We performed a comparison between webMethods Integration Server and webMethods.io Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."What I found most valuable in webMethods Integration Server is that it's a strong ESB. It also has strong API modules and portals."
"webMethods Integration Server is an easy-to-use solution and does not require a lot of coding."
"The product supports various types of digital documents, including XMLs and EDI."
"They are the building blocks of EAI in SAG products, and they offer a very good platform."
"It is a very stable product."
"Given that you have one integration API in place, it takes very minimal effort to scale it to any other application that might want to use the same. Its flow-based development environment is a breeze and makes it really easy to re-use most of the existing components and build up a new API."
"It's a visual tool, so our transformations can be quickly implemented without a lot of fuss. The fact that we have an easy way to expose REST services is also very interesting. It offers the possibility to connect over GMS to synchronize message brokers."
"All of the components are very independent but are tied together to give the business value."
"It's easy to construct new interfaces like apps and client portals."
"Our use case is for integration factory for SAP. It is mostly for SAP integration."
"There's hardware, software and application integration, providing hosting flexibility."
"Oracle's self-service capabilities, of which we make extensive use, is the most valuable feature."
"The solution is scalable."
"The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of the product."
"I like the tool's scalability."
"This product is for larger companies. Compared to TIBCO I think webMethods is better in terms of ease of use and support."
"We need more dashboards and reporting engines that can provide detailed information for management. In short, we need better analytics."
"When migration happens from the one release to an upgraded release from Software AG, many of the existing services are deprecated and developers have to put in effort testing and redeveloping some of the services. It would be better that upgrade releases took care to support the lower-level versions of webMethods."
"The installation process should be simplified for first time users and be made more user-friendly."
"It could be more user-friendly."
"The interface needs some work. It is not very user-friendly."
"The market webMethods Integration Server falls under is a very crowded market, so for the product to stand out, Software AG would need to get traction in the open source community by releasing a new version or a base version and open source it, so people can create new custom components and add it to the portfolio."
"The deployment should be simplified."
"It is difficult to maintain."
"webMethods.io Integration's installation is complex. It should also improve integration and connectors."
"The solution's release management feature could be better."
"Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved."
"I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier."
"The products, at the moment, are new and there should perhaps be support for the older version of the protocols."
"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews while webMethods.io Integration is ranked 22nd in Cloud Data Integration with 7 reviews. webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0, while webMethods.io Integration is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods.io Integration writes "Though the tool provides great connectivity functionality, it needs to be made more stable". webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks, Boomi AtomSphere Integration and Oracle Service Bus, whereas webMethods.io Integration is most compared with SAP Cloud Platform, Apigee, Microsoft Azure API Management, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and Amazon API Gateway. See our webMethods Integration Server vs. webMethods.io Integration report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
