Grafana Enterprise Stack Reviews

It's a dashboarding system. It's good because if you're doing energy management, people like yourself don't pay millions of pounds or dollars just to see your energy usage. That's why all the systems are free. You just log on, and although you have to accept what they provide, it's sufficient. 

When you want to get into that type of market, cost is a big driving factor. Then, there are things like Node-RED, which are free. You can go on there and do everything you want: dashboards, even reporting. I can do my bulk reporting through Node-RED, using it as the enterprise version. I suck the data out, customize my reports, and do a bulk run—all free.

Grafana itself has a number of third-party interfaces, and it depends on which one you choose. It's just a dashboard system. You've got to write your own database access. I found one with an Indian guy in England who's made the interface very simple and easy. 

You can write queries and do a lot of stuff that the standard tools can't do because people get data in JSON and XML, and many of these things are very specific and very expensive.

I use the charting functions. It's got a very serious charting function. You can pull data in, stack the data, and change colours and shades. The chart plugin is very good, far better than any other charting tool I've seen.

Dashboard management:

Grafana has enough features around dashboard management. It's got enough plugins to create your dashboards. It can automatically create a list if you've got a hundred meters and then automatically do all one hundred and fold them up so you can make very detailed or very compact dashboards with it.

Real-time monitoring: 

I do real-time monitoring in the millisecond region, not banking-like real-time. If you're looking at waveforms and stuff like that, there's no product suitable for it.  I have to use an embedded system to do the real-time stack and then take the data from there and view it. A lot of these things claim they can stream data in real-time, but nothing can really do it accurately. They can do it approximately.

Security features & data governance:

I've never had a problem with data governance. In terms of security, it runs on your own server. You put your own security on it. If any passwords are on the server, they don't get passed. You don't have to pass them in your API strings. It's very secure in that regard. 

I've never had a problem. I've never heard them report any data breaches because they don't hold any data. The data is yours. It's just a middleman. It takes the data from you, displays it, and that's it. 

I do know there is a problem. You can create a dashboard for your screen at work, and it will flip over and update. But if you go to the URL, delete it, and go back, it will go back to your original dashboard. So people can have access to your whole dashboard system.

In terms of what Grafana provides, it just provides the charting tools. Everything else is third-party. It's like Node-RED. Node-RED is free, and you can choose an application, but that application depends on the person who's supporting it. If they decide not to support it, then you're stuck.

However, I believe that it can't be improved or changed because people have to make money and make a living from it. Nothing will ever be changed. It depends on the software. Same as Windward. Windward just decided it could not support a large number of customers, so it focused on high-income, low-volume clients. Whereas Node-RED has millions of followers and fantastic support, the same as Grafana. 

Grafana is partly free, but it's your problem. That's how all these companies work. If you're big and you pay a lot of money, they'll pay attention to you. 

I've used it for many years now because it's free for small users.

The version control is very good. They have:

• A stable version 
• Beta versions

In certain instances, the beta version has fallen down. One problem is that I can't reset it to the earlier version; I have to start again. So, I don't use the beta versions, and I only work with stable versions.

The scalability is your problem because you're accessing your own database. It depends on your database. 

I've got a personal database with MS SQL, and it's slow and horrible. But the Postgres, which supports millions of meters, is very quick. So, it depends on your database design with scalability. It's got nothing to do with Grafana. 

Grafana is used mostly for very large data centres worldwide. That's why they give it away for free for smaller users. But for enterprise, you're talking about hundreds of thousands of dollars to buy into the system. People like Google use it in their big data centres. A lot of data centre people use it. That's its prime focus.

Grafana has a very good wiki where you can get help. But direct support from them is very limited. They focus on their big customers.

If you're trying to do something left field, they just won't respond to you unless you pay for support.

However, I've never had any support from them. I've never needed support. I've worked with the stable version and used a third party, so any issues I've had were with the third party, not Grafana.

You can just download it and put it on your PC, and it will start running. Then you have to set it up; it has tons of internal settings you can customize. You can also make it more security-enhanced with two-factor authorization. 

In terms of scalability, you can take something like that and scale it up for a bigger organization. No problem, because it's got all the features to enable it to do that.

Integration capabilities & third-party tools: 

It allows you to access the entire JavaScript. You can take Grafana and embed it in Node-RED, for example, or embed it in other places. They've got all that.

There are lots of tools or third-party tools available, and you have to choose what you want to use. Grafana develops and maintains a limited number of tools, which serve the market they are intended for. 

If you want to do something left field or right field, then Grafana, Microsoft, or any of these things are not something that you go for unless you do it yourself.

I don't use it for services or commercial purposes. There's no return on investment because it's not costing us anything. The only investment is our time in programming and setting it up. So for us, it's like a 100% return on investment.

It is open-source for small users. For energy management in any organization, you need more than two or three users. You don't need 20 users. It's not like Windward, where there are a whole lot of people using it. 

Grafana Enterprise Stack allows up to three users. If you want more than that, then I think it's 35 dollars a year per user.

If you're just using Grafana as it is and what it's designed for, I would say it's a ten out of ten. There's nothing else like it that I've seen. There are lots of dashboard systems, but not for free and not online, and they don't have all the features that Grafana has.

My advice depends on what people want. For example, I have customers who pay a lot of money for Schneider metering software. I tell them they can get the data out of the SQL database and use Grafana. You can customize it and never have to pay for an upgrade. Those Schneider models, and a lot of people, basically work on the next version. In about three versions, the software has not been compatible with your old databases. 

Here, if you've got the old database, you don't have to buy the new system. You still have the same meters in the system. Just use Grafana or Node-RED. It's also free. You just have to learn how to pull the data in and out, and you've got yourself a free system.

I primarily use Grafana for monitoring various aspects of our infrastructure, such as CPU and memory utilization, storage, and response times. It helps me gain a clear overview of resource usage and performance metrics, allowing me to quickly identify any anomalies or issues like high failure rates.

The most valuable features of Grafana for data visualization are its ability to create intuitive dashboards and its wide range of visualization options like graphs, charts, and tables.

I have encountered occasional issues with false inputs or incorrect data in Grafana, but I am not sure whether these stem from the tool itself or our configuration. In terms of improvements, while Grafana serves our monitoring needs well, additional functions like enhanced application flow visualization could be beneficial for providing more comprehensive insights into our systems.

I have been working with Grafana Enterprise Stack for six months.

I would rate the stability of Grafana as a seven out of ten. While we have encountered occasional issues with data loading or display, I'm not sure if these stem from Grafana itself or other factors.

We have approximately 200 to 300 end users of Grafana at our company.

In my experience, I prefer Grafana Enterprise Stack over competitors like AppDynamics. Grafana is easier to use, especially for standard monitoring tasks, while AppDynamics offers a broader overview of application interactions but can be more complex to navigate.

For us, Grafana serves as our go-to tool for monitoring infrastructure performance. While we don't handle the initial integration or setup, we rely on Grafana to investigate alerts and anomalies, collaborating with support teams to confirm and address any issues promptly. Overall, Grafana empowers our monitoring efforts, keeping us informed and proactive in maintaining system stability and performance.

Overall, I would rate Grafana Enterprise Stack as an eight out of ten.

We had a good experience in Grafana because it is a graphical component that establishes the dashboard functionality. It helps in collecting logs from various products, such as Prometheus, FluentD, and Sysdig. This tool categorizes signals according to the current situation, providing a graphical representation of the signals received from port applications or nodes.

Grafana helps in providing current scenarios and statuses, such as node, KS status, or application status. It has made it easier to manage logs and visualize the data, offering better results compared to other tools.

Grafana's most valuable feature is its ability to provide a graphical representation of data collected from various sources. It categorizes signals accurately and is easy to integrate with Kubernetes or OpenShift clusters using Helm charts. It helps administrators put in minimal effort due to its automatic data source collection capabilities.

One area for improvement is if Grafana had its own data source. This would enhance its functionality. Additionally, integrating AI capabilities for automated self-healing and reduced manual interventions would be valuable.

I have been using Grafana for almost five years, starting from my work in containerization.

I have not faced any stability issues so far.

No scalability issues have been encountered.

The initial setup using Helm charts is straightforward, and I haven't faced any issues.

Overall, Grafana is fantastic. If you are considering its use, integrating it through Helm charts with Kubernetes or OpenShift clusters is highly efficient. Adding AI capabilities in the future could significantly reduce manual intervention. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

I use Grafana Enterprise Stack primarily to monitor the metrics of Selenoid, focusing on checking the CPU, iOS, network, and additional metrics. I create dashboards to check the status of these metrics. I utilize it for alerting, particularly in monitoring memory issues. Additionally, I use Logstash for log searching and analysis, focusing on Linux and other logs.

The tool's most valuable feature is real-time monitoring. It helps in securing the application or the node by allowing us to monitor and manage resource consumption during peak times. For instance, from 10 AM to 2 PM, we may experience high memory utilization. It helps us to solve these issues. 

The tool has refined monitoring data. This allows us to make on-the-spot decisions. 

The tool needs to show only fewer updates. 

To ensure stability, I regularly inspect the machine and assess whether additional resources are needed. If necessary, I scale up the resources of the machine. 

I haven't encountered any issues during the implementation of a single node or in monitoring the network.

I use Google to search for answers. 

The tool's deployment is straightforward and takes six hours to complete. You just need to add your exporter and license, and then you are up and running. 

We did the deployment in-house. 

I use the tool's free license. 

I rate the product a nine out of ten. 

We use Grafana Enterprise Stack for monitoring.

The most valuable feature of Grafana Enterprise Stack is the dashboards.

The solution should include integration with Power BI.

The solution’s stability could be improved.

I rate Grafana Enterprise Stack a six out of ten for stability.

I rate Grafana Enterprise Stack a six out of ten for scalability.

Grafana Enterprise Stack's initial setup is straightforward.

Grafana Enterprise Stack's deployment did not take much time. The solution was implemented through an in-house team.

I would recommend Grafana Enterprise Stack to other users.

Overall, I rate Grafana Enterprise Stack a six out of ten.