We performed a comparison between OpenText Documentum and OpenText MBPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management."The most valuable features of this solution are the security, storage, and document search capability."
"The most valuable feature is the management."
"The most valuable feature of OpenText Documentum is the versioning."
"It stands out for its impressive records management capabilities and the ability to handle an extensive volume of documents, even reaching into the billions."
"The most valuable feature is that the documents are kept secure."
"Two things are excellent in Documentum. One is business process management. The other is its support for metadata."
"The storage of metadata content, workflows, and life cycles are the most valuable features of OpenText Documentum."
"We like Documentum for its capacity and reliability."
"Not just the solution's automation capabilities, but we like everything about it since we are more of a system integrator."
"An area that needs to improve is how to reduce storage space on the AWS site."
"The documentation often leaves customers feeling somewhat frustrated, as OpenText seems to expect customers to remind them constantly about the need for better documentation, as they don't provide clear guidance on their documentation practices."
"The user interface can be a bit more intuitive."
"Documentum is a very robust system. Everything can be improved, but at this time, I do not have anything in particular. If anything, they can put our software in their standard."
"OpenText Documentum is moving to the cloud, and I am concerned about the security aspect of it."
"I would like to see performance improvements, especially regarding slow response times."
"One area for improvement in OpenText Documentum is its handling of outdated documents, especially technical ones."
"They should develop something so that bugs don't happen in our project. We make changes manually and some bugs happen."
"The user interface could be better in OpenText MBPM."
"There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part."
OpenText Documentum is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Content Management with 26 reviews while OpenText MBPM is ranked 41st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. OpenText Documentum is rated 7.8, while OpenText MBPM is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of OpenText Documentum writes "Saves time and increases an organization's productivity". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText MBPM writes " A solution offering good automation capabilities while needing to improve its support and documentation". OpenText Documentum is most compared with OpenText Extended ECM, SharePoint, IBM FileNet, Hyland OnBase and Alfresco, whereas OpenText MBPM is most compared with Camunda.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.