature is its admin interface.

Online Protection has an issue in that it doesn't provide an option to stop impersonation. 

I've been using Online Protection for about a year.

I would rate Online Protection's stability seven out of ten.

I would rate Online Protection's scalability ten out of ten.

The initial setup was straightforward.

Online Protection is fairly expensive.

I would give Online Protection a rating of seven out of ten.

We are using Microsoft Exchange Online Protection for the migration of users from on-premise to the cloud.

The most valuable features of Microsoft Exchange Online Protection are the EOP, ATP, safe links, fishing, and antispam.

Not all settings can be configured automatically and most still require manual configuration. However, there is an automation tool available that can be used to input all the configurations either as a script or a tool it would be helpful.

I have been using Microsoft Exchange Online Protection for approximately three years.

The stability of Microsoft Exchange Online Protection is good. We have not had many issues.

I rate the stability of Microsoft Exchange Online Protection a nine out of ten.

I have used Mimecast. I do not have a lot of experience in Mimecast. 

Microsoft Exchange Online Protection can handle a more broad range of areas than Mimecast.

The initial setup of Microsoft Exchange Online Protection and streamlining is complex. When we use a feature and we try to streamline them based on its outcomes can be difficult, such as false positives.

We often use third-party tools for the deployment. We try and use Microsoft native tools, such as Office Configuration Analyzer.

I help my customers implement the solution and it typically takes one week with two consultants.

The price of Microsoft Exchange Online Protection is reasonable.

If you're looking for recommendations, I suggest selecting the standard or strict settings provided by Microsoft for configuring Microsoft Exchange Online Protection. You can start with the standard settings and gradually increase the blocking and other settings such as spam confidence level based on your experience over time. It's important to keep in mind that further tuning may be required based on false positives and other factors, which will require manual adjustments based on experience. This configuration process is not a one-time setup and will evolve based on your customer experience.

I rate Microsoft Exchange Online Protection a nine out of ten.

I work in a financial institution and we use Microsoft Exchange Online Protection to protect our CEO's emails and all users' emails from phishing and other threats.

The most valuable feature of Microsoft Exchange Online Protection is the accidental release of information protection capabilities. Additionally, the solution is easy to use.

The price of Microsoft Exchange Online Protection could be reduced to make it more competitive.

I have been using Microsoft Exchange Online Protection for approximately one year.

Microsoft Exchange Online Protection is stable.

We have had some issues and the support we received was good and quick.

I have used other solutions, such as Carbon Black and Trend Micro Deep Discovery Email Inspector. I found that Microsoft Exchange Online Protection is a much better solution because the search time is quicker and there are more alert results.

The configuration of Microsoft Exchange Online Protection is easier than other solutions.

We did the deployment of the solution in-house.

The solution is priced high and could be less expensive compared to other solutions.

There is no maintenance needed for this solution, but we have analyzed the results from the findings from the alerts.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Microsoft Exchange Online Protection a ten out of ten.

We use the product to provide full email security protection policies.

We like the holding facility that is available for potentially suspicious URLs.  This allows a real-time review to be performed before the email reaches a user's inbox.

We would like the solution to have more in-built intelligence in the way that it reviews potential security risks, rather than our team constantly having to update the policies.

We have been using this solution for around 15 years.

We have found the stability of this solution to be good.

We have found the solution to be easily scalable when new users need to be added; this is a multi-tenant product.

We have found the support to be good.  However, the default first line of issue resolution for this product is the online community and FAQ pages.

The initial setup was very straightforward due to the solution being completely cloud-based.

Licenses for this solution are available as packages of different tiers. The package will differ depending on the features that an organization wants, but all packages come with some default features included.

We would advise organizations who wish to build customized policies that this will increase the implementation time for this solution.

We would also advise organizations to carry out extensive testing before implementing this solution; this will ensure that it is set up exactly the way that they need it to be.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

We use Microsoft Exchange Online Protection for scanning and protecting email attachments and URLs. Primarily we use Mimecast for URL protection, but it's good to have a second step, particularly Microsoft Exchange Online Protection, just in case something slips through.

What I like most about Microsoft Exchange Online Protection is its integration with Windows, so we have one central view for all alerts and incidents.

I'm pretty happy with Microsoft Exchange Online Protection, so off the top of my head, I can't think of any reason for me to want to change something in the solution.

Having orchestration features added to Microsoft Exchange Online Protection, particularly automation and remediation, would be quite useful.

I've been using Microsoft Exchange Online Protection for five or six years.

Microsoft Exchange Online Protection is quite stable.

Microsoft Exchange Online Protection is a scalable solution.

I haven't contacted technical support for Microsoft Exchange Online Protection.

Before Microsoft Exchange Online Protection, we used Mimecast. We still use Mimecast, but for an antimalware solution, we've always used what's available on Windows.

I didn't configure the solution, so I can't tell if the setup was straightforward or complex. Our Exchange administrators were the ones who set up Microsoft Exchange Online Protection.

We implemented the solution in-house.

Our license for Microsoft Exchange Online Protection is covered by our enterprise agreement.

There are three thousand users of Microsoft Exchange Online Protection in our company. There is no plan to increase the number of users, at least not in the near future.

Microsoft Exchange Online Protection is quite a difficult product. I would recommend it because it's a good product. My advice to others looking into using it is to make sure their rules are configured correctly, and they have turned on all the necessary features.

I'm rating Microsoft Exchange Online Protection eight out of ten.

It's a spam filter and an antivirus solution. It protects our clients from spammers.

It has a really nice web-based administration console. Thanks to this, our clients are not tied to a particular server or workstation. They can just hit a URL anywhere in the enterprise and view the console.

The included patch management system is really good. It keeps itself up to date which is critical when you're dealing with anti-virus and spam filtering. Overall, I think it's really a great product.

It kind of has a heavy footprint — in terms of an implementation footprint. I think the implementation could be more streamlined. The implementation could be more flexible in terms of allowing users to pick and choose where they want to deploy.

Personally, I like to be able to pick and choose what I'm implementing and where I am implementing it in the environment instead of having to install the whole stack.

In the next release, I would like to see them add some features beyond just spam and anti-virus. Maybe some bulk email tools — in terms of being able to send them from within the environment. Send group emails, send information to the administration team; I'd like to see them add some MailChimp kind of functionality or mailing lists. 

Instead of just providing spam and anti-virus filtering, I'd like to see them add more feature functionality. The one thing that I don't like is that it's very much a point product. It just does what it does, very specialized. I think this industry as a whole is going away from point products and heading towards suites — integrated suites that do a number of different things. I think that they would be wise to fold this into a broader overall suite of products.

I have been using Microsoft Exchange Online Protection for roughly 15-16 years. 

This solution is exceptionally stable. It scales excellently for what it's used for.

The technical support is outstanding.

The initial setup is straightforward. 

ROI-wise, this solution has been great.

If you're interested in using this solution, make sure you understand the technical requirements and deploy it somewhere where it will have access both inside and outside that it needs. Inside, it needs to see the mail stores, and outside it needs to be able to download the packages that it needs to provide the spam and anti-virus filtering with protection.

Overall, on a scale from one to ten, I would give this solution a rating of ten. 

We use the product to configure anti-spam solutions.

The product's most valuable feature is third-party integrations.

The management interface of Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) could be intuitive. Additionally, it could be easy to configure and fine-tune the components.

We have been using Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) for two years.

It is a stable platform.

It is a scalable product.

I work with Microsoft's technical support team a lot. In some simple cases, the services are very good. However, it needs improvement for dealing with complex issues.

Neutral

I have experience working with Mimecast and Barracuda. In comparison, Microsoft Exchange Online Protection has good integration and policies. However, it is not easy to configure.

The initial setup process is easy. At the same time, it's complicated to configure. From a maintenance perspective, it requires keeping a tab on the console for security or operations to filter out emails.

The product generates a good return on investment for the US market.

The product's pricing is competitive for the US market. However, it is expensive for the regions where businesses don't have enough budget to invest.

I recommend Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) to others and rate it a seven out of ten.