We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Integration and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like the tool's optimization feature."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is stable."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its monitoring part to debug certain issues and find problems."
"It is a low-code and high-configuration platform, which is very valuable. Develop once and run anywhere is another useful feature. It also has connectors for more than 200 applications. It provides value for money. Our customers who have implemented this solution have a very high ROI."
"I have found the solution to be scalable."
"The Salesforce and NetSuite Application specific “connectors” provide a layer of abstraction on top of the SOAP-based APIs to streamline integration development."
"The tool's most valuable features I've found are related to debugging and testing. It makes it easy to track execution, documents, and process history. This functionality is particularly useful for identifying issues with data and providing insights to the business."
"It is easy to learn and implement."
"The Software AG Designer has been great. It's very intuitive."
"The tool supports gRPC."
"Segregation of deployment for the environments is the most valuable feature of the solution."
"The most valuable feature is stability."
"We needed a tool that was able to orchestrate and help us configure our APIs so that we could maintain and see the heartbeat, traffic, trends, etc."
"It is a very stable product."
"One [of the most valuable features] is the webMethods Designer. That helps our developers develop on their own. It's very intuitive for design. It helps our developers to speed the development of services for the integrations."
"We can arrange data caching and look at the solid state. Also, the API gateway is a very good component that can handle relevant cachings and integrations, as well as and also load permitting."
"It is a costly platform. Its pricing could be better."
"Documentation could be improved."
"There should be more scripting possibilities."
"The API can use some work to come up to speed with the competition but Dell has plans and is working on resolving that."
"In day-to-day operations, tracking transactions is a major challenge. It takes hours to track a single transaction. It is not a straightforward process."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is not yet exposed to the world as a good product owing to certain shortcomings in the area of marketing where improvements are required."
"There are more mature (dedicated) API management and master data management (MDM) solutions available in the market."
"They should create a custom connector option. With this, they could improve where the user can create the connector, based on their usage."
"On the monitoring side of things, the UI for monitoring could be improved. It's a bit cumbersome to work with."
"wM SAP Adapter User Guide - Example, like Message Broker setup was unclear, leading to issues during Testing and we had refer the internet forums to understand that there is a Message Broker Cleanup utility and that needs to be setup as well."
"We need more dashboards and reporting engines that can provide detailed information for management. In short, we need better analytics."
"The product must add more compatible connectors."
"The price should be reduced to make it more affordable."
"In terms of scale, I would give it a four out of 10."
"The solution has big instances when deployed under microservices or in a containerized platform. They need to improve that so that it is competitive with other integration solutions, like Redis and Kafka. Deployments under microservices with those solutions are much more lightweight, in the size of the runtime itself, compared with Software AG."
"We'd like for them to open up to a more cloud-based solution that could offer more flexibility and maybe a better rules engine or more integration with rules engines."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Boomi AtomSphere Integration is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Integration is rated 7.8, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Integration writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". Boomi AtomSphere Integration is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SSIS, Azure Data Factory and AWS Glue, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Oracle Service Bus. See our Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. webMethods Integration Server report.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
