We performed a comparison between OpenText Documentum and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management."The most valuable feature is that the documents are kept secure."
"We like Documentum for its capacity and reliability."
"It has reduced the amount of paper documents; reducing time and errors in the process."
"The tool's most valuable feature is ACL, which helps to control the user groups that access the documents."
"The most valuable feature of Documentum for our content management needs is its ability to segregate access based on department and role."
"The stability is very good."
"It is a very secure system. It is reliable, and that is one of the reasons people manage their content within Documentum. It gives them the confidence that the content is accessible to the right people and not to the wrong people."
"I appreciate Documentum's scalability, allowing for vast volumes of content storage."
"They are the building blocks of EAI in SAG products, and they offer a very good platform."
"The most valuable feature of webMethods Integration Server is all the capabilities it provides. We leverage most of the features, that they have offered to us. Our vendor has made some additional features on top of the webMethods Integration Server and we use all the features together."
"Application integrations are offered out-of-the-box, and that is extremely important to us. This is one of the main use cases that we have for it. It is about 60 to 70 percent of the workload in our application today."
"It's very flexible and a good platform to use."
"The Software AG Designer has been great. It's very intuitive."
"It frankly fills the gap between IT and business by having approval and policy enforcement on each state and cycle of the asset from the moment it gets created until it is retired."
"Best feature is Insight for monitoring, and as a debugging tool. It has saved us a lot of time during crisis situations."
"The comprehensiveness and depth of Integration Servers' connectors to packaged apps and custom apps is unlimited. They have a connector for everything. If they don't, you can build it yourself. Or oftentimes, if there is value for other customers as well, you can talk with webMethods about creating a new adapter for you."
"In BPM could be better. Its GUI needs the ability to build more rules. This is a crucial feature. For example, OpenText has some products that allow you to control your checks, invoices, and so on. They have exciting approaches to converting pictures to text, but the tool for business process management isn't easy to use. The GIU is not so good."
"Documentum is a very robust system. Everything can be improved, but at this time, I do not have anything in particular. If anything, they can put our software in their standard."
"An area that needs to improve is how to reduce storage space on the AWS site."
"OpenText Documentum has a lot of scope for improvement in terms of adding some AI integrations."
"The product needs to improve the way documents are logged together. I believe running it on the cloud or containerization will bring value to it. The tool's Time to Market and deployment cycle need to be improved. Finding suitable training materials for OpenText Documentum is also a bottleneck. If we can find the training modules easily, we can bring together people, give them quick training, and start working on the deployment. It can help with quick outputs."
"OpenText Documentum is moving to the cloud, and I am concerned about the security aspect of it."
"The user interface can be a bit more intuitive."
"They should develop something so that bugs don't happen in our project. We make changes manually and some bugs happen."
"One area that needs improvement is the version upgrade process. Many customers I've worked with encounter challenges when transitioning from their current version, such as x or 9, to a newer version. The process is not smooth, and they must shift their entire website."
"This solution could be improved by offering subscription based licensing."
"wM SAP Adapter User Guide - Example, like Message Broker setup was unclear, leading to issues during Testing and we had refer the internet forums to understand that there is a Message Broker Cleanup utility and that needs to be setup as well."
"Other products have been using AI and cloud enhancements, but webMethods Integration Server is still lagging in that key area."
"This product is for larger companies. Compared to TIBCO I think webMethods is better in terms of ease of use and support."
"The orchestration is not as good as it should be."
"t doesn't represent OOP very well, just a method and proprietary interface called IData."
"The price should be reduced to make it more affordable."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
OpenText Documentum is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Content Management with 26 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews. OpenText Documentum is rated 7.8, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of OpenText Documentum writes "Saves time and increases an organization's productivity". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". OpenText Documentum is most compared with OpenText Extended ECM, SharePoint, IBM FileNet, Hyland OnBase and Alfresco, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Boomi AtomSphere Integration.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
