Fortinet FortiSIEM Reviews

The primary use case of FortiSIEM for my client is to provide comprehensive security information and event management (SIEM) capabilities. It is used to monitor, detect, and respond to security incidents across the client's network by aggregating and analyzing logs, events, and other data from various sources. FortiSIEM enables real-time threat detection, compliance reporting, and overall visibility into the security posture, helping to identify potential risks and take proactive measures to protect the organization's infrastructure.

Fortinet FortiSIEM has positively impacted my client's organization by enhancing their ability to monitor security incidents in real time. The solution has provided comprehensive visibility into the network, allowing for quicker identification of potential threats. FortiSIEM's integration with various systems to collect different types of logs and its ability to correlate data from multiple sources have been particularly valuable in reducing the time spent on manual analysis and increasing overall security efficiency.

The most valuable feature is auto-discovery. When you send logs from various device to FortiSIEM it automatically detects and maps all devices, across the network, providing a comprehensive and up-to-date inventory of the IT environment

It's agent-based UEBA enhances security monitoring by utilizing agents installed on endpoints to collect detailed user activity data.It offers deeper insights into user behaviors, improving anomaly detection accuracy.

It's out-of-the-box compliance reporting features significantly ease the burden of regulatory compliance for organizations by offering pre-built report templates aligned with industry standards. Automated report generation minimizes manual effort and reduces the risk of errors, while customizable reporting allows organizations to tailor reports to specific needs.

One area where FortiSIEM could improve is in its custom normalizer/parser capabilities. While FortiSIEM offers powerful event correlation and log analysis features, creating and customizing normalizers can be complex and time-consuming.

Improving the user interface for building custom normalizers, along with providing more intuitive tools or templates, would make it easier for security teams to tailor the solution to specific needs. Enhancements in this area would enable quicker adaptation to unique log formats and data sources, allowing for more accurate event parsing and better overall performance in diverse environments.

Additionally, the search functionality could be less confusing. Streamlining the search experience and providing clearer guidance or examples would help users quickly find the information they need, ultimately improving the overall usability of the platform. These enhancements would facilitate quicker adaptation to unique log formats and more efficient event analysis, leading to better performance in diverse environments.

I have used the solution for two years.

I rate the solution's stability a seven point five out of ten. 

Regarding scalability, it's better for vertical and horizontal scale-up, but expanding log sources isn't very easy due to the licensing model.

The support team was great, technically proficient, and helped with numerous bugs.

Positive

The installation and setup can be tough, requiring planning for hardware segregation and log volume. However, the installation isn't too difficult if you have clear requirements.

For those interested in using Fortinet FortiSIEM, I'd advise planning your hardware specifications and considering backup and archives to prevent log loss. It's worth the money for what they've developed. 

It's difficult for beginners to learn, mainly because of Fortinet FortiSIEM's specific queries and the lack of a user-friendly environment. Understanding these queries to find your desired logs can be challenging for newcomers.

I'd rate Fortinet FortiSIEM an eight out of ten because it's powerful and simple.

We use the solution to monitor events and logs. It gives us a very powerful view of what is going on. We can configure it to send notifications of any malicious detection because it is based on an ML (machine learning) algorithm. Aside from using the solution to monitor the logs from different sources, we can also get detections because it has strong machine learning capability.

Fortinet FortiSIEM provides good detection against advanced threats.

The solution's interface could be modernized and improved.

I have been working with Fortinet FortiSIEM for one year.

I rate Fortinet FortiSIEM ten out of ten for stability.

Around 50 users are using Fortinet FortiSIEM in our organization.

I rate the solution an eight out of ten for scalability.

I rate Fortinet FortiSIEM a nine out of ten for the ease of its initial setup.

If nothing goes wrong, the solution can be deployed in one week.

We have seen a return on investment with Fortinet FortiSIEM.

Fortinet FortiSIEM is very cost-efficient compared to other SIEM solutions.

On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten.

The solution is deployed on the cloud in our organization. I'll recommend Fortinet FortiSIEM to users because of its functionalities, irrespective of whether they have a hybrid, on-prem, or cloud deployment. If a company has some compliance and regulations, the solution can fulfill their compliance and regulations within their country or industry.

Overall, I rate Fortinet FortiSIEM a nine out of ten.

We use the Fortinet FortiSIEM tool for log monitoring and alert generation. We use Fortinet FortiSIEM to collect logs from the critical servers of the customer's infrastructure, like active directory servers and file servers. We also collect logs from a few security devices like the firewall, the proxy, and the antivirus setup. Based on that, our team checks the logs, and we get an alert to take action on the development.

Fortinet FortiSIEM has its own validated and authentic IP database that marks malicious IP attacks against the firewall and generates an alert for the same.

Our team tried configuring MS SQL database logs with Fortinet FortiSIEM, but it did not work for some time.

Fortinet FortiSIEM's database monitoring could be made easier, like the servers and the security devices.

I have been using Fortinet FortiSIEM for the past four to five months.

Fortinet FortiSIEM is a stable product.

Fortinet FortiSIEM is a scalable product. We initially configured five devices, and then we could scale it to twenty. There could be some issues if the device count goes up to hundreds and thousands. Around 10 to 15 engineers use Fortinet FortiSIEM in our company.

Overall, I rate Fortinet FortiSIEM an eight out of ten.

I primarily use FortiSIEM for Rwandan clients in banking and finance. Most of my clients require strictly on-prem solutions because of national data regulations. They are also skeptical of putting their data on the cloud, and the law requires all data to reside at a domestic data center. 

I like FortiSIEM because it integrates natively with our other Fortinet solutions and the Fortinet Fabric, but it also integrates with Cisco, Palo Alto and other security fabrics. 

The only drawback is the licensing model. It can get expensive if you want to integrate more solutions.

I rate FortiSIEM eight out of 10 for stability. 

FortiSIEM is highly scalable, but you need to consider the costs. It will be expensive if you want to scale it up. 

We rely on Fortinet support, and their response times have room for improvement. They can take a while to respond sometimes. 

Setting up FortiSIEM is straightforward because they provide you with a step-by-step guide that covers installation and troubleshooting. The deployment time depends on your setup and what you need to integrate. It can take days or weeks, but we can typically finish in under a week.

There isn't a single one-size-fits-all implementation because some clients have mixed environments, and we need to develop a custom solution if we are working on multiple fabrics.

You can get an annual license for FortiSIEM or a three-year license. It can be expensive if you're pulling data from many sources. If you plan to keep the solution for a while, I recommend choosing a three-year license or longer to save money. 

I rate FortiSIEM eight out of 10. My only advice is to understand your environment and learn as much as you can about SIEM before implementing the solution. I started by building open-source solutions from scratch, which gave me a big picture view of how to implement SIEM solutions and work with fabrics. You need to learn the basics about how to set rules and interpret logs. 

Our use case is for collecting logs and monitoring internet traffic through firewalls. We have Fortinet firewalls and Fortinet WAF. I'm a system programmer and we are customers of Fortinet. 

I like the Threat Hunting feature which provides complete traffic analysis, like file movement and processes. It's a good feature. 

We have recently faced many issues in terms of support and their turnaround time for giving support as well as their patch level. The patching is one of the significant issues we face with Fortinet SIEM. We're at the enterprise level and we're not getting the support we'd expect. They really need to bring in new features like proper dashboards and alert systems and a real-time alert system which would be beneficial for users.

I've been using this solution for four years. 

Scalability is good; you just add extra licenses. We have 15 admin users and around 10,000 EPS.

There are lots of issues with licensing policies like the agentless and agent-based installation. It creates a lot of issues because when we purchase the SIEM, by default, we expect most of the licenses to be in the bundle. But it's not like that. We need to purchase separate licenses for each agent and agentless system. There is also licensing with the EPS. It's quite difficult for proposing and purchasing the solution. We hire Fortinet professional services for deployment. 

I think that QRadar and RSE are better solutions than SIEM. The interactivity, scalability, and performance are far better than Fortinet. 

My needs are not getting met with this solution so I would not recommend it to anyone and rate it four out of 10. 

We primarily use the solution for security.

Fortinet has a unique model, which they call MSSP, managed services security partner. They select a telco in a country, partner with them, and offer them the certification track. We are an MSSP partner in Pakistan. FortiSIEM and FortiSOAR, their overall solutions that are there for threat mitigation, visibility, control, et cetera, is well integrated.

We like the integration of all of these Fortinet platforms together. Everything is integrated well, and we are able to sell that as a service to our customers.

There's a VR feature that is basically segmenting these firewalls, these security devices. Using that feature, we can make a network slice for each and every enterprise customer. All of the infrastructure is deployed in our data center, yet customer uses it as if it is their own.

FortiSIEM is not a market leader in the SIEM space. In SIEM solutions, typically, our customers ask for Splunk, or they ask for Logarithm. Some legacy customers ask for IBM. This isn’t as popular. Fortinet needs to grow in that perspective. They need to become a leader in the magic quadrant of Gartner and be seen as visionary so that the top customers, the big customers, take them seriously in the SIEM space.

I’ve been using the solution for more than a year now.

This is an absolutely stable solution. There aren’t bugs or glitches, and it doesn’t crash or freeze. It’s reliable.

We don’t have users per se. We are selling it. We have just started selling it. At this point, we have more than double-digit customers onboarded who are using the services.

My understanding is that the solution is entirely scalable.

We find technical support quite helpful. They're very responsive. They have a very good on-the-ground team in Pakistan.

While I am responsible for the overall product owners within PTCL, within my organization, I don’t directly deal with implementation tasks.

My colleagues tell me it is easy to deal with, however.

I can’t speak to the general cost of the solution. They have a very flexible model for partners like us, however. It is a pay-as-you-grow model.

I’m not sure which exact version I’m using.

We are a cloud provider. Whatever we do, we sell it to our clients. We're not an enterprise, we are a public cloud provider, PTCL, and we sell to our clients.

I’d rate the solution eight out of ten.

If a company already has Fortinet devices in their network they have all the components of security of Fortinet, then it will make sense for them to consider FortiSIEM. If, however, it doesn’t have Fortinet security devices, it may be difficult to leverage.

FortiSIEM combines information from operations and integrates it into management.  

FortiSIEM is a great tool for making security processes transparent. 

I rate FortiSIEM 10 out of 10 for stability. 

I rate FortiSIEM nine out of 10 for scalability.

Setting up FortiSIEM is straightforward.  I prefer this product in the Fortinet environment. It's easy to install and configure.  

FortiSIEM might be considered expensive in some markets. We have an international customer base, and it's affordable for a lot of them. 

However, customers in some markets cannot build a suitable use case around it. But it's not because of the product. It often depends on customers' operation organization. 

You also need some operation and security knowledge to make a professional management decision. 

A company needs to work with the consultants and distributors who are delivering the environment and necessary support.

I rate Fortinet FortiSIEM nine out of 10. 

We have eight use cases installed, and we are collecting log sources from most of the relevant endpoints. We did all that configuration ourselves. So, the product didn't really have a lot to do with it.

It is deployed on a private cloud. We manage the cloud infrastructure ourselves, and its primary purpose is to monitor and protect our network devices and our own business systems, not necessarily our customer-facing services.

We are most probably on version 3. We are not on the current release.

The event correlation is pretty robust. The GUI is pretty good. 

Their technical support is horrible. By horrible, I mean a train wreck of a disaster that has fallen off a bridge and caught fire.

The out-of-the-box log ingestion for the supported devices is fine. The main issues arise when you're trying to ingest a log source that's not supported. You're left to figure it out yourself. You have to figure out the custom parsing yourself. There should be better support for nonstandard log sources. That's because unless you can ingest logs from all of your key controls, the solution will have gaps. Out of the box, this product doesn't support a lot of normal security devices that are common, and then you get into building custom parsers yourself to get it to work.

The other problem is infrastructure stability. The architecture scaling rules that the vendor provides are vastly understated. So, we constantly run into stability problems that we end up figuring out and solving by throwing more infrastructure at it because they're understating the infrastructure requirements. It is understandable that they would do that, and you see why they would do that, but it is causing no end of problems.

We've been using it for about three years.

Scaling is problematic because of the architecture. It is very hard to figure out the required compute, memory, and disk space because the documentation is so bad. Like any SIEM, it is very compute-heavy. So, scaling is always a problem. We've come to the conclusion that it is not scalable to the magnitude that we require.

I have two system administrators at the moment who are a part of my SOC. We have a very small operation. My SOC right now is comprised of two analysts, a senior analyst, and a manager. All of them are technical, and all of them are involved in managing this solution in one way, shape, or form.

We use the product as one of our internal controls. We have several others, which I won't get into, and we do not plan on scaling it beyond that. We have been piloting some customer-facing use cases, and we will be deprecating those, scaling them back, and moving them to the Microsoft product.

Their technical support is really bad. Their account support and product support are fine. I would rate their technical support one out of ten.

Negative

The initial deployment was done with the partner. Since then, we have done additional endpoints and upgrades, and we are doing all the work ourselves now. 

We used a partner to help us with the initial setup.

We are not really tracking ROI. We just view it as a cost of business, and we are not driving any revenue from it. So, it is just a sum cost.

This is probably more on the lower cost end of the spectrum compared to competing products.

Fortinet's license model is based on events per second, which makes sense, but that's not typical. It makes it very hard to calculate what your costs are going to be as you scale the platform because some log sources, such as firewall logs, are very noisy, and there are lots and lots of events per second, but some of them are not. So, it becomes a bit of a science experiment trying to guess what your costs are going to be as you scale the solution. This is where other competing products perhaps have a more straightforward license model.

In terms of additional costs, we also pay for our cloud infrastructure to run it. If your log source is not supported, you're going to have to develop custom parsing. So, you're going to incur that development cost. There is also the normal day-to-day administration cost.

We implemented Fortinet FortiSIEM for our own use, and then we have been exploring the idea of using it for a customer-facing or a managed service provider multi-tenant SIEM. We offer managed SIEM services to our customers, and we've come to the conclusion that it is not well suited for that purpose. We are in the process of installing Microsoft Sentinel and Azure Lighthouse for a new service.

My overall impression is that this is an SMB product. It is not a large-scale enterprise or multi-tenant product. Even though they tell you it'll do that, it is an SMB tool, and it is pretty good for that purpose. However, most institutions would not have the required in-house expertise for it. You need a dedicated, skilled technical administrator. You need your own DevOps team, which small and medium businesses generally don't have, or you can do what we did and use a partner to do the work for you.

I would caution others to fully understand the support model and talk to reference customers about it and have a solid understanding of what their internal resource needs will be to implement and support it. That's because it is complicated. Depending on the product you pick, you would need some in-house technical capabilities. For bigger companies, that's usually not a problem, but for small and medium businesses, that can be a problem.

I would rate it a six out of ten. It is suitable for its purpose. It is targeted at the SMB market. The feature function is fine. I would rate it higher if their technical support was better.