We performed a comparison between Pexip and TeamViewer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zoom Video Communications, Cisco, TeamViewer and others in Virtual Meetings."The solution offers a very user-friendly experience."
"The best feature is the remote access and being able to control another person's computer when you're showing them something, or teaching them how to do something during training, or fixing a problem they're having."
"TeamViewer allows us to do multiple controllers on a Host, which is great. We have a lot of Macs in our organization, and TeamViewer being cross-platform is a good thing."
"TeamViewer is a step ahead of solutions like, for example, AnyDesk."
"The quality of the call and the quality of the sharing have been excellent."
"It's a user-friendly product."
"The solution is very stable. We've never had a problem with it."
"I am satisfied with TeamViewer, and its performance."
"The most valuable feature of TeamViewer is its ease of use."
"Since they use a capacity license model, the problem is you have to do a first step proof of concept to see how many calls you have."
"Sometimes it lags."
"The security could improve in TeamViewer."
"The file transfer functionality crashes sometimes."
"The business interface is clunky and not well-documented."
"The solution could be improved by enhancing the use of the mobile version to be used on phones."
"The performance could always be better."
"I didn't like the fact that you had to install a client for remote support. If you didn't install the client, you were very limited in terms of what you could do. For a whole enterprise, it is just not an easy task to install a client on everything. Even if you're using SCCM, it is an undertaking. For transient clients that you don't necessarily support a hundred percent of the time, it would be nice to be able to connect to them and support their issues without having to install something on their machines. In my previous company, we were looking at this solution as being a collaborative tool for the enterprise in terms of video conferencing, calling, and scheduling. They were working on bringing a bunch of products together to make their suite a little more integrated, but it really wasn't at the point where we wanted it to be in terms of integration. We looked at it, reviewed it, and tested it out a bit. We then decided to go with Microsoft Teams. It has the clunkiness of having separate modules that aren't totally integrated. There are different methods for doing different things, which makes it a little bit more complicated. There should be the same way whether you are doing remote support or just calls."
"We'd like to be able to work from mobile to desktop and vice versa. We'd like more mobility."
Earn 20 points
Pexip is ranked 22nd in Virtual Meetings while TeamViewer is ranked 3rd in Virtual Meetings with 84 reviews. Pexip is rated 0.0, while TeamViewer is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Pexip writes "Well-priced, user-friendly, and offers many great features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TeamViewer writes "Solid cross-platform remote control, but with kludgy central management and some serious feature issues on macOS". Pexip is most compared with Cisco Meeting Server, whereas TeamViewer is most compared with TeamViewer Tensor, Microsoft Remote Desktop Services, Parallels Access, ISL Online and BeyondTrust Remote Support.
See our list of best Virtual Meetings vendors.
We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
