We performed a comparison between Nintex Process Platform and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I find it useful to utilize LDAP query action to find out the status of a particular user."
"The most valuable features of this solution are that it's no code, it's very flexible, and it's easy to design."
"Out of box connectivity with UiPath."
"The setup is easy."
"The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform."
"Only Nintex has the feature which allows attachments to an email."
"It has helped us a lot, especially during the initial phase of a project where most of the things are done on paper."
"It can scale well."
"Segregation of deployment for the environments is the most valuable feature of the solution."
"From a user perspective, the feature which I like the most about Integration Server is its designer."
"It's a visual tool, so our transformations can be quickly implemented without a lot of fuss. The fact that we have an easy way to expose REST services is also very interesting. It offers the possibility to connect over GMS to synchronize message brokers."
"It’s fairly easy to view, move, and mange access across different components. Different component types are categorized and can be viewed in a web based administration console."
"The product supports various types of digital documents, including XMLs and EDI."
"It has a good integration server, designer, and a very good API portal."
"They are the building blocks of EAI in SAG products, and they offer a very good platform."
"The most valuable feature of the webMethods Integration Server is the built-in monitoring, auditing, RETS, and SOAP services."
"We are currently facing a lot of issues with Nintex, and we are trying to move away from this solution."
"Nintex is still at the starting point of integrating with AI. It has integrated with a very small piece of artificial intelligence., like only integrated with the Google Cloud. There is a benefit, like a no-code and low-code solution. But, again, if you are a developer, especially if you are a hardcore developer, you are using your code knowledge, its skills, and all. And, suddenly, you are moving into the low-code solution, and then you will feel, like, so many things you can't achieve with the low-code solution."
"The security features for this solution need to be improved."
"Converting a document from PDF to MS Word, or vice versa, needs to be improved."
"Unfortunately, Nintex Workflow is not that stable. We are looking at shifting to another tool."
"Hawkeye is emerging as a reporting solution, but as a V1 product it’s not very useful yet."
"The cost of the solution is high and has room for improvement."
"We would like to have access to an on-premises solution. In our country, we have a relationship with Central Bank of Egypt, which do noes not allow cloud solutions to be used. They should offer an on-prem solution with a flexible price license."
"This product has too many gaps. You find them after update installations. This should be covered by automatic testing."
"There should be better logging, or a better dashboard, to allow you to see see the logs of the services."
"webMethods Integration Server needs to add more adapters."
"The certifications and learning resources are not exposed openly enough. For instance, they have a trial version which comes with only a few basic features, and I think that community-wise they need to offer more free or open spaces where developers can feel encouraged to experiment."
"The market webMethods Integration Server falls under is a very crowded market, so for the product to stand out, Software AG would need to get traction in the open source community by releasing a new version or a base version and open source it, so people can create new custom components and add it to the portfolio."
"wM SAP Adapter User Guide - Example, like Message Broker setup was unclear, leading to issues during Testing and we had refer the internet forums to understand that there is a Message Broker Cleanup utility and that needs to be setup as well."
"The stability of the various modules of the product suite have been a bit of a concern lately. Though their support team is always easy to reach out to, I would prefer it not come to that."
"Other products have been using AI and cloud enhancements, but webMethods Integration Server is still lagging in that key area."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Nintex Process Platform is ranked 9th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews. Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". Nintex Process Platform is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Appian, Pega BPM and SAP Signavio Process Manager, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Boomi AtomSphere Integration. See our Nintex Process Platform vs. webMethods Integration Server report.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
